I agree with this. I also believe that both teams the Cowboys have played are better than most expected.Dallas is an 0-2 team by virtue of correctable errors. By a combined 13 points. They've left about 21 on the field at least.
I have a hard time being objective with the Cowboys because of my utter distaste for that team, but their OL has gotten old and is pretty bad at this point. You can discuss correctable errors, and i didn't see the game today, but the holding by Barron in the game against the Skins saved Romo's life. If he didn't hold, it would have pretty much been a sack. Maybe you 2 are right, but i figure if they can't get up for the home opener against an average team, they will be in for a long year.I agree with this. I also believe that both teams the Cowboys have played are better than most expected.Dallas is an 0-2 team by virtue of correctable errors. By a combined 13 points. They've left about 21 on the field at least.
They are still one of the most talented teams in the NFL. Agreed that their offensive line has shown some age, but every team in the NFL has a weakness.I have a hard time being objective with the Cowboys because of my utter distaste for that team, but their OL has gotten old and is pretty bad at this point. You can discuss correctable errors, and i didn't see the game today, but the holding by Barron in the game against the Skins saved Romo's life. If he didn't hold, it would have pretty much been a sack. Maybe you 2 are right, but i figure if they can't get up for the home opener against an average team, they will be in for a long year.I agree with this. I also believe that both teams the Cowboys have played are better than most expected.Dallas is an 0-2 team by virtue of correctable errors. By a combined 13 points. They've left about 21 on the field at least.
Where are you getting odds like this?Some other plays because I'm bored.
Jacobs un 60' rush yds -115 and ov 52' +100 - more on un
longest fg un 45' -115
manningham un 4' rec +110 and ov 3' -130
eli yes int -160
addai/brown +55' rush/rec yds -135 over jacobs/bradshaw
jacobs 1st rush un 3' yds -115
Good luck guys.
over was at bodog. under was at a website my local uses.Where are you getting odds like this?Some other plays because I'm bored.
Jacobs un 60' rush yds -115 and ov 52' +100 - more on un
longest fg un 45' -115
manningham un 4' rec +110 and ov 3' -130
eli yes int -160
addai/brown +55' rush/rec yds -135 over jacobs/bradshaw
jacobs 1st rush un 3' yds -115
Good luck guys.
NE -12.5hou -2.5week 3 at greekoak +4.5
Agree with this.MarshallPlan said:I think that betting within your bankroll is also very key (and cliche). I typically bet only .5% of my bankroll per play. Obviously some plays are more but I never get over 2% per play and if I do get close it's probably a pretty good bet. It really makes the bad beats a lot easier to take.
Raider Nation said:At first glance, Bet of the Century is Stanford -3½ @ NOTRE DAME. Are they serious with this number?If Notre Dame was called Joe Blow University, but had the same players, this line would be about 10.
The board is moving this to 4.5 right now but for some reason sportsbook.com just moved to 3.5....in for 2uRaider Nation said:At first glance, Bet of the Century is Stanford -3½ @ NOTRE DAME. Are they serious with this number?If Notre Dame was called Joe Blow University, but had the same players, this line would be about 10.
cincy -3(-115) at betonline....with claussen starting this week i like the bengals herelumpy19 said:NE -12.5lumpy19 said:hou -2.5week 3 at greekoak +4.5
I agree on Claussen, it's more of a play against his first start in the NFL, we're not in preseason anymore. I think the opener of 3.5 is the right lineCall me crazy but I thought Claussen looked ok. He's no worse than Moore. That stanford/nd line is just sick. I've stayed off NCAA except for one or two little taps here and there. May have to hit this soon and hard.
You gotta think NE is gonna come strong and its just been announce that bills will be starting a new QB this week.lumpy19 said:NE -12.5lumpy19 said:hou -2.5week 3 at greekoak +4.5
betus has 6.5(-105)....NO wins this game by 6 i'll probably drink myself to deathI can't find 6 at any books i still have limits at, all the dog books don't want my business anymoreSF +6 (+105) at bodog at this point.![]()
I will be cheering for a blowout GB.betus has 6.5(-105)....NO wins this game by 6 i'll probably drink myself to deathI can't find 6 at any books i still have limits at, all the dog books don't want my business anymoreSF +6 (+105) at bodog at this point.![]()
![]()
Wow you guys really like Alex Smith, alot.![]()
foeget smith....i'm a bigger fan of the OC who doesn't properly call plays!!culdeus said:Wow you guys really like Alex Smith, alot.![]()
Safety, 1st possession, YES +22,000?among many pro-sf bets.SF to win every quarter +7000.![]()
had it!!! not. SF looks dreadful.Safety, 1st possession, YES +22,000?among many pro-sf bets.SF to win every quarter +7000.![]()
That seems like a fair line to me based on my ratings of the teams. But Carolina has certainly looked terrible so far...jumped on Cinncy -3 -118 at Carolina. Already bet it, but would like for some of you to tell me why I'm wrong or list reasons why Carolina is the play.
I'm not a fan of the "L word"... but this game could still go either way. One break could make the difference.Honest opinion here: was I an idiot for thinking that Saints -6 was a lock? I'm a rook so I'll take my licks, but I actually saw -6 on Tuesday and grabbed it and then put another .5 unit on a -5 today.Ugh.
Here's the deal....Saints are a better team. But, a home dog is usually a good bet. Further a home dog, that opens at +4.5/5 and the public is all over, yet the line goes to +5.5/6, well, that's not a great sign either. I'm on the Niners a little. But, I also teased the Cowboys and Vikings this week because I love home teams.Don't fall in love with any team/bet.g'luckHonest opinion here: was I an idiot for thinking that Saints -6 was a lock? I'm a rook so I'll take my licks, but I actually saw -6 on Tuesday and grabbed it and then put another .5 unit on a -5 today.Ugh.
Don't sweat it. I mean in general the NFL gambling manifesto has you taking home dogs whenever possible.Honest opinion here: was I an idiot for thinking that Saints -6 was a lock? I'm a rook so I'll take my licks, but I actually saw -6 on Tuesday and grabbed it and then put another .5 unit on a -5 today.Ugh.
I wouldn't call you an idiot but you're probably guilty of overreacting to one week, which is a very common mistake for new gamblers. Before the season, everyone was talking up the 49ers as if they'd be a breakout team. I think that's a bit overrated but they're a team with a very good defense and decent running attack, which is a solid formula. Point is, they're not as bad as they looked in their week 1 game. This line is an overreaction to that game IMO.A great example of this is the Jets this week. Week 1 they host Baltimore and are 2 point favorites. THe next week they host New England and are 3 point underdogs?!? New England is not 5 points better than Baltimore. Hell, they're probably not better at all. But everyone talked all week about how terrible Sanchez was and how the JEts are in real big trouble, etc. Try not to overreact to one week.Honest opinion here: was I an idiot for thinking that Saints -6 was a lock? I'm a rook so I'll take my licks, but I actually saw -6 on Tuesday and grabbed it and then put another .5 unit on a -5 today.Ugh.