Go.
They must have a staples buttonWell, that was easy.
Apparently he just needed the opportunity.Bennett > Wittens.
Yes he was, but it didn't matter. It would have been a loss of about 4 yards, but the next play got thirty-something anyway.Eli was down
No one cares about your fantasy team.Picked up Bennett and started in 3 leagues (replacing Hernandez in 2). Off to a good start.![]()
I do!!!No one cares about your fantasy team.Picked up Bennett and started in 3 leagues (replacing Hernandez in 2). Off to a good start.![]()
Yep. About a 1/3rd of the ball touched the ground. Should have been incomplete.That ball touched the ground.
I'll mark it up to making it even with the non sack on Eli.Yep. About a 1/3rd of the ball touched the ground. Should have been incomplete.That ball touched the ground.
hahayeah, it's gonna be another one of those gamesI'll mark it up to making it even with the non sack on Eli.Yep. About a 1/3rd of the ball touched the ground. Should have been incomplete.That ball touched the ground.
Can't it touch the ground after he makes the catch and as long as he maintains possession throughout?I thought it was a catch.Now, I thought the PI on Webster was a bad call. Very minimal contact and he just made a great play on the ball.Yep. About a 1/3rd of the ball touched the ground. Should have been incomplete.That ball touched the ground.
It hit the ground, but olsen kept his hand under it and maintained control. Isn't that a catch?hahayeah, it's gonna be another one of those gamesI'll mark it up to making it even with the non sack on Eli.Yep. About a 1/3rd of the ball touched the ground. Should have been incomplete.That ball touched the ground.
I assumed that a guy who catches it in mid air has to keep it off the ground. I could be wrong but it seems like it should be the rule. ??It hit the ground, but olsen kept his hand under it and maintained control. Isn't that a catch?
If they don't have forward progress when going OB, it's as if they didn't go out so the clock doesn't stop.'Childress said:When a player runs out of bound they don't always stop the clock? I apologize if that's a stupid question but i always thought that the clock stopped when players run out of bounds.
Brown needed a quick restOne carry and Wilson's back out.
A.Brown looks like a real pro out there...nice waiver wire pick upUmmmmmmm, are we sure Bradshaw should get the job back?
It can take years to come back fully from an injury to the Achilles, for a RB. This is why the optimism about LeShoure is puzzling, unless medicine has advanced THAT much in just the last couple years.How many times was Brown cut by other teams? Amazing what he is doing with the opportunity last week and this game.
This is correct IMO.Can't it touch the ground after he makes the catch and as long as he maintains possession throughout?I thought it was a catch.Yep. About a 1/3rd of the ball touched the ground. Should have been incomplete.That ball touched the ground.
Now, I thought the PI on Webster was a bad call. Very minimal contact and he just made a great play on the ball.
No, that rule was changed. It can hit the ground as long as receiver maintains control and refs judge that the ball hitting the ground did not help them control it.I assumed that a guy who catches it in mid air has to keep it off the ground. I could be wrong but it seems like it should be the rule. ??It hit the ground, but olsen kept his hand under it and maintained control. Isn't that a catch?
Yeah I thought the tip rolling across the ground would make it incomplete.I assumed that a guy who catches it in mid air has to keep it off the ground. I could be wrong but it seems like it should be the rule. ??It hit the ground, but olsen kept his hand under it and maintained control. Isn't that a catch?
I don't think it should. He didn't use the ground to help make the catch. He made a great catch and maintained possession. It just happened to touch the ground after he'd made the catch. Hitting the ground just helped demonstrate how much control he had of it (because it didn't jar it loose).I assumed that a guy who catches it in mid air has to keep it off the ground. I could be wrong but it seems like it should be the rule. ??It hit the ground, but olsen kept his hand under it and maintained control. Isn't that a catch?
Nope, it can touch the ground if you keep control. Regardless, it's fun to bag on the refs even when they get it right.I assumed that a guy who catches it in mid air has to keep it off the ground. I could be wrong but it seems like it should be the rule. ??It hit the ground, but olsen kept his hand under it and maintained control. Isn't that a catch?
Well, I guess you learn something new everyday. Never knew that balls can touch the ground and still be called a catch. Wow, they really try to make it way too easy for the offenses don't they.This is correct IMO.Can't it touch the ground after he makes the catch and as long as he maintains possession throughout?I thought it was a catch.Yep. About a 1/3rd of the ball touched the ground. Should have been incomplete.That ball touched the ground.
Now, I thought the PI on Webster was a bad call. Very minimal contact and he just made a great play on the ball.
That used to be the rule. Not anymore. As long as player maintains control, it's a catch even if there's contact with the ground.I assumed that a guy who catches it in mid air has to keep it off the ground. I could be wrong but it seems like it should be the rule. ??It hit the ground, but olsen kept his hand under it and maintained control. Isn't that a catch?
this ^^I don't think it should. He didn't use the ground to help make the catch. He made a great catch and maintained possession. It just happened to touch the ground after he'd made the catch. Hitting the ground just helped demonstrate how much control he had of it (because it didn't jar it loose).I assumed that a guy who catches it in mid air has to keep it off the ground. I could be wrong but it seems like it should be the rule. ??It hit the ground, but olsen kept his hand under it and maintained control. Isn't that a catch?