Wilbur Wood
Footballguy
We have fantasy playoffs fast approaching (weeks 13-16 for most).
What do people who are fortunate enough to own both Boldin and Fitzgerald think about the need to "diversify" by moving one of these WR's for a comparable WR talent? Any logic?
My own view is that if were to move one I would probably move Boldin and keep Fitz. Would someone like Greg Jennings or Owens (assuming that you view them as "like assets") be a better blend for the playoffs which are a "1 and done" format?
Back ~ 2 years ago both Fitz and Boldin were Top 5 WRs and both frequently produced each week. I think it was David Yudkin who postulated how unusual that dynamic is and that one shouldn't count on it again. However, 2008 Arizona remains Air Arizona and absent an injury to Warner I don't really see the rest of 2008 being any different than the climate that resulted in 2 Top 5 WRs on the same team in 2006 (heck, Breaston is even a legitimate WR#3 starter in deep leagues).
Interested in what folks think?
My $0.02 is keep them both (unless you extract some extra value that addresses a weakness elsewhere).
What do people who are fortunate enough to own both Boldin and Fitzgerald think about the need to "diversify" by moving one of these WR's for a comparable WR talent? Any logic?
My own view is that if were to move one I would probably move Boldin and keep Fitz. Would someone like Greg Jennings or Owens (assuming that you view them as "like assets") be a better blend for the playoffs which are a "1 and done" format?
Back ~ 2 years ago both Fitz and Boldin were Top 5 WRs and both frequently produced each week. I think it was David Yudkin who postulated how unusual that dynamic is and that one shouldn't count on it again. However, 2008 Arizona remains Air Arizona and absent an injury to Warner I don't really see the rest of 2008 being any different than the climate that resulted in 2 Top 5 WRs on the same team in 2006 (heck, Breaston is even a legitimate WR#3 starter in deep leagues).
Interested in what folks think?
My $0.02 is keep them both (unless you extract some extra value that addresses a weakness elsewhere).