What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (9 Viewers)

0.5 point per reception. Would you rather be team A or team B tomorrow night?

Team A - Up by 4 points with Martellus Bennett

Team B - Down by 4 points with Alshon Jeffery

 
Yeah, I'm team B. Normally I'd be very confident but Bennett has been a target monster the last two games. He's now option 1B with Marshall out.

Oddly enough, I'm in the same position with the same players against Aaron and Team GMTAN, but that lead is much safer.

 
Yeah, I'm team B. Normally I'd be very confident but Bennett has been a target monster the last two games. He's now option 1B with Marshall out.

Oddly enough, I'm in the same position with the same players against Aaron and Team GMTAN, but that lead is much safer.
So bet on Bennett props...win win :hifive:

 
0.5 point per reception. Would you rather be team A or team B tomorrow night?

Team A - Up by 4 points with Martellus Bennett

Team B - Down by 4 points with Alshon Jeffery
Similar, but non-PPR:

Team A: Up 6.2 points with Jimmy Graham

Team B: Down 6.2 points with Matt Forte

I am team A, and I am scared. Might play some Forte/Graham props to hedge tonight.

 
Frostillicus said:
Oregon State -24
btw if you want to tail and have a book that takes forever to put lines up I don't care what this line is as long as it's under 30 I'd play it.
Georgia Tech -16.5
-17 now. still a play or was 16.5 the ceiling?
I don't use a system for college basketball or anything, so generally as long as it's within 2 points I'd still play it.

 
Nothing today unlss another book posts something later. Hard to trust Sean Payton offense and seeing Eric Lorig, Josh Hill, Travis Cadet, and Ben Watson catching all the passes

Lean/action play on Stills over 4 +105, and Cutler over 24.5 -120

 
TF> My last Bovada check cleared collections today so I wouldn't sweat it.
how long did it take? and just so I know we're on the same page...you're talking about a foreign bank transaction,r ight?
I often write checks from one bank account to another bank account. I wrote a check 10/31 that cleared 11/04. Another 11/27 that cleared 12/02. But I had one I deposited 11/14 that didn't clear my other account until 12/09. I'm not sure what happened, but it can happen to US checks as well so I wouldn't sweat too much yet.

 
TF> My last Bovada check cleared collections today so I wouldn't sweat it.
how long did it take? and just so I know we're on the same page...you're talking about a foreign bank transaction,r ight?
I often write checks from one bank account to another bank account. I wrote a check 10/31 that cleared 11/04. Another 11/27 that cleared 12/02. But I had one I deposited 11/14 that didn't clear my other account until 12/09. I'm not sure what happened, but it can happen to US checks as well so I wouldn't sweat too much yet.
tjnc09, what your seeing with those checks is probably more about when they were deposited by whoever you gave them to. With the electronic cash letter transmittal through the FED now a days. it should only take 1 maybe 2 days to go from bank to bank.

Foreign checks on the other hand are a whole different ball game with conversion and going through several levels of banks.

 
TF> My last Bovada check cleared collections today so I wouldn't sweat it.
how long did it take? and just so I know we're on the same page...you're talking about a foreign bank transaction,r ight?
I often write checks from one bank account to another bank account. I wrote a check 10/31 that cleared 11/04. Another 11/27 that cleared 12/02. But I had one I deposited 11/14 that didn't clear my other account until 12/09. I'm not sure what happened, but it can happen to US checks as well so I wouldn't sweat too much yet.
tjnc09, what your seeing with those checks is probably more about when they were deposited by whoever you gave them to. With the electronic cash letter transmittal through the FED now a days. it should only take 1 maybe 2 days to go from bank to bank.

Foreign checks on the other hand are a whole different ball game with conversion and going through several levels of banks.
I was writing checks to myself to transfer money from one account from bank A to another account at bank B. The 11/14 check had funds available within 1-2 days in the account I deposited it to, but the funds weren't withdrawn from the other until 12/09 (so for 3 weeks I thought I won free money :bag: )

 
Nothing today unlss another book posts something later. Hard to trust Sean Payton offense and seeing Eric Lorig, Josh Hill, Travis Cadet, and Ben Watson catching all the passes

Lean/action play on Stills over 4 +105, and Cutler over 24.5 -120
Unacceptable....please look again

Thanks

 
I read this dude's free NBA pick of the Spurs tonight:

I realize the Spurs are playing the second of a back-to-back after beating the Nuggets 99-91 on the road last night, but they aren’t any more tired than the Blazers right now. Portland will be playing its 5th game in 7 days, which is one of the toughest situations in the NBA. This is the Spurs’ 5th game in the last 9 days. link
Since 2012 the Blazers playing their 5th game in seven days when their opponent is on B2B: 10-2 SU and 9-3 ATS (avg line -2.1). As the favorite: 8-0 SU and 7-1 ATS (avg line -5.2). I paired the Blazers with the Bulls. The Bulls are 6-0 SU and ATS versus the Hawks since Jan 14, 2013, and 6-0 SU away before returning home this season, two of which were on zero rest. The Bulls are without Noah again tonight. He was declared out about an hour ago and the line went to 2½. He didn't play last night, either.

The Hawks are a good team, and I heard Kenny say something about being the best team nobody knows about the other night on NBATv after the Kings game. They are 9-1 SU L10, but seven of those wins were against teams with losing records. Just some action junkie stuff since I'm not trying to watch football tonight.

Bulls 120

Bulls/Blazers 225

 
TF> My last Bovada check cleared collections today so I wouldn't sweat it.
how long did it take? and just so I know we're on the same page...you're talking about a foreign bank transaction,r ight?
Yes, it was a Canadian check that had to go through collections. This had been taking 5-7 business days usually, but this time it took nearly 3 weeks. Not bad still, but out of the ordinary.

 
I read this dude's free NBA pick of the Spurs tonight:

I realize the Spurs are playing the second of a back-to-back after beating the Nuggets 99-91 on the road last night, but they arent any more tired than the Blazers right now. Portland will be playing its 5th game in 7 days, which is one of the toughest situations in the NBA. This is the Spurs 5th game in the last 9 days. link
Since 2012 the Blazers playing their 5th game in seven days when their opponent is on B2B: 10-2 SU and 9-3 ATS (avg line -2.1). As the favorite: 8-0 SU and 7-1 ATS (avg line -5.2). I paired the Blazers with the Bulls. The Bulls are 6-0 SU and ATS versus the Hawks since Jan 14, 2013, and 6-0 SU away before returning home this season, two of which were on zero rest. The Bulls are without Noah again tonight. He was declared out about an hour ago and the line went to 2½. He didn't play last night, either.

The Hawks are a good team, and I heard Kenny say something about being the best team nobody knows about the other night on NBATv after the Kings game. They are 9-1 SU L10, but seven of those wins were against teams with losing records. Just some action junkie stuff since I'm not trying to watch football tonight.

Bulls 120

Bulls/Blazers 225
Really like that Blazers play. Mcbob out for season (prolly) for Miami. At least I got '11 and '12 on dvr. Sigh.

Thoughts on chi/atl under?

 
Jene and I both on Curtis Lofton U9.5 tackles (was -115 at BV and -125 at 5d last I checked).

projections have him right around 10, but Chicago crew is very tough so he'll have to earn it. Busy day for Forte could get him there, but still think it's likely he winds up under.

 
Yeah, I'm team B. Normally I'd be very confident but Bennett has been a target monster the last two games. He's now option 1B with Marshall out.

Oddly enough, I'm in the same position with the same players against Aaron and Team GMTAN, but that lead is much safer.
pfft
Had I lost, I would have been the first one to bump that thread to congratulate you guys. :shrug:
Just messing with you GB. All is good. :hifive:

 
Nothing today unlss another book posts something later. Hard to trust Sean Payton offense and seeing Eric Lorig, Josh Hill, Travis Cadet, and Ben Watson catching all the passes

Lean/action play on Stills over 4 +105, and Cutler over 24.5 -120
Unacceptable....please look again

Thanks
It's Sean Payton and his stupid offense's fault. All 3 RB's are back now for the first time in a while. Then on Chicago side not sure how they run without Marshall. Forcing to Jeffery and Bennett? Will it be a 10 carry day for Forte or 23 carry?

 
Jene and I both on Curtis Lofton U9.5 tackles (was -115 at BV and -125 at 5d last I checked).

projections have him right around 10, but Chicago crew is very tough so he'll have to earn it. Busy day for Forte could get him there, but still think it's likely he winds up under.
also available at SB at -125 currently

 
Thinking of taking a chance on Bree's under 27.5 completions and under 302.5 passing yards. The temps aren't bad for chicago in december, but the precipitation might hamper things. Its not pouring or torrential, but I think it might come into play. Anyone else with thoughts on either of these.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top