3.5 what for Richardson?Catches? Seems high.Wayne under 65.5 -115
Richardson over 3.5 +110
Edelman over 5.5 -105
Last edited by a moderator:
3.5 what for Richardson?Catches? Seems high.Wayne under 65.5 -115
Richardson over 3.5 +110
Edelman over 5.5 -105
This has to be bradshaw o 3.5:tail: on Richardson and Edelman.Wayne under 65.5 -115
Richardson over 3.5 +110
Edelman over 5.5 -105What props you got tonight Swirve?
Actually getting TRich O2.5 receptions -110 and Edelman O5.5 receptions +100,
![]()
I can't remember 4hours of football that was worse. On every level. (Well all except Rodgers and GB of course)ok, Eagles. F off. you only had to get ov 24.5. you have 1st and goal on the 4 and that is what you do
crap.... I'm sorry Its bradshaw3.5 what for Richardson?Catches? Seems high.Wayne under 65.5 -115
Richardson over 3.5 +110
Edelman over 5.5 -105
hmmmm. I will start with Pats +2 1st half, and go from there.In Luck's two games after the bye, he was outscored 21-3 in the first half of both games. The Colts would end up outscoring the opposing 27-6 and 24-3 in the 2H of those games and win both of them SU and ATS. Also, both games went over. link
So maybe Pats win 1H and lose game?
I'm on o67.5 for a uHard to believe Edelman is +100, based on average target volume (8.75/game) and receptions (6.0/game) in what is perceived to be an absolute shootout. Might add another 1U onto this one with no vig.
You're not worried that the world is on the Pats but the book is still giving them 3 points? I think they could move it to 2.5 and still get plenty of Patriot action.hmmmm. I will start with Pats +2 1st half, and go from there.In Luck's two games after the bye, he was outscored 21-3 in the first half of both games. The Colts would end up outscoring the opposing 27-6 and 24-3 in the 2H of those games and win both of them SU and ATS. Also, both games went over. link
So maybe Pats win 1H and lose game?
I agree with you. I'm chasing a little here, so hopefully it all ends well. I think i like a Bill Belicheck team coming off a bye, playing what might be their last big game of the regular season. I figure they know this is one of the few teams that they will be competing with for home field advantage. I do get a little worried with this likely being a heavy public side, but sometimes the public is right.You're not worried that the world is on the Pats but the book is still giving them 3 points? I think they could move it to 2.5 and still get plenty of Patriot action.hmmmm. I will start with Pats +2 1st half, and go from there.In Luck's two games after the bye, he was outscored 21-3 in the first half of both games. The Colts would end up outscoring the opposing 27-6 and 24-3 in the 2H of those games and win both of them SU and ATS. Also, both games went over. link
So maybe Pats win 1H and lose game?
Also, that's not something the Colts are going to do three years in a row.. get down in that hole early?
3.5 what for Richardson?Catches? Seems high.Wayne under 65.5 -115
Richardson over 3.5 +110
Edelman over 5.5 -105
Rushing yards, imo.3.5 what for Richardson?Catches? Seems high.Wayne under 65.5 -115
Richardson over 3.5 +110
Edelman over 5.5 -105
It's hard to argue against taking either one of these teams. It's a trip that both of them are coming off the bye. I am just now realizing that within the last fifteen minutes. Trying to dig some stuff up on that.Am I the only person who likes the Colts tonight? I haven't placed any wagers, but I like Saw's note about Luck being 2-0 ATS & SU after the bye. Small data set, but still...
That's ####### sick... I might just sit this one out.Since 1990, the home team coming off a bye and the opposing team coming off >10 days of rest (I figured >10 days of rest was the equivalent of the other team coming off the bye):SU: 53-40-1 (2.98, 57.0%)ATS: 47-47-0 (1.22, 50.0%) avg line: -1.8How nuts is it that the ATS record is .500.
Indy -6.5 +155You have to bet something dude. Sports bettors don't pass this game up. It's a learning experience, if nothing else.
I took Hilton and Lafell to score a TDHilton o5.5
Bradshaw o74.5 rush+rec
Lafell u5
i couldn't find first tds. I need to spend some time on that siteTook LaFell 1st TD. I always lose everything.
OopsIndy -6.5 +155You have to bet something dude. Sports bettors don't pass this game up. It's a learning experience, if nothing else.
Excellent man! So, you on some good drugs right now? Maybe you're in a different plane of reality and we can exploit your unique temporary vision status.