But you really didn't explain why you disagreed with the comments about Gordon not being able to run inside. Nor did you provide any video clips to defend your position. There is nothing inherently wrong with that......but it also isn't helpful. It is like the FBG version of he said, she said.That said, I really enjoy hearing the different viewpoints. It would just be nice to see some facts or evidence paired with the opinions.It would be silly if that is what I had said.It's not that criticism or contrary opinion isn't welcome, it's just that if the criticism isn't constructive it's going to be met with resistance. Telling me I don't understand the sport because I don't think Melvin Gordon's strength is running inside is silly. I'd much rather you tell me WHY you disagree with that instead of turning your disagreement into an insult.
It's not a very objective comment to attack the author instead of the author's argument. I'm not really too bothered by it though.
I attacked your argument that he can't run inside and that he is soft.
I could have started with your comparison of WHite to Fitz but with speed. But I chose not to as I know more about Gordon than White.
And you have proven over and over on these boards that you can't handle criticism and you are bothered by it.