Garrard gets no love on the cheatsheet (1 Viewer)

[Sputnikv8]

Looking at the FP matchups chart, it seems that some of the QB's ranked ahead of Garrard don't match up with the data. With all the weapons he has, the not-so-stout Ten D coming into Jax, I think Garrard has a decent game.

Am I missing something?

 

[kncks12]

Looking at the FP matchups chart, it seems that some of the QB's ranked ahead of Garrard don't match up with the data. With all the weapons he has, the not-so-stout Ten D coming into Jax, I think Garrard has a decent game.Am I missing something?

I think you take into the fact that he did nothing really a Philly because they could not pass in the wind. So that is fresh in minds. Then, he will have a short hook if he does not get it done with Lefty saying he ready despite coach not thinking so. Too many variables=what you see.

 

[joffer]

the QB rankings in general seem really odd this week. i wouldn't start Seneca Wallace over Philip Rivers if you paid me.

 

[coolnerd]

Unless I am forgetting something from last year, Garrad has not proven to do anything that interesting as a fantasy player. while there is a conversasion to be had about Garrad or Leftwich as the starter in Jax, neither has proved to be regular starter worthy as fantasy players.

 

[Billy Ball Thorton]

the QB rankings in general seem really odd this week. i wouldn't start Seneca Wallace over Philip Rivers if you paid me.

I was very very suprised by Wallace ranking. I could hardly believe my eye balls.

 

[Phil Elliott]

I would combine this thread with the "No love for Leftwich by Football Guys" thread...

 

[KevT]

the QB rankings in general seem really odd this week. i wouldn't start Seneca Wallace over Philip Rivers if you paid me.

I was very very suprised by Wallace ranking. I could hardly believe my eye balls.

Haven't logged in to check the subscription stuff this week, I would be surprised to see Wallace ranked high, haven't the Raiders been pretty good against the pass this year?

 

[joffer]

not much love for the Jax WRs either. 35th, 44th, and 62nd.

 

[diesel7982]

Unless I am forgetting something from last year, Garrad has not proven to do anything that interesting as a fantasy player. while there is a conversasion to be had about Garrad or Leftwich as the starter in Jax, neither has proved to be regular starter worthy as fantasy players.

I think youre forgetting that he was a top 10 QB in most formats during his period as a starter.

 

[[scooter]]

When Garrard has a good game against a good team, then he'll get a good ranking.

So far his best career games have come against Tennessee and Detroit.

 

[finnmaccoul]

' date='Nov 5 2006, 01:07 AM' post='5850004']When Garrard has a good game against a good team, then he'll get a good ranking.So far his best career games have come against Tennessee and Detroit.

And this week he plays..........Tenn! Shouldn't he get a good ranking based on your comment??

 

[SickThing]

' date='Nov 5 2006, 01:07 AM' post='5850004']When Garrard has a good game against a good team, then he'll get a good ranking.So far his best career games have come against Tennessee and Detroit.

And this week he plays..........Tenn! Shouldn't he get a good ranking based on your comment??

That will be the Titans without Pacman Jones too! As I posted in another thread earlier this week, I think Garrard's a good sleeper pick this week.

 

[SickThing]

' date='Nov 5 2006, 01:07 AM' post='5850004']When Garrard has a good game against a good team, then he'll get a good ranking.So far his best career games have come against Tennessee and Detroit.

And this week he plays..........Tenn! Shouldn't he get a good ranking based on your comment??

That will be the Titans without Pacman Jones too! As I posted in another thread earlier this week, I think Garrard's a good sleeper pick this week.

Two TDs in the first half already!

 

[omally]

Two TDs in the first half already!

Plus Matt Jones dropped what would have been a TD.

 

[Sputnikv8]

So far..so good.