LOL, I know...just trying to spice things up and lose the money I won on Greene. Betus won't let me cash out anyway.
wow. weird bet like this just wiped out over $600 in ill-advised Cowboy wagers.cosjobs said:Because I find it very hard to believe that the AFC and NFC championships will be comprised solely of #1 and #2 seeds, I am taking the Jets +320. And because the only way I can see them winning is going under, I am going to parlay it with the under.
Jets +7.5. i am not sure what to grab, will likely buy .5 and hit it hard for nowThat line will be at -10, no?Gotta hand it to the Jets...this is stunning. I just didn't think it was possible with Sanchez. But good D and running got it done.I'll have to get it back when the colts demolish this team next weekI played SD +160 at greek![]()
Indy -7 & 41.5That line will be at -10, no?Gotta hand it to the Jets...this is stunning. I just didn't think it was possible with Sanchez. But good D and running got it done.I'll have to get it back when the colts demolish this team next weekI played SD +160 at greek![]()
I liked the way you think. I also liked the Vikings today. Turns out it was a good weekend.wow. weird bet like this just wiped out over $600 in ill-advised Cowboy wagers.cosjobs said:Because I find it very hard to believe that the AFC and NFC championships will be comprised solely of #1 and #2 seeds, I am taking the Jets +320. And because the only way I can see them winning is going under, I am going to parlay it with the under.
Already going up, no -7 out there.Indy -7 & 41.5That line will be at -10, no?Gotta hand it to the Jets...this is stunning. I just didn't think it was possible with Sanchez. But good D and running got it done.I'll have to get it back when the colts demolish this team next weekI played SD +160 at greek![]()
and the o/u just droped to 40.5Yeah that -7 lasted about 2 minutes. The Indy moneyline has jumped from -320 to -$400
Really?MarshallPlan said:
1k on indy -7(-120)ETA: currently available at thegreekAlready going up, no -7 out there.Indy -7 & 41.5That line will be at -10, no?Gotta hand it to the Jets...this is stunning. I just didn't think it was possible with Sanchez. But good D and running got it done.I'll have to get it back when the colts demolish this team next weekI played SD +160 at greek![]()
From the guy who bet Kurt Warner mvp +200 when Cardinals +230 was available last year at the Super Bowl.Really?MarshallPlan said:
Then bet total pts 43-46 +300 or something stupid. Please shut up. Sorry to all, but prosposis is a terrible bettor and wants to criticize me.sigh, you are clueless. You just dont get it.From the guy who bet Kurt Warner mvp +200 when Cardinals +230 was available last year at the Super Bowl.Really?MarshallPlan said:![]()
Then bet total pts 43-46 +300 or something stupid. Please shut up. Sorry to all, but prosposis is a terrible bettor and wants to criticize me.
Your warner +200 bet was more clueless. I don't care what other people think of me and my bets - you think this bothers me? I posted my Felix Jones bet over 3 days ago right on this board. I have bet throughout the football season doing just fine without posting here, i have no problem going back into a hole and just winning money on my own. I wouldn't mind seeing some of your Super Bowl bets this year though... From what I do recall you had Warner +200 mvp, Dansby ov 6' tackles (I bet ov 4'), and then some stupid 42-46 pts scored bet. Somebody asked you what each point was worth and your answer was "I don't care." Strong gambling that is.You should never criticize my bets ever again, or anyone else's for that matter. Moving onto next week.....(Sonny)sigh, you are clueless. You just dont get it.From the guy who bet Kurt Warner mvp +200 when Cardinals +230 was available last year at the Super Bowl.Really?MarshallPlan said:![]()
Then bet total pts 43-46 +300 or something stupid. Please shut up. Sorry to all, but prosposis is a terrible bettor and wants to criticize me.
Of course, I am pompous or confident, I believe all of my bets are good and are money making in the longrun. Why shouldn't everyone gambling be confident, seriously think about that? What are you going to be completely not confident in the wagers you are making? You were questioned about your 42-46 pts bet in the super bowl and said something like, "I don't know" You mine has well have spent your money on a hooker. When I have come back this season I have posted all of my picks here for all to play or fade. No plagiarism as in the past. I am confident in all the gambling that I do. I don't post all of the bets I make here, but nearly all of bets I commented on here today I posted in this thread. The only one I did not is the romo under completions, which was a small bet anyway. I don't know why I post here sometimes, people think I lie about some of the plays I get or lines I bet. Why would I lie about my bets? I don't even keep a record and try to sell people on my picks. I don't care what anyone else thinks.MP you are a proven liar and have a history of plagiarism. All of this could be forgiven and forgotten but on top of that stuff you are a pompous jerk and that is why it is only a matter of time for people to turn on you yet again.
I have kept a record of your picks. You lie about your record. I am not sure why you post here either. We have done this before. Just carry on. Despite what I have said here I do find you entertaining, in a shine box kind of way.Of course, I am pompous or confident, I believe all of my bets are good and are money making in the longrun. Why shouldn't everyone gambling be confident, seriously think about that? What are you going to be completely not confident in the wagers you are making? You were questioned about your 42-46 pts bet in the super bowl and said something like, "I don't know" You mine has well have spent your money on a hooker. When I have come back this season I have posted all of my picks here for all to play or fade. No plagiarism as in the past.MP you are a proven liar and have a history of plagiarism. All of this could be forgiven and forgotten but on top of that stuff you are a pompous jerk and that is why it is only a matter of time for people to turn on you yet again.
I am confident in all the gambling that I do. I don't post all of the bets I make here, but nearly all of bets I commented on here today I posted in this thread. The only one I did not is the romo under completions, which was a small bet anyway.
I don't know why I post here sometimes, people think I lie about some of the plays I get or lines I bet. Why would I lie about my bets? I don't even keep a record and try to sell people on my picks. I don't care what anyone else thinks.
Please find where I have lied and please compile whatever record you might find for me. I'd like to see what you come up with here. Seriously, I would like to find a record. I post about 10% of my bets here. Please post one reason why I would lie about my record. I'm not selling my picks, I don't even want others to play my props for fear of me getting cut off.I have kept a record of your picks. You lie about your record. I am not sure why you post here either. We have done this before. Just carry on. Despite what I have said here I do find you entertaining, in a shine box kind of way.Of course, I am pompous or confident, I believe all of my bets are good and are money making in the longrun. Why shouldn't everyone gambling be confident, seriously think about that? What are you going to be completely not confident in the wagers you are making? You were questioned about your 42-46 pts bet in the super bowl and said something like, "I don't know" You mine has well have spent your money on a hooker. When I have come back this season I have posted all of my picks here for all to play or fade. No plagiarism as in the past.MP you are a proven liar and have a history of plagiarism. All of this could be forgiven and forgotten but on top of that stuff you are a pompous jerk and that is why it is only a matter of time for people to turn on you yet again.
I am confident in all the gambling that I do. I don't post all of the bets I make here, but nearly all of bets I commented on here today I posted in this thread. The only one I did not is the romo under completions, which was a small bet anyway.
I don't know why I post here sometimes, people think I lie about some of the plays I get or lines I bet. Why would I lie about my bets? I don't even keep a record and try to sell people on my picks. I don't care what anyone else thinks.
If you bet o/u on the game do you also bet the same on the 1st half? I would think the 1st half would be more consistent than the second half because of late game fouls.Still looking for thoughts/opinions on this onetribecalledjeff,do you play the first halves on the CBB totals you play?do you play the 2nd halves if the first halves don't play out the way you expected? ex. you bet an over, the first half is disastrous, do you look to hit the over on the 2H number?
This was the overwhelming norm.2 out of 3 Mother F'ers!!! I will take the winnings and a little some and ride the K. State train tonightwhew, getting heated. I like it. here are some plays for tonight:67th Golden Globes - Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture - Musical Or Comedy Matt Damon – The Informant 01/17/10(20:00 ET)+150 67th Golden Globes - Best Director - Motion Picture James Cameron – Avatar 01/17/10(20:00 ET)+200 67th Golden Globes - Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture - Drama Jeff Bridges – Crazy Heart 01/17/10(20:00 ET)+150 let me be clear, i don't even know what the hell i bet on with these, but they are pretty light.EDIT: Whoops, just realized the show has started. Well, good luck to anybody who tried any of the golden globe bets
tailing2 out of 3 Mother F'ers!!! I will take the winnings and a little some and ride the K. State train tonightwhew, getting heated. I like it.
here are some plays for tonight:
67th Golden Globes - Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture - Musical Or Comedy
Matt Damon – The Informant 01/17/10(20:00 ET)
+150
67th Golden Globes - Best Director - Motion Picture
James Cameron – Avatar 01/17/10(20:00 ET)
+200
67th Golden Globes - Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture - Drama
Jeff Bridges – Crazy Heart 01/17/10(20:00 ET)
+150
let me be clear, i don't even know what the hell i bet on with these, but they are pretty light.
EDIT: Whoops, just realized the show has started. Well, good luck to anybody who tried any of the golden globe bets
Sorry, didn't see the post. Don't spend a lot of time in this thread. It hurts my brain to read some of the crap in here. I play the full game. There are reasons for that which I'd rather not discuss.I do not chase on 2nd halves. I will play them if I think that it provides value on its own.ETA an update on my record: I'm 122-96 on the season, and since tweaking my system after a rough start I am 101-70, or 59%. All plays are posted and documented. If you flat bet all of my totals, you'd be up 16.4 units on the season. By comparison, if you flat bet all of RAS totals, you'd be up 17.4 units. He's obviously got a higher percentage, but I've got much more volume.If you bet o/u on the game do you also bet the same on the 1st half? I would think the 1st half would be more consistent than the second half because of late game fouls.Still looking for thoughts/opinions on this onetribecalledjeff,do you play the first halves on the CBB totals you play?do you play the 2nd halves if the first halves don't play out the way you expected? ex. you bet an over, the first half is disastrous, do you look to hit the over on the 2H number?
I would have grabbed your attn at SFW but I don't have rights to post thereSorry, didn't see the post. Don't spend a lot of time in this thread. It hurts my brain to read some of the crap in here. I play the full game. There are reasons for that which I'd rather not discuss.I do not chase on 2nd halves. I will play them if I think that it provides value on its own.ETA an update on my record: I'm 122-96 on the season, and since tweaking my system after a rough start I am 101-70, or 59%. All plays are posted and documented. If you flat bet all of my totals, you'd be up 16.4 units on the season. By comparison, if you flat bet all of RAS totals, you'd be up 17.4 units. He's obviously got a higher percentage, but I've got much more volume.If you bet o/u on the game do you also bet the same on the 1st half? I would think the 1st half would be more consistent than the second half because of late game fouls.Still looking for thoughts/opinions on this onetribecalledjeff,do you play the first halves on the CBB totals you play?do you play the 2nd halves if the first halves don't play out the way you expected? ex. you bet an over, the first half is disastrous, do you look to hit the over on the 2H number?
Thanks for answeringI'm done...added more at +15001400 to win 24500 lets go cuseMore futures funI added more Syracuse to win the NCAA title at +1600 at thegreek. I think +1000 is about the right line. I also have +2500 from earlier in the season. I'll be playing the hedging game come tourney time to lock in a profit.
Did you register?I would have grabbed your attn at SFW but I don't have rights to post thereSorry, didn't see the post. Don't spend a lot of time in this thread. It hurts my brain to read some of the crap in here. I play the full game. There are reasons for that which I'd rather not discuss.I do not chase on 2nd halves. I will play them if I think that it provides value on its own.ETA an update on my record: I'm 122-96 on the season, and since tweaking my system after a rough start I am 101-70, or 59%. All plays are posted and documented. If you flat bet all of my totals, you'd be up 16.4 units on the season. By comparison, if you flat bet all of RAS totals, you'd be up 17.4 units. He's obviously got a higher percentage, but I've got much more volume.If you bet o/u on the game do you also bet the same on the 1st half? I would think the 1st half would be more consistent than the second half because of late game fouls.Still looking for thoughts/opinions on this onetribecalledjeff,do you play the first halves on the CBB totals you play?do you play the 2nd halves if the first halves don't play out the way you expected? ex. you bet an over, the first half is disastrous, do you look to hit the over on the 2H number?Thanks for answering
Another winner tonight with Marist under 138.Sorry, didn't see the post. Don't spend a lot of time in this thread. It hurts my brain to read some of the crap in here. I play the full game. There are reasons for that which I'd rather not discuss.I do not chase on 2nd halves. I will play them if I think that it provides value on its own.ETA an update on my record: I'm 122-96 on the season, and since tweaking my system after a rough start I am 101-70, or 59%. All plays are posted and documented. If you flat bet all of my totals, you'd be up 16.4 units on the season. By comparison, if you flat bet all of RAS totals, you'd be up 17.4 units. He's obviously got a higher percentage, but I've got much more volume.If you bet o/u on the game do you also bet the same on the 1st half? I would think the 1st half would be more consistent than the second half because of late game fouls.Still looking for thoughts/opinions on this onetribecalledjeff,do you play the first halves on the CBB totals you play? do you play the 2nd halves if the first halves don't play out the way you expected? ex. you bet an over, the first half is disastrous, do you look to hit the over on the 2H number?
A few weeks ago when the MP stuff was going down i wanted to get in on the fun so i registered but i haven't been approved to postDid you register?I would have grabbed your attn at SFW but I don't have rights to post thereSorry, didn't see the post. Don't spend a lot of time in this thread. It hurts my brain to read some of the crap in here. I play the full game. There are reasons for that which I'd rather not discuss.I do not chase on 2nd halves. I will play them if I think that it provides value on its own.ETA an update on my record: I'm 122-96 on the season, and since tweaking my system after a rough start I am 101-70, or 59%. All plays are posted and documented. If you flat bet all of my totals, you'd be up 16.4 units on the season. By comparison, if you flat bet all of RAS totals, you'd be up 17.4 units. He's obviously got a higher percentage, but I've got much more volume.If you bet o/u on the game do you also bet the same on the 1st half? I would think the 1st half would be more consistent than the second half because of late game fouls.Still looking for thoughts/opinions on this onetribecalledjeff,do you play the first halves on the CBB totals you play?do you play the 2nd halves if the first halves don't play out the way you expected? ex. you bet an over, the first half is disastrous, do you look to hit the over on the 2H number?Thanks for answering
What username did you use? I'll send a pm to the owner. I do know that he just had triplets so approving new members probably isn't high on his priority list, but I can give it a shot.A few weeks ago when the MP stuff was going down i wanted to get in on the fun so i registered but i haven't been approved to post
same as hereWhat username did you use? I'll send a pm to the owner. I do know that he just had triplets so approving new members probably isn't high on his priority list, but I can give it a shot.A few weeks ago when the MP stuff was going down i wanted to get in on the fun so i registered but i haven't been approved to post
Well, i understand why you always talk about not watching the games when you guys bet on basketball props and/or games. K. State could have made it easier, and a few times in the 2nd half they had me sweating it. but all is well, that ends well. (Quick caveat. if this stupid Texas team comes back with 57.1 seconds left, and down 9 points, I will literally cry. literally)tailing2 out of 3 Mother F'ers!!! I will take the winnings and a little some and ride the K. State train tonight
You just had triplets?same as hereWhat username did you use? I'll send a pm to the owner. I do know that he just had triplets so approving new members probably isn't high on his priority list, but I can give it a shot.A few weeks ago when the MP stuff was going down i wanted to get in on the fun so i registered but i haven't been approved to post
That's actually funny, but no I'm not the owner.You just had triplets?same as hereWhat username did you use? I'll send a pm to the owner. I do know that he just had triplets so approving new members probably isn't high on his priority list, but I can give it a shot.A few weeks ago when the MP stuff was going down i wanted to get in on the fun so i registered but i haven't been approved to post
In for the Saints -4 and Colts -8 Parlay at 10u. Pays around 3g. This is my "safe" play.Also in for the Jets winning the SB at 10u. Pays around 6g. This is my "heart" play.GL all.I'm on the Saints -4 again for 3u.
Exactly the strat I used with the Jets last week. Jets and the UNDER were no brainers then. I'm a whole lot more concerned about them stopping Peyton Manning, which is why I (sadly) think the right play may be Colts and OVER. Still GL to you (and the Jets).Because I find it very hard to believe that the AFC and NFC championships will be comprised solely of #1 and #2 seeds, I am taking the Jets +320. And because the only way I can see them winning is going under, I am going to parlay it with the under.
Raider Nation said:Indy -1.5 is the no-brainer teaser leg of the year.But what do you match it up with?How does Minnesota +10 sound?
Min +4.5 is available in some places to get to 10.5Sucks that the Vikes are on the road, but I look at it this simply:Both teams have weapons, but Minnesota should stop the Saints far more often than the Saints stop Minnesota.:( Min +4.5 is available in some places to get to 10.5Raider Nation said:Indy -1.5 is the no-brainer teaser leg of the year.But what do you match it up with?How does Minnesota +10 sound?