This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
10-9. If anybody wants to know exactly what this guy is doing, here it is:Go to espn.com NCAAB schedule. If you have espn insider, you can click on simulation. He looks at each game and anything that the accuscore simulation that they run says has a 60% or better chance of covering, he posts here. I'm also 99% sure that he's not betting these. If he was, he'd realize that Arkansas St. is +5 right now. However, espn's simulation lists it at +3.5, so that's all he looked at. If he actually had placed the bet, you'd think he'd realize that it was +5. And that Boise is -18.5, not 18. And that Brown is +11, not +12.5. And that books charge juice, so when he loses a bet it costs 1.1 units, not 1 as he posted earlier. Trust me, people, this doesn't work long term. If it did, it wouldn't be available to every Tom, ****, and Gussy that pays $2/month or whatever it is for espn insider.
A)Date placed
ec 05, 2011 11:19a Single #235800342 (Placed by Web)Basketball - College Lines (Game) Point SpreadADDED GAME(752) Boise State -18 (-120) Mon@8:00pCompetitor:(751) Idaho StateBought 0.5 points Date placedec 05, 2011 11:19a Single #235800328 (Placed by Web)Basketball - College Lines (Game) Point SpreadADDED GAME(749) Arkansas State +4½ (-115) Mon@7:00pCompetitor:(750) Austin Peay Date placedec 05, 2011 11:19a Single #235800327 (Placed by Web)Basketball - College Lines (Game) Point Spread(741) St John's -1 (-105) Mon@6:00pCompetitor:(742) Detroit Date placedec 05, 2011 11:19a Single #235800326 (Placed by Web)Basketball - College Lines (Game) Point Spread(743) Brown +12½ (-115) Mon@6:00pCompetitor:(744) ProvidenceB)What is your problem dude? I wasn't going to take it personally, and I still really could care less, but it seems you have a problem with what I'm doing here. Is it because I post my overall record since trying this? I posted that the reason I was going to give it a try for a while was because it went 7-1 in the first 2 days of playing. My guess is that it's more likely your own poor performance betting. I'm posting for informational purposes only. Yes. I'm actually playing the picks. If you aren't interested that's fine. Message boards at their finest. Jeebus.
And actually, I didn't realize that I played Ark St. at 4 1/2. It was 3 1/2 when I logged on. It probably changed before I played it and I didn't notice. Otherwise I probably wouldn't have played it. I'm not trying to "prove" anything. I already admitted that I've never had much success at CBB and thought I'd try something for s***s and giggles.A)Date placed
Or, on second hand, I would have since they were getting 4 1/2 not giving. See how little thought I'm putting in to this?And actually, I didn't realize that I played Ark St. at 4 1/2. It was 3 1/2 when I logged on. It probably changed before I played it and I didn't notice. Otherwise I probably wouldn't have played it. I'm not trying to "prove" anything. I already admitted that I've never had much success at CBB and thought I'd try something for s***s and giggles.A)Date placed
My problem is that it's dishonest. First of all, it's simply a lie to post that you're 17-10, because all that matters is what you've posted, as other people have also commented on. Second of all, you're acting like you have some "system" that is magical and mysterious. It's on freaking espn.com. If you were really posting for informational purposes, you'd have said "hey, I'm trying this thing at espn.com, I'll keep the record of it from this point forward but it's done well so far." You're obviously in search of credibility or attention of some sort. Does all of that stuff bother me more than it should? Probably. But in my opinion, you should either keep an honest record of posted picks, posting the line available when you post (like bmj does), or don't post a record.I encourage you to keep posting, hopefully with your honest record. And I'll bow out now. Good luck to ya, sir. Just don't bet too much on those picks, because they won't win in the long run. I promise you that.A)Date placed
It's an anti-Gabbert play more than a pro-Chargers play for me.I have NEVER seen a QB so jittery in the pocket. He sacks himself when the rush is nowhere near him. I really believe he's a total [MEOW] .... if MJD is allowed to run all over S.D., the Jags can and should win. But if the Chargers play even a little bit of run defense, and need Gabbert to come through, they are done.
I'm gun shy about going big against Jax after what they did to the Ravens, but I agree with you. I don't trust the Chargers D to stop MJD but I think they'll keep it close because of Gabbert's ineptitude.
Otis is getting fat, this won't end well.
On cue, they were just showing what you're talking about.But I think they will be able to run on them. Actually only prop I played -- MJD over yards.
I don't believe that I implied anywhere that I was doing some mystical magical anything. I said I was trying a little system just to see how it worked. I never said what it was or wasn't. I also said..........."here's why I'm trying this"..........because I did it for 2 days and it went 7-1. I've posted every play since then. There's no dishonesty. I've always posted the line that I've played at outside of my mistake on the Ark. St. game today. I didn't come here to get fellated by anybody. Just wanted to see how it does. It's played out at just under 63% so far. It may fail, who knows. It keeps me interested. Relax Francis.My problem is that it's dishonest. First of all, it's simply a lie to post that you're 17-10, because all that matters is what you've posted, as other people have also commented on. Second of all, you're acting like you have some "system" that is magical and mysterious. It's on freaking espn.com. If you were really posting for informational purposes, you'd have said "hey, I'm trying this thing at espn.com, I'll keep the record of it from this point forward but it's done well so far." You're obviously in search of credibility or attention of some sort. Does all of that stuff bother me more than it should? Probably. But in my opinion, you should either keep an honest record of posted picks, posting the line available when you post (like bmj does), or don't post a record.I encourage you to keep posting, hopefully with your honest record. And I'll bow out now. Good luck to ya, sir. Just don't bet too much on those picks, because they won't win in the long run. I promise you that.A)Date placed
That's the second time today that somebody has said the exact phrase "Relax, Francis" to me. I should probably go have a drink or 6.
Accuscore is a terrible tool for gambling on games but i've found it pretty useful for other gambling aspects.ETA: to be less cryptic, the simulations sometimes point out team strengths vs team weaknesses in the NBA. A few years ago the lakers were terrible against smaller faster guards....the accuscore projections showed aaron brooks of houston having an abnormally huge game against the lakers. The only success i've found with accuscore is the NBA.
Well this doesn't happen often.
Go get em GooRoo...I think my team is now officially dead with Forte out. You carry the torch from here, it was fun while it lasted. I'll be watchinWins me one of those fbg players championship fantasy leagues. Big shout-out to Wick for finishing 4th overall in total points.19?Novak u 19 pts is the only thing I'm very interested in tonight
I haven't been playing all the 60% plus plays that a few think I am, however, the plays I have been playing have all been above 60%. I was very close to laying off of the St. John's play today, not sure why I didn't. The line move in the Arkansas St. game ended up making that game a winner. Outside of the first 2 days that jeff insists I ignore it's gone about .500 for me in 5 days, assuming Boise hangs on. I know I've had 3 really good days, 1 ofer day and a couple of 50-60% days. Who knows. Just looking for an edge. It may be no better than if I was just picking games that I thought would hit. Thought I'd give it a try.
You couldn't lay off St. John's because while looking at the accuscore simulation, you noticed that St. John's had a starter named God'sgift, and you felt divine intervention (along with a 60% simulation) were good enough to take down my hometown Detroit Titans on the night where our own God'sgift, **** Vitale, had the court named after him. Accuscore is awesome baby, ITS UNBELIEVABLE, primetime simulator, ohhhhh!
Actually wanted to lay off because St. Johns is incredibly young and I don't think Detroit is that bad of a team. Oh, and a little known fact that I was at a game YEARS ago when Dickie V came and gave a mediocre Nebraska basketball team a pre-game speech right before they went out and beat a highly rated Kansas team. Thought it might be an emotional night. St. John's is going to be a tough team to predict all year. Very young, very talented. And yes, they have Gods Gift.
He's horrible. One of the worst QB'd games I've seen in a long time. That's what you get for spurning the Huskers chump.
I think Charv is pretty solid, but he doesn't seem to be around much anymore.My NBA "system" may be perfect for you! It's all "Which team scores first" props, so, you know, it's over quickly.
Joke, right?
Joke, right?
Okay, good. You can never be sure around here. MP actually bets stuff like that.Joke, right?
Okay, good. You can never be sure around here. MP actually bets stuff like that.Joke, right?
Okay, good. You can never be sure around here. MP actually bets stuff like that.Joke, right?
Follow RickJSportPlays on twitter, 5-6 hockey plays a week, definitely with an edge. Actually all his stuff is good, very low volume but usually action on at least a game or 2 a day.
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
Is he that much of a lock to win it or is there some sick value over there aside from him?Heisman OTB at Sportsbook
I think the numbers a little high but I think RGIII is surprisingly going to win it.
