What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Fantasy Insurance (1 Viewer)

This is awesome. The question becomes which option do you choose? I would think opition 2 would be the best one.

 
what a great scam. they pretty much only cover catastrophic injuries. i can see them going bankrupt if a major player like brady goes down for the season.

 
I picked option #3 and plugged in Warner, SJax and LT, all players that have had injury problems or are an injury risk this year and said I wanted to be reimbursed $150. The fee was like $18.50.

I changed the players to Brees, Portis and Andre Johnson and the fee was the exact same.

This is a numbers game on the number of games missed not on the players involved with insanely high premiums compared to payouts. Still interesting tho...

 
I picked option #3 and plugged in Warner, SJax and LT, all players that have had injury problems or are an injury risk this year and said I wanted to be reimbursed $150. The fee was like $18.50. I changed the players to Brees, Portis and Andre Johnson and the fee was the exact same. This is a numbers game on the number of games missed not on the players involved with insanely high premiums compared to payouts. Still interesting tho...
right, they are not trying to predict who will be injured like a sportsbook doesnt care who wins. Just get a few people to take the bait.
 
It seems not much different than any other type of insurance. :loco:
Insurance companies are businesses. All forms of insurance are profitable, or they wouldn't be offered (or the prices would be raised until they were profitable again). In other words, over the long run, buying insurance is always a losing proposition from a strictly dollars-and-cents point of view. With that said, some expenses are so large that it makes sense to get insurance to protect against them. Things like your house, your health, and your car. My philosophy has always been to only insure the things I couldn't afford to replace out-of-pocket should something happen to them. A $20,000 car? Sure. A $200 XBox? No. If you're playing in fantasy leagues where the buy-in is so high that you can't afford not to win, then I'd say the problem isn't that you don't have fantasy insurance (holy double double-negative, Batman!).In my mind, buying fantasy insurance is a lot like going to a roulette wheel and putting money on both red and black. Sure, it'll heavily mitigate your losses... but the fact remains that over the long run it's a guaranteed losing strategy (whereas every other bet is just a likely losing strategy)

 
It seems not much different than any other type of insurance. :drive:
Insurance companies are businesses. All forms of insurance are profitable, or they wouldn't be offered (or the prices would be raised until they were profitable again). In other words, over the long run, buying insurance is always a losing proposition from a strictly dollars-and-cents point of view. With that said, some expenses are so large that it makes sense to get insurance to protect against them. Things like your house, your health, and your car. My philosophy has always been to only insure the things I couldn't afford to replace out-of-pocket should something happen to them. A $20,000 car? Sure. A $200 XBox? No. If you're playing in fantasy leagues where the buy-in is so high that you can't afford not to win, then I'd say the problem isn't that you don't have fantasy insurance (holy double double-negative, Batman!).In my mind, buying fantasy insurance is a lot like going to a roulette wheel and putting money on both red and black. Sure, it'll heavily mitigate your losses... but the fact remains that over the long run it's a guaranteed losing strategy (whereas every other bet is just a likely losing strategy)
A. Some insurance products are statistically money losers. They make up the difference by investing the premia.B. You don't just protect yourself against catastrophe, you also lower variance which is a valuable thing to risk averse individuals (most of us). Yes, you are typically 'losing money' by buying insurance. But you are taking a small guaranteed loss to avoid a potential large loss. That loss doesnt have to be catastrophic to make it worthwhile to insure against it. Take your $200 XBOX. You dont insure it because it would be a pain in the neck to do so, you'd have to file paperwork, etc. But what if your roommate, who you know is good for it, says to you "Hey, give me 50 cents and if your XBOX breaks I'll buy you a new one" -- you wouldn't do that? I definitely would.

The problem with this insurance isn't the fact that it is insurance and it insurance is bad, or the fact that there is no need to buy insurance for something as 'insigificant' as fantasy football (hey, that's up to everyone to decide for themself). The problem with it is that the premium looks insanely high. So you're not taking a small loss to protect against a large one, you're taking a medium one to protect against a large one, and that almost definitely is not worthwhile. It's like insurance on cell phones: unless your phone is insanely expensive, or you are insanely likely to break yours, it's not worth it -- in a few months of paying the premium you could have bought yourself the new phone already.

 
A. Some insurance products are statistically money losers. They make up the difference by investing the premia.
Good to know. Unless I'm offered one of those insurance policies, though, I'm still going to pass.
 
They have some guys on there who probably have a better than one out of ten shot of meeting their criteria. Rice, Harvin, Cadillac Williams and Antonio Bryant jump immediately to mind. Anyone trying to play this as a gambling site, not merely insurance?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My all-injury bet team would have to be:Ronnie Brown (almost guaranteed to miss some late-season games)Antonio Bryant (may not even get started this season)Sidney Rice ( ditto)Of course, if a major player took a hit in the first regular season game, they have this out clause:

Fantasy Sports Insurance reserves the right at any time to modify or discontinue, temporarily or permanently, Fantasysportsinsurance.com or Services (or any part thereof) with or without notice.
 
My issue seems that it says a combined total. Not a combined minimum. So if your players miss more I feel like they will screw you based on wording.

Ben Tate: Out for the season...someone put some money on this....

If Tate is still listed than this has to be a scam because they aren't updating it.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top