Don't think the giants sign a big name player at RB, though I do think they bring in someone through free agency or the draft to share carries with Jacobs. Do think Jacobs carries increase significantly this year to the 200 range.
I agree that 200 touches or so is a good guess for now. Maybe more, could be less depending on who else they get.
I am very much interested in seeing a spread offense with 3 wide and Shockey matched with a bruiser in Jacobs to pound the spread out defense.
To do this, you got to have 3 WR's. Toomer is on his last leg. Moss is too small to catch Eli's horrible passes. Other than Burress, they have nothing at WR.
Agree to an extent, however, with Burress, Toomer, Moss, & Carter. The Giants have an interesting blend of size, experience, and speed to implement a 3 WR system. Plaxico creates mismatches based on his size, so he requires more than one DB coverage. That leaves Moss and Toomer against aweaker DB's where the Giants can exploit those match-ups. Also, Shockey is someone who can cause problems, too.
...the Giants will have a new GM and very likely a new coach coming on board, so the odds favor them not going with an unproven RB to handle the load and getting caught short-handed.
I can foresee the Giants bringing on a back to share as much as half the load -- ideally a Warrick Dunn-type.
I highlighted the biggest variable. The questions won't be answered until later on though, when we know who the GM and Coach will be, what the offensive philosophy is and what type of personnel they prefer.IMHO, they do have the personnel to run a 3 WR sets along with Shockey and a single RB, so Jacobs could be an interesting fit in that equation.
Think about it: Burress out wide, Moss in the slot, Toomer a yard off on the other side to uncover Shockey. This would really spread the defense. They would then still have to worry about Jacobs, who can wear down opposing tacklers, especially if he keeps banging on smaller DB's and SS's required to be on the field for coverage required for that formation.