Cocksucking bookmaker is trying to say Werth over 21.5 HRs is a loser, even though they didn't play 162 games. Yet on the other hand I have a buddy who's with the same book and they are not grading his Dodgers under as a winner...because the Dodgers also didn't play 162. Bottom line is there are a number of player props and team totals affected in this and they are trying to snake both sides of this ####. That's not gonna happen but I want to get my arguments down first. Any ideas? I haven't looked at what major books are doing about this, yet, will have to later... Anyway, is there some precedent(s) here I can look to?Thanks. And while we're on the subject of crooks, I still have yet to go over the Utah fiasco with this same guy. I had Utah (vs SC) pretty big and I had them parlayed to a winner, so all told it was a huge swing. My feeling is he should have ruled it a no-play or at least compromised some, no? But since I was up, he took it off my figure, giving me no choice. Any idea what's my best angle to take here as well (besides the obvious, GFY)?Be back later tonight
, thanks for the input! I think I'm done with this guy after we hash this #### out.
JESUS ####### CHRIST, I just caught this ########## changing one of the totals I lost by adding a zero. Unreal. Luckily I took pics of the screen before season and during, so I have proof. AND he cancelled my 2300/2000 on Kendry Morales under 26 1/2 because he didn't play -- a line that had already been adjusted to the fact he might not. This is getting bad, seriously. All because he owes me a bunch, so he's trying to cut down the debt, thinking the dumb drunk won't notice because I'm still up on him. So ####### pissed right now.
What book is this? Local?Sorry, GB.
Yeah, local, who goes through some big Costa Rica site. Not that it matters all that much, but I know where he lives, has wife and kids and ####, he's not going anywhere, but still. Dumb#### is gonna lose a lot of business over this, the idiot. I was just starting to refer him to people and one guy in Chicago already owes him 40 large.
'hooter311 said:
Wow, that's a #####. If he's doing it to you, he's doing it to others.
He absolutely is, me n' some friends have compared notes already. I've never had a guy go this far to try and screw people. He's hurting right now for sure, must've got killed these last few weeks, which he pretty much admitted. Thing is, he changed sites, but when football started the site crashed and he scurried back to the old one. Since he had to transfer the futures over twice during the process, he thought he could fudge some numbers along the way. He went so far as to change teams with one guy from LAA to LAD. Unreal. We know what he will say. It was the idiots in Costa Rica inputting the wrong numbers and letters...yeah right, you ####### crook. One good thing we have going is futures on teams that didn't complete 162 games -- winners AND losers -- so there is NO WAY he will be able to ride both sides of that BS.
for naught
Put every penny you have on the Phils to win the World Series 
. Got burned real bad last year with them, but i can't see them slumping that bad in a series again.
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
Romo will get a couple deep balls off where, IMO, DET has a bit of a weakness. That said, Romo will definitely be getting teed off on. Surprised DET is getting points here... love them in a tease at +10 
