chinawildman
Footballguy
an aggie and a longhorn as starting corners... :wacko:
Except his singing "Candyman"...Berman nails it!

Who knows......How can you pass on Eric Steinbach and Boss Bailey for Sammy Davis!?!?
Don't you mean, "How can you pass on Steinbach and Bailey for Da Raidahs?"How can you pass on Eric Steinbach and Boss Bailey for Sammy Davis!?!?
Personally, I'd rather see them take Henderson, but I know Al Davis loves the athletic guys.I feel much better now.Tom Kowalski, of MLive.com, reports Oregon State LB Nick Barnett draws some attention from the Detroit Lions as a possible third round draft selection.

Bad pick. Steinbach and Bailey are better players and they could get a decent CB in the 2nd.How can you pass on Eric Steinbach and Boss Bailey for Sammy Davis!?!?
he needed tom jackson there to sing with him.Except his singing "Candyman"...![]()
1st - 15 mins2nd - 10 minsOthers - 5 minsdo the teams still get 15min in the second or less?
Boss Bailey may be worse in coverage than Rodney Harrison, and he definitely doesn't tackle as well, so drafting him as a SS wouldn't make sense for the Chargers. And the only linebacker position he can play in a 4-3 is WLB -- but the Bolts already have an undersized linebacker who struggles to shed blocks in Donnie Edwards. I don't see any way Bailey could help the Chargers. (Well, maybe on special teams . . .)How can you pass on Eric Steinbach and Boss Bailey for Sammy Davis!?!?
Too true Maurile - the Chargers did need a CB more than a WLB. Might have gotten a decent one in the mid-second though. I just hope the Raiders don't pick Bailey or Henderson.Chargers take Sammy Davis. Maybe not the best athlete available, but it does fill the biggest area of need.
Obviously he was on the Packers' board.did sherman just call barnett the top rated LB in the draft???????
garbage in - garbage out. i think we've seen a perfect exampledid sherman just call barnett the top rated LB in the draft???????
huh?followed by some terrible picking for need eg RB Larry Johnson.
I'm not watching the draft, but I believe that Barnett is an Strong Side Linebacker and Boss Baily is a Weak Side LB.QUOTE (MiniDitka @ Apr 26 2003, 03:43 PM) did sherman just call barnett the top rated LB in the draft??????? Obviously he was on the Packers' board.
The Chiefs have major needs on D. Granted, there is some doubt over Priest's recovery but it strikes me that taking a RB in the first round is a major over-compensation.QUOTE (Miro Z @ Apr 26 2003, 03:50 PM) followed by some terrible picking for need eg RB Larry Johnson. huh?
You would think they would try to trade down and still get him. But it seems a lot of teams would like to trade down.QUOTE (MiniDitka @ Apr 26 2003, 03:43 PM) did sherman just call barnett the top rated LB in the draft???????
I can see the Raiders picking Baily, but not Henderson. The don't need an ILB, got Nap last year.Too true Maurile - the Chargers did need a CB more than a WLB. Might have gotten a decent one in the mid-second though. I just hope the Raiders don't pick Bailey or Henderson.
wasn't Nap drafted as an OLB though?I can see the Raiders picking Baily, but not Henderson. The don't need an ILB, got Nap last year.
The Raiders have finally brought this draft to a halt...

you knew they wouldThe Raiders have finally brought this draft to a halt...![]()
Barnett is indeed a strong side linebacker, and it appears that's where the Packers will use him as well. According to some notes I was taking before the draft:"Now that the 24-year-old Diggs is in the fold, the Packers have to decide whether to keep him at his current strong-side position or move him to the weak side. That decision will probably depend on whom the Packers acquire to fill their final starting linebacker position. Free agent Hannibal Navies is scheduled to start at middle linebacker. (http://www.jsonline.com/packer/news/mar03/129386.asp)"But I still think Henderson would have been a better pick as Navies is also been working at the strong-side position. Again, my notes:"Sherman said linebacker Hannibal Navies has been working mostly at the strong-side position — not middle linebacker — during workouts with position coach Mark Duffner. Navies, a free-agent signee from Carolina, has played all three linebacker positions during his pro career but originally was believed to be signed as a replacement for departed middle linebacker Hardy Nickerson. Sherman said there is a chance Na’il Diggs will move from strong-side to weak-side linebacker to replace Nate Wayne, who was cut last month. (http://www.packersnews.com/archives/news/p...k_9904581.shtml)"So, I guess the Pack will not go after Derrick Rodgers after all and may be looking for a MLB later in the draft; perhaps Terry Pierce (who worked out for the Packers a few weeks ago) or Gerald Hayes.I'm not watching the draft, but I believe that Barnett is an Strong Side Linebacker and Boss Baily is a Weak Side LB.
The movie will be over by the time they pick...BTW, Ted marries the Bear...My daughter took over the television set, and is now watching some movie showing (I think) Ted Danson in a cowboy outfit with a bear...Anyway, are the Raiders taking 30 minutes for their two picks?

I second that esp. with Oakland on the clock.Also for some reason my puter is crawling today.Lol @ the predictions coming to a grinding halt. We all pretty much have just given up and realize that this has to be the biggest smokescreen draft of recent memory. There are no predictables.
Marketing. This is still a business. It keeps the "heads" on TV stuck on the topic of the Raiders for a solid 30 minutes. One might think that some of the teams early on would have done the same thing. SB premature drafting.Why take the whole half hour? Are they just now breaking down tape or something?