What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (5 Viewers)

man I love xanax. I truly feel bad for you guys that have to take those things for real reasons. I just like them for fun. It's been a few years since i've had one, though.

I can only imagine anxiety...my worst fear.
Jcmrx.co. Delivered to your mailbox.
you serious Clark?
Dead serious, eddie.All done through google wallet. You will get a receipt saying you purchased some rare first edition book. At your house in 2-3 weeks.
I do like rare first edition books. ty sir. WILL REPORT BACK

 
man I love xanax. I truly feel bad for you guys that have to take those things for real reasons. I just like them for fun. It's been a few years since i've had one, though.

I can only imagine anxiety...my worst fear.
Jcmrx.co. Delivered to your mailbox.
you serious Clark?
Dead serious, eddie.All done through google wallet. You will get a receipt saying you purchased some rare first edition book. At your house in 2-3 weeks.
I do like rare first edition books. ty sir. WILL REPORT BACK
They usually throw in a few ED pills on the house too.

 
FSU/SMU appear to be winners...any reason to hedge this last Cal ML leg? About a 3 to 1 bet.

Also I hit a 6 to 1 NBA against the spread parlay and added a round robin of 2s of the same 3 bets tonight. Sorry I didnt post it but i'm dancing just the same, great hit for me. (OKC-11.5,Phx-3,Port+6.5)

c'mon Cobb!

 
Anyone ever see "Money Talks" on CNBC, it's a reality TV show about Tout/Scamdicapper Steve Stevens, good for some yucks.

Last week he had a client with a 50k bankroll. Had they guy bet 10 dimes on the first game and lost. Doubled up on the 2nd game and lost. Guy was now down 33k and he had him go to the bank and withdraw more so he could bet 6 dimes on the 3rd game. He won the 3rd game so he ended up +27k - the 50% fee he had to pay Stevens, so +13.5 in all.

Stevens was bragging about how he could go 1-2 and still make the guy money, "Suck it percentages!" What a tool

 
Anyone ever see "Money Talks" on CNBC, it's a reality TV show about Tout/Scamdicapper Steve Stevens, good for some yucks.

Last week he had a client with a 50k bankroll. Had they guy bet 10 dimes on the first game and lost. Doubled up on the 2nd game and lost. Guy was now down 33k and he had him go to the bank and withdraw more so he could bet 6 dimes on the 3rd game. He won the 3rd game so he ended up +27k - the 50% fee he had to pay Stevens, so +13.5 in all.

Stevens was bragging about how he could go 1-2 and still make the guy money, "Suck it percentages!" What a tool
Lump?

 
Dude has no interest in shooting.
Assuming this refers to Cobbs I'm not watching but what exactly is he doing out there? 3 shot attempts so far when he averages 12 and I know he can occasionally have a slow night he hasn't taken less than 6 since December 2nd and he hasn't even been to the line despite averaging 6 attempts per game. Every time I check I assume he's gone into facilitator role or is in foul trouble, but with five assists and 1 foul that isn't anything out of the norm.

 
Dude has no interest in shooting.
Assuming this refers to Cobbs I'm not watching but what exactly is he doing out there? 3 shot attempts so far when he averages 12 and I know he can occasionally have a slow night he hasn't taken less than 6 since December 2nd and he hasn't even been to the line despite averaging 6 attempts per game. Every time I check I assume he's gone into facilitator role or is in foul trouble, but with five assists and 1 foul that isn't anything out of the norm.
He's facilihating my bet is what he's doing. That and trying to be cliff paul with the assist. On every possession.

 
Congats on the parlay, Brosevelt. I counted one kick to the nuts that landed square, a broken nose, and another kick that didn't land. But that one kick was nuts. In my little writeup on Cal yesterday I meant to say that our bro Sagarin made the line ARK -1 instead of ARK +1. That was the whole deal - the fact that he made ARK the favorite yet it opened at Cal -3.5. So maybe that is something to look forward to, Bro-de-lay He-Who.

Did you know that the Knicks are making their trip out west today. They are 2-7 SU and 1-7-1 ATS on the road against the Pacific Division since 2011. But they have been strong as the road favorite 7-2 SU and 6-3 ATS this year. They are also in game one of a B2B tonight.

 
man I love xanax. I truly feel bad for you guys that have to take those things for real reasons. I just like them for fun. It's been a few years since i've had one, though.

I can only imagine anxiety...my worst fear.
Jcmrx.co. Delivered to your mailbox.
I used this place last year, I can vouch for them, though I think they sell something called Tranax (same stuff, different manufacturer i think).

Weird reading the forum today. I've had anxiety over the years, and having the Xanax around just in case, helps immensely. I also suffer from GERD which is probably driven by anxiety. I cut out wheat (which limits carbs), and I've had good success, no GERD episodes since (I usually had 1 every few months - feels like a heart attack, as acid gets stuck in my esophagus, panic attack ensues). Good luck guys fighting this stuff, but I highly recommend JCM.

 
Here are the SU, ATS, and O/U results from the Sweet 16 round the L5 seasons sorted by underdog: link

Dogs went 3-5 SU and 6-2 ATS in this round last year (avg line 5.8). And they are 10-14 SU and 17-7 ATS in this round since 2011 (avg line 5.9).

 
Underdogs receiving more than 50% of the action are 7-7 SU and 10-4 ATS in this round the L5 years. Underdogs receiving less than 50% of the action are 7-19 SU and 12-13-1 ATS in this round during that same time.

 
Bro-de-lay-he-who!

Until Miami figures out the playoff rotation, fading ats is a good idea. Any idea what the heats last 12 game record ats is? I know I've done well last fee weeks going back to that well.

 
In March the Heat are 7-7 SU and 3-9-2 ATS (avg line -6.5). They haven't covered a spread since Mar 16 when they had the Rockets at home. They are 1-5 SU and 0-6 ATS on the road this month (avg line -3.5).

 
They haven't beat the Pacers at Indiana in the regular season since Feb 4, 2012 (0-4 SU and ATS there L4 reg season games against an average line of -0.9). Overall, including the playoffs and the regular season, they are 4-7 SU and ATS at Indiana (avg line -1.7) since Feb 4, 2012.

 
I'm trying to get something down on this Knicks game. It's the only thing I am going to be home in time to watch if you do anything with it. I have no feel for NBA right now. Maybe a prop or something would be cool.

 
Since Feb 25, 2011, the Knicks are 4-3 SU and 2-5 ATS when they lay seven or more on the road. You have to go back to 2001 before you can find a game they laid that many points on the road before then. This is the amount of points they gave the Bucks and Sixers on the road this season, and they went 1-2 SU and 0-2 ATS, winning both games by an average margin of one point.

 
Action Junkie confirmation bias: The Lakers are 7-3 SU and ATS in 2014 against teams like the Knicks who are 12 or more games under .500. Since the trade, the Lakers are 3-2 SU and ATS at home against teams with losing records. The Knicks are 6-9 SU and 5-10 ATS in game one of a B2B this season. You have Gasol out, which is a good thing. He missed the whole 2H when they beat the Magic on Sunday anyway.

The Lakers are 3-7 SU and 4-6 ATS L10. But the average combined record of their opponents in those games was 42-28 (.603). They actually beat the Blazers on the road ten games ago, lost to the Pelicans in the subsequent B2B, got spanked versus the Clips the next game, and then lost to the Nugs in the B2B 260-point game in Denver. Since then it's been two games each versus the Spurs and the Thunder, one of which the Lakers actually won, then a loss to the Wizards and a SU win versus the Magic.

The Lakers have had it rough lately against teams over .500, but screw the Knicks, their thirteen road wins, and their seven points. Their little run is over.

Lakers 100/275

Lakers +7½ 214/200

 
Action Junkie confirmation bias: The Lakers are 7-3 SU and ATS in 2014 against teams like the Knicks who are 12 or more games under .500. Since the trade, the Lakers are 3-2 SU and ATS at home against teams with losing records. The Knicks are 6-9 SU and 5-10 ATS in game one of a B2B this season. You have Gasol out, which is a good thing. He missed the whole 2H when they beat the Magic on Sunday anyway.

The Lakers are 3-7 SU and 4-6 ATS L10. But the average combined record of their opponents in those games was 42-28 (.603). They actually beat the Blazers on the road ten games ago, lost to the Pelicans in the subsequent B2B, got spanked versus the Clips the next game, and then lost to the Nugs in the B2B 260-point game in Denver. Since then it's been two games each versus the Spurs and the Thunder, one of which the Lakers actually won, then a loss to the Wizards and a SU win versus the Magic.

The Lakers have had it rough lately against teams over .500, but screw the Knicks, their thirteen road wins, and their seven points. Their little run is over.

Lakers 100/275

Lakers +7½ 214/200
IN.

 
Anyone ever see "Money Talks" on CNBC, it's a reality TV show about Tout/Scamdicapper Steve Stevens, good for some yucks.

Last week he had a client with a 50k bankroll. Had they guy bet 10 dimes on the first game and lost. Doubled up on the 2nd game and lost. Guy was now down 33k and he had him go to the bank and withdraw more so he could bet 6 dimes on the 3rd game. He won the 3rd game so he ended up +27k - the 50% fee he had to pay Stevens, so +13.5 in all.

Stevens was bragging about how he could go 1-2 and still make the guy money, "Suck it percentages!" What a tool
PSA: When searching the DirecTV online listings, this is for the show "Money Talks" on CNBC, and definitely NOT on Playboy TV. No wonder it didn't record because the purchase wasn't authorized :bag:

 
My hockey futures at RB:

Team Points

2U Calgary U73.5 (-115) - On Pace for 76 points (LOSING, BUT CLOSE)

2U Chicago O103.5 (-115) - On Pace for 110.5 points (WINNING)

2U Buffalo U83.5 (-115) - On Pace for 55 points (WIN)

1U Anaheim O89.5 (-115) - On Pace for 114 points (WINNING)

1U NY Rangers O97.5 (-115) - On Pace for 94 points (LOSING, BUT CLOSE)

1U San Jose O95.5 (-115) - On Pace for 113.5 points (WINNING)

1U NY Islanders O87.5 (-115) - On Pace for 72.8 points (LOSING)

Player Matchups

2U Goals Stamkos > Malkin (-160) (21 < 23 but Malkin injured) - LOSING, BUT SHOULD WIN

1U Goals Neal > Malkin (-115) (23 = 23) - PUSH, BUT SHOULD WIN

1U Goals Perry > Iginla (-125) (37 > 28) - WINNING

1U Goals Moulson > Eriksson (-135) (21 > 8) - WINNING

1U Points Perry > Iginla (-140) (72 > 58) - WINNING

1U Points Eriksson > B.Ryan (+110) (29 < 48) - LOSING

1U Points Marleau > Gaborik (+110) (61 > 18) - WINNING

2U Points M.Koivu > Kesler (-130) (43 > 40) - WINNING
In case anyone tailed on these, things are looking pretty good at the midway mark.

Koivu and Stamkos injuries could wind up really hurting, but still enough time left for those to come through hopefully. The Olympic break this year could help too.
UPDATE:

4-3 now in team point totals (still +3u or so), but the Flames and Rangers bets still have a shot to improve those numbers.

Flames have 67 points and 10 games remaining so they need fewer than 8 points out of a possible 20. They have a pretty tough remaining schedule, but have been playing well of late.

Rangers have 84 points and 9 games remaining so they need 14 points. Basically hoping for a 7-2 or 6-1-2 finish. Their schedule looks pretty easy and they are fighting for the playoffs. (7-3 in their last 10 has helped).

Looks like 7-1 is likely in player point totals, but that Koivu/Kesler one might be tight.

Kesler returned pretty quickly from his injury. In terms of PPG, Koivu at .78 and Kesler at .59 so even if both are healthy, hopefully Koivu can hold on. Couver being eliminated from the playoffs might help them shut him down at some point while the Wild figure to be playing big games right until the end.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very few people could approach 60%, and that's on sides. I'd gather we see a rough 60/40 split of sides to props posted even in here. Makes me think props are where the money is being made, with sides/totals for fun/recreation. Thus, why many Vegas books aren't in the business of props or don't specialize in them (maybe LVH, a select few others). These guys would be pushing props with that said if their intent was really about making clients money. Any schlub "generally" can float around 50% +/- at a point in time if they have a better than casual knowledge of what they're betting on sides/totals.

Reminds me of...the movie Boiler Room/ Wolf of Wall Street/ etc. . How'd those end? Guys like Stevens pushing "plays" to a sales team, that pumps the plays to the other end of the phone. Sometimes, the conspiracy theorist in me believes these boiler rooms operate in line with the mob, selling the other side of mob plays to hopeless smucks who buy the plays from the touts "thinking" they have a leg up from an expert, and effectively move the public numbers in the mob's favor. Just like the guys at the very top in Boiler Room/ Wolf of Wall Street, those guys being the ones making the real money on sides and totals.

 
The Miami/UNC game where they lose and the SEA/ARI game where they win, supposedly the next day after they go and drive cars...those games happened on the same day at the same time.

Miami/UNC: Oct 17: http://espn.go.com/ncf/recap?id=332900153

SEA/ARI: Oct 17 http://espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=331017022

Steve's not the only non-honest operator here.
Not only that - they were played at basically the same time. Someone should write to CNBC and ##### about it.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top