What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (9 Viewers)

Falcons moved from 11 to 11.5 to 12. You guys feel comfortable laying that kind of wood?

I already have dough on the ATL team total over 27. It's now at 27.5.

I can see a final of 34-13 or so.
Up to 13.5 at most casinos. :eek: Does that say blowout?? I certainly dont feel comfortable laying that much with Atlanta. I think ill just make a small play on the overs.
I guess that's a yes.
 
I would like to key most of my teasers off of one of these teams.

They are all favored by 6.5, so we'd be laying 0.5.

Saints (AT MINN)

Titans (AT INDY)

Giants (home vs. Wash)

Which of those favorites is LEAST likely to lose outright?

I keep going back to the Saints. Yes, it's on the road, but it's indoors which they prefer. Also, Brees will TORCH those Vikings safeties. The only thing that worries me is that Peterson is back, but Ponder is still not 100%.

What say you?

 
FYI jokingly texted buddy (who also is leaning on roddy white this week in semis of a cash league) that I expected 6/150/2 out of Roddy tonight. Final line, 10/135/2 :excited:

 
Saints

Vikings won't be able to hang.

The Colts could pull it off at home for sure. Titans are banged up. Plus only be right for my Lions to be 0-16 alone..lol

Grossman had great games against the Giants last year if I recall correctly. Also NY could be in for the "let down" after the big win against Dallas.

 
Texans and Cards are at home, I think I like those two better than the Titans.
Definitely looking hard at Houston, but DAMN it's hard to trust the Cardinals with actual legal tender.
I play three a week, I think my three teams will be the Giants/Texans/SaintsCards are playing pretty well right now though, I might play them mid-day with all the options.
 
For anyone eyeballing the NE/Den game - not only has the line moved to 6.5 it is now -115 NE.

Personaly I have NE at -6 and I'm going to dare Deacon Tebow into making me pay, but it does look this will get to 7 for you believers... sort to speak.
Already on this at 6. Probably put a little more on 6.5. Also on NE TT over 26. Pulling an RN so to speak on the Pats this week. Hopeful for the same result.
This line seems high to me. NE was 7.5 over Washington. How is Denver only one point better than Washington? Add on top of that Denver has a better homefield advantage. I'm sure I'll be on Denver. Also love the over here. NE can't stop anybody; their defense is atrocious.
I don't bother with what a spread was last week, and this team beat that team, so that team should kill this team, etc...This is a step up in class for Denver. Tebow won't be able to withstand a slow start in this one IMO. If he goes 3/16 thru 3 quarters, he'll be down by a lot more than 10 points. I also think Denver's D is a bit overrated. They've been exposed a few times against good offenses.
Ha! THe only reason Tebow hasn't look good for more than a quarter is because he hasn't had to.He can give as many quarters as needed..

 
So I have never been a teaser guy, but the talk I am hearing is intriguing.

You choose favorite that have a money line of -240 or more and laying 6 or more points?

Is that the only qualifier and is that correct?

I realize this has been covered ad infinitum in here, but its all in little bits, spread like shotgun pellets throughout 500 pages.

 
So I have never been a teaser guy, but the talk I am hearing is intriguing.

You choose favorite that have a money line of -240 or more and laying 6 or more points?

Is that the only qualifier and is that correct?

I realize this has been covered ad infinitum in here, but its all in little bits, spread like shotgun pellets throughout 500 pages.
Most of the guys here look to cross the two key numbers (3 & 7). If you like a dog which is getting 1.5, you use the six points and you are now getting 7.5, and in the process you have "crossed" the two key numbers upon which NFL games land most frequently -- 3 and 7. (Side note: some also have a general rule of thumb when teasing dogs UP... don't bet them if you don't think they have a legitimate shot to win the game outright.)Then you have the 7.5, 8 or 8.5 point favorite which you tease down to -1.5, -2 and -2.5 respectively. Thus, you have again "crossed" 3 and 7, only in the opposite direction.

While Wong teasers are the best bang for your buck, I'll tease any side (NFL, not college, and never totals).

For example, if I have a conviction that a team laying 2.5 will cover, I'll bet them straight minus the 2.5, and I might throw them in a teaser or two at +3.5. That is what's known as "crossing zero," and doing so will earn you ridicule and scorn in a forum such as this one. But I look at it as maximizing money-making opportunities on a game I really like. I wouldn't suggest making a habit out of this practice, but every now and then I'll see a spot for it. Similarly, I don't mind taking a 12 point favorite and knocking them down to -6.

 
3 team 10 point teaser:

Patriots +3 @ Broncos (It'll take more than Jesus for Tebow to beat the Pats by a TD)

Bengals +3.5 @ Rams (Bradford probably out and the Bengals still in the playoff hunt)

Browns +17 @ Cardinals (Cleveland has played far tougher teams and kept it close, Cardinals haven't won a game by more than 5 points)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pending12/18/11 1:00pm NFL Football 309 New Orleans Saints -½ +105* vs Minnesota Vikings

Pending12/18/11 1:00pm NFL Football 316 Houston Texans -½ +115* vs Carolina Panthers

Pending12/18/11 1:00pm NFL Football 317 Tennessee Titans -1½ +115* vs Indianapolis Colts

Pending12/18/11 1:00pm NFL Football 319 Cincinnati Bengals -½ +105* vs St. Louis Rams

I like GB teased to -8.5 too.

 
Teaser philosophy:

Teasing 3 at +180 or more is always the best bet. Teasing 3 all the way to +160 is supposedly still EV under tight guidelines.

Home teams laying 7.5 to 8.5 or getting 1.5 to 2.5 tease 6 blind and don't even bother to see who the teams are. -Decidedly +EV

Road teams under the same guidelines is also +EV but has proven long term to not pay out quite as well

If you want to key something key something from the above two lists. This is basic information that everyone knows.

Other good teaser strategies I like when there aren't many teams in above list

Home team +3 -120 or higher total less than 48

Home team -7 -120 or higher total less than 45

Marginal teasers that apply

Road teams that apply from above list

All teams laying or getting points crossing either the 7 or 3 with a total of 42.5 or less.

Teasing 6 teams by 3s and 4s is my basic strategy. I will usually pick the "best" 6 that apply. If more than 6 apply by basic strategy then I will do more.

Questions, comments, concerns?

 
So I have never been a teaser guy, but the talk I am hearing is intriguing.

You choose favorite that have a money line of -240 or more and laying 6 or more points?

Is that the only qualifier and is that correct?

I realize this has been covered ad infinitum in here, but its all in little bits, spread like shotgun pellets throughout 500 pages.
teasers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Raider Nation said:
And do the Colts have ANY interest in winning? Seriously? They are thisclose to Luck, and they know it.
Pretty sure its a done deal at this point though. They can win this week and still get him.
 
'Raider Nation said:
And do the Colts have ANY interest in winning? Seriously? They are thisclose to Luck, and they know it.
Pretty sure its a done deal at this point though. They can win this week and still get him.
You've seen/heard about the gigantic billboards in town plastered with "SUCK FOR LUCK". The fanbase is rallying around this zero win season, absolutely bizarre.
 
I have been painstakingly building an access database with historical lines and results. It currently is nowhere near where I want it to be but progressing. 1. What sites are out there for historical lines? The main one I use is SBR2. If the historical information is available, what should be included?3. Is there anything like this out there where easy queries could be run without having to go to a bunch of different sites. If not, is there any $ value to get this done quicker?
it costs money but kostats.com is the best i've found for sports data
 
'Raider Nation said:
And do the Colts have ANY interest in winning? Seriously? They are thisclose to Luck, and they know it.
Fwiw, I saw a report earlier this week on PFT that if Caldwell doesn't win at least 1 game he's a goner.
 
any of you guys interested in making some money for good ol' JTG in these bowls?Let's hear it doods.
Trends for tomorrow's games:Utah State to even money nowGame total rising Temple down to 7game total risingULL/SDSU locked in, I don't think anyone can get a read on it to be honest. What I'm on: USU/Ohio over, Temple/Wyoming under
 
any of you guys interested in making some money for good ol' JTG in these bowls?

Let's hear it doods.
Trends for tomorrow's games:Utah State to even money now

Game total rising

Temple down to 7

game total rising

ULL/SDSU locked in, I don't think anyone can get a read on it to be honest.

What I'm on: USU/Ohio over, Temple/Wyoming under
I'm on the opposite side of both those.....hope you go 0-2 :thumbup:
 
any of you guys interested in making some money for good ol' JTG in these bowls?

Let's hear it doods.
Trends for tomorrow's games:Utah State to even money now

Game total rising

Temple down to 7

game total rising

ULL/SDSU locked in, I don't think anyone can get a read on it to be honest.

What I'm on: USU/Ohio over, Temple/Wyoming under
I'm on the opposite side of both those.....hope you go 0-2 :thumbup:
Rough, man.
 
'Raider Nation said:
And do the Colts have ANY interest in winning? Seriously? They are thisclose to Luck, and they know it.
Fwiw, I saw a report earlier this week on PFT that if Caldwell doesn't win at least 1 game he's a goner.
:mellow: won't be coaching the Colts next year regardless of what happens in the final three games.
I agree with you that :mellow: will be gone after this year. I don't, however, think he and the coaching staff have packed it in yet.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top