What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

FFA Wagering Thread: THERE HE IS!@! (11 Viewers)

Anybody ever have trouble using the BetOnline mobile app? I keep submitting bets and then they don't show up as pending and my balance stays the same.

My balance might now be zero
had that happen once. i sent them an email about it and they said it was due to technical difficulties that had been resolved.

none of the bets I was submitting ever took. I thought they locked me out or something for awhile, but turned out to be nothing big.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aaron Rudnicki said:
swirvenirvin said:
The Ref said:
What car is sponsoring the MVP award this year? If it's still caddy tom Brady can't/won't win the award. That would make for some real value on the non tom patriots players.
huh
yeah, this makes no sense.
Sorry. When I posted this I had just finished up a 12 hour omaha session at 4am.

What I mean is Tom Brady won the Super Bowl MVP in 2001 and 2003. Each time he got a Cadillac for his efforts. Only thing is when you accept the car you agree to a certain amount of sponsorship commitments. Well things didn't work out between Cadillac and Brady. They ended up in court with lawsuits and it got ugly. So much so that in 2004 Cadillac put the word out that Brady was not to win the award. It was widely speculated at the time that Cadllac put the fix in for second best, this time D Branch.

So the point in getting at here is if Cadillac is still the sponsor there must be some value in other patriot players. Brady was at +175 and every other patriot was +800.

 
Aaron Rudnicki said:
swirvenirvin said:
The Ref said:
What car is sponsoring the MVP award this year? If it's still caddy tom Brady can't/won't win the award. That would make for some real value on the non tom patriots players.
huh
yeah, this makes no sense.
Sorry. When I posted this I had just finished up a 12 hour omaha session at 4am.

What I mean is Tom Brady won the Super Bowl MVP in 2001 and 2003. Each time he got a Cadillac for his efforts. Only thing is when you accept the car you agree to a certain amount of sponsorship commitments. Well things didn't work out between Cadillac and Brady. They ended up in court with lawsuits and it got ugly. So much so that in 2004 Cadillac put the word out that Brady was not to win the award. It was widely speculated at the time that Cadllac put the fix in for second best, this time D Branch.

So the point in getting at here is if Cadillac is still the sponsor there must be some value in other patriot players. Brady was at +175 and every other patriot was +800.
Tom Brady's stats: 236 yards with 2 TD/0 INTs

Deion Branch had 11 receptions for 133 yards.

seems a bit :tinfoilhat: to say the sponsor dictated who won this award.

some additional background here: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2212948

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anybody ever have trouble using the BetOnline mobile app? I keep submitting bets and then they don't show up as pending and my balance stays the same.

My balance might now be zero
This problem showed up for me recently as well. Better check your pending bets u might have loaded up on your 1 bet. It's really annoying.
Anybody ever have trouble using the BetOnline mobile app? I keep submitting bets and then they don't show up as pending and my balance stays the same.

My balance might now be zero
had that happen once. i sent them an email about it and they said it was due to technical difficulties that had been resolved.none of the bets I was submitting ever took. I thought they locked me out or something for awhile, but turned out to be nothing big.
Hm, okay thanks. One bet actually did take and is showing in pending. I also can't log in unless I use the activation email link they sent me again (again). Yeah, it's definitely annoying.

 
Seahawks average 8 penalties a game (most in the NFL), and are the beneficiaries of penalties 4.44 times a game (32nd in the NFL!)

The Pats average 7.39 penalties a game (2nd most in the NFL), but are the beneficiares of penalties 5.67 times a game (25th most in the NFL).

Seahawks first penalty -115

 
Gotta read the Pats investigation thread. :lmao:

Trolls trolling trolls who are calling the trollers trolls, idiots, trolls, ####s and ########s

Almost EVERYONE, calling others trolls while trolling the thread. It's like a wrinkle in the space time continuum.

What a waste of bandwidth.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There were 21 safeties scored in 256 games this year, 20 last year. I think they used to be around YES +1000/NO -2000, but they've probably moved them down due to the recent string of SB safeties. I personally think the recent spate has been pretty fluky, I still think there's about a 7-8% chance of there being a safety.

 
Gotta read the Pats investigation thread. :lmao:

Trolls trolling trolls who are calling the trollers trolls, idiots, trolls, ####s and ########s

Almost EVERYONE, calling others trolls while trolling the thread. It's like a wrinkle in the space time continuum.

What a waste of bandwidth.
I love it. I haven't stopped by a shark pool thread this often in a long time.

The cheats are going to lose 1-4 round draft picks for 5 years!!!!!

 
Gotta read the Pats investigation thread. :lmao:

Trolls trolling trolls who are calling the trollers trolls, idiots, trolls, ####s and ########s

Almost EVERYONE, calling others trolls while trolling the thread. It's like a wrinkle in the space time continuum.

What a waste of bandwidth.
I love it. I haven't stopped by a shark pool thread this often in a long time.

The cheats are going to lose 1-4 round draft picks for 5 years!!!!!
Bill B. will also have to wear a scarlet letter on his forehead. League will decide if it's a "C" for cheater or a "U" for underinflated.

 
Harden under 28

Curry under 39.5 p,r,a,
in on curry. Harden at 26.5 now at bovada
28 was at sportsbook.ag

Ive been playing these including those MCW ones from a few days ago based on twitter daily league nba gurus
Links?
Joe Kaiser @JoeKaiserSports · 4h4 hours ago
Beverley plays as good of D on Curry as anyone not named CP3, and Klay Thompson absolutely smothered Harden on D in last week's meeting.

View conversation
0 replies1 retweet5 favorites Reply
Retweet1
Favorite5
More
Belmont, CAJoe Kaiser @JoeKaiserSports · 4h4 hours ago
The more I think about it, the more I'm going to fade Stephen Curry and James Harden in my #DFS lineups tonight. Here's why...

 
Gotta read the Pats investigation thread. :lmao:

Trolls trolling trolls who are calling the trollers trolls, idiots, trolls, ####s and ########s

Almost EVERYONE, calling others trolls while trolling the thread. It's like a wrinkle in the space time continuum.

What a waste of bandwidth.
I love it. I haven't stopped by a shark pool thread this often in a long time.

The cheats are going to lose 1-4 round draft picks for 5 years!!!!!
:lmao: :lmao:

25 pages, 3 days after the game was played. 2 or so days into investigation rumors.

 
There were 21 safeties scored in 256 games this year, 20 last year. I think they used to be around YES +1000/NO -2000, but they've probably moved them down due to the recent string of SB safeties. I personally think the recent spate has been pretty fluky, I still think there's about a 7-8% chance of there being a safety.
If I could get 15 cents I think no safety would be a good bet this time around.

 
Frostillicus said:
Frostillicus said:
St. John's -5.5

Northern Iowa -13
Penn State +12.5

TAMU/Mizzou u 126.5

UMass/St. Joe o 131

Houston/Cincy u 124

New Mex/UNLV o 122.5
Bovada: Meeks (unc) o 12.5p
Sportsbetting:

House (tamu) o 16p+r
Wright (utah) o 23.5p+r+a
p or p+r+a? Be careful there.
The header says p+r+a, but then the over/under part says just points. 23.5 is clearly a p+r+a line so that's what I played. Am I gonna get screwed here?

 
Frostillicus said:
Frostillicus said:
St. John's -5.5

Northern Iowa -13
Penn State +12.5

TAMU/Mizzou u 126.5

UMass/St. Joe o 131

Houston/Cincy u 124

New Mex/UNLV o 122.5
Bovada: Meeks (unc) o 12.5p
Sportsbetting:

House (tamu) o 16p+r
Wright (utah) o 23.5p+r+a
p or p+r+a? Be careful there.
The header says p+r+a, but then the over/under part says just points. 23.5 is clearly a p+r+a line so that's what I played. Am I gonna get screwed here?
Grab a screenshot

 
Been tailing a "system" type NBA guy the last few days or so to some success. I'm not playing full units on all of his leans, and staying away from some of his leans also. Here's what I'm playing tonight:

Cavs -9 1/1

Heat TT under 89 (-115)

Hornets -6

Hawks -11

Nets/Kings under 197 1/2

1/2 unit plays:

Grizz -6

Mavs/Wolves under 215 1/2

LAL/NO under 203 1/2

Hou/GS over 217 1/2

 
Frostillicus said:
Frostillicus said:
St. John's -5.5

Northern Iowa -13
Penn State +12.5

TAMU/Mizzou u 126.5

UMass/St. Joe o 131

Houston/Cincy u 124

New Mex/UNLV o 122.5
Bovada: Meeks (unc) o 12.5p
Sportsbetting:

House (tamu) o 16p+r
Wright (utah) o 23.5p+r+a
p or p+r+a? Be careful there.
The header says p+r+a, but then the over/under part says just points. 23.5 is clearly a p+r+a line so that's what I played. Am I gonna get screwed here?
Grab a screenshot
Screenshot would still be inconclusive now that I look. Chatting with customer service to get clarification and will get a screen shot of that.

 
Frostillicus said:
Frostillicus said:
St. John's -5.5

Northern Iowa -13
Penn State +12.5

TAMU/Mizzou u 126.5

UMass/St. Joe o 131

Houston/Cincy u 124

New Mex/UNLV o 122.5
Bovada: Meeks (unc) o 12.5p
Sportsbetting:

House (tamu) o 16p+r
Wright (utah) o 23.5p+r+a
p or p+r+a? Be careful there.
The header says p+r+a, but then the over/under part says just points. 23.5 is clearly a p+r+a line so that's what I played. Am I gonna get screwed here?
Assuming he's not going to go over 23.5 pts. best case would be no action.

 
Frostillicus said:
Frostillicus said:
St. John's -5.5

Northern Iowa -13
Penn State +12.5

TAMU/Mizzou u 126.5

UMass/St. Joe o 131

Houston/Cincy u 124

New Mex/UNLV o 122.5
Bovada: Meeks (unc) o 12.5p
Sportsbetting:

House (tamu) o 16p+r
Wright (utah) o 23.5p+r+a
p or p+r+a? Be careful there.
The header says p+r+a, but then the over/under part says just points. 23.5 is clearly a p+r+a line so that's what I played. Am I gonna get screwed here?
Grab a screenshot
Screenshot would still be inconclusive now that I look. Chatting with customer service to get clarification and will get a screen shot of that.
What? I grabbed a screenshot of the wager offered and it clearly show pra

 
Frostillicus said:
Frostillicus said:
St. John's -5.5

Northern Iowa -13
Penn State +12.5

TAMU/Mizzou u 126.5

UMass/St. Joe o 131

Houston/Cincy u 124

New Mex/UNLV o 122.5
Bovada: Meeks (unc) o 12.5p
Sportsbetting:

House (tamu) o 16p+r
Wright (utah) o 23.5p+r+a
p or p+r+a? Be careful there.
The header says p+r+a, but then the over/under part says just points. 23.5 is clearly a p+r+a line so that's what I played. Am I gonna get screwed here?
Grab a screenshot
Screenshot would still be inconclusive now that I look. Chatting with customer service to get clarification and will get a screen shot of that.
What? I grabbed a screenshot of the wager offered and it clearly show pra
It says pts in one spot though too.

 
Well if they grade it a loss the screenshot will get the push.....but he's gonna score 24 pts and not make us sweat this anyway

 
Remainder of WED Pucks:

Flames (+170) at Ducks-Both teams are 4-1 in their last 5. Flames are among the streakiest teams in the NHL, winning 4 in a row, coming off of losing 3 in a row, off of winning 4 in a row, off of losing 8 in a row, off of winning 4 in a row..........you get the point. 23 year old Joni Ortio has been hot in the net since getting the callup, giving up 5 goals in his 4 starts, and now gets his 5th start in a row. The +170 is entirely too high of a number and I'll be riding the Flames again here after the nice win against San Jose for me. I'm also going to throw a 1/2 unit at the OT-Y +280 play. Bear in mind I'm bucking the trend here as Calgary hasn't won in Anaheim since 04!

Kings (EV) at Sharks-Neither team is playing great right now. I do think the Kings are the more talented squad, but can't look to back them with them playing the way they are. I don't like SJ at (-120) here either. I DO, however, like the overtime play, which I'll play.

Wednesday Puck Plays:

Flames (+170)

Jets REG Time -1/2 (EV)

1/2 units

Leafs TT under 2 1/2 (-105)

Flames/Ducks OT-Y (+280)

Pens/Hawks OT-Y (+270)

Kings/Sharks OT-Y (+270)

 
Adding Charleston -2. Not really sure what is happening as this line is OTB some places. Freddie Jackson, 15.5 PPG was announced probable at about 9am, but line moved for UNCW about 30 min later from -1.5 to 0. That isnt too significant but since then went past -2 for CC and I assume some buy back on UNCW at 2.5. Majority of action is on UNCW which I will fade anyways.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top