Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Remember, they have it coming because of their job. Harassment, threats, attempting assassination, shutting down highways, taking over city blocks, mostly peaceful
protests, getting people fired etc etc. All perfectly normal behavior. Let's add banning government business from one state to another, being compared to apartheid and on and on. This is all rational behavior to many on this site. 
Remember, they have it coming because of their job. Harassment, threats, attempting assassination, shutting down highways, taking over city blocks, mostly peaceful
They were protesting outside the restaurant... and it is reported that he didn't see them. He grabbed his doggy bag of beer and scurried out the back door, into the back alley that so many women will be forced into around the country.
I don’t like the idea of personally harassing people out to eat with their families but it is a constitutionally protected right. I believe SCOTUS has protected the right of protesters at abortion clinics without buffer zones. There’s a time and place imo for protest. It’s not at restaurants and isn’t at Planned Parenthood either. The Constitution and SCOTUS seem to disagree with that.
Worth noting that pro-lifers didn't do stuff like this. We had to deal with a fringe element of violent extremists, of course, but they were always just that: a fringe that most of us were more or less constantly condemning. I can't even recall anybody saying that we should have been stalking RBG or Blackmun or anybody.
Just 50 years worth. These folks are just as fringe and only fringe as "yours" (since your using a team "we" here)
I wish this weren't true, but it is probably true. The worst part of the internet is that extremist groups can now radicalize people at arms length.
The part I find infuriating is that terrible people are using the right to free speech to inflict terror.
Also, it will instigate the other right to do the same to the them. This is a step backwards imo. It's 2022, put an emoji in your twitter handle, don't stalk supreme court justices smh.
Then you can start feeling bad. Fact checks are in full swing for this story and it looks very much illusory.
Thanks for exposing this, scary what will get thrown out there just cause it fits the narrative.
The law is the law though right? We can certainly talk about how this is a valid concern for any 10 year old in the state of SD, not because the scenario played out, but because if it did, she would, indeed, have to leave the state to get help. I can't imagine being a 10 year old girl in that position. Whether the scenario has played out or not and arguing about that seems very "LOOK!!!! SQUIRREL!!!!!!" to me.
Its not surprising a story like this is difficult to check (per the article) --a 10 year old getting raped could be within family where not wanting info out would be expected --I really hope its not true
Sure, it's fine to talk about hypotheticals in a logical argument like this. However, this wasn't an argument, this was an appeal to pure emotion (and largely circumvents logical thinking due to the horrific nature of this situation).
Me too. If nothing else I'd really hope to hear of an investigation and arrest. I haven't heard of any police agency talk about looking for a perpetrator here, though. I'm positive that any cop in Ohio would be keenly interested in catching someone who'd do this.
He`s using a fake story to condone a true story (harassing a supreme court justice and his family out in public) , things are getting so weird by the day
Well yeah....that's what politics are in this country. It's why I try to take the individual out of the equation and look at the arguments they are making or the situation they are talking about. Of course with some, it's 100% personal nonsense at all times with broadly gross generalizations, so IF that gets a response it's pretty much going to be snark OR a question specific to the event/circumstance. And oddly enough, I get more responses from those people when I give them snark....they rarely engage on the actual event/circumstance.
I don't consume the garbage this country produces in the "media". I've told you guys a billion times it would be wise for you to not consume it either. I have ZERO idea how the story goes or what it was and I don't really care because it's immaterial to the reality of how the law would work IF it happened. It could be completely fabricated or 100% true and it wouldn't make a single iota of difference to the laws.
Nonsense....there are millions and millions posting and reposting already debunked conspiracy theories all over social media TODAY. Takes less than a second to find them.
Given that you think the current committee is a clown show and reject it completely, why would you want to see a GOP version of that exact same thing? Or are you saying that if the GOP version came to fruition you'd be in here lambasting their clown show too? It's tough to "whatabout" when you form the other side of the coin you claim to loathe
When you're done shoving goalposts around and settle on a narrative, let me know...then we can talk.
I agree and I doubt absolutely nothing is being done. Id guess the FBI and other authorities are very much looking into any threats like this (at least I would hope so)
Agreed. How many liberals are actually defending this behavior? AOC and the squad? Anybody else?
Being on the other side of the country, I don’t hear/read everything AOC says. Is she really defending actual threats to Supreme Ct justices? Or is she simply defending people who are peacefully exercising their 1st Amendment rights?
