SacramentoBob
Footballguy
Kind of an odd move.
Bb3 makes a5 less attractive, as Bc4 stop Ba6. I have to admit I'm now partial to Bb7. I do like that diagonal, and we'd be ready to get to work on the c file.First thought is that he's setting up for control of the c file. If so he plans on Bh6 and then Rc1. Either he doesn't see the possible Ba4 pin (doubtful) or he's decided that it's not worth it and his bishop is better on c2 attacking the knight.
A defensive strategy in response would be to play Bb7. An offensive strategy would be to play a5 and Ba6.
He's probably just trying to rattle us.
Resign imo
That makes a lot of sense- except don't we want both rooks on the c file?Bb3 makes a5 less attractive, as Bc4 stop Ba6. I have to admit I'm now partial to Bb7. I do like that diagonal, and we'd be ready to get to work on the c file.Qd7 looks good as well, to prepare to put pressure on the isolated d pawn. The reason I like this maybe better than Bb7 is that it gives us an extra tempo to get the king's rook in play. If you luft the queen and he plays Bh6, you can slide the rook right to d8.First thought is that he's setting up for control of the c file. If so he plans on Bh6 and then Rc1. Either he doesn't see the possible Ba4 pin (doubtful) or he's decided that it's not worth it and his bishop is better on c2 attacking the knight.
A defensive strategy in response would be to play Bb7. An offensive strategy would be to play a5 and Ba6.
I think I like putting pressure on an isolated pawn more than doubling the rooks at this point. That might be a matter of taste, though.That makes a lot of sense- except don't we want both rooks on the c file?Bb3 makes a5 less attractive, as Bc4 stop Ba6. I have to admit I'm now partial to Bb7. I do like that diagonal, and we'd be ready to get to work on the c file.Qd7 looks good as well, to prepare to put pressure on the isolated d pawn. The reason I like this maybe better than Bb7 is that it gives us an extra tempo to get the king's rook in play. If you luft the queen and he plays Bh6, you can slide the rook right to d8.First thought is that he's setting up for control of the c file. If so he plans on Bh6 and then Rc1. Either he doesn't see the possible Ba4 pin (doubtful) or he's decided that it's not worth it and his bishop is better on c2 attacking the knight.
A defensive strategy in response would be to play Bb7. An offensive strategy would be to play a5 and Ba6.
I don't see much either. I don't think he'll trade the bishop for the knight, or play Bh6 which just loses him a tempo. I think N2c3 or N4c3 is probably in the future. If our bishop is on b7, I think we have to take on c3 to keep that file clear.14. Bb3 Bb7
15. Bxd5 (15. Bh6 Re8 16. Rac1 Rc8) Qxd5
16. N4c3 Qh5
17. d5 exd5
18. Nxd5 Bc5
19. Ng3 Qe5
This is what I've come up with so far. I don't see anything dangerous about Bb3.
Except that it gets rid of the isolated pawn for white. I thought our goal was not to allow the d pawn to advance. Is there anyway to avoid it?14. Bb3 Bb7
15. Bxd5 (15. Bh6 Re8 16. Rac1 Rc8) Qxd5
16. N4c3 Qh5
17. d5 exd5
18. Nxd5 Bc5
19. Ng3 Qe5
This is what I've come up with so far. I don't see anything dangerous about Bb3.
Not if he wants to force the issue, but I don't see any advantage for White here.Except that it gets rid of the isolated pawn for white. I thought our goal was not to allow the d pawn to advance. Is there anyway to avoid it?14. Bb3 Bb7
15. Bxd5 (15. Bh6 Re8 16. Rac1 Rc8) Qxd5
16. N4c3 Qh5
17. d5 exd5
18. Nxd5 Bc5
19. Ng3 Qe5
This is what I've come up with so far. I don't see anything dangerous about Bb3.
if we take on c3, a plan of Na5-c4 and Rc8 to blockade the hanging pawns Grunfeld style makes a lot of sense.I don't see much either. I don't think he'll trade the bishop for the knight, or play Bh6 which just loses him a tempo. I think N2c3 or N4c3 is probably in the future. If our bishop is on b7, I think we have to take on c3 to keep that file clear.14. Bb3 Bb7
15. Bxd5 (15. Bh6 Re8 16. Rac1 Rc8) Qxd5
16. N4c3 Qh5
17. d5 exd5
18. Nxd5 Bc5
19. Ng3 Qe5
This is what I've come up with so far. I don't see anything dangerous about Bb3.
Bishop is on e7 now.wdcrob said:Do we not have a bishop on D6? Qxd5 is blocked by that, no?14. Bb3 Bb7
15. Bxd5 (15. Bh6 Re8 16. Rac1 Rc8) Qxd5
16. N4c3 Qh5
17. d5 exd5
18. Nxd5 Bc5
19. Ng3 Qe5
This is what I've come up with so far. I don't see anything dangerous about Bb3.
Possible I've just horked the board, but went back and ran though it again and got same thing.
I don't understand- when would we take on c3?if we take on c3, a plan of Na5-c4 and Rc8 to blockade the hanging pawns Grunfeld style makes a lot of sense.I don't see much either. I don't think he'll trade the bishop for the knight, or play Bh6 which just loses him a tempo. I think N2c3 or N4c3 is probably in the future. If our bishop is on b7, I think we have to take on c3 to keep that file clear.14. Bb3 Bb7
15. Bxd5 (15. Bh6 Re8 16. Rac1 Rc8) Qxd5
16. N4c3 Qh5
17. d5 exd5
18. Nxd5 Bc5
19. Ng3 Qe5
This is what I've come up with so far. I don't see anything dangerous about Bb3.
I like Bb7So here are our choices:
1. Bb7
2. Qd7
I like Green and Gold's idea of Qd7 first, freeing up the rook on f8 to move to d8.
Please vote.
I don't know.Does his Bc4 (anticipated move to our a5) give us a more advantageous position, or was his Bb3 a solid deterrent to a5?
Given time, I aim to answer this question myself, but it's the type of thought I'd put into considering the move. Seemed consensus to disregard a5 moving forward based on him wanting to counter our (eventual) Ba6.I don't know.Does his Bc4 (anticipated move to our a5) give us a more advantageous position, or was his Bb3 a solid deterrent to a5?
It's a good question. a5 gives us a weakness on b6, although I don't see him being able to take advantage of it right away. It also takes away a5 for the knight, whatever that's worth. It does give us space on the queen side, though. I don't think it would have been a bad move. His bishop on c4 is tough to dislodge, though, and it's a pretty good square.Given time, I aim to answer this question myself, but it's the type of thought I'd put into considering the move. Seemed consensus to disregard a5 moving forward based on him wanting to counter our (eventual) Ba6.I don't know.Does his Bc4 (anticipated move to our a5) give us a more advantageous position, or was his Bb3 a solid deterrent to a5?
I prefer Qd7 to Bb7, given the choices. I value flexibility, no matter the game I'm playing, and from reading the arguments, this gives us more flexibility.
I'm beginning to realize I really need to learn the openings. I see a lot of this same stuff.An e5 pawn break if it can be prepared correctly is also an idea I'm just spitballing here.
You could just tune into my twitch channel on chess nightsI'm beginning to realize I really need to learn the openings. I see a lot of this same stuff.An e5 pawn break if it can be prepared correctly is also an idea I'm just spitballing here.
Yes.Bh6
So Rd8, right? Wasn't that the point of our last move?
I knew it!Bh6
So Rd8, right? Wasn't that the point of our last move?
Very important for everyone to recognize that the e7-bishop is the guardian of the Nf6+ queen/king fork square. We can't move it from its current location without losing tactically.I almost hesitate to write this but it seems like White's last 2 moves are to our advantage. After Rd8 we can play Bf8, if white wants to trade great. If he retreats we move Bg7 attacking that d4 pawn.
Youre right, of course.Very important for everyone to recognize that the e7-bishop is the guardian of the Nf6+ queen/king fork square. We can't move it from it's current location without losing tactically.I almost hesitate to write this but it seems like White's last 2 moves are to our advantage. After Rd8 we can play Bf8, if white wants to trade great. If he retreats we move Bg7 attacking that d4 pawn.