Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Game Thread W10 - Washington V Philadelphia (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Andy Hicks
- Start date
Yes, he did.
azngangster
Footballguy
So Portis is out for this game.
Do you think he will be back next week?
Do you think he will be back next week?
Billy1x
Footballguy
No chance. If he has surgery at least out for a game. If not then 6 weeks or more.So Portis is out for this game.
derek19
Footballguy
I guess we were looking at two different replays because he didn't make a step, or NFL move, whatever you wanna call it....
jerseys finest
Footballguy
id doubt it at this point. the season seems to look more and more like its lost for the skins and portis' right hand is his dominant hand for carrying the ball. I guess it depends on how badly his hand is broken, where the break is, and if its actually a break afterall.So Portis is out for this game.
It is also possible we are looking at the same play and it is a judgement call.
Last edited by a moderator:
I just looked at the play in slow motion on my dvr. Brown caught it, made a move and the ball was knocked out. Looks like it was the correct call - a catch and a fumble.No chance. If he has surgery at least out for a game. If not then 6 weeks or more.So Portis is out for this game.
fatness
Footballguy
Why do they always decapitate the head? Why not decapitate a foot or something?Brunell looks bad, by the way. Nothing new there.
jerseys finest
Footballguy
if portis is done for more then just this game(which seems likely), i fully expect to see jason cambell next week with the way brunell is playing.
BigRed
Footballguy
Perfect. That hissing sound is my playoff chances leaking away.When he did and Fragile Freddy switch uniforms?
BigRed
Footballguy
I'd figure them to start Betts instead.[/lame joke]Portis' status won't make a diff on what QB starts.
Grace Under Pressure
Footballguy
poor clock management by Gibbs giving McNabb a chance
Are those empty seats I'm seeing? How hard is it raining?
J
J
redman
Footballguy
This game is a great play by Dawkins and a bizarre tipped ball (assuming a defensive stop) away from being 10-10. Strange game.
McNabb's looked worse than Brunell since that long pass to Stallworth, and that's saying something.
Going back to my other post about Betts > Portis today, I stand by that. Portis looked a step slow today. I think his ankle is bothering him more than he was letting on. He outran no one and was falling forward rather than still moving his legs when he made first contact. Betts looks fresh and explosive. Moot point now with the broken hand, but that's what I was seeing.
I'm frustrated that the 'Skins can't seem to find any sort of blocking combo that allows them to take deep shots to Lloyd or Moss or Randle El. This dink and dunk stuff ain't cutting it.
McNabb's looked worse than Brunell since that long pass to Stallworth, and that's saying something.
Going back to my other post about Betts > Portis today, I stand by that. Portis looked a step slow today. I think his ankle is bothering him more than he was letting on. He outran no one and was falling forward rather than still moving his legs when he made first contact. Betts looks fresh and explosive. Moot point now with the broken hand, but that's what I was seeing.
I'm frustrated that the 'Skins can't seem to find any sort of blocking combo that allows them to take deep shots to Lloyd or Moss or Randle El. This dink and dunk stuff ain't cutting it.
SaintArnold
Footballguy
?Donde esta L.J. Smith?
before they come back and rule on the westbrook reception at the 2...
was ruled a catch and down by contact...
on replay looks like it may have been a fumble but my question is since it was ruled down by contact can the skins be given the ball as a fumble recovery? i can see it being ruled incomplete but can they get it as a fumble recovery since the play technically is blown dead at contact?
was ruled a catch and down by contact...
on replay looks like it may have been a fumble but my question is since it was ruled down by contact can the skins be given the ball as a fumble recovery? i can see it being ruled incomplete but can they get it as a fumble recovery since the play technically is blown dead at contact?
dparker713
Footballguy
Skins got jobbed on that review. That was clearly a fumble by Westbrook.
fred_1_15301
Footballguy
Do refs ever get an obvious call right?Terrible. That was clearly a fumble, ball clearly came out before he was touched.This whole replay thing is idiotic. Hey let's have one guy look at it on a 7" screen
bump for edit
Hammered Finz
Footballguy
WOW.. clearly a fumble.. cost the Skins 3..
Looked to me like he was touched before the ball was all the way out./shrug
Utter Chaos
Footballguy
New NFL rules for 2006: • Down by contact calls may be reviewed by instant replay. Previously, a fumble was not reviewable if the ball carrier was ruled down by contact. If the ruling of down by contact is changed, the ball belongs to the recovering player at the spot of the recovery of the fumble.
Reason for the change: Provides a mechanism for correcting an obvious on-field officiating error.
http://nfldraft.scout.com/2/556118.html
edit to add link
Last edited by a moderator:
Utter Chaos
Footballguy
Because decapitate means "to cut off the head of". So you want them to cut off the head of a foot?
OneEastRiver
Footballguy
About to post the same thing. Especially considering Westy's injury history and knee problems. Makes no sense.
fatness
Footballguy
:whoosh:
Last edited by a moderator:
Jestefarean
Footballguy
Did Lemar Marshall really not put up one single number?!??!
Similar threads
