What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Fanduel week 14 (1 Viewer)

Another week where the GPP cut lines are way lower than cash games.  Weird #### going on when I look right now.  A 137 cashing everything, but another 137 not cashing trips/quints.  See 5050s under 120 all the way up 133.  GPPs under 110.  Uggh.

 
At the moment 109 is cashing is a gpp and 116 isn't in a 50/50.

Got 7 of 9 through in the crossover.  One is 3 pts and 250 spots down with Elliott and one is 9 points up and 750 positions up with nothing.  Looks like 1/3 of the teams are done so the 9 pt up team has about a 12-14 pt cushion.

 
At the moment 109 is cashing is a gpp and 116 isn't in a 50/50.

Got 7 of 9 through in the crossover.  One is 3 pts and 250 spots down with Elliott and one is 9 points up and 750 positions up with nothing.  Looks like 1/3 of the teams are done so the 9 pt up team has about a 12-14 pt cushion.
This the NFL/EPL thing?  Let me know what you think of it as it moves forward.  

 
This the NFL/EPL thing?  Let me know what you think of it as it moves forward.  
The 5882 to 4000 cut right now is at 82.56.  I think the next cut for the soccer portion is 1500 and you double your $2 to $4.  I'm hoping that a good number of people forget to enter lineups for the next phase.  One thing I've learned about soccer is that there isn't much information out there and it's easy to get stung with coaches resting good players after the lock for the games later in the slate.

 
monster day.

1pm (144) and main slate (162) cash games lineups cashed 100%.

min crushed the $1 tourney for like 2x.

7th out of 147k for $1100 in the big $2 1pm tournament.

got some chances at reasonable money tomorrow night too.  151, 145, 142, 138, 136, 135, 133 plus brady/mitchell.

 
monster day.

1pm (144) and main slate (162) cash games lineups cashed 100%.

min crushed the $1 tourney for like 2x.

7th out of 147k for $1100 in the big $2 1pm tournament.

got some chances at reasonable money tomorrow night too.  151, 145, 142, 138, 136, 135, 133 plus brady/mitchell.
Congrats

Looks like I will take  small lose, mostly due to bad cash LUs in the Thur-Mon slate

$450 in $422 out

Cashed in 2 of 4 $25 GPPs

Both main slate cash LUs hit 100%, with 154.54 and 137.24

Cashed in 1 of 3 $10 100 player leagues

Cashed 2 of 3 $5 100 player leagues

Cashed a few $2 and $5 GPPs but lost more here than I won

 
Andrew Luck


Jameis Winston


Russell Wilson


LeVeon Bell


David Johnson


Ezekiel Elliott


Jeremy Hill


Jeremy Hill


Melvin Gordon


Mike Evans


Doug Baldwin


Larry Fitzgerald


T.Y. Hilton


Emmanuel Sanders


Golden Tate


Ted Ginn


Jordy Nelson


Brandin Cooks


C.J. Fiedorowicz


Cameron Brate


Jimmy Graham


Roberto Aguayo


Dan Bailey


Roberto Aguayo


Cincinnati Bengals


Minnesota Vikings


Minnesota Vikings



Usually I play 2 LUs at cash+ but may split it up to 3.  This is what I'm looking at.
LU1 - 146.24 :)

LU2 - 110.16 :unsure:  (pivoted from Bailey to Hopkins)

LU3 -  61.8 :X  - worst showing of the year.

I played all 3 at:


2


40%


3


26%


5


17%


100


11%


          GPP


6%

The tiered, cash+ approach bailed me out htis week. LU1 cashed all entries and paid out exactly what I entered $ wise on the main slate.  Little bit behind based on my Thu-Mon, hoping to come out around even on the week.  Think I'm going back to 2 main slate LUs next week. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Congrats

Looks like I will take  small lose, mostly due to bad cash LUs in the Thur-Mon slate

$450 in $422 out

Cashed in 2 of 4 $25 GPPs

Both main slate cash LUs hit 100%, with 154.54 and 137.24

Cashed in 1 of 3 $10 100 player leagues

Cashed 2 of 3 $5 100 player leagues

Cashed a few $2 and $5 GPPs but lost more here than I won
ty ty.

looks like i got your rungood for this week lol.  will give it back in time for next sunday...

 
LU1 - 146.24 :)

LU2 - 110.16 :unsure:  (pivoted from Bailey to Hopkins)

LU3 -  61.8 :X  - worst showing of the year.

I played all 3 at:


2


40%


3


26%


5


17%


100


11%


          GPP


6%

The tiered, cash+ approach bailed me out htis week. LU1 cashed all entries and paid out exactly what I entered $ wise on the main slate.  Little bit behind based on my Thu-Mon, hoping to come out around even on the week.  Think I'm going back to 2 main slate LUs next week. 
try just 1 lineup.  gamble less and use the other slates for differentiation if you have to.  you will feel better about it.

 
weird week 0-3 in 50/50   3-0 in gpp  and in the $$ in thu-mon gpp with edelman/gost. Will finish up $2 plus whatever tonights does(currently $3)

best lineup 153.04 in a 100man that was good for 8th.

 
try just 1 lineup.  gamble less and use the other slates for differentiation if you have to.  you will feel better about it.
Yeah, I could see the value in that.

Looking back on the thread/expert buzz, if you were to build one and only one LU, it would've likely been the spend at RB, cheap at WR core, e.g. DJ/Bell/Sanders/Taylor Gabriel

Maybe that's some unfair post hoc analysis to assume I would've came to that, but it's always easy to see the Sunday plays on Monday morning  :P

 
Not feeling so great heading into today.  Sometimes that's a good sign.

1pm:

#1 Luck, DJ, Bell, Ginn, Tate, Crowder, Ertz, Prater, MIN :(  132.8, nice score but only cashed 2 of 3 5050s and nothing else

Cousins, DJ, Hill, Hilton, Tate, D.Jackson, Walker, Prater, CIN  :( , loser

Main:

Newton, Gore, Bell, Evans, Fitz, Gabriel, Eifert, Aguayo, MIN :thumbup:  138.6, but didn't hit 3x, 5x, or 100-man

Cousins, DJ, Bell, Cooks, Sanders, Crowder, Brate, Prater, DET :thumbup:  137.8, but didn't 5x

#1 Wilson, DJ, Hill, Nelson, Tate, Gabriel, Graham, Vinatieri, CIN  :X  106.4
Guess my feeling was spot on.  None of my straight GPP LU's hit anything.  Lost about 50% of what I had in play.  Not horrible as I'm still at a nice spot, I just like winning.

 
LU1 - 146.24 :)

LU2 - 110.16 :unsure:  (pivoted from Bailey to Hopkins)

LU3 -  61.8 :X  - worst showing of the year.

I played all 3 at:


2


40%


3


26%


5


17%


100


11%


          GPP


6%

The tiered, cash+ approach bailed me out htis week. LU1 cashed all entries and paid out exactly what I entered $ wise on the main slate.  Little bit behind based on my Thu-Mon, hoping to come out around even on the week.  Think I'm going back to 2 main slate LUs next week. 
I have been pretty much doing this all year, all you have to do is hit on 1 of 3 and you win your money back. I mix the 3 LU between Thur/Mon-Sun Only-Sun/Mon slates. 

I have pretty much the same week as you so far, my Sun Only scored a whopping 63. My Sun/Mon is setting at 139 with doing well with Edel to go. My Thur/Mon is setting at 120 with with Mitchell to go. Should make some money this week. 

 
So let me get this straight, @podunker and @sooted72 use multiple LU's, but only 1 per slate?  Do you generally/usually fade TNF and MNF?

I rarely have my #### together to put a full host of LU's in on Thursday.  So I'd be down to Sun Only, Sun-Mon, and 1pm Only if I wanted to use just 3 LU's (versus the 5 I posted above, which is what I've been doing lately, with somewhat success).  

Does anyone else use that strategy, one LU per slate?

 
So let me get this straight, @podunker and @sooted72 use multiple LU's, but only 1 per slate?  Do you generally/usually fade TNF and MNF?

I rarely have my #### together to put a full host of LU's in on Thursday.  So I'd be down to Sun Only, Sun-Mon, and 1pm Only if I wanted to use just 3 LU's (versus the 5 I posted above, which is what I've been doing lately, with somewhat success).  

Does anyone else use that strategy, one LU per slate?
Pretty sure they are referring to Cash LUs, not GPPs as well

 
Yeah, I could see the value in that.

Looking back on the thread/expert buzz, if you were to build one and only one LU, it would've likely been the spend at RB, cheap at WR core, e.g. DJ/Bell/Sanders/Taylor Gabriel

Maybe that's some unfair post hoc analysis to assume I would've came to that, but it's always easy to see the Sunday plays on Monday morning  :P


So let me get this straight, @podunker and @sooted72 use multiple LU's, but only 1 per slate?  Do you generally/usually fade TNF and MNF?

I rarely have my #### together to put a full host of LU's in on Thursday.  So I'd be down to Sun Only, Sun-Mon, and 1pm Only if I wanted to use just 3 LU's (versus the 5 I posted above, which is what I've been doing lately, with somewhat success).  

Does anyone else use that strategy, one LU per slate?
so this wont show up in the math at all.  as a matter of fact, the math will prove the opposite...

what everybody will tell you is to diversify and use multiple lineups.  and, again, the math obviously agrees with that.  theyll say things like 'theres no difference between your best lineup and your 2nd and 3rd best lineup' so use all 3 to diversify.  and obv this is true too.  statistically you cant argue with it...

but what ive found when ive diversified is that its just ended up costing me money.  now this may all just be small sample size statistically insignificant noise.  but there also may be something here.  the thing that disturbs me most when i diversify my cash game lineups is that i end up using guys that im just not as comfortable with as the guys in my main lineup.  now ive probably been unlucky in that my diversification lineups have sunk me a bunch but its also true that i would be much further ahead had i just played the lineup i liked the most every week.

i think the peace of mind is worth something.  i want to just use my one best lineup and ride or die with it.  its definitely higher variance.  but variance doesnt really affect ev.  i mean with my style i have to be ok with my rb tearing his acl on the first play and sinking all my lineups by 1:15.  which is bound to happen given the nature of the nfl.

like ive said tons on here i get my diversification through other slates, mainly the 1 pm slate but also occasionally sun-mon.

 
Right, I'm only talking about cash LUs too.  Using Dodds' approach to entering contests.
Are you playing at Dodd's volume? or even close to it?  If not then you are better off sticking to one or two cash LUs for any slate that you choose.  I typically have $150-200 in play cash and will never use more that 2 cash LUs in a particular slate, typically I do the Thur-Mon slate and the Sunday main for cash, all other slates are strictly GPP

 
so this wont show up in the math at all.  as a matter of fact, the math will prove the opposite...

what everybody will tell you is to diversify and use multiple lineups.  and, again, the math obviously agrees with that.  theyll say things like 'theres no difference between your best lineup and your 2nd and 3rd best lineup' so use all 3 to diversify.  and obv this is true too.  statistically you cant argue with it...

but what ive found when ive diversified is that its just ended up costing me money.  now this may all just be small sample size statistically insignificant noise.  but there also may be something here.  the thing that disturbs me most when i diversify my cash game lineups is that i end up using guys that im just not as comfortable with as the guys in my main lineup.  now ive probably been unlucky in that my diversification lineups have sunk me a bunch but its also true that i would be much further ahead had i just played the lineup i liked the most every week.

i think the peace of mind is worth something.  i want to just use my one best lineup and ride or die with it.  its definitely higher variance.  but variance doesnt really affect ev.  i mean with my style i have to be ok with my rb tearing his acl on the first play and sinking all my lineups by 1:15.  which is bound to happen given the nature of the nfl.

like ive said tons on here i get my diversification through other slates, mainly the 1 pm slate but also occasionally sun-mon.
If you are playing any type off volume in GPPs I simply can't get behind this process for LU construction, they are very different types of LUs.  I rarely use stacks in my cash LUs but almost always use them in GPP as an example of how different they are.

 
Are you playing at Dodd's volume? or even close to it?  If not then you are better off sticking to one or two cash LUs for any slate that you choose.  I typically have $150-200 in play cash and will never use more that 2 cash LUs in a particular slate, typically I do the Thur-Mon slate and the Sunday main for cash, all other slates are strictly GPP
Not at all.  I'm about half of you.  I'm still tinkering with getting it right with the amount I play....and lowering down to one 1pm Only, and two main slate LUs, seems like it might be the answer.

 
Not at all.  I'm about half of you.  I'm still tinkering with getting it right with the amount I play....and lowering down to one 1pm Only, and two main slate LUs, seems like it might be the answer.
Why play cash in the 1pm only's?? Especially when the strong cash RBs are playing late, IMHO you are better off playing cash in the main slate only or maybe the Thur-Mon slate if there is/are players in the Thur night game you really like for cash.

One of the reasons I play cash in the Thur--Mon slate is you can all by eliminate the MNF game players from it as they will be minimally owned, so if the TNF game matchup is a favorable one I go equally on that slate and the mail slate cash wise.

I assume you are getting most of your cash in the $1 and $2 100 player 50/50s right?

 
If you are playing any type off volume in GPPs I simply can't get behind this process for LU construction, they are very different types of LUs.  I rarely use stacks in my cash LUs but almost always use them in GPP as an example of how different they are.
i was talking about cash lineups only.  my bad thought that was obvious :/

 
but now that you mention it i also get diversification through gpps.  so if there was a wr i really liked but couldnt fit into my cash lineup i can get like 40% exposure in gpps and still benefit if he does well.  thats another way to diversify without 'weakening' your cash lineup.

 
Looking back on the thread/expert buzz, if you were to build one and only one LU, it would've likely been the spend at RB, cheap at WR core, e.g. DJ/Bell/Sanders/Taylor Gabriel

Maybe that's some unfair post hoc analysis to assume I would've came to that, but it's always easy to see the Sunday plays on Monday morning  :P
yeah my cash lineup had all 4 of those guys so not really post hoc analysis.

 
but now that you mention it i also get diversification through gpps.  so if there was a wr i really liked but couldnt fit into my cash lineup i can get like 40% exposure in gpps and still benefit if he does well.  thats another way to diversify without 'weakening' your cash lineup.
Exactly, play hunches/feelings/tingles whatevers in your GPPs, it's low cost risk with high rewards.  I'm referring to large multiple entry GPPs of course, single entry or large dollar GPPs can be treated as cash LUs in your are looking to cash rather than win,  With my Sunday 1.5 Million tickets I usually treat half as cash and half as GPPs.

$10 and up 100 player leagues I treat as GPPs as well but for $5 dollars I treat as cash

 
Why play cash in the 1pm only's?? Especially when the strong cash RBs are playing late, IMHO you are better off playing cash in the main slate only or maybe the Thur-Mon slate if there is/are players in the Thur night game you really like for cash.

One of the reasons I play cash in the Thur--Mon slate is you can all by eliminate the MNF game players from it as they will be minimally owned, so if the TNF game matchup is a favorable one I go equally on that slate and the mail slate cash wise.

I assume you are getting most of your cash in the $1 and $2 100 player 50/50s right?
I've had success in the past on the shorter, 1pm slate.  

$1 and $2 contests in 5050s, 2x, 3x, 5x, 20 or 100 mans, and I'll toss in a gpp.  That's the Dodds model I was referring to.  I don't think you have to play thousands of dollars like Dodds to run a lineup out in that fashion.  

 
I've had success in the past on the shorter, 1pm slate.  

$1 and $2 contests in 5050s, 2x, 3x, 5x, 20 or 100 mans, and I'll toss in a gpp.  That's the Dodds model I was referring to.  I don't think you have to play thousands of dollars like Dodds to run a lineup out in that fashion.  
Dodd plays his 50/50s differently than he does his 2-5Xs if I'm not mistaken, he often stacks QB/WR or RB/Def in the multipliers

 
I've been playing 3 lineups in the main slate, doubles and triples. Mostly, they don't vary much. In general, I haven't felt like it has hurt, but I did notice that my loser this week was my #3. 

 
I've been playing 3 lineups in the main slate, doubles and triples. Mostly, they don't vary much. In general, I haven't felt like it has hurt, but I did notice that my loser this week was my #3. 
statistically there wont be much difference, so in that sense it doesnt 'hurt'.  like your top 3 cash game lineups might be projected for, say, 130.3, 129.5, 129.2.  but for me its that sinking feeling that the 2nd and 3rd lineups have guys that im not as comfortable with as the guys in my #1 lineup.  thats the main reason i changed my playing style.

 
Megla said:
Dodd plays his 50/50s differently than he does his 2-5Xs if I'm not mistaken, he often stacks QB/WR or RB/Def in the multipliers
Ok, so I'm assuming your point of all this is 2-5x are not "cash" games and I didn't catch on til right now?

I often stack in that regard.  If you think the lineup will cash 2-5x and 100-mans, isn't putting it in 5050s sort of hedging in case you get stuck in between the 5050 cuts and the 2/3x cuts?  Or maybe you reach the 3x level but not the 5x level?  I don't really see the issue doing this.  

But anyways, after all these posts, I still don't understand why you think it would be wise for people like me to avoid the 1pm slate.  It's not like a 2 or 3 game NBA slate or Thanksgiving Day NFL. 

 
Ok, so I'm assuming your point of all this is 2-5x are not "cash" games and I didn't catch on til right now?

I often stack in that regard.  If you think the lineup will cash 2-5x and 100-mans, isn't putting it in 5050s sort of hedging in case you get stuck in between the 5050 cuts and the 2/3x cuts?  Or maybe you reach the 3x level but not the 5x level?  I don't really see the issue doing this.  

But anyways, after all these posts, I still don't understand why you think it would be wise for people like me to avoid the 1pm slate.  It's not like a 2 or 3 game NBA slate or Thanksgiving Day NFL. 
No worries, I was just responded to you original post about single LUs in each slate. If you are having success playing the way you are then just ignore my replies, I'm not here to argue, just to offer my thoughts on DSF matters.

When you use a smaller pool of players, 1pm slate, then by the very nature of variance you are limiting your room for error as more owners will have the players you have.  Using the Sunday slate gives you more options, as it does others, so as a good player you gain an advantage as other owners have more bad options.

 
No worries, I was just responded to you original post about single LUs in each slate. If you are having success playing the way you are then just ignore my replies, I'm not here to argue, just to offer my thoughts on DSF matters.

When you use a smaller pool of players, 1pm slate, then by the very nature of variance you are limiting your room for error as more owners will have the players you have.  Using the Sunday slate gives you more options, as it does others, so as a good player you gain an advantage as other owners have more bad options.
I'm right with you.   :thumbup:    For some reason it works for me.  I think it was last season where it was by far my best slate.  

What I probably do wrong is build my 1pm Only first, then move on to the Main slate.  I'll overlap a guy if I really like him, but trying to differentiate the slates sometimes gets tricky.  It helps if I have a high cost QB and a mid/low cost QB in opposite slates, it drives you to different choices most of the time.

I also have a very hard time making lineup decisions when guys are so close, hence wanting 5 LU's when I should have 2-3 LU's.  

Is there an overall strategy thread?  If not it's probably overdue.  

 
50/50s cashed at 130, 123, 116, 120, 105 (prime).

gpps cashed at 120, 119, 117, 104 (prime).

Is there any reason to be playing cash?

 
monster day.

1pm (144) and main slate (162) cash games lineups cashed 100%.

min crushed the $1 tourney for like 2x.

7th out of 147k for $1100 in the big $2 1pm tournament.

got some chances at reasonable money tomorrow night too.  151, 145, 142, 138, 136, 135, 133 plus brady/mitchell.
won another 1100 tonight with that last brady td pass worth $500.  sick weekend. wish i could cash nba though :/

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top