Ministry of Pain
Footballguy
I've also had 3 beers, 1/2 bottle of red wine and 2 shots of The Glenlivet 12
I shouldn't be in charge of a dog walk tonight
I shouldn't be in charge of a dog walk tonight

Half of one, six dozen of another to me.Don't get upset but I don't vote for a trade here with no GMI would propose this deal... It works according to the chart and buys this draft some time.
MN gives 3.97 & 5.139
LA gives 3.90 & 6.201
I'd prefer a pick for the Rams
You can reach out to me at 92, I'm up in 2 picks
I’m literally jumping on a plane right now and not caught up. I thought we discussed you or @rockaction were going to pick for me this round?Would anyone NOT picking in the next 5-10 picks please make a pick for the Rams based on their needs?
I think the Rams have only selected once so far
I would do it but I'm 2 picks away and feel like I wouldn't be doing the other 30-31 much justice by taking Willie Lampkin at Guard from North Carolina
Don't get me wrong, I actually love Lampkin and think he's a BIG part of why Hampton had such an amazing 2024
That said, Lampkin is like a 6th round pick right now, maybe 4-5 if the right team discovers him. He won't be playing Tackle, I promise, he's a true OG and I love it
Would someone please pick for the Rams so we can move forward? DKP-Rams would want us to keep moving
Thanks!
No problem BudI’m literally jumping on a plane right now and not caught up. I thought we discussed you or @rockaction were going to pick for me this round?Would anyone NOT picking in the next 5-10 picks please make a pick for the Rams based on their needs?
I think the Rams have only selected once so far
I would do it but I'm 2 picks away and feel like I wouldn't be doing the other 30-31 much justice by taking Willie Lampkin at Guard from North Carolina
Don't get me wrong, I actually love Lampkin and think he's a BIG part of why Hampton had such an amazing 2024
That said, Lampkin is like a 6th round pick right now, maybe 4-5 if the right team discovers him. He won't be playing Tackle, I promise, he's a true OG and I love it
Would someone please pick for the Rams so we can move forward? DKP-Rams would want us to keep moving
Thanks!
I don't think that's directly responsive, FWIW. It would be a waste to turn Skattebo into just a passing specialist. I'm not saying you couldn't, just...you could do that with less draft capital. He overlaps a lot with Judkins.Skattebo is as good a pass catcher as there is in the class, at least among the top RBs (Brashard Smith is probably the best pass catcher, but he's in that specialist bucket ala Justice Hill)Aren't Skattebo and Judkins kind of similarly skilled? I'd have maybe waited til the 4th/5th and taken a guy more in the speed/passing down mold.Yes. You are correct in pointing out the logical flaw and so that is clearly a misstatement on my part.I think the draft is nice, but I'd strongly disagree with the bolded. If Estime and McLaughlin were starting caliber guys, RB wouldn't be a need. If Denver drafts both Skattebo and Judkins, those guys don't see snaps, and Estime is likely inactive, if he even makes the team.Denver filled three glaring starter holes in free agency (TE, S, and ILB). RB is the only position where starter is not locked in for 2025.With pick #85, the Denver Broncos select:
Cam Skattebo - RB - Arizona State
It was widely known that Denver's offensive Achilles Heel last year was the running game, but in one imaginary draft it has hopefully gone from weakness to strength (Rd 1 C/G Grey Zabel, Rd 2 RB Quinshon Judkins and now Rd 3 Skattebo).
The knock on Skattebo is obviously his 40-time, but his contact balance is elite and the tape is outstanding.
While it may suck for fantasy managers, from an NFL perspective Sean Payton will love his deep stable of young RB's. Judkins and Skattebo will compete for the lead dog role during imaginary training camp, while A. Estime and J. McLaughlin will provide exceptional depth and situational power/COP.
This was my pick at 86.
That said, as a Chargers fan, I would love to see Denver spend 2 Day 2 picks on RBs. I do not think that is maximizing roster value.
Getting the PFF #3 RB at pick 85 and having four starting-caliber guys all under age 25 at such an injury-prone position is pretty decent roster value IMO.
Where I was coming from is that Estime and McLaughlin have started games in the past as part of a rotation.
So while capable in a weaker RB room, those two can clearly be upgraded upon and would not likely see snaps in this scenario (my first Skattebo post stated they would be situational at best).
Go!!!I would propose this deal... It works according to the chart and buys this draft some time.
MN gives 3.97 & 5.139
LA gives 3.90 & 6.201
I agree with you on the dropoff. I just think you hurt the value of each by taking both. I could be wrong. But neither is really Kamara, and both are closer to Ingram, if we're talking previous Payton models.It's a fair point. I was actually considering that strategy taking Kaleb Johnson in Rd 2 and then adding a Bhayshul Tuten-type or pass catching specialist later.Aren't Skattebo and Judkins kind of similarly skilled? I'd have maybe waited til the 4th/5th and taken a guy more in the speed/passing down mold.
And had I gone with Hampton in Rd 1 (instead of Zabel) then I wouldn't have doubled down on RB like this since Hampton is a clear tier above Skattebo/Judkins.
But IMO beyond Skattebo and and Judkins there is a clear dropoff in terms of skillset for becoming quality 3-down NFL starters. And both are incremental upgrades over the Broncos' current roster.
Ha...just got a pick ready for the Rams too.Go!!!I would propose this deal... It works according to the chart and buys this draft some time.
MN gives 3.97 & 5.139
LA gives 3.90 & 6.201
![]()
Appreciate the reference and...@Andy Dufresne
"You may fire when ready"
Noel was the obvious BPA. He was on my short list at 78 for ARI, and would've been the pick if Schwesinger wasn't there and I hadn't already taken McMillan. Good trade-up for the Vikings, and I guess it makes sense that the Rams traded out of that pick given that they have much less of a need at WR.Appreciate the reference and...@Andy Dufresne
"You may fire when ready"
Minnesota Vikings select:
3.90 - WR Jaylin Noel, Iowa State
And not just because he's being pimped at the top of the forum.
The Vikings' WR depth chart is gross and that's before the possibility of an Addison suspension.
Noel had a great season and has poured gas on the fire in his post season activities.
He could step right in as a WR3 and contribute on special teams (another weak area).
@Uruk-Hai is up.
Joe's being too modest. This player was his suggestion.Picking on behalf of Uruk-Hai, with the 91st pick in the draft the Ravens pick:
03.91CJ West- UI by way of Kent St
Interior DT comfortable in both the A and B gap he’s a disruptor with potential. He’s built like Warren Sapp and has a motor similar as well. Strong against the run he’ll slot nicely next to Madubuike and Travis Jones on 1sr and 2nd downs. Needs work for pass rush but is in a good place to learn on the job.
Excellent choice. I had him at #85 if Skattebo hadn't been there.With the 94th pick, the Atlanta Falcons select Kevin Winston Jr; S - Penn State
@Ben & Jerry's w/KC is up.
This is like when Amazon had a competition between all those cities that spent millions in hopes they could land the new headquarters - only to find out it was all just market research provided for free to Amazon!-This was partly why I jumped in to guide the thread, wanted to get more info on some of the players and see what others are going to do in these rookie drafts
Thanks to Everyone!
It was between Winston and Mukuba for me at 88, Winston much better at the run Defense & Mukuba much better at pass protection. Health & pass protection won out.Excellent choice. I had him at #85 if Skattebo hadn't been there.With the 94th pick, the Atlanta Falcons select Kevin Winston Jr; S - Penn State
@Ben & Jerry's w/KC is up.
Winston has fallen through the cracks among pundits due to the injury, but PFF's best run-defense grade for a safety in the draft
This is like when Amazon had a competition between all those cities that spent millions in hopes they could land the new headquarters - only to find out it was all just market research provided for free to Amazon!-This was partly why I jumped in to guide the thread, wanted to get more info on some of the players and see what others are going to do in these rookie drafts
Thanks to Everyone!
I feel so used!![]()
Turns out we've been training AI for free with all those CAPTCHA's too.This is like when Amazon had a competition between all those cities that spent millions in hopes they could land the new headquarters - only to find out it was all just market research provided for free to Amazon!-This was partly why I jumped in to guide the thread, wanted to get more info on some of the players and see what others are going to do in these rookie drafts
Thanks to Everyone!
I feel so used!![]()
Thank you for doing this. I was late to jump in because I don't follow the college game at all.We are winding down the 3rd round, I wanted to take a moment to thank all of you for doing this
I appreciate the efforts to make it feel real with the trades, something we do see a lot in the NFL drafts with teams moving up and down the boards.
There are some players I want to go back and take a 2nd/3rd look at after reading the discussion you all had and spotlighted on certain players
-I have a lot more thoughts about the QB position and some other general trends we see in mocks here and on other sites
I think most front offices would be wise to see what the successful teams are doing and try to mimic them. Miami/Chris Grier have done a poor job of loading Miami up with young talent
When you look at the Miami depth charts you can barely find starting players we have drafted. We trade a lot of picks for players on other teams.
But back to my original thought, thank you for making this easy.
I always want to know what you all are thinking about players and trends.
-I also want to make an announcement to those who participated
After 10 years if not longer of not competing in Dynasty leagues and routinely warning folks of the dangers of these GMs in your redrafts...
I am going to be joining my son and some of his friends in creating a new Dynasty league after showing him how to play FF the last 4-5 years, all redraft leagues.
His friends wanted us to launch a dynasty. I agreed on the condition of a simultaneous redraft league w/same owners to keep MoP-Pops happy
I want to compete and do well so I will be more active in dynasty discussions and maybe slightly more open to player projections beyond just the immediate season
-This was partly why I jumped in to guide the thread, wanted to get more info on some of the players and see what others are going to do in these rookie drafts
Thanks to Everyone!
Feel the same way about the 49ers at 11.Thank you for doing this. I was late to jump in because I don't follow the college game at all.We are winding down the 3rd round, I wanted to take a moment to thank all of you for doing this
I appreciate the efforts to make it feel real with the trades, something we do see a lot in the NFL drafts with teams moving up and down the boards.
There are some players I want to go back and take a 2nd/3rd look at after reading the discussion you all had and spotlighted on certain players
-I have a lot more thoughts about the QB position and some other general trends we see in mocks here and on other sites
I think most front offices would be wise to see what the successful teams are doing and try to mimic them. Miami/Chris Grier have done a poor job of loading Miami up with young talent
When you look at the Miami depth charts you can barely find starting players we have drafted. We trade a lot of picks for players on other teams.
But back to my original thought, thank you for making this easy.
I always want to know what you all are thinking about players and trends.
-I also want to make an announcement to those who participated
After 10 years if not longer of not competing in Dynasty leagues and routinely warning folks of the dangers of these GMs in your redrafts...
I am going to be joining my son and some of his friends in creating a new Dynasty league after showing him how to play FF the last 4-5 years, all redraft leagues.
His friends wanted us to launch a dynasty. I agreed on the condition of a simultaneous redraft league w/same owners to keep MoP-Pops happy
I want to compete and do well so I will be more active in dynasty discussions and maybe slightly more open to player projections beyond just the immediate season
-This was partly why I jumped in to guide the thread, wanted to get more info on some of the players and see what others are going to do in these rookie drafts
Thanks to Everyone!
As far as Dallas goes, I just don't like their spot at #12. Outside of Hunter and Carter, the only player I really like for Dallas at the top is DT Mason Graham. No way he falls to #12. I hope that Dallas can trade down to the 20-25 range and pick up another second rounder. That way they could either take RB Hampton or another top RB in the second. ( If Hampton falls to Washington I will be PO'd. )Then they could still address OL, DL and WR.
Very deep class for DTs and sometimes teams do not value them the same way we do. If you don't get one in the 1st, there's plenty in the 2nd and even 3rd roundThank you for doing this. I was late to jump in because I don't follow the college game at all.We are winding down the 3rd round, I wanted to take a moment to thank all of you for doing this
I appreciate the efforts to make it feel real with the trades, something we do see a lot in the NFL drafts with teams moving up and down the boards.
There are some players I want to go back and take a 2nd/3rd look at after reading the discussion you all had and spotlighted on certain players
-I have a lot more thoughts about the QB position and some other general trends we see in mocks here and on other sites
I think most front offices would be wise to see what the successful teams are doing and try to mimic them. Miami/Chris Grier have done a poor job of loading Miami up with young talent
When you look at the Miami depth charts you can barely find starting players we have drafted. We trade a lot of picks for players on other teams.
But back to my original thought, thank you for making this easy.
I always want to know what you all are thinking about players and trends.
-I also want to make an announcement to those who participated
After 10 years if not longer of not competing in Dynasty leagues and routinely warning folks of the dangers of these GMs in your redrafts...
I am going to be joining my son and some of his friends in creating a new Dynasty league after showing him how to play FF the last 4-5 years, all redraft leagues.
His friends wanted us to launch a dynasty. I agreed on the condition of a simultaneous redraft league w/same owners to keep MoP-Pops happy
I want to compete and do well so I will be more active in dynasty discussions and maybe slightly more open to player projections beyond just the immediate season
-This was partly why I jumped in to guide the thread, wanted to get more info on some of the players and see what others are going to do in these rookie drafts
Thanks to Everyone!
As far as Dallas goes, I just don't like their spot at #12. Outside of Hunter and Carter, the only player I really like for Dallas at the top is DT Mason Graham. No way he falls to #12. I hope that Dallas can trade down to the 20-25 range and pick up another second rounder. That way they could either take RB Hampton or another top RB in the second. ( If Hampton falls to Washington I will be PO'd. )Then they could still address OL, DL and WR.
Thats @efactor for the NinersPick #99 @RC94 Giants
Pick #100 @farfromforgotten Niners
MoP again for the Rams at 101
And pick #102 will be @nysfl2 for the Detroit Lions to wrap things up
Not sure if I am entitled to critique picks when I declined to participate. IMO, there's nothing terrible taking Campbell at 4 (he's most likely going to end up as the NE pick). However, his prospect evaluation scores don't lead to being a Top 5 pick in pretty much any recent draft. Last year, he probably would have fallen into the 2nd round. I think he'll be a decent starter for a number of years. The issue will be when he comes off his rookie deal, is an above average tackle going to be worth $30M a season (which is where the market is headed). I just think with the #4 pick you need to come away with better than a decent multi-year starter.Highest rated Tackle in the Draft, one of the only OL that's worth a Top 5-10 pick1.04 The New England Patriots select Will Campbell OT LSU
The need to protect Maye has to be a priority. The short arms are a concern but his athleticism will make up for it.
You now have protection for Maye and that will lead to big things
WRs, RBs, TEs and QBs are only as good as their OL, that's one of my pet peeves with the Miami Dolphins, all the shiny toys but little to no blocking to exploit their talents
You can take avg talent at the skill spots and if you have a solid OL, you get far better production out of them.
Once in a while we start picking on RBs who leave yards on the field but these days that's not very common.
Most of the time if you build a Top 5-10 OL you get great production both running and passing the ball
It might not feel sexie to take an OL at No 4 but it's the right decision to further the development of Maye
I'm sure you would have gladly grabbed Travis Hunter if he fell to you at No 4
Been waiting for somebody to take this guy! Good pick.Pick 3-100 SF 49ers select Shemer Turner, DT, Texas AM
Going to double up on DT and take Turner to pair up with Alfred Collins. Turner is a bit undersized at 300 pounds, but good athlete and extremely aggressive (mean hopefully). 49ers have to improve their run D and like this pair to shore that up.
Jerk - the Lions were hoping he'd fall two more picksPick 3-100 SF 49ers select Shemer Turner, DT, Texas AM
Going to double up on DT and take Turner to pair up with Alfred Collins. Turner is a bit undersized at 300 pounds, but good athlete and extremely aggressive (mean hopefully). 49ers have to improve their run D and like this pair to shore that up.
Unfortunately he probably won’t fall this far in the real draft.Jerk - the Lions were hoping he'd fall two more picksPick 3-100 SF 49ers select Shemer Turner, DT, Texas AM
Going to double up on DT and take Turner to pair up with Alfred Collins. Turner is a bit undersized at 300 pounds, but good athlete and extremely aggressive (mean hopefully). 49ers have to improve their run D and like this pair to shore that up.
wait WTH, I swore he was gone because I remember thinking that both Shemars were gone and I might have even taken him at 48 or considered not going Tyleik and hoping for him at 64.Pick 3-100 SF 49ers select Shemer Turner, DT, Texas AM
Going to double up on DT and take Turner to pair up with Alfred Collins. Turner is a bit undersized at 300 pounds, but good athlete and extremely aggressive (mean hopefully). 49ers have to improve their run D and like this pair to shore that up.
He’s available to trade forwait WTH, I swore he was gone because I remember thinking that both Shemars were gone and I might have even taken him at 48 or considered not going Tyleik and hoping for him at 64.Pick 3-100 SF 49ers select Shemer Turner, DT, Texas AM
Going to double up on DT and take Turner to pair up with Alfred Collins. Turner is a bit undersized at 300 pounds, but good athlete and extremely aggressive (mean hopefully). 49ers have to improve their run D and like this pair to shore that up.
Williams is an interesting prospect. McShay compared him to Patterson too.3.95 KC Chiefs select WR Savion Williams, TCU
Savion Williams measured in at the NFL Combine at 6'4 and 222lbs. His 4.48 40-yard dash was the fastest of any offensive prospect his size or larger at this year's combine. 1st round talent with Day 3 polish.
In 2024, scored 12 TDs, 6 through the air, and 6 on the ground. Squats 600 lbs, with 355 on the bench press.
Very effective lining up in the backfield, and in goal line/short yardage situations as a running back or wildcat option.
Played QB in High School and could chuck the ball farther than any of the Hornfrogs QBs. Will need a creative playcaller to maximize his unique physical talents.
With the ball in his hands, flashes elements of Deebo Samuel and CeeDee Lamb to his game, but needs work catching the football consistently.
His ceiling is Cordarrelle Patterson 2.0, with a floor of Chase Claypool.
Thanks for the feedback and I concur. I announced that the pick was available the moment I took the Patriots and throughout the process up until the pick. I didn’t get one offer.Not sure if I am entitled to critique picks when I declined to participate. IMO, there's nothing terrible taking Campbell at 4 (he's most likely going to end up as the NE pick). However, his prospect evaluation scores don't lead to being a Top 5 pick in pretty much any recent draft. Last year, he probably would have fallen into the 2nd round. I think he'll be a decent starter for a number of years. The issue will be when he comes off his rookie deal, is an above average tackle going to be worth $30M a season (which is where the market is headed). I just think with the #4 pick you need to come away with better than a decent multi-year starter.Highest rated Tackle in the Draft, one of the only OL that's worth a Top 5-10 pick1.04 The New England Patriots select Will Campbell OT LSU
The need to protect Maye has to be a priority. The short arms are a concern but his athleticism will make up for it.
You now have protection for Maye and that will lead to big things
WRs, RBs, TEs and QBs are only as good as their OL, that's one of my pet peeves with the Miami Dolphins, all the shiny toys but little to no blocking to exploit their talents
You can take avg talent at the skill spots and if you have a solid OL, you get far better production out of them.
Once in a while we start picking on RBs who leave yards on the field but these days that's not very common.
Most of the time if you build a Top 5-10 OL you get great production both running and passing the ball
It might not feel sexie to take an OL at No 4 but it's the right decision to further the development of Maye
I'm sure you would have gladly grabbed Travis Hunter if he fell to you at No 4
I think either of the following would have worked out better for NE: trade down a few picks and get Campbell anyway (adding additional draft assets in the process) . . . or dropping a lot further down (adding players or picks or both) and drafting a similarly skilled OT that could very likely be a long-term decent starter. Put another way, I don't see a ton of difference in the tackles available in the middle or the first round, late in the first round, or in the top of the second round. If NE really wanted to, they could have dropped down in the draft and ended up with two starting tackles who I view as similar to Campbell and maybe even had raked in other assets on top of it.
This guy is super exciting, especially for fantasy. Will be interesting to see at what point in the NFL draft he goes, because I have no idea today where he should go in a dynasty rookie draft.101 - LA Rams - Bhayshul Tuten - RB
This guy just tore up the combine and it seemed like every time I saw him on the highlight reels it was a constant 70 yards to the house. He's 5'9", 206 and he's called an early down back even at that size. He burns a 4.32 and jumps out the gym. The knocks on him are fumbling and pass protection, but we'll see if we can't rectify those in the pros. I know Corum is there, but he isn't that great and frankly, neither is Kyrem Williams. I feel like even though Tuten probably has 4th- or 5th-round grade, I consider him too electric to pass up and was thrilled when I saw him.