This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I had 5.5 with Denver, not Seattle (no way). I meant to quote your Tebow covers post, oops.Yeah, I could use STL but I hedged for 10 units, hoping for a push or even a middle.I'm on delay so I JUST NOW saw that first TD. Sucks for me with the under. What a BS holding call, shoulda only gave up 3.
the Raven's have beaten 3 playoffs teams and lost by a FG to the Pats.Chiefs haven't beaten any playoff teams, and only played 1 on their schedule.Lost to the Chargers 31-0, lost by 20 to the Broncos, lost to the Raiders TWICE, including today while playing their starters all game.Getting luck to beat the Bills (Bills missed a FG to win the game).Sorry, not buying the Chiefs at all. Raven's haven played a schedule far superior.
I guess. I just don't buy the Ravens being a road fav anywhere in the playoffs. I like teams like the Chiefs. Run the football, smart qb, and a coach who takes risks. Are the Chargers really better then the Chiefs?
6-1 on these and the correlated parlays had 1 loss, 1 push and all wins. Pretty good day on a relatively light Sunday.
God I love that stuff.Caught up on this football game, which should be 3-3, and thinking about halftime lines. Nothing stands out.nothing sweeter than winning a 2h college bball over because of DOUBLE OT
winning that way is better than the pain of losing an under to an OT
It's not 1970, running the football in the playoffs doesn't mean what it used to. People bring up this argument every year and it just isn't the case anymore. With all the rules favoring the offense, insanely sticky gloves for the players(helping receivers catch the ball in crappy weather)......just not a good argument.I do like that their coach has balls and calls the game like it's a video game.
I wouldn't be crazy about taking teasers if I was booking. Keep in mind, teaser options with most old-school bookies include only 2-teams, 6.5 points or 3-teams, 9 points for the same vig. They are in effect protecting you from yourself, which of course isn't their intention. What I mean is, it's very easy to put in a 6-teamer online without thinking about how stupid it is to do that. With a local, I stick to 2-teamers. And in the playoffs, I believe I will win more 2-teamers than I lose since the talent on both teams is *relatively* equal. Games are more likely to be played in the range they are lined. More than in the regular season. That would be my guess anyway. And it's almost always sides. I try to avoid teasing totals, even in the NFL.
Oh, nice - great cover and certainly fair considering the TCU beat for you yesterday. I was afraid they were going to go for 2 there under the guise that, should they get the ball back on the onsides and score a td, they would be up 3.
Haha, nice try. What, did you fade my ###?I like it that right after you posted that, a holding call takes away your expected TD. Sweet revenge (if you were indeed initiating the lock here).Congrats UNDER backers. This one was disgustingly easy.
No ulterior motives, GB. I told you yesterday, I am on a one-week sabbatical. This under is lock city.Haha, nice try. What, did you fade my ###?I like it that right after you posted that, a holding call takes away your expected TD. Sweet revenge (if you were indeed initiating the lock here).Congrats UNDER backers. This one was disgustingly easy.
My question for Jeff would be, how is he selling any picks at all? Aren't CBB totals his bread & butter?
pinny, 5dimes, greek have totals for every game. Some other books copy those but most of the offshore world copies CRIS(like sportsbook.com)
Not going to talk you out of GB because I like them too, but just parlay moneylines all the way through. No value in betting them 6:1 to win the nfc. If you make them +125, +135, +130 that's over 11:1. Even if we make them a 2.5 pt road fav in the nfc title game (-130), that's still 8:1. And this is taking into account Rodgers is very injury prone. Would suck holding a 6:1 ticket with him being out in the divisional round....
Ok. That makes sense.If they win this week they play ATL and probably are in the exact same situation line wise as this week. Could be slightly better if vegas wants to shade it out of the teaser window.
He's missed 2 games in 3 years of being the starter due to a concussion. Wouldn't say he's very injury prone - not even a little bit.
He has had 2 concussions THIS year, the last one being just 3 weeks ago. The guy is one hit from being knocked squarely out of the playoffs. Their running game is helped with his running ability and he will be running from time to time. It's not like he's Peyton Manning who barely gets touched and never runs.Very unlikely he gets knocked out with a concussion, but I'd rather be parlaying moneylines just in case then holding my 6:1 nfc ticket. And obviously I'd rather be parlaying because it will make you more money and you can quit whenever.
Seahawks can surprise at home.
I was hoping someone could talk me out of betting Seattle +10.5, maybe we should call each otherGetting 10.5 points at home in the playoffs
NO up by 17 and seattle scores a meaningless TD with less than a minute to play.
I hear you.I was hoping someone could talk me out of betting Seattle +10.5, maybe we should call each otherGetting 10.5 points at home in the playoffsNO up by 17 and seattle scores a meaningless TD with less than a minute to play.
Dumb question here, but parlay the MLs with who? Can you give me an example for this week?
This.
You seem to do well on College Hoops, what do you feel most strong about tonight?
UPenn, hence the 2u.
Didn't even pay attention to that. I was excited as you posted a ton. You did well this past weekend.
We don't tease across the zeros in this thread GB.We try not to tease totals either.
Teasing totals.
Crossing 0. Doing both. 
