Raider Nation said:3:40 pm - New York Metropolitans +135
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CPlF-IEkXQGoing with a square Pens/Ducks parlay tonight, fairly big.
The ####### death smoochBut hey at least over 5.5 (2units) hits!Raider Nation said:3:40 pm - New York Metropolitans +135Going with a square Pens/Ducks parlay tonight, fairly big.
Really wish I would listen to my gut more often. Six goals before the 2nd period is done.With the fireworks in these two early games, I'm wondering if Stars/Ducks o5.5 (+120) is worth a shot.
I took it for 1/10 of your unit or 2x mine. So thanksReally wish I would listen to my gut more often. Six goals before the 2nd period is done.The under was -140.With the fireworks in these two early games, I'm wondering if Stars/Ducks o5.5 (+120) is worth a shot.
Thumb up good call.Going with a square Pens/Ducks parlay tonight, fairly big.
Between you and arud I ended up taking Habs/pens/nets/stars +1.5Only I would have to sweat a hockey game where the home team had a 4-goal lead!![]()
I'll take it.... got my money's worth in excitement, anyway.
GJ. I like the "hedges" where I have a shot to win everything.... the Stars +1.5, for example. But the cost (-190) didn't do it for me.Between you and arud I ended up taking Habs/pens/nets/stars +1.5Only I would have to sweat a hockey game where the home team had a 4-goal lead!![]()
I'll take it.... got my money's worth in excitement, anyway.
Perfect finish! Ty sir. Do it again tomorrow
That was a parlay, 3 heavy favs and a slight dog. I thought it was toasty at 0-4 so it's like free $$.GJ. I like the "hedges" where I have a shot to win everything.... the Stars +1.5, for example. But the cost (-190) didn't do it for me.Between you and arud I ended up taking Habs/pens/nets/stars +1.5Perfect finish! Ty sir. Do it again tomorrowOnly I would have to sweat a hockey game where the home team had a 4-goal lead!![]()
I'll take it.... got my money's worth in excitement, anyway.
You were 100% dead on with this last night.got_nugs said:Toss in the cavs ml in a parlay. -275 now, Brooklyn wants to lose tonight.
I'm also playing -6.
Gl
Blind acorns and squirrels or something.You were 100% dead on with this last night.got_nugs said:Toss in the cavs ml in a parlay. -275 now, Brooklyn wants to lose tonight.
I'm also playing -6.
Gl
Like the totals. Tough night to pick straight-up winners. I'm inclined to take every road team, though the Flyers scare me a bit.Flyers/Rangers OVER 5 -110
LAK +120
Blackhawks/Blues UNDER 5.5 -140
One of the cookiest and smuggest people I've ever seen on TV."My goal is to bet 30k a game."![]()
THE NUGGET IS AFRAID OF STEVE STEVENS.One of the cookiest and smuggest people I've ever seen on TV."My goal is to bet 30k a game."![]()
I know the show is more about entertainment than gambling but my god are his analysis blurbs cringe-worthy.
"Uconn has lost 6 in a row and they aren't gonna start winning now!" (right, that's why they are 28 point dogs dooshbag)
"Air Forces defense is garbage!"
Terrible
Only -8.5.
I noticed that too. Wasn't it like 45-37?New Mexico apparently beat Air Force 28-17 in some weird alternate-reality last year. CNBC is part of this sham, they're not just objectively covering this clown.
Yep. And the spread was NM -3.I noticed that too. Wasn't it like 45-37?New Mexico apparently beat Air Force 28-17 in some weird alternate-reality last year. CNBC is part of this sham, they're not just objectively covering this clown.
I grew up on D'Alessandro's but I know that they changed owners a few years ago and now suck.Phily guys>Steve's Prince of Steaks, Tony Lukes, or D'Alessandro's?
Good start. The Phillies game is gonna be scoreless in the 15th, and I already bought out of the Tigers play in live betting because Salazar looks better than Verlander.Tigers -153
Braves/Phils o7
Ugh, that's sad to hear. Last time I had D'Alessandro's was almost a decade ago. So, so good, I lived in Manayunk at the time and got sandwiches there alotI grew up on D'Alessandro's but I know that they changed owners a few years ago and now suck.Phily guys>Steve's Prince of Steaks, Tony Lukes, or D'Alessandro's?
Yeah I grew up in Roxborough myself and that was really the only place we ever got steaks from.mquinnjr said:Ugh, that's sad to hear. Last time I had D'Alessandro's was almost a decade ago. So, so good, I lived in Manayunk at the time and got sandwiches there alotScoobySnack said:I grew up on D'Alessandro's but I know that they changed owners a few years ago and now suck.Doctor Detroit said:Phily guys>Steve's Prince of Steaks, Tony Lukes, or D'Alessandro's?![]()
If that's all true, I'd go Tony Luke's, can't go wrong. Can also try the pulled pork, you can't lose any which way though.