What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Gay marriage (1 Viewer)

Are you for or against?

  • For

    Votes: 291 80.2%
  • Against

    Votes: 72 19.8%

  • Total voters
    363
two ministers in Toronto, Canada were sent to jail last week for preaching that homosexualiyt was a sin...
There has to be more to that story. But to be fair I'd like to test that hypothesis.Jericho, please go outside and yell as loud as you possibly can (get a bullhorn if you have one handy), "HOMOSEXUALITY IS A SIN!!!!"Then come back and post what happens. We'll be waiting.
 
it doesn't infringe on my rights, because I don't care...it infringes on other people's rights because they hold marriage as a sacred vow between a man and a woman to live together for the rest of thier lives, to love, and honor, etc., etc...
Larry,Just looking for a clarification. What specific right, granted by the constitution is being infringed upon?I am honestly trying to get an understanding here, not trying to antagonize.
it might not infringe upon a right... like I said, I don't care...BUT my point is, that these people hold something sacred...that's like saying that it is no illigal to say the word "Jesus" and that must be replaced with some new word that is homogenous and would reflect beliefs in any god of the hearer's choosing...
 
You can't be born a Christian.  Church-going doesn't make you a Christian.  Even the demons of hell believe in Christ.  What makes you a Christian is believing that Christ died on the cross to pay the penalty for your sins.  You trust in Him alone for your salvation.  It's God's grace alone that saves you, it is not your birth-right or your own doing.
not that I want to debate this because I really don't care. But all those things you say you need to believe to be a Christian, I believed. I was then shown why it is a phony operation run by a bunch of loons and I jumped ship.
A true Christian doesn't focus on the people, he focuses on Christ.
you don't seem to listen very well. When I considered myself Christian, it was all about God. I didn't care about the people. NOW, I see how it runs. I gotta give them credit for the largest hoax in the history of the world though.I just think the concept of God to be unlikely, unproven, and unprovable.
Like I said, you never were a Christian.
So let's just say that for some reason you realized that you may not believe in what Christianity is preaching. That would make it so that you never were a Christian even though you are one right now. Interesting.
 
two ministers in Toronto, Canada were sent to jail last week for preaching that homosexualiyt was a sin...
There has to be more to that story. But to be fair I'd like to test that hypothesis.Jericho, please go outside and yell as loud as you possibly can (get a bullhorn if you have one handy), "HOMOSEXUALITY IS A SIN!!!!"Then come back and post what happens. We'll be waiting.
there might be... but what could they have possibly done?not let a gay man be the head of a department in the church?seriously...its not like they attacked a gay guy or something... they just preached that it was wrong...
 
Like I said, you never were a Christian.
Why do you get to decide who is/was a Christian? It sounds to me like he was a Christian.
the person saying that believes in Calvinism (I think its Calvinism)...basically that's saying that those who are saved were chosen by God before time and the rest of people are damned no matter what they do...actually, that's a slightly off definition...realy its just saying that if you are truly saved you can't backslide and stopping believing shows taht you were never really a Chrsitian...
 
Like I said, you never were a Christian.
Why do you get to decide who is/was a Christian? It sounds to me like he was a Christian.
the person saying that believes in Calvinism (I think its Calvinism)...basically that's saying that those who are saved were chosen by God before time and the rest of people are damned no matter what they do...actually, that's a slightly off definition...realy its just saying that if you are truly saved you can't backslide and stopping believing shows taht you were never really a Chrsitian...
Be careful about answering for others, Larry. I am not a Calvinist.
 
So let's just say that for some reason you realized that you may not believe in what Christianity is preaching. That would make it so that you never were a Christian even though you are one right now. Interesting.
If that happened, then you are right, I was never a Christian, even though I thought I was. But, knowing what I know now, that hypothetical will not happen.
 
it infringes on other people's rights because they hold marriage as a sacred vow between a man and a woman to live together for the rest of thier lives, to love, and honor, etc., etc...
What specific right is being infringed upon there?
 
You can't be born a Christian.  Church-going doesn't make you a Christian.  Even the demons of hell believe in Christ.  What makes you a Christian is believing that Christ died on the cross to pay the penalty for your sins.  You trust in Him alone for your salvation.  It's God's grace alone that saves you, it is not your birth-right or your own doing.
not that I want to debate this because I really don't care. But all those things you say you need to believe to be a Christian, I believed. I was then shown why it is a phony operation run by a bunch of loons and I jumped ship.
A true Christian doesn't focus on the people, he focuses on Christ.
you don't seem to listen very well. When I considered myself Christian, it was all about God. I didn't care about the people. NOW, I see how it runs. I gotta give them credit for the largest hoax in the history of the world though.I just think the concept of God to be unlikely, unproven, and unprovable.
Like I said, you never were a Christian.
So let's just say that for some reason you realized that you may not believe in what Christianity is preaching. That would make it so that you never were a Christian even though you are one right now. Interesting.
The fact that you just don't get this confirms that you aren't and never were a Christian. It's not a change of mind, it's a change of heart.
 
Like I said, you never were a Christian.
Why do you get to decide who is/was a Christian? It sounds to me like he was a Christian.
the person saying that believes in Calvinism (I think its Calvinism)...basically that's saying that those who are saved were chosen by God before time and the rest of people are damned no matter what they do...actually, that's a slightly off definition...realy its just saying that if you are truly saved you can't backslide and stopping believing shows taht you were never really a Chrsitian...
No, I don't get to decided. God gets to decide. I can make a guess at what I think based on what I know about the person and what I know about being a Christian. But, ultimately, what I think doesn't matter a bit. You are accountable to God, not man.
 
Here is how dictionary.com defines "Christian":

1) Professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus.

2) Relating to or derived from Jesus or Jesus's teachings.

3) Manifesting the qualities or spirit of Jesus; Christlike.

4) Relating to or characteristic of Christianity or its adherents.

5) Showing a loving concern for others; humane.

Seems to me like Dickies was a Christian, at least as far as the word is commonly used. I know you folks are very concerned about the ways that words are commonly understood.

 
Like I said, you never were a Christian.
Is the Pope a Christian?
I have no idea, I've never spoken with the pope.Edited to add: Unlike Larry, I do believe that Catholics can be true Christians.
 
Last edited:
it doesn't infringe on my rights, because I don't care...it infringes on other people's rights because they hold marriage as a sacred vow between a man and a woman to live together for the rest of thier lives, to love, and honor, etc., etc...
Larry,Just looking for a clarification. What specific right, granted by the constitution is being infringed upon?I am honestly trying to get an understanding here, not trying to antagonize.
it might not infringe upon a right... like I said, I don't care...BUT my point is, that these people hold something sacred...that's like saying that it is no illigal to say the word "Jesus" and that must be replaced with some new word that is homogenous and would reflect beliefs in any god of the hearer's choosing...
So let's follow this a little further.If nobody's rights are being infringed upon by allowing it, then the sole basis for not using the word marriage is that it contradicts the beliefs of specific religions.The use of the word marriage does not infringe upon the religious beliefs of others. Regardless of whether the term marriage is used or not, the beliefs of Christians will remain unaffected. Homosexuality will still be a sin in their eyes.
 
Here is how dictionary.com defines "Christian":1) Professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus. 2) Relating to or derived from Jesus or Jesus's teachings. 3) Manifesting the qualities or spirit of Jesus; Christlike. 4) Relating to or characteristic of Christianity or its adherents. 5) Showing a loving concern for others; humane. Seems to me like Dickies was a Christian, at least as far as the word is commonly used. I know you folks are very concerned about the ways that words are commonly understood.
I'm more concerned with how the bible defines it, not dictionary.com.The bible says in order to be saved (i.e., a Christian) you must confess your sins to God and trust in Christ's atonement for your sin by His death on the cross and subsequent resurrection to pay the penalty for your sin.
 
Here is how dictionary.com defines "Christian":1) Professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus. 2) Relating to or derived from Jesus or Jesus's teachings. 3) Manifesting the qualities or spirit of Jesus; Christlike. 4) Relating to or characteristic of Christianity or its adherents. 5) Showing a loving concern for others; humane. Seems to me like Dickies was a Christian, at least as far as the word is commonly used. I know you folks are very concerned about the ways that words are commonly understood.
#5 shows me that they don't get it either. Showing love and being humane is a result of being a Christian, not a definition of it. This would imply that only Christians have the ability to be humane.
 
Here is how dictionary.com defines "Christian":1) Professing belief in Jesus as Christ or following the religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus. 2) Relating to or derived from Jesus or Jesus's teachings. 3) Manifesting the qualities or spirit of Jesus; Christlike. 4) Relating to or characteristic of Christianity or its adherents. 5) Showing a loving concern for others; humane. Seems to me like Dickies was a Christian, at least as far as the word is commonly used. I know you folks are very concerned about the ways that words are commonly understood.
Don't even bother. They just don't get it. I am giving up on arguing my point to them.
 
Like I said, you never were a Christian.
Is the Pope a Christian?
I have no idea, I've never spoken with the pope.
That answers the question well enough. You and Larry evidently have extremely non-standard definitions of the word "Christian."
Yet creating non-standard definitions of the word 'marriage' is a transgression of sulfuric proportions. Interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
it doesn't infringe on my rights, because I don't care...it infringes on other people's rights because they hold marriage as a sacred vow between a man and a woman to live together for the rest of thier lives, to love, and honor, etc., etc...
Larry,Just looking for a clarification. What specific right, granted by the constitution is being infringed upon?I am honestly trying to get an understanding here, not trying to antagonize.
it might not infringe upon a right... like I said, I don't care...BUT my point is, that these people hold something sacred...that's like saying that it is no illigal to say the word "Jesus" and that must be replaced with some new word that is homogenous and would reflect beliefs in any god of the hearer's choosing...
So let's follow this a little further.If nobody's rights are being infringed upon by allowing it, then the sole basis for not using the word marriage is that it contradicts the beliefs of specific religions.The use of the word marriage does not infringe upon the religious beliefs of others. Regardless of whether the term marriage is used or not, the beliefs of Christians will remain unaffected. Homosexuality will still be a sin in their eyes.
I agree, Ken. What Larry isn't recognizing is that allowing gay marriage isn't taking away his beliefs. He is still able to believe all the things that he believes about marriage and live his life in accordance with those beliefs. He should also recognize that if he truly doesn't care what gays do that if the government allows them to be married it is in no way forcing him to change his definition of what marriage means to him. Athiests getting married violates his definition but he is still able to hold his beliefs. Nothing is saying he has to change his beliefs, all they are saying is that his personal beliefs based upon the religious definition of marriage should not be allowed to affect how the government defines marriage since there is separation of church and state and that people of all religions, or lack thereof have the right to the institution of marriage.
 
these threads never change. It always boils down to:"yes, it is""no, it isn't""yes, it is" :mellow:

 
I'm more concerned with how the bible defines it, not dictionary.com.
Was the Bible written in English?
Nope, but according to your "English dictionary", Homosexuality is the lack of moral restraint. That's not the Bible, that's the dictionary.
It says no such thing. It says that's one definition of 'gay.' Not 'homosexual.' Just like a square can be a four-sided figure or a nerd. Or a 'double snack pack' can be a delicous two-pudding treat or a deviant sex act.
Which is exactly my point. That a "dictionary" does not provide an all encompassing definition. And, yes, the dictionary does say such a thing... gay ( P ) Pronunciation Key (g)

adj. gay·er, gay·est

Of, relating to, or having a sexual orientation to persons of the same sex.

Showing or characterized by cheerfulness and lighthearted excitement; merry.

Bright or lively, especially in color: a gay, sunny room.

Given to social pleasures.

Dissolute; licentious.

dis·so·lute ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ds-lt)

adj.

Lacking moral restraint; indulging in sensual pleasures or vices.

I'm pretty sure the dictionary is not stating that it is the "bright and lively" or "merry" people that are exhibiting a lack of moral restraint.

 
I have..... I have even read the Mormon Bible... my roommate was Mormon and I wanted to know what he was about so I read his Bible.Didn't you say Catholicism isnt Christianity? If you did, you are most certainly wrong.
Mormonism1) The true gospel was lost from the earth. Mormonism is its restoration, Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 182-185 2) We need prophets today, the same as in the Old Testament, Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 444-445 3) The book of Mormon is more correct than the Bible, History of the Church, 4:461. 4) If it had not been for Joseph Smith and the restoration, there would be no salvation. There is no salvation [the context is the full gospel including exaltation to Godhood] outside the church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Mormon Doctrine, p. 670. 5) There are many gods, Mormon Doctrine, p. 163. 6) There is a mother god, Articles of Faith, by James Talmage, p. 443. 7) God used to be a man on another planet, Mormon Doctrine, p. 321. Joseph Smith, Times and Seasons, Vol 5, pp. 613-614; Orson Pratt, Journal of Discourses, Vol 2, p. 345, Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 7, p. 333. 8) After you become a good Mormon, you have the potential of becoming a god, Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pages 345-347, 354. 9) God the Father had a Father, Joseph Smith, History of the Church, vol. 6, p. 476; Heber C. Kimball, Journal of Discourses, vol. 5, p. 19; Milton Hunter, First Council of the Seventy, Gospel through the Ages, p. 104-105. 10) God resides near a star called Kolob, Pearl of Great Price, pages 34-35; Mormon Doctrine, p. 428. 11) God the Father has a body of flesh and bones, Doctrine and Covenants, 130:22. 12) God is in the form of a man, Joseph Smith, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 6, p. 3. 13) God is married to his goddess wife and has spirit children, Mormon Doctrine p. 516. 14) We were first begotten as spirit children in heaven and then born naturally on earth, Journal of Discourse, Vol. 4, p. 218. 15) The first spirit to be born in heaven was Jesus, Mormon Doctrine, page 129. 16) The Devil was born as a spirit after Jesus "in the morning of pre-existence," Mormon Doctrine, page 192. 17) Jesus and Satan are spirit brothers and we were all born as siblings in heaven to them both, Mormon Doctrine, p. 163. 18) A plan of salvation was needed for the people of earth so Jesus offered a plan to the father and Satan offered a plan to the father but Jesus' plan was accepted. In effect the Devil wanted to be the Savior of all Mankind and to "deny men their agency and to dethrone god." Mormon Doctrine, page 193; Journal of Discourses, vol. 6, page 8. 19) God had sexual relations with Mary to make the body of Jesus, Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 4, p. 218, 1857; vol. 8, p. 115. - This one is disputed among many Mormons and not always 'officially' taught and believed. Nevertheless, Young, the 2nd prophet of the Mormon church taught it. 20) Jesus' sacrifice was not able to cleanse us from all our sins, (murder and repeated adultery are exceptions), Journal of Discourses, Vol. 3, p. 247, 1856. 21) Good works are necessary for salvation, Articles of Faith, p. 92. 22) There is no salvation without accepting Joseph Smith as a prophet of God, Doctrines of Salvation, Vol. 1, p. 188. 23) Baptism for the dead, Doctrines of Salvation, Vol. II, p. 141. This is a practice of baptizing each other in place of non-Mormons who are now dead. Their belief is that in the afterlife, the "newly baptized" person will be able to enter into a higher level of Mormon heaven. 24) There are three levels of heaven: telestial, terrestrial, and celestial, Mormon Doctrine, p. 348. 25) The Holy Ghost is a male personage, A Marvelous Work and a Wonder, by Le Grand Richards, Salt Lake City, 1956, page 118; Journal of Discources, Vol. 5, page 179 You think this is Christianity?And no, I never said anything about Catholicism.
 
I'm more concerned with how the bible defines it, not dictionary.com.
Was the Bible written in English?
Nope, but according to your "English dictionary", Homosexuality is the lack of moral restraint. That's not the Bible, that's the dictionary.
It says no such thing. It says that's one definition of 'gay.' Not 'homosexual.' Just like a square can be a four-sided figure or a nerd. Or a 'double snack pack' can be a delicous two-pudding treat or a deviant sex act.
Which is exactly my point. That a "dictionary" does not provide an all encompassing definition. And, yes, the dictionary does say such a thing... I'm pretty sure the dictionary is not stating that it is the "bright and lively" or "merry" people that are exhibiting a lack of moral restraint.
What is 'exactly your point.' The dictionary goes out of its way to provide all-encompassing definitions. Sometimes multiples. Sometimes they are related, sometimes not.Here, it's saying that sometimes 'gay' refers to people who prefer to bugger others with the same equipment they have, sometimes it refers to a state of happiness, and sometimes it refers to somebody morally corrupt.

Based on multiple definitions, would suggest that all '###s' are not only homosexual, but also cigarettes?

 
... its already that way in Canada, you can't say that homosexuality is a sin without going to jail...
Huh?
two ministers in Toronto, Canada were sent to jail last week for preaching that homosexuality was a sin...edited for spelling...
Link? Or some sort of reference?
couldn't find one... my pastor was talking about it on Sunday... the orginazation sent our church an e-mail about it...I looked it up, couldn't find anything about it...not that I would think the media would actually report it... }=O(
 
guess they might have had it wrong:

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/jul/04072803.html

check this article out:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=37410

never heard of worldnetdaily (there might be a reason for that...) what do you think??

check this out, a few instances of "anti-dissent laws":

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/apr/04043006.html

http://www.catholicexchange.com/vm/index.a...52&art_id=20848

there are 4 articles about how it could happen... nothing on major news sources, though...

anyone find anything? Maybe I'm just bad at looking...

edit to add: I got the links by searching on CNN.com if that changes anything lol

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top