MarshallPlan
Footballguy
Sportsbook put up some dumb 2h team totals. Colts un 14 and Jets un 10 were great bets with the 2h total at 20'. Crazy.
So we are all idiots for not taking the +3s sitting out there all week. I will take the Colts.Indy -3 +105 and 49 vs MinnyIndy -2.5 -110 and 55 vs NO
who was +3? The AFC? Really?So we are all idiots for not taking the +3s sitting out there all week. I will take the Colts.Indy -3 +105 and 49 vs MinnyIndy -2.5 -110 and 55 vs NO
no nfc was.who was +3? The AFC? Really?So we are all idiots for not taking the +3s sitting out there all week. I will take the Colts.Indy -3 +105 and 49 vs MinnyIndy -2.5 -110 and 55 vs NO
where did you see this?i can't find lines anywhereIndy -3 +105 and 49 vs MinnyIndy -2.5 -110 and 55 vs NO
popped up at Greek right before Indy game was over and taken down right before NO/Minny kickoff.where did you see this?i can't find lines anywhereIndy -3 +105 and 49 vs MinnyIndy -2.5 -110 and 55 vs NO
thankspopped up at Greek right before Indy game was over and taken down right before NO/Minny kickoff.where did you see this?i can't find lines anywhereIndy -3 +105 and 49 vs MinnyIndy -2.5 -110 and 55 vs NO
so any prediction on movement? I think it will be 4 for at least a week. o/u is 56, which i would think under would be the play, but with both of these offenses they could rack the points up. maybe a N.O. and under tease is the way to go?colts -3.5ETA: already at 4....i was praying we'd see 2.5 like GR posted![]()
sportsbetting at 5so any prediction on movement? I think it will be 4 for at least a week. o/u is 56, which i would think under would be the play, but with both of these offenses they could rack the points up. maybe a N.O. and under tease is the way to go?colts -3.5ETA: already at 4....i was praying we'd see 2.5 like GR posted![]()
wow, how far do you think it will go. over 4 i think has to be a good tease with the Saints, no?sportsbetting at 5so any prediction on movement? I think it will be 4 for at least a week. o/u is 56, which i would think under would be the play, but with both of these offenses they could rack the points up. maybe a N.O. and under tease is the way to go?colts -3.5ETA: already at 4....i was praying we'd see 2.5 like GR posted![]()
great number to tease but there's nothing to tease it with.wow, how far do you think it will go. over 4 i think has to be a good tease with the Saints, no?sportsbetting at 5so any prediction on movement? I think it will be 4 for at least a week. o/u is 56, which i would think under would be the play, but with both of these offenses they could rack the points up. maybe a N.O. and under tease is the way to go?colts -3.5ETA: already at 4....i was praying we'd see 2.5 like GR posted![]()
i think under 62 is reasonable to tease to, but there are 2 weeks for the number to move up from 56 where it is nowgreat number to tease but there's nothing to tease it with.wow, how far do you think it will go. over 4 i think has to be a good tease with the Saints, no?sportsbetting at 5so any prediction on movement? I think it will be 4 for at least a week. o/u is 56, which i would think under would be the play, but with both of these offenses they could rack the points up. maybe a N.O. and under tease is the way to go?colts -3.5ETA: already at 4....i was praying we'd see 2.5 like GR posted![]()
mo do you not remember the conversation we had a few weeks ago? teasing totals, especially 56 pt totals 6 points is bad gambling.i think under 62 is reasonable to tease to, but there are 2 weeks for the number to move up from 56 where it is now
I agree with this 100%mo do you not remember the conversation we had a few weeks ago? teasing totals, especially 56 pt totals 6 points is bad gambling.i think under 62 is reasonable to tease to, but there are 2 weeks for the number to move up from 56 where it is now
mo do you not remember the conversation we had a few weeks ago? teasing totals, especially 56 pt totals 6 points is bad gambling.i think under 62 is reasonable to tease to, but there are 2 weeks for the number to move up from 56 where it is now
that is why i posted here first. only bet so far was i bought .5 pts and bet the Colts -4. i have some good futures with the Saints to win the SB and Brees as MVP, so i am in good shape for now. but thanks for the heads up, you're rightToday damn near any way you teased any game with any total you won. It's not a stretch to think that at some books all 8 teasers hit.The later games the totals are closer to spot on. I can recall lots of super bowl totals within teaser range recently.mo do you not remember the conversation we had a few weeks ago? teasing totals, especially 56 pt totals 6 points is bad gambling.i think under 62 is reasonable to tease to, but there are 2 weeks for the number to move up from 56 where it is now
Complete opposite with games with high totals. Over 1h, under 2h.Anyone else agree with betting the under 1st half and over 2nd half in superbowls?
From what I can recall the only game that didn't hit at least 3 teaser legs in the prior 10 years is TB/OAK. I'm a little hazy on the lines, but I think 9 of the last 10 super bowl totals were within 6 of the number. At worst 8. Still searching.I'm still trying to locate a few numbers, but in general since the salary cap era the super bowls have been much easier to handicap. Lots of people are still of the mindset to think back to the 90s era when blowouts were common.culdeus said:Today damn near any way you teased any game with any total you won. It's not a stretch to think that at some books all 8 teasers hit.The later games the totals are closer to spot on. I can recall lots of super bowl totals within teaser range recently.lumpy19 said:mo do you not remember the conversation we had a few weeks ago? teasing totals, especially 56 pt totals 6 points is bad gambling.modogg said:i think under 62 is reasonable to tease to, but there are 2 weeks for the number to move up from 56 where it is now
Greek opened the ML at colts -155It's shocking to me that the line went from Indy -2.5 over NO before gametime and Indy -5.5 now.I think money is just going to keep pouring in on the colts. Line is in a dead zone right now until it gets to 6.I don't think we'll see a ML of -170 again.MarshallPlan said:Why lay 4 with the Colts, or 5 for that matter? We saw -170 ml for the Saints game tonight - I expect Colts -170 will also be available gameday. -170 a very good bet. And yes under for sure, but with the super bowl there is always more creative ways to bet it.Proptime!!!!
ML for favorites in Super Bowls are always underlayed. This has been very reliable since the first New England disaster.Greek opened the ML at colts -155It's shocking to me that the line went from Indy -2.5 over NO before gametime and Indy -5.5 now.I think money is just going to keep pouring in on the colts. Line is in a dead zone right now until it gets to 6.I don't think we'll see a ML of -170 again.MarshallPlan said:Why lay 4 with the Colts, or 5 for that matter? We saw -170 ml for the Saints game tonight - I expect Colts -170 will also be available gameday. -170 a very good bet. And yes under for sure, but with the super bowl there is always more creative ways to bet it.Proptime!!!!
Your probably right, I never thought this would sniff 6. I made the line 4 myself. I mean the line was 2' before the Saints game. Sure they were lucky and did not play well, but your telling me we give them 4' more pts because of ONE game? Like I said +3 nfc was out there all week and now we will see +6 on gamday. I will be huge on both the +6 (when it shows) and Colts ml - hoping for -180. I can't count how many times I have lost going against Peyton.Greek opened the ML at colts -155It's shocking to me that the line went from Indy -2.5 over NO before gametime and Indy -5.5 now.I think money is just going to keep pouring in on the colts. Line is in a dead zone right now until it gets to 6.I don't think we'll see a ML of -170 again.MarshallPlan said:Why lay 4 with the Colts, or 5 for that matter? We saw -170 ml for the Saints game tonight - I expect Colts -170 will also be available gameday. -170 a very good bet. And yes under for sure, but with the super bowl there is always more creative ways to bet it.Proptime!!!!
no actionI bet Mike bell ov 3' +110 1st attempt. He never got one - no action or a loss?
Well they graded it as a loss. Bet was at betonline.com. Chatted for over a half hour about it, they said all he had to do was play.no actionI bet Mike bell ov 3' +110 1st attempt. He never got one - no action or a loss?
Tough break, I had thegreek grade a prop earlier in the season the same way when moats showed up making a tackle on special teams but never carried the ball. It seems to vary from book to book, my guess is SB would have graded this NA.Well they graded it as a loss. Bet was at betonline.com. Chatted for over a half hour about it, they said all he had to do was play.no actionI bet Mike bell ov 3' +110 1st attempt. He never got one - no action or a loss?
Yes, sb would have graded it NA. I had a Westbrook prop against Dallas on first carry or catch and they graded it no action. I guess it was my fault, but I fully expected Bell to get a carry and +115 on over 3' yds seemed decent.Tough break, I had thegreek grade a prop earlier in the season the same way when moats showed up making a tackle on special teams but never carried the ball. It seems to vary from book to book, my guess is SB would have graded this NA.Well they graded it as a loss. Bet was at betonline.com. Chatted for over a half hour about it, they said all he had to do was play.no actionI bet Mike bell ov 3' +110 1st attempt. He never got one - no action or a loss?
Should move a line 30 cents, not sure on sb props but on all other props that's what i've seen.How have you only had an acct there a few weeks when you were making NBA prop bets there at the end of last NBA season? :(Greek guys:I have only had an account here for a few weeks. Will a max bet on a prop move the line? Max bets on these props they are offering for the sb are $500. I don't know what will move the line and what won't.
Looks like others have read this, it's at -120 nowCalling this a one-horse race no longer does justice to the lead James has over the competition; he's making Secretariat's win at the Belmont seem like a cliffhanger. James is the best player in the league and nobody else is close right now, with LeBron's league-leading 31.51 mark nearly matching his Jordanesque performance of a season ago.James is hitting a career-high 50.9 percent and averaging 29.9-7.9-7.2 per contest, helping Cleveland stay atop the Eastern Conference standings despite the team's struggles to incorporate Shaquille O'Neal. So thoroughly is he dusting the competition that he has more than a third more estimated wins added than any other player.If anything, James' lead on the field has increased. Last season, Dwyane Wade and Chris Paul nearly matched James with their own historically great seasons, plus Kobe Bryant led the Lakers to 65 wins. This season, the field isn't as strong. Wade has upped his play of late after a slow start, but Paul missed several games with an injury and hasn't been as good since he returned, while Bryant has labored through multiple injuries after a strong start.A few other candidates warrant mentioning but similarly fall short of James' ridiculously high standard. Tim Duncan is having the best offensive season of his career, Chris Bosh has been similarly effective for a Toronto team that plays only one side of the floor, and Kevin Durant and Carmelo Anthony have done yeoman's work rounding out what were once one-dimensional games. That said, nobody has seriously matched James' impact in scoring, rebounding, passing and defending, and with the Cavs owning the NBA's best record and a season sweep of the Lakers, this award seems a slam dunk.Honorable mention: Bryant, Bosh, Duncan, Wade, Anthony, Durant
I used to have a local (he cut me off a few weeks ago) that mirrored the greek's lines.30 cents is a lot, that sucks.Should move a line 30 cents, not sure on sb props but on all other props that's what i've seen.How have you only had an acct there a few weeks when you were making NBA prop bets there at the end of last NBA season?Greek guys:I have only had an account here for a few weeks. Will a max bet on a prop move the line? Max bets on these props they are offering for the sb are $500. I don't know what will move the line and what won't.![]()
They might not move 30 cents on SB props and they might not move 30 cents when a new acct bets them, i have no idea. you can re-bet after the line move though and if the line moves back to where you originally bet it you can keep re-betting, there is no cap. If you pound one side and someone else pounds back you can play the game till the accts are empty.I used to have a local (he cut me off a few weeks ago) that mirrored the greek's lines.30 cents is a lot, that sucks.Should move a line 30 cents, not sure on sb props but on all other props that's what i've seen.How have you only had an acct there a few weeks when you were making NBA prop bets there at the end of last NBA season?Greek guys:I have only had an account here for a few weeks. Will a max bet on a prop move the line? Max bets on these props they are offering for the sb are $500. I don't know what will move the line and what won't.![]()
My gambling exploits are fairly-well documented around these parts, so let me start off saying I get where you're coming from. It's a crappy feeling going thousands in the hole, in over your head, and dragging yourself down into debt over such stupidity. It's lonely and scary at times.The good news, as others have mentioned, is you're on the right path here. Do yourself a favor, take control, and force yourself away from it for an extended period of time. I saw you saying in another thread you might lay some cash on the SB. I would say go ahead and place a modest bet -- maybe $100 -- and that's it. Make that your last bet for a year. Maybe seems like counter-intuitive advice, but I think given the magnitude of the SB in our culture and the fact that it's so associated with betting means that rather than worry about temptation, just go ahead, plunk down a SMALL bet, and leave it be.After that, don't gamble for a year. The first thing you'll start to realize is that it's really nice NOT being pissed off all the time about the cash you just blew. The other thing you'll start to realize is that you'll start to have a lot more money than you used to. You'll be able to start paying down your debts and get financially stable. Do yourself a favor and the day after the super bowl sit down and make a budget. Make a financial plan. Give yourself next to zero cushion. Close all your credit cards but one -- pick one that the online betting sites typically reject. Close down every online betting side you can -- send e-mail to their support address letting them know you have a gambling problem and for that reason want them to close your account immediately and permanently. Most of them will honor that and will not let you play there again, ever. You think it's stupid, but I did this, and there were times later when I had the urge and tried to get on and play. They wouldn't let me. I tried to snake my way around it and open new accounts. They wouldn't let me. Hell, PokerStars won't let me back on without a notarized letter from a family member attesting to the fact that I'm reformed. Seems ridiculous, but it works.I've fallen off from time to time and gambled here and there since, but never over my head, and never to the point of financial instability. If I play with hundreds, it's hundreds I can afford to lose. If I break out $3k at the blackjack tables in Atlantic City, it's with the fiance within arms' length, knowing I'm doing it, and us both recognizing that we can lose it all very quickly. It's not mortgage payment money, or wedding money. Which brings me to another point --it's helpful to have someone else involved. We are planning a wedding, and in order to keep myself in check financially, I funnel every last cent I can into our joint account. There's no way I would go gambling with "our" money, particularly money we have an important purpose for, and I'd be much more to plunk down gambling money that is only "mine." So I only gamble with money from my own account, and have a budget to plunk down a certain chunk of my monthly take into our joint account and I don't touch it. It works.One other thing I found that works is finding another less destructive (even if it's not constructive) hobby that I can obsess about and eat up time with. I went out and picked up an Xbox and one of those games that you can play against other people and where you have to spend tons of time to "rank up." Rather than killing my down time at home by sitting in front of the computer playing online poker or blackjack, I would plop down in front of the Xbox. Yeah, still a total waste of time, but it didn't ruin me financially.Like I said, to this day I've gotten hold of it. I still allow myself to gamble here and there -- and I win some and lose some -- but it's never over my head and not destructive like it once was. Yes, you'll hear my pissing and moaning in the shark pool about the stupid 'Aints winning by three and not covering my 4 point spread, and I hate losing, but at least it's not money that I couldn't afford to lose. I still even play online blackjack or poker here and there, but to the tune of a hundred bucks here or there (as opposed to a thousand).Bottom line -- good luck to you. It's a rough thing to go through. But do yourself a favor and take it seriously. Once you pull out of it, you'll look back and be glad you did.Raider Nation said:Just wanted to say goodbye and good luck to all of you, at least as far as this thread is concerned.Putting this into words will help me cope... my version of a G.A. meeting. It's become clear that I cannot gamble like a "normal" person. This has always been evident to me, but I kept denying it. I get $5,000 in my account, and it's gone in two days. I get $2,000 in my account, and it's gone in two hours. Doesn't matter how much I deposit, because it's all going into play. Discipline is the key to beating sports betting, and I have none. I am through sending my hard-earned money to some faceless person in the Philippines or Panama. There is no point in sending money. When I'm on a roll, I don't cash out. I get greedy and end up losing every dime of it. It is insanity defined. I do the same thing over and over and expect a different result.It's not just offshore. I grabbed $1,000 last night and went to the casino after work. Played blackjack and it was all gone within a half hour. That's a nice 45-minute drive home afterwards. I was never up. I would have 20, the dealer would get blackjack. I would have 19, the dealer has 20. I would double-down and get a 20, the dealer pegs to 21. And my expression never changed. I completely, fully expected it.I lost $28,000 to a bookie a few years ago during football season. Had to refinance the mortgage to cover it, and eventually the monthly nut got so large I had to sell the house -- because of gambling. I lost my wonderful girlfriend because I'd rather sit and watch games I had money on than be doing things with her. I don't buy sneakers and clothes very often because I'd rather save all my money to gamble on sports. I'm getting fat because all I do is watch games that I have money on.Some of you will see a little bit of yourself in this post. I hope not though.I'd like to think I'm a strong person, and I refuse to let this get the best of me. I can't say I won't send any money for next football season, but I'm going to try with all my strength not to. I need to get out and live life. Gambling has gotten me nothing, but it has robbed me of cash, relationships, and my reputation within my family. I can't get any of that back, but I can start trying to do something about it.You guys are very cool, and I wish the best for all of you.