FB creates shadow accounts for EVERYONE. So even if you don't have a FB account, you have a FB account. You are in their database. They know what photos you are in. They know who you have connections to. They know your approximate age, where you live, and tons of other info.With Facebook being a mandatory service for all americans, I can see why Congress and Senate is getting involved. I mean, its not like we have a choice when we sign up for Facebook, don't read their 98 page terms of use and then post our lives online.
Wait, what? Its not mandatory?
Agreed.most of these committee members have no idea how technology and business work. Let alone what personal data is out there already that we willingly share. And it is not only FB, every loyalty card you have from as small as your local supermarket is mining data on you each time you walk in the door.
I'll admit, that I don't know the full details of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, and i know FB is no choir boy when it comes to exploiting things. But these committee members are embarrassing to listen to.
i dont know much about that, but it seem like it would be a massive undertaking. Plus, lets be honest, how many people actually read and understand the basic controls already in place on platforms like FB? Now expand that to even instance of my voluntary opt in?Agreed.
The best outcome for this would be for Congress to pass laws similar to the EU's that would give Americans the right to know ALL of the data that companies have collected on them and be explicitely able to control what is done with that data.
What exactly is Facebook's business? Like, how do they make money? Just think, we don't even want to give census takers information once every 10 years, but we all willingly spread our legs for this turd.FB creates shadow accounts for EVERYONE. So even if you don't have a FB account, you have a FB account. You are in their database. They know what photos you are in. They know who you have connections to. They know your approximate age, where you live, and tons of other info.
So yeah, it matters when a gigantic company collects huge databases on virtually everyone in the world and then is irresponsible with that information.
nopeany of you ever fire up the internet? watch a tv? shop at a grocery store?
as someone in the advertising industry, FB's biggest revenue model is that it sells ads. But the way they do it, from an advertisers perspective, is that i can choose to only serve ads to specific targets and those targets are pretty granular. But the service it provides to my clients is that they dont have to spend their ad $$'s on a print ad that may be seen by a small % of their intended audience.What exactly is Facebook's business? Like, how do they make money? Just think, we don't even want to give census takers information once every 10 years, but we all willingly spread our legs for this turd.
I am not naïve enough to think my info isn't everywhere. However, I have not willingly created a Facebook account either.
Zuckerberg created Facebook either to score chicks, rate chicks or make money or all of the above.
I think we agree here.......they are a fancy data miner selling ads based on information we willingly coughed up.as someone in the advertising industry, FB's biggest revenue model is that it sells ads. But the way they do it, from an advertisers perspective, is that i can choose to only serve ads to specific targets and those targets are pretty granular. But the service it provides to my clients is that they dont have to spend their ad $$'s on a print ad that may be seen by a small % of their intended audience.
so there "data" collected is so much more valuable to advertisers vs other traditional media forms, including TV.
You're not wrong, but at the same time, technology has changed, and changed the way the world operates, so quickly that we have struggled to keep up with what that means. The world had never changed so much in such a short amount of time. Humanity has had no ability to keep up with all of the effects, intended and unintended.I think we agree here.......they are a fancy data miner selling ads based on information we willingly coughed up.
I always laugh at the following scenario.......people have their entire lives plastered all over facebook. they have willingly ignored that this info is now public record. yet when something tragic or upsetting occurs, these same people immediately plead for privacy. lol
video of this?Scoresman said:https://twitter.com/ditzkoff/status/983789531257294848
“Mr. Zuckerberg, a magazine i recently opened came with a floppy disk offering me 30 free hours of something called America On-Line. Is that the same as Facebook?”
![]()
It's a satirical tweet but very representative of the lack of knowledge the committee has about the subject they are grilling Zuckerberg about.video of this?
Ok, I did not think it could be real, which is why I asked, but these days, you never know what is realIt's a satirical tweet but very representative of the lack of knowledge the committee has about the subject they are grilling Zuckerberg about.
Maybe they should just have their interns that do all their work and actually know stuff sit up there and ask the questions? I'm sure we'd get more out of it.It's a satirical tweet but very representative of the lack of knowledge the committee has about the subject they are grilling Zuckerberg about.
Definitely. I really don't understand why there wasn't more outrage about the Equifax breach and more changes implemented.This still pales in comparison to the permanent damage done by the Equifax breach. They need to start solidifying the change to a new unique identifier system and get rid of SS numbers.
Maybe over 65 and you can't run?It's really ####### amazing that we have the CEO of a company that has a terrible reputation of privacy and data issues and really should be the bad guy in this, but instead its our elected officials who are coming out of this looking like idiots on a witch hunt.
This makes me want to create a rule for myself to never again vote for anyone over a certain age, because their inability to understand and relate to current times really makes them look like the morons they are.
It makes sense though. In these hearings they are questioning experts in the field who obviously know far more than them. It's unavoidable that they come across as idiots in this setting.It's really ####### amazing that we have the CEO of a company that has a terrible reputation of privacy and data issues and really should be the bad guy in this, but instead its our elected officials who are coming out of this looking like idiots on a witch hunt.
This makes me want to create a rule for myself to never again vote for anyone over a certain age, because their inability to understand and relate to current times really makes them look like the morons they are.
this country has no principles.....simple.These hearings should have either been a) done behind closed doors, or b) by a well versed sub-committee that had a clue.
But, I get it, the public is OUTRAGED over the sharing of "likes" on Facebook and need a public hearing, whereas all of your personal information that can lead to crippling identity theft is just swept under the rug and forgotten about. Maybe it's just time to shut it all down.
I take it you've never seen any of these public hearings before. The result is pretty much the same no matter who is sitting in the chair being grilled. It's not just technology they have trouble with. Find a hearing that's even tangentially related to whatever work you do on a day to day basis and you'll be amazed at how clueless our elected officials are.It's really ####### amazing that we have the CEO of a company that has a terrible reputation of privacy and data issues and really should be the bad guy in this, but instead its our elected officials who are coming out of this looking like idiots on a witch hunt.
This makes me want to create a rule for myself to never again vote for anyone over a certain age, because their inability to understand and relate to current times really makes them look like the morons they are.
I think they have those memorized by now. The trick is to ask them how much would be out of their pocket if they went and picked up a dozen eggs, a gallon of milk, and a loaf of bread and on the way back filled up their 12 gallon gas tank.Asked any elected official how much a loaf of bread or a gallon of gas or a carton of milk costs. hilarity ensues.
Wow, is there any kind of forced retirement law for jokers like this? Who votes for guys like this?
No #### what a ####### idiotWow, is there any kind of forced retirement law for jokers like this? Who votes for guys like this?
Apparently Mark Zuckerberg had to explain how the internet works to these people. Awesome having regulators that can barely send an email overseeing the digital age. Shoo shoo boomersglvsav37 said:most of these committee members have no idea how technology and business work. Let alone what personal data is out there already that we willingly share. And it is not only FB, every loyalty card you have from as small as your local supermarket is mining data on you each time you walk in the door.
I'll admit, that I don't know the full details of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, and i know FB is no choir boy when it comes to exploiting things. But these committee members are embarrassing to listen to.