bryan11joseph
Footballguy
It has more to do with the 2H line than anything. Obviously if the 1H is low scoring, the linesmakers aren't going to put out a ridiculously high 2H #. You know what I mean?It is more about capitalizing on small discrepencies in the line.Clem/GA Tech went under 1st, you bet over 2ndKSU/Mizzou went over 1st, you bet under 2ndNo. I could see why you think that though, being that I bet the 1H lines. I am considering dropping the 1H plays, they are just additional plays/hedges.I am better with examples!If it's X more than the 1st half total, you take the under 2ndIf it's Y less than 1st half total, you take the over 2ndBased on your statement, I am guessing you think I am simply taking the Avg Pts? Is that correct?I don't think CBB totals are efficient enough to assume they will always regress towards the mean. Curious to know how far back you looked.1u on Michigan / Northwestern OVER 67.52H O/U PLAYS (at the Half):
7pm GAMES
2u on Kansas State / Missouri UNDER 74 LOSS
2u on Clemson / Georgia Tech OVER 64.5 LOSS
2u on Georgetown / Seton Hall UNDER 68.5 WIN - Middled it
2u on Illinois / Ohio State UNDER 69.5 LOSS
EDITED to add my plays as the other games reach half-time.
No?
So for example, the Clemson game. 1H line I took u55.5
I had Clemson o120 for the GAME.
Since the 1H went UNDER, you think I went with the OVER.
Right?
It's easy to come up with thinking I would use that theory because since you know I bet all unders 1H... there are only 4 potential scenarios.
1H-2H-GAME
U-U-U
U-U-O
U-O-O
U-O-U
Georgetown/Seton went over 1st, you bet under 2nd
IL/OSU went over 1st, you bet under 2nd
Mich/NW went under 1st, you bet over 2nd
VA/VA Tech went over 1st, you bet under 2nd
KY/Miss St went over 1st, you bet under 2nd
NM/CSU went under 1st, I assume you bet over 2nd
Say the GAME line is 130 - that means the 1H will ALWAYS be 60.
Say the teams combine for 57 for the 1H.
The line for the 2H usually comes out around 71, depending...
So now, just because it went under, doesn't mean I automatically take the over.
Because say they score 63 in the 1H and the line is still 71 - you're saying my bet would change entirely to the other side? The UNDER?


schwartzel stanley
after the Spurs second half debacle, i hit Tiger pretty good. If that mother f'er loses, Kurt will be contributing quite a bit to me going on a stringent diet and losing weight....
What's not to like about Poulter? To say Bae is untested against the big boys is an understatement.



I am not making a living gambling nor am I doing it for any other reason than for the rush.Thats just me though, I am sure you guys are more serious about it.