Ok. Last week I went against the thread liking falcons and I tried it here too. I think I won't try that againthen i will roll solo. No doubt Belicheck goes for broke here, wouldn't be surprised to see an onsides kick in the 1st Q, but this will come down to talent. Cincy should win itThread play? I haven't seen much Cincy support in here, and leaning Pats at home myself, regardless of the subpar play so far.And give me Pats ML
Wondering which side to take? Check out PickCenter and do your research before making that critical decision. PickCenter
Football has its answer to Andrea Bargnani!My next billion-dollar wager is going on Dee Ford UNDER whatever his tackle number is. Check out this sweet backpedal (#55).
WTF?
I had to Google this reference: LOLFootball has its answer to Andrea Bargnani!My next billion-dollar wager is going on Dee Ford UNDER whatever his tackle number is. Check out this sweet backpedal (#55).
WTF?
Deadspin doesn't have the video to this one anymore it looks like, but this is amazing:I had to Google this reference: LOLFootball has its answer to Andrea Bargnani!My next billion-dollar wager is going on Dee Ford UNDER whatever his tackle number is. Check out this sweet backpedal (#55).
WTF?
Schefty knows things. Wow, that's scary.
Props, brotha!Pats +220 2H ML
we run thisexpert picks my ###.Schefty knows things. Wow, that's scary.
To be fair (and only to be fair because I'm not a fan) Berman had the Pats as well.Schefty knows things. Wow, that's scary.
So all of these hit (even thought Cle shifted over to a dog), and guess who decided to roll them all into a parlay......and added the Saitns -10?Looking at the above trends, the 3 stand out (heavily sided for both teams) would lean towards:
BUF +7
Since 2004, the Bills following two losses and as dogs of 7 or more points are 6-1 ATS (86%)
Since 2011, the Lions as home favorites of 3 points or more are 7-11 ATS (39%)
CLE -2
In the last 10 years, the Browns as a road favorite are 5-1 ATS (83%)
In the last 10 years, the Titans as home dogs are 10-22 SU (31%) - still have the potential Cle win by 1 here, but it's still strong
NE +1
Since 2001, the Tom Brady era, the Patriots as home dogs are 6-2 ATS (75%)
All-time, 3-0 teams that are road favorites of 3 or fewer points are 6-12-2 ATS (33%)
I am sure there were some garbage trends favoring Nola as well, just like for every other NFL team on any given daySo all of these hit (even thought Cle shifted over to a dog), and guess who decided to roll them all into a parlay......and added the Saitns -10?Looking at the above trends, the 3 stand out (heavily sided for both teams) would lean towards:
BUF +7
Since 2004, the Bills following two losses and as dogs of 7 or more points are 6-1 ATS (86%)
Since 2011, the Lions as home favorites of 3 points or more are 7-11 ATS (39%)
CLE -2
In the last 10 years, the Browns as a road favorite are 5-1 ATS (83%)
In the last 10 years, the Titans as home dogs are 10-22 SU (31%) - still have the potential Cle win by 1 here, but it's still strong
NE +1
Since 2001, the Tom Brady era, the Patriots as home dogs are 6-2 ATS (75%)
All-time, 3-0 teams that are road favorites of 3 or fewer points are 6-12-2 ATS (33%)
I wouldn't call it garbage, but IIRC they Saints had covered their last 9 in a row at home. Moral of the story is I should have played them one off and not parlayedI am sure there were some garbage trends favoring Nola as well, just like for every other NFL team on any given daySo all of these hit (even thought Cle shifted over to a dog), and guess who decided to roll them all into a parlay......and added the Saitns -10?Looking at the above trends, the 3 stand out (heavily sided for both teams) would lean towards:
BUF +7
Since 2004, the Bills following two losses and as dogs of 7 or more points are 6-1 ATS (86%)
Since 2011, the Lions as home favorites of 3 points or more are 7-11 ATS (39%)
CLE -2
In the last 10 years, the Browns as a road favorite are 5-1 ATS (83%)
In the last 10 years, the Titans as home dogs are 10-22 SU (31%) - still have the potential Cle win by 1 here, but it's still strong
NE +1
Since 2001, the Tom Brady era, the Patriots as home dogs are 6-2 ATS (75%)
All-time, 3-0 teams that are road favorites of 3 or fewer points are 6-12-2 ATS (33%)
Just curious, why the over 5 instead of the over 57.5. I would think that if he hits 5 catches, the 57.5 would be hit as well....and he has the chance to get the 57.5 on fewer than 5 catches. Not doubting, just wondering aobut thought processHaving a hard time seeing anything that stands out for tonight.
Just one play on play on the fact the redskins are not very atheltic at all, but dont want to double up on the yards too in case he pulls a 1 target game again.
Harvin over 5 +110
Will prob play these also for super small for action since its fun to be a degenerate...
Morris under 66.4
Jackson under 59.5
Lynch under 15.5 receiving
Harvin over 57.5
He's averaging about 7 yards per catch. Seattle tries to get him the ball in space, alot of plays near the line of scrimmage, little screens, high completion percentage passes, but plays where he might need some blocking or to break a tackle to gain yardage. At his current yards per catch, he'd need 8-9 catches to go over 57'. I'm passing on Harvin but if you're gonna play receptions or yards, data says you play receptions.Tiger Fan, on 06 Oct 2014 - 10:53 AM, said:Just curious, why the over 5 instead of the over 57.5. I would think that if he hits 5 catches, the 57.5 would be hit as well....and he has the chance to get the 57.5 on fewer than 5 catches. Not doubting, just wondering aobut thought processswirvenirvin, on 06 Oct 2014 - 10:36 AM, said:Having a hard time seeing anything that stands out for tonight.
Just one play on play on the fact the redskins are not very atheltic at all, but dont want to double up on the yards too in case he pulls a 1 target game again.
Harvin over 5 +110
Will prob play these also for super small for action since its fun to be a degenerate...
Morris under 66.4
Jackson under 59.5
Lynch under 15.5 receiving
Harvin over 57.5
Meh, wouldn't look at it too hard.Hm, I feel like I had a decent read on the matchups when it came to the QB props. Now I need to incorporate the game script and realize that Rivers won't need to throw it 30 times against the godawful Jets.
:learning:
Hindsight is a good teacher in some regards though.Meh, wouldn't look at it too hard.Hm, I feel like I had a decent read on the matchups when it came to the QB props. Now I need to incorporate the game script and realize that Rivers won't need to throw it 30 times against the godawful Jets.
:learning:
Oliver is what happened.
Jets run D has been pretty good. Oliver just tore them up and got SD out in front a good deal couple with the bigger deal that Jet's couldn't do anything and Rivers didn't need to throw too much
buffalo game was in toronto....kind of an away game for both teams, bills got SMOKED that daysince the beginning of the 2012 season the Seahawks have only beaten a team by 7 or more points 4 times in regular season away games. (BUF 2012, ARI 2013, ATL 2013, NYG 2013).
Main lesson.Hindsight is a good teacher in some regards though.Meh, wouldn't look at it too hard.Hm, I feel like I had a decent read on the matchups when it came to the QB props. Now I need to incorporate the game script and realize that Rivers won't need to throw it 30 times against the godawful Jets.
:learning:
Oliver is what happened.
Jets run D has been pretty good. Oliver just tore them up and got SD out in front a good deal couple with the bigger deal that Jet's couldn't do anything and Rivers didn't need to throw too much
Probably should have been laying off the bet, not picking a side one way or the other because NYJ's performance was a wildcard that directly affected how many times Rivers threw the ball. He had a 73% completion rate weeks 2-4, which held to a T with his 20/28 performance yesterday.
edit: I understand your point though - Rivers threw it 39 times vs the Jags. Just learning and calibrating.
I like that three of the four were in the Eastern time zone. And that the margin of victory in those four games was 33,12,23,23, respectively.since the beginning of the 2012 season the Seahawks have only beaten a team by 7 or more points 4 times in regular season away games. (BUF 2012, ARI 2013, ATL 2013, NYG 2013).
what he saidHe's averaging about 7 yards per catch. Seattle tries to get him the ball in space, alot of plays near the line of scrimmage, little screens, high completion percentage passes, but plays where he might need some blocking or to break a tackle to gain yardage. At his current yards per catch, he'd need 8-9 catches to go over 57'. I'm passing on Harvin but if you're gonna play receptions or yards, data says you play receptions.Tiger Fan, on 06 Oct 2014 - 10:53 AM, said:Just curious, why the over 5 instead of the over 57.5. I would think that if he hits 5 catches, the 57.5 would be hit as well....and he has the chance to get the 57.5 on fewer than 5 catches. Not doubting, just wondering aobut thought processswirvenirvin, on 06 Oct 2014 - 10:36 AM, said:Having a hard time seeing anything that stands out for tonight.
Just one play on play on the fact the redskins are not very atheltic at all, but dont want to double up on the yards too in case he pulls a 1 target game again.
Harvin over 5 +110
Will prob play these also for super small for action since its fun to be a degenerate...
Morris under 66.4
Jackson under 59.5
Lynch under 15.5 receiving
Harvin over 57.5
Moral of the story is that you will never win playing garbage team trends. Guess what, for every trend you show for/against a team, I can produce likewise for their opponent.I wouldn't call it garbage, but IIRC they Saints had covered their last 9 in a row at home. Moral of the story is I should have played them one off and not parlayedI am sure there were some garbage trends favoring Nola as well, just like for every other NFL team on any given daySo all of these hit (even thought Cle shifted over to a dog), and guess who decided to roll them all into a parlay......and added the Saitns -10?Looking at the above trends, the 3 stand out (heavily sided for both teams) would lean towards:
BUF +7
Since 2004, the Bills following two losses and as dogs of 7 or more points are 6-1 ATS (86%)
Since 2011, the Lions as home favorites of 3 points or more are 7-11 ATS (39%)
CLE -2
In the last 10 years, the Browns as a road favorite are 5-1 ATS (83%)
In the last 10 years, the Titans as home dogs are 10-22 SU (31%) - still have the potential Cle win by 1 here, but it's still strong
NE +1
Since 2001, the Tom Brady era, the Patriots as home dogs are 6-2 ATS (75%)
All-time, 3-0 teams that are road favorites of 3 or fewer points are 6-12-2 ATS (33%)
its hard sometimes. You can according to the stats and still lose. Offesnes were calling a pass play 67% of the time vs the Jets coming into that game, but when it turns into a blowout that is going to change. Look at the Jags they blow and get blown out but QB's were still torching them up until last week. Wheaton killed me in draftkings and on the prop bet.Hm, I feel like I had a decent read on the matchups when it came to the QB props. Now I need to incorporate the game script and realize that Rivers won't need to throw it 30 times against the godawful Jets.
:learning:
Can you show us anything you have contributed to the thread besides personal opinion before calling other dudes' info "garbage?" What the hell, dude. TF was just telling you a story about his day yesterday.Moral of the story is that you will never win playing garbage team trends. Guess what, for every trend you show for/against a team, I can produce likewise for their opponent. You're trying to use a mousetrap to kill something that people with atomic bombs can't kill.
Can you show us anything you have contributed to the thread besides personal opinion before calling other dudes' info "garbage?" What the hell, dude. TF was just telling you a story about his day yesterday.Moral of the story is that you will never win playing garbage team trends. Guess what, for every trend you show for/against a team, I can produce likewise for their opponent. You're trying to use a mousetrap to kill something that people with atomic bombs can't kill.
Trends are a huge waste of time. They may be interesting to read but they're useless for betting purposes IMO.Can you show us anything you have contributed to the thread besides personal opinion before calling other dudes' info "garbage?" What the hell, dude. TF was just telling you a story about his day yesterday.Moral of the story is that you will never win playing garbage team trends. Guess what, for every trend you show for/against a team, I can produce likewise for their opponent. You're trying to use a mousetrap to kill something that people with atomic bombs can't kill.![]()
I post my leans, but generally don't back them up with stats unless I have them. Guys in here doing the lord's work pouring over stats and trends that are meaningful and have won over time, don't dismiss their hard work in here please.
also if bridgewater is still out, take the under for the matchupIf Calvin sits next week take Stafford under. Historically his numbers are extremely piss poor without him as we have seen the past two weeks, and in 2013
2013also if bridgewater is still out, take the under for the matchupIf Calvin sits next week take Stafford under. Historically his numbers are extremely piss poor without him as we have seen the past two weeks, and in 2013
This means rushing/receiving right?Russell Wilson to score 1st TD +1500