That FG gives them a chance to drive for the win if the defense gets a stop. If the defense doesn't get a stop, it didn't matter either way.Your logic is very bad...A FG gives them a chance at the win.Seriously??? If they go for it and miss their defense can still get them the ball back. A FG does nothing for them.They have to. The defense has played well enough to give them a shot at a last drive.You've gotta be kidding me. You are going to kick the FG here?
I'm not interested in arguing about what name we should give that type of kick.You usually are good at backpedaling.This isn't one of those times.I know that I didn't want to waste time trying to distinguish the difference between that and a conventional kick...That wasn't an onside kick.I hate the onside kick too. The field is wet and there's an increased likelihood the Steelers may muff a conventional kick. By doing an onside kick, you just made it easier to recover it AND give them good field position to start.
But if they convert on 4th down and score a TD on that drive, then things are very different.That FG gives them a chance to drive for the win if the defense gets a stop. If the defense doesn't get a stop, it didn't matter either way.Your logic is very bad...A FG gives them a chance at the win.Seriously??? If they go for it and miss their defense can still get them the ball back. A FG does nothing for them.They have to. The defense has played well enough to give them a shot at a last drive.You've gotta be kidding me. You are going to kick the FG here?
Any Mendenhall sightings? Is he getting Gatorade for everyone else?
He's not gonna see the ball here, that is for certain.I wasn't arguing about what name we give the kick.I was pointing out that you're a moron.I wouldn't expect you to notice the difference, though.I'm not interested in arguing about what name we should give that type of kick.You usually are good at backpedaling.This isn't one of those times.I know that I didn't want to waste time trying to distinguish the difference between that and a conventional kick...That wasn't an onside kick.I hate the onside kick too. The field is wet and there's an increased likelihood the Steelers may muff a conventional kick. By doing an onside kick, you just made it easier to recover it AND give them good field position to start.
The defense doesnt need a stop if they convert the 4th and 7. It wasnt 4th and a mile and they were at the 20. The FG was a dumb call.That FG gives them a chance to drive for the win if the defense gets a stop. If the defense doesn't get a stop, it didn't matter either way.Your logic is very bad...A FG gives them a chance at the win.Seriously??? If they go for it and miss their defense can still get them the ball back. A FG does nothing for them.They have to. The defense has played well enough to give them a shot at a last drive.You've gotta be kidding me. You are going to kick the FG here?
I don't think they are getting the ball back unless the steelers score a TD.And that's gonna put Romeo on the hot seat.Cleveland doesn't get the ball back. Game over. Good thing they got the extra 3 points!
What he saidCleveland doesn't get the ball back. Game over. Good thing they got the extra 3 points!

Good thing they kicked the FG!Ball game.
Braylon Edwards definitely got hit before the ball got there and my guess is that the crowd was booing the lack of an interference call and then the decision to punt.I don't think they are in a hurry. Sure looked like he got hit before the ball was there.5:00 left, at the Steeler 26. Down 10-3. Do you run the hurry up to try to score quickly and get the ball back, or milk the clock and play for OT?
Astoundingly poor clock management. Yet... we have these discussions every year, where coaches call a timeout at 2:42, which saves roughly 2 or 3 seconds effectively, rather than let the next play go off at 2:03 and save the timeout for after the two minute warning.How can a league where hundreds of millions of dollars are spent per franchise and likely at least $5 million for every coaching staff (and above $10M for some I suppose) not get this right?It's crazy to me how dumb coaches are with their timeouts.
They had to gamble on either the offense or defense. The offense hasn't played well yet so they chose the defense. It's not paying off right now, but hind sight is always 20/20. If the D does get the stop and they come back with a TD it looks like a good call.But if they convert on 4th down and score a TD on that drive, then things are very different.That FG gives them a chance to drive for the win if the defense gets a stop. If the defense doesn't get a stop, it didn't matter either way.Your logic is very bad...A FG gives them a chance at the win.Seriously??? If they go for it and miss their defense can still get them the ball back. A FG does nothing for them.They have to. The defense has played well enough to give them a shot at a last drive.You've gotta be kidding me. You are going to kick the FG here?
Steeler DB was inside of him and going for the ball, they won't and don't call that.Braylon Edwards definitely got hit before the ball got there and my guess is that the crowd was booing the lack of an interference call and then the decision to punt.I don't think they are in a hurry. Sure looked like he got hit before the ball was there.5:00 left, at the Steeler 26. Down 10-3. Do you run the hurry up to try to score quickly and get the ball back, or milk the clock and play for OT?
He should have been fired on the spot last week when he called for a FG down 21 in the 4th. Romeo needs to grow a sack.I don't think they are getting the ball back unless the steelers score a TD.And that's gonna put Romeo on the hot seat.Cleveland doesn't get the ball back. Game over. Good thing they got the extra 3 points!
Wee Willie?Mendy may need to go get Willie a new pair of pants. A couple more quick rushes and we may see ALOT more of Willie.![]()
Rogers no call on roughing the passer, it all come out in the wash.Braylon Edwards definitely got hit before the ball got there and my guess is that the crowd was booing the lack of an interference call and then the decision to punt.I don't think they are in a hurry. Sure looked like he got hit before the ball was there.5:00 left, at the Steeler 26. Down 10-3. Do you run the hurry up to try to score quickly and get the ball back, or milk the clock and play for OT?
This could be assigned to someone already on the staff to handle during the game. I would guess some teams actually do have a timeout advisor.Not that it matters in the end, but really teams need to think about hiring someone as a "game manager" because these coaches just have too much going on not to end up being complete idiots when it comes to managing the game.
Geez... if they gamble and don't get it, they still give their D a chance to get the ball back. And you're right, their O has been bad this game which is exactly you don't want them to have to drive the length of the field again.They had to gamble on either the offense or defense. The offense hasn't played well yet so they chose the defense. It's not paying off right now, but hind sight is always 20/20. If the D does get the stop and they come back with a TD it looks like a good call.But if they convert on 4th down and score a TD on that drive, then things are very different.That FG gives them a chance to drive for the win if the defense gets a stop. If the defense doesn't get a stop, it didn't matter either way.Your logic is very bad...A FG gives them a chance at the win.Seriously??? If they go for it and miss their defense can still get them the ball back. A FG does nothing for them.They have to. The defense has played well enough to give them a shot at a last drive.You've gotta be kidding me. You are going to kick the FG here?
They didn't stop them. You have no idea whther they could convert on 4th and 7. Anybody know the odds of that conversion?Good thing they kicked the FG!Ball game.
Romeo is wondering why they didn't kick the FG.Rodgers is gonna block the FG
A FG gives them a chance at the win.Seriously??? If they go for it and miss their defense can still get them the ball back. A FG does nothing for them.They have to. The defense has played well enough to give them a shot at a last drive.You've gotta be kidding me. You are going to kick the FG here?
But they could have at least attempted to tie the game instead of kicking a useless field goal and not getting the ball back. If they don't convert they defense still gets the same chance to hold and get them the ball back.They didn't stop them. You have no idea whther they could convert on 4th and 7. Anybody know the odds of that conversion?Good thing they kicked the FG!Ball game.
I'm guessing, at worst, he'll throw no more than one.Please God no INT's from Anderson.
Yeah, but the Browns are 3-17 overall since the rebirth, and they actually started 2-1. So that's one win out of the past 17 games against the Steelers. It's not just Romeo.It is unacceptable to open year 4 at 0-2 and have ZERO playoff appearances. It doesn't take THAT long to build a competitive team. START WINNING GAMES ROMEO. 0-7 against the Steelers is ridiculous.
10 in a row.![]()
