Usually within 24 hours.The Ref said:Any idea how long it takes sportsbook to pay out exotics? They put the Obama bet up as no action but the rest are still open.
Also, any ideas on how theywill pay "best comercial"? It ended up being co #1's?
sportsbetting states tie results in no action...not sure on sportsbookThe Ref said:Any idea how long it takes sportsbook to pay out exotics? They put the Obama bet up as no action but the rest are still open.Also, any ideas on how theywill pay "best comercial"? It ended up being co #1's?
March madness just a few weeks away, then MLB, then NBA/NHL playoffs, then CFL, then NCAA football, then fingers crossed NFLNow what?![]()
the primetime portion of the match-up on Fox at an estimated 48.6 rating/71 share in the overnights from approximately 7-10:15 p.m. Here is the half-hour breakdown:Super Bowl XLV (Fox)7:00 p.m.: 46.0/707:30 p.m.: 47.2/718:00 p.m.: 47.4.708:30 p.m.: 48.5/719:00 p.m.: 50.0/729:30 p.m.: 50.9/7210:00 p.m.: 52.3/74As a reminder, results for any live sporting event are always approximate.Comparably, Green Bay vs. Pittsburgh last night outdelivered Super Bowl XLIV: Indianapolis vs. New Orleans on the year-ago evening on CBS (47.9/71 in the overnights on February 7, 2010) by one percent. And it beat Super Bowl XLIII: Arizona vs. Pittsburgh on NBC on Sunday, Feb. 1, 2009 (42.1/65) by 15 percent. As a benchmark, last year's Indianapolis/New Orleans match-up averaged 106.48 million viewers, so it is safe to predict Green Bay vs. Pittsburgh will hover around the 110 million total viewer mark.
So how did these get graded?Raider Nation said:She held "brave" for a loooooooooooooong time. The last sound out of her mouth came at 1:54 on the nose.modogg said:hmm, you sure about this bud? My under 114 seconds won, i certainly am not complaining if 5dimes stopwatch is a little slower then your'sI timed the National Anthem on my stopwatch.
It took exactly 1:54 from the word "Oh" until the word "brave"...![]()
My over 1:50 is still ungraded at SB.Any chance this goes no action since she missed part or all of a line of the song?So how did these get graded?Raider Nation said:She held "brave" for a loooooooooooooong time. The last sound out of her mouth came at 1:54 on the nose.modogg said:hmm, you sure about this bud? My under 114 seconds won, i certainly am not complaining if 5dimes stopwatch is a little slower then your'sI timed the National Anthem on my stopwatch.
It took exactly 1:54 from the word "Oh" until the word "brave"...![]()
As soon as I saw that color of gatorade I thought of this thread.Hit on Gatorade Orange on BetUS

Sportsbook graded over 1:54So how did these get graded?Raider Nation said:She held "brave" for a loooooooooooooong time. The last sound out of her mouth came at 1:54 on the nose.modogg said:hmm, you sure about this bud? My under 114 seconds won, i certainly am not complaining if 5dimes stopwatch is a little slower then your'sI timed the National Anthem on my stopwatch.
It took exactly 1:54 from the word "Oh" until the word "brave"...![]()

WTF? I did it on a stopwatch and calculated 1:53Sportsbook graded over 1:54So how did these get graded?Raider Nation said:She held "brave" for a loooooooooooooong time. The last sound out of her mouth came at 1:54 on the nose.modogg said:hmm, you sure about this bud? My under 114 seconds won, i certainly am not complaining if 5dimes stopwatch is a little slower then your'sI timed the National Anthem on my stopwatch.
It took exactly 1:54 from the word "Oh" until the word "brave"...![]()
![]()
lol WTFSportsbook is paying both sides of the 1:54 according to their twitter
They didn't pay me. Under 1:54 lost.lol WTFSportsbook is paying both sides of the 1:54 according to their twitter
I heard Favre's name mentioned.We had a few novelty prop bets for last night's game and don't think any of them came through.1) Who was shown first? Rodger's girlfriend or Big Ben's fiancee. Didn't see either that I can recall.2) How many times would they show Jerry Jones? Didn't see him once during the game.3) How many times would they mention Brett Favre during the game? Didn't hear his name once.Of course with various interuptions throughout the game there is a chance we missed some so curious to know if you guys heard different.Thx.
Jones was definitely shown once talking to WWe had a few novelty prop bets for last night's game and don't think any of them came through.1) Who was shown first? Rodger's girlfriend or Big Ben's fiancee. Didn't see either that I can recall.2) How many times would they show Jerry Jones? Didn't see him once during the game.3) How many times would they mention Brett Favre during the game? Didn't hear his name once.Of course with various interuptions throughout the game there is a chance we missed some so curious to know if you guys heard different.Thx.
Sportsbook posted me a loss on the under. Should at least be no action.Sportsbook.com spokesman Mike Pierce told CNBC that it had timed out Aguilera’s anthem at both 1:53 and 1:54 and was going to make a determination sometime on Monday.
Lost quite a bit on the Favre name thing. I think I heard it once. I also think that they were given a list of things/people not to bring up. I mean, how is it that Rodgers puts up a MVP performance and they don't compare him once to Favre or what Favre has done by the end of the game? First time playing a prop like this, I think I may have learned something.I got o 2.5 -140, -185, and -210. I thought it was easy money.I heard Favre's name mentioned.We had a few novelty prop bets for last night's game and don't think any of them came through.1) Who was shown first? Rodger's girlfriend or Big Ben's fiancee. Didn't see either that I can recall.2) How many times would they show Jerry Jones? Didn't see him once during the game.3) How many times would they mention Brett Favre during the game? Didn't hear his name once.Of course with various interuptions throughout the game there is a chance we missed some so curious to know if you guys heard different.Thx.
WTF is going on here?
Sportsbook posted me a loss on the under. Should at least be no action.Sportsbook.com spokesman Mike Pierce told CNBC that it had timed out Aguilera’s anthem at both 1:53 and 1:54 and was going to make a determination sometime on Monday.
Update: Sportsbook.com's Mike Pierce said the site is giving money to both sides of the bet. It's the first time in the site's history that they've ever done that on an over/under bet.
I don't know anything whatsoever about hockey, but I'm going to tail this anyway.Hockey tonight:Canucks/Sens over 5.5Until the Sens can prove they can play a game without allowing four goals, I'm going to ride the over with them. Smarter people than me think Vancouver O3.5 is the better bet so I'd suggest grabbing that if you can find it. I think this one is 4-2 or 5-2 though so the Vancouver PL might be attractive for some also. gllllll

I have a boatload on the Vancouver ML at -250. We have the best team in the NHL, who plays even better at home against the worst team in the NHL, who plays even worse on the road. The only thing I fear is a big letdown and not a lot of hard skating from Vancouver after their come from behind win against Chicago. Also, for only having 10 losses, I think more than half of them are against teams with losing records. Just throwing up some information here as I locked my bet in this morning. Keep the hockey plays coming!Hockey tonight:Canucks/Sens over 5.5Until the Sens can prove they can play a game without allowing four goals, I'm going to ride the over with them. Smarter people than me think Vancouver O3.5 is the better bet so I'd suggest grabbing that if you can find it. I think this one is 4-2 or 5-2 though so the Vancouver PL might be attractive for some also. gllllll
Yeah, I was posted a loss for under 1:54. I just got off live chat and they confirmed they are paying out both sides. They said they will fix my bet. And others I have to assume. Check your tickets closely if you made this bet.I don't know why they would pay out the over. If she didn't sing the whole song I would think they would grade it no action. I do see the controversy with the under if they tried to keep the time of 1:54. CNBC says they included the "oh" she did after "brave". That's not right, what if she said, "thank you America, go Green Bay!" after she was done? Would they have included that as part of the song?WTF is going on here?
Sportsbook posted me a loss on the under. Should at least be no action.Sportsbook.com spokesman Mike Pierce told CNBC that it had timed out Aguilera’s anthem at both 1:53 and 1:54 and was going to make a determination sometime on Monday.Update: Sportsbook.com's Mike Pierce said the site is giving money to both sides of the bet. It's the first time in the site's history that they've ever done that on an over/under bet.
Contact their live chat to fix itWTF is going on here?
Sportsbook posted me a loss on the under. Should at least be no action.Sportsbook.com spokesman Mike Pierce told CNBC that it had timed out Aguilera’s anthem at both 1:53 and 1:54 and was going to make a determination sometime on Monday.
Hawks really needed to win that game too. Hats off to the canucks thus far, they look like the best team in the west. A good goaltender helps, and LuLu was playing out of his mind that game against chicago. Jealous hawk fan of team with a real goalie.. The only thing I fear is a big letdown and not a lot of hard skating from Vancouver after their come from behind win against Chicago.
Wouldn't giving the goal and a half be a better value here? -250 seems pretty steep, no?I have a boatload on the Vancouver ML at -250. We have the best team in the NHL, who plays even better at home against the worst team in the NHL, who plays even worse on the road. The only thing I fear is a big letdown and not a lot of hard skating from Vancouver after their come from behind win against Chicago. Also, for only having 10 losses, I think more than half of them are against teams with losing records. Just throwing up some information here as I locked my bet in this morning. Keep the hockey plays coming!Hockey tonight:Canucks/Sens over 5.5Until the Sens can prove they can play a game without allowing four goals, I'm going to ride the over with them. Smarter people than me think Vancouver O3.5 is the better bet so I'd suggest grabbing that if you can find it. I think this one is 4-2 or 5-2 though so the Vancouver PL might be attractive for some also. gllllll
Run and pucklines only cause me pain, but yes I agree its a better value, especially at a + number. I'm just afraid they only turn it on when they need to and we get 2 teams just going through the motions. With these teams going through the motions still means plenty of goals though.Wouldn't giving the goal and a half be a better value here? -250 seems pretty steep, no?I have a boatload on the Vancouver ML at -250. We have the best team in the NHL, who plays even better at home against the worst team in the NHL, who plays even worse on the road. The only thing I fear is a big letdown and not a lot of hard skating from Vancouver after their come from behind win against Chicago. Also, for only having 10 losses, I think more than half of them are against teams with losing records. Just throwing up some information here as I locked my bet in this morning. Keep the hockey plays coming!Hockey tonight:Canucks/Sens over 5.5Until the Sens can prove they can play a game without allowing four goals, I'm going to ride the over with them. Smarter people than me think Vancouver O3.5 is the better bet so I'd suggest grabbing that if you can find it. I think this one is 4-2 or 5-2 though so the Vancouver PL might be attractive for some also. gllllll
See Pitt -1 now.Well, that was fun. Now onto CBB... Pitt +1 at WV looks like a very good bet to me. I also like Kansas at home -10.5.
Jones was for sure on twice. And I didn't really watch all that close.We had a few novelty prop bets for last night's game and don't think any of them came through.1) Who was shown first? Rodger's girlfriend or Big Ben's fiancee. Didn't see either that I can recall.2) How many times would they show Jerry Jones? Didn't see him once during the game.3) How many times would they mention Brett Favre during the game? Didn't hear his name once.Of course with various interuptions throughout the game there is a chance we missed some so curious to know if you guys heard different.Thx.
Tailing. Got 4.5 on Loyola and -17.5 on Iona at sportsbook2u Jacksonville St pk1u Loyola MD +41u Iona -181u Alabama St +2.5153-118 56.5% +30.65u
I like Jacksonville St a lot too. In their first meeting, Tenn. St shot 16 more free throws and only won by 5 at home. Smart money seems to be on Jax St. too.2u Jacksonville St +11u Detroit +2.5so far for me2u Jacksonville St pk1u Loyola MD +41u Iona -181u Alabama St +2.5153-118 56.5% +30.65u
2u Jacksonville St pk1u Loyola MD +41u Iona -181u Alabama St +2.5153-118 56.5% +30.65u
Statistically pucklines are bad bets but there is a time and place for them (I like them in parlays). Ottawa is playing so bad right now that it seems like this would be a great place for a puckline bet, but in the salary cap NHL a long losing streak is gonna stop at some point. Don't think it will be tonight but any team is capable of keeping the game close on any given night.Run and pucklines only cause me pain, but yes I agree its a better value, especially at a + number. I'm just afraid they only turn it on when they need to and we get 2 teams just going through the motions. With these teams going through the motions still means plenty of goals though.Wouldn't giving the goal and a half be a better value here? -250 seems pretty steep, no?I have a boatload on the Vancouver ML at -250. We have the best team in the NHL, who plays even better at home against the worst team in the NHL, who plays even worse on the road. The only thing I fear is a big letdown and not a lot of hard skating from Vancouver after their come from behind win against Chicago. Also, for only having 10 losses, I think more than half of them are against teams with losing records. Just throwing up some information here as I locked my bet in this morning. Keep the hockey plays coming!Hockey tonight:Canucks/Sens over 5.5Until the Sens can prove they can play a game without allowing four goals, I'm going to ride the over with them. Smarter people than me think Vancouver O3.5 is the better bet so I'd suggest grabbing that if you can find it. I think this one is 4-2 or 5-2 though so the Vancouver PL might be attractive for some also. gllllll
4 shots in the 1st period.It's past 7 so you can only get in on a few of these, but my hockey pal likes these for 2 stars.S Weber O 3 Shts -115 (This one was more like 2.5 stars)