Griese would be for 1 game, I doubt Garcia's ankle is in that bad of shape.Collins chance of starting more games > Griese's chance
I have a feeling that if Griese (and Collins) plays well - big if - they would each keep the starting gig. Just a gut feel - I just don't know which opportunity provided the biggest upside.Griese would be for 1 game, I doubt Garcia's ankle is in that bad of shape.Collins chance of starting more games > Griese's chance
Yeah, I could def see a QB controversy in Tampa if Griese has a huge game.I have a feeling that if Griese (and Collins) plays well - big if - they would each keep the starting gig. Just a gut feel - I just don't know which opportunity provided the biggest upside.Griese would be for 1 game, I doubt Garcia's ankle is in that bad of shape.Collins chance of starting more games > Griese's chance
Wk Opp. Com Att Yards TD Int15 vs ATL 15 25 109 1 1 16 @ SFO 12 20 196 1 0 18 vs NYG 23 39 207 1 2
True, but Griese has hardly been dominant as a starter either putting up 10 Tds and 12 Ints in 6 starts with the Bears in '07. He put up 7 Tds and 7 Ints in 6 games with the '05 Bucs and 20 Tds and 12 Ints in 10 games with Tampa in '04. Griese is also 33.valhallan said:People seem to be very sure about Garcia around here. He was good, not great last season. He missed 3 games and didn't play particularly well when he came back from injury:
Combine those performances with his age (38), what he did in the pre-season (78 yards and two picks on 18 attempts) and week 1 (only 5.4 YPA and a pick on 42 attempts), and I don't see why it's outlandish to think his days with Gruden could be numbered.Code:Wk Opp. Com Att Yards TD Int15 vs ATL 15 25 109 1 1 16 @ SFO 12 20 196 1 0 18 vs NYG 23 39 207 1 2
Who knows. I think Herm has gone crazy because he says Tyler Thigpen will get some playing time while Croyle is out, so that hurts Huard's potential value. Knowing Herm, if Croyle gets healthy he'll get the starting job back.Add Huard to these guys. He looked good in relief of Croyle, who has never looked very good. If Huard does really well the next few games, does Croyle get the starting job back?
27 TDs in 16 games for Gruden is way more than the 14 in 14 games Garcia has put up. But regardless, the point is if Garcia's skills have diminished, someone else is getting the starts. In deep leagues and start 2QB leagues, we care a lot about which guy is starting, even if he's not great. It's close, but right now my gut is telling me Griese could have a better shot than Collins to start longer, and certainly a better shot to put up decent FF numbers. He was brought back this off-season, which shows Gruden is comfortable with him. The Titans also signed Simms, which could easily be an indication that they want competition at their back-up/new starter spot.True, but Griese has hardly been dominant as a starter either putting up 10 Tds and 12 Ints in 6 starts with the Bears in '07. He put up 7 Tds and 7 Ints in 6 games with the '05 Bucs and 20 Tds and 12 Ints in 10 games with Tampa in '04. Griese is also 33.valhallan said:People seem to be very sure about Garcia around here. He was good, not great last season. He missed 3 games and didn't play particularly well when he came back from injury:
Wk Opp. Com Att Yards TD Int15 vs ATL 15 25 109 1 1 16 @ SFO 12 20 196 1 0 18 vs NYG 23 39 207 1 2Combine those performances with his age (38), what he did in the pre-season (78 yards and two picks on 18 attempts) and week 1 (only 5.4 YPA and a pick on 42 attempts), and I don't see why it's outlandish to think his days with Gruden could be numbered.
You definitely make some valid points and Collins hasn't put up numbers with the Titans, but he hasn't had much of an opportunity to do so either. I get your point about who is starting because as I said I'm considering Griese, Collins and Huard as my QB2 in a 16 team league with not much else available on waivers. I would have to drop VY though, so that is another thing to consider.27 TDs in 16 games for Gruden is way more than the 14 in 14 games Garcia has put up. But regardless, the point is if Garcia's skills have diminished, someone else is getting the starts. In deep leagues and start 2QB leagues, we care a lot about which guy is starting, even if he's not great. It's close, but right now my gut is telling me Griese could have a better shot than Collins to start longer, and certainly a better shot to put up decent FF numbers. He was brought back this off-season, which shows Gruden is comfortable with him. The Titans also signed Simms, which could easily be an indication that they want competition at their back-up/new starter spot.True, but Griese has hardly been dominant as a starter either putting up 10 Tds and 12 Ints in 6 starts with the Bears in '07. He put up 7 Tds and 7 Ints in 6 games with the '05 Bucs and 20 Tds and 12 Ints in 10 games with Tampa in '04. Griese is also 33.valhallan said:People seem to be very sure about Garcia around here. He was good, not great last season. He missed 3 games and didn't play particularly well when he came back from injury:
Wk Opp. Com Att Yards TD Int15 vs ATL 15 25 109 1 1 16 @ SFO 12 20 196 1 0 18 vs NYG 23 39 207 1 2Combine those performances with his age (38), what he did in the pre-season (78 yards and two picks on 18 attempts) and week 1 (only 5.4 YPA and a pick on 42 attempts), and I don't see why it's outlandish to think his days with Gruden could be numbered.
Yup. In a 16 team league where the top 3 waiver choices at QB are Orton, Collins or Griese you know the pickings are slim. Luckily it is only a QB2 slot I'm looking to fill.Griese could be top-15 in Tampa if he was the permanent starter, remember 05' before he got hurt? He will only start 1-2 games, so not an option unless you need a guy for this week.Collins could be OK, may start the rest of the year, but has at least 4 games. He's a better option than what's on the WW IMO (T Jackson, Ryan, or Orton).