What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hackett Time (1 Viewer)

mad sweeney

Footballguy
In Holmgren's post mortem press conference he said that Hackett will practice Wednesday and is expected to play. Hass threw for over 300/2 last night and except for a few passes has been quietly putting up decent numbers. If you need a WW receiver and no one's been sitting on him he might be worth a flier. Engram will go back to the slot and the main WR has been gettting over 100 yards/game, and that's usually the flanker. No idea if Burleson or Hackett will go to flanker but since they leapfrogged Engram to F instead of bumping up Burleson I would guess Hackett will play flanker. If all goes well, more info after practice on Wednesday.

Could be a great play for the week, who knows how he will split time when Branch is back, but he should get the start this week and Rams games are almost always shootouts.

Also sadly, Darby is out for the season, further damaging the rush D. Without a rush D and a rush O, Seattle WRs could become very valuable in the near future.

 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
Why? Obamanu gonna beat him out? Doubt it. If he's healthy, he'll get significant playing time.
 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
Why? Obamanu gonna beat him out? Doubt it. If he's healthy, he'll get significant playing time.
He will be the WR3 behind Burleson and Engram for the first week is my best guess. It won't be hard for him to pass Burleson soon enough, and then finally passing Engram in about 4 weeks. This guy is a monster. He and Branch should be a solid one-two punch.
 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
Why? Obamanu gonna beat him out? Doubt it. If he's healthy, he'll get significant playing time.
Do you see Hackett and Burleson starting this week and Engram returning to the slot? I could see Engram and Burleson remaining the starters for a week or two while Hackett gets back into the game from the slot, but by the time Hackett is ready, Branch will be returning and the whole thing will be a mess.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
Why? Obamanu gonna beat him out? Doubt it. If he's healthy, he'll get significant playing time.
Umm cuz hes just coming back from an injury and its not like he was entrenched as a starter before his injury.
Branch is out. The term "starter" in Seattle doesn't matter if you're only talking about 2 wr's. They play 3 and 4 wr sets a lot. If healthy, DJ will play a lot. Anybody's guess who's week it is to get the stats.
 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
Why? Obamanu gonna beat him out? Doubt it. If he's healthy, he'll get significant playing time.
Do you see Hackett and Burleson starting this week and Engram returning to the slot? I could see Engram and Burleson remaining the starters for a week or two while Hackett gets back into the game from the slot, but by the time Hackett is ready, Branch will be returning and the whole thing will be a mess.
I would think they would put their best receivers on the field so they would go with DJ at split, Burleson at flanker and Engram in the slot. But I don't know if either DJ or Burleson have practiced at flanker though, so it might not be as simple as that.
 
See the bolded section below.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/seaha...ory/180210.html

Holmgren looks to plug holes in script

FRANK HUGHES; The News Tribune

Published: October 16th, 2007 01:00 AM

KIRKLAND – Seattle Seahawks coach Mike Holmgren on Monday hinted that he is likely to make changes with the offense when the Seahawks play the St. Louis Rams on Sunday at Qwest Field.

Unhappy with a unit that has fallen behind in the first half in four of six games, including 21-0 against New Orleans on Sunday and 17-0 against Arizona in Week 2, Holmgren said he will sit down with offensive coordinator Gil Haskell and devise a plan he hopes will restore the team’s effectiveness.

One thing Holmgren might alter is his scripted 15 plays, ostensibly to give the offense, ranked 25th in the league with a 17.3 points per game average, more flexibility to deal with various situations.

Holmgren has seemed insistent upon establishing a run game. However, with the offensive line missing assignments and Shaun Alexander not running well, it has placed the Seahawks in a lot of third-and-long situations, which are more difficult to convert and place additional pressure on quarterback Matt Hasselbeck.

“We haven’t started the game the way I would like to start the game, or the way we have started the game in years past,” Holmgren said Monday. “In the past, we have been used to going down and scoring a fair amount of time in our first 15 (plays). It’s not happening now. And so we’re going to look (at changing), that’s one of my projects this week.”

Hasselbeck said Holmgren scripts the first 15 plays in an effort to give the offense an idea of which plays to study in the nights leading up the game. He said Holmgren alters the play-calling depending on the down and distance, estimating that Holmgren uses on average eight of the 15 plays he has scripted.

However, Holmgren said he may try to further simplify the play-calling because he thinks the players are not executing assignments properly. He has already simplified the offense once this season – and is not happy with the lack of results.

“I am hard-pressed to figure it out,” Holmgren said.

The Seahawks should get some help this week with the anticipated return of split end D.J. Hackett, out since the first game with a high ankle sprain.

Hackett is expected to practice Wednesday, and if things go well he could be back in the starting lineup.

Holmgren expressed some displeasure with the receiving corps on Monday, admitting that some receivers were breaking off routes prematurely, leading to incompletions or interceptions.

“It’s something we are looking at right now,” Holmgren said. “And now we have some options. I might juggle the receivers around a little bit to shake things up a little this week.”

A strong possibility is Hackett resuming his starting role at split end and Bobby Engram, who led the Seahawks on Sunday with nine receptions for 120 yards, starting at flanker, with Nate Burleson, who had been starting for Hackett, being used as a third receiver.

Burleson had six receptions, including a touchdown, on Sunday, but he took the blame for Hasselbeck’s interception in the fourth quarter, when he stopped running down the left sideline, giving Josh Bullocks a free shot at the ball.

“I made the assumption that the ball was thrown somewhere else,” Burleson said.

Meanwhile, the Seahawks’ running game continues to flounder. Alexander gained 35 yards on 14 carries a week after gaining 25 yards in Pittsburgh. It adds up to his worst two-game stretch since November 2002, when he had a combined 60 yards in back-to-back games.

Holmgren is loathe to place the blame solely on Alexander, saying the blocking by the line and the fullback are as culpable as the 2005 league MVP, though Holmgren did admit that the cracked bone in Alexander’s left wrist is bothering him more than he is revealing.

Regardless, the inability to run has placed a strain on the rest of the offense, which has converted only 33 percent of its third downs, among the worst in the league.

“We’ve got to stop pressing and just relax,” center Chris Spencer said. “We are all out there trying to make the big block to spring the back. We need to trust each other. It is small things. Nothing major. Take care of the small things and everything else will fall into place.” blogs.thenewstribune.com/seahawks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
See the bolded section below.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/seaha...ory/180210.html

Holmgren looks to plug holes in script

FRANK HUGHES; The News Tribune

Published: October 16th, 2007 01:00 AM

The Seahawks should get some help this week with the anticipated return of split end D.J. Hackett, out since the first game with a high ankle sprain.

Hackett is expected to practice Wednesday, and if things go well he could be back in the starting lineup.

Holmgren expressed some displeasure with the receiving corps on Monday, admitting that some receivers were breaking off routes prematurely, leading to incompletions or interceptions.

“It’s something we are looking at right now,” Holmgren said. “And now we have some options. I might juggle the receivers around a little bit to shake things up a little this week.”

A strong possibility is Hackett resuming his starting role at split end and Bobby Engram, who led the Seahawks on Sunday with nine receptions for 120 yards, starting at flanker, with Nate Burleson, who had been starting for Hackett, being used as a third receiver.

Burleson had six receptions, including a touchdown, on Sunday, but he took the blame for Hasselbeck’s interception in the fourth quarter, when he stopped running down the left sideline, giving Josh Bullocks a free shot at the ball.

“I made the assumption that the ball was thrown somewhere else,” Burleson said.
Branch and Engram are locks, and it sounds like Burleson (who's vastly overrated to behin with) is headed to Holmgren's doghouse. Bring on Hackett.

 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
I don't see any reason to rush him back 1 week before the bye unless he was ready to go full speed. And with Branch out, there's a starter spot with his name on it. The passing game didn't seem to suffer too much without Branch and Hackett so they're not hurting for WRs. I just don't see him playing this week unless he starts, otherwise he should sit 2 more weeks and be full speed against the Browns.
 
Bob Lee Swagger said:
Any Seattle homers heard anything about Hackett's playing time this week?
He isnt even practicing until Wednesday so i wouldn't expect any news until Th or Fri at the earliest.
 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
I don't see any reason to rush him back 1 week before the bye unless he was ready to go full speed. And with Branch out, there's a starter spot with his name on it. The passing game didn't seem to suffer too much without Branch and Hackett so they're not hurting for WRs. I just don't see him playing this week unless he starts, otherwise he should sit 2 more weeks and be full speed against the Browns.
:shrug: You da man for Seattle info.I was thinking Engram would be keeping the flanker spot until Branch is back and he would play in 2WR sets with either Hackett or Burleson as the split end. Hass loves him and he sure didn't do anything to lose the spot. Are you saying you think Hackett gets the Branch spot and Engram is back to full-time slot guy?Thanks.
 
Until Branch returns I think you're going to see Engram as the flanker. Holmgren is going to want the guy who he KNOWS is going to catch it getting the most looks.

Holmgren'll likely do what he did this past week, but Hackett will be the SE(if he can go) instead of Burleson: Engram at flanker on 1st and 2nd downs with him shifting to the slot on 3rd to get one of the speedier guys(Burleson/Obomanauafalalfishandpoi) on the outside.

 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
I don't see any reason to rush him back 1 week before the bye unless he was ready to go full speed. And with Branch out, there's a starter spot with his name on it. The passing game didn't seem to suffer too much without Branch and Hackett so they're not hurting for WRs. I just don't see him playing this week unless he starts, otherwise he should sit 2 more weeks and be full speed against the Browns.
:thumbup: You da man for Seattle info.I was thinking Engram would be keeping the flanker spot until Branch is back and he would play in 2WR sets with either Hackett or Burleson as the split end. Hass loves him and he sure didn't do anything to lose the spot. Are you saying you think Hackett gets the Branch spot and Engram is back to full-time slot guy?Thanks.
No way Hackett plays flanker. Hackett is the split end if he's healthy. Engram would move to flanker for the time being. I know they would much rather keep Engram in the slot, but he's the most logical to move to flanker. All three of the other options (Burleson, Hackett, and Obomanu) are better suited to play split end than flanker. Seattle has themselves in a bind really with Branch being out. Branch is the only natural flanker they have and Engram is just born to be the slot guy. They have a log jam at split end. Time will tell who emerges at that spot.Ugh. The injury to Branch really screws things up.From my observations the Seattle receivers (Obomanu, Pollard, and Burleson in particular) have really struggled to gain separation and get open. Its hard to tell watching on TV, but its the only logical conclusion I can come to. Hasselbeck has been seen standing in the pocket looking at covered receivers. He had tons of time play after play in Pittsburgh, but chose not to throw into coverage. I didn't see this so much against New Orleans, but still the receivers are just not running good routes. If you watch the game tape you see Engram is the only guy that was consistently getting open, hence he got a ton of balls thrown his way.
 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
Why? Obamanu gonna beat him out? Doubt it. If he's healthy, he'll get significant playing time.
Umm cuz hes just coming back from an injury and its not like he was entrenched as a starter before his injury.
I was going to say the same thing, he wasn't very impressive before getting injured. I think Obomanu has a good chance to stay ahead of him in the rotation.
 
In Holmgren's post mortem press conference he said that Hackett will practice Wednesday and is expected to play. Hass threw for over 300/2 last night and except for a few passes has been quietly putting up decent numbers. If you need a WW receiver and no one's been sitting on him he might be worth a flier. Engram will go back to the slot and the main WR has been gettting over 100 yards/game, and that's usually the flanker. No idea if Burleson or Hackett will go to flanker but since they leapfrogged Engram to F instead of bumping up Burleson I would guess Hackett will play flanker. If all goes well, more info after practice on Wednesday.Could be a great play for the week, who knows how he will split time when Branch is back, but he should get the start this week and Rams games are almost always shootouts.Also sadly, Darby is out for the season, further damaging the rush D. Without a rush D and a rush O, Seattle WRs could become very valuable in the near future.
First of all, I'm glad Hackett is back. But Darby does NOT damage the rush D. If anything it makes it better because Mebane will get more PT.
 
In Holmgren's post mortem press conference he said that Hackett will practice Wednesday and is expected to play. Hass threw for over 300/2 last night and except for a few passes has been quietly putting up decent numbers. If you need a WW receiver and no one's been sitting on him he might be worth a flier. Engram will go back to the slot and the main WR has been gettting over 100 yards/game, and that's usually the flanker. No idea if Burleson or Hackett will go to flanker but since they leapfrogged Engram to F instead of bumping up Burleson I would guess Hackett will play flanker. If all goes well, more info after practice on Wednesday.Could be a great play for the week, who knows how he will split time when Branch is back, but he should get the start this week and Rams games are almost always shootouts.Also sadly, Darby is out for the season, further damaging the rush D. Without a rush D and a rush O, Seattle WRs could become very valuable in the near future.
First of all, I'm glad Hackett is back. But Darby does NOT damage the rush D. If anything it makes it better because Mebane will get more PT.
I have to agree. I was very impressed with the little I saw out of Mebane this preseason. However, this hurts the DT rotation that Marshall has grown fond of. One less fresh fat boy to plug into the middle. That can't be good.
 
Just picked him up. One thing to think about, as a poster mentioned above is if he comes back AFTER the bye, his matchup is Cleveland, and that is just too good not to take a flier on. By then he is healthy and doing some good things.

 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
Why? Obamanu gonna beat him out? Doubt it. If he's healthy, he'll get significant playing time.
Umm cuz hes just coming back from an injury and its not like he was entrenched as a starter before his injury.
I was going to say the same thing, he wasn't very impressive before getting injured. I think Obomanu has a good chance to stay ahead of him in the rotation.
? The guy got hurt in the first game, what did he play 10 minutes? I think you have to look to the end of last year and see some of the games he had. He has better big play ability than Engram and better EVERYTHING than Brickson- I mean Burleson. Great compliment to Branch when he's there. Seattles been sitting on the guy for 7 weeks, if he's not fully ready they will hold him off until after the bye IMO. As an a Hackett owner, this would be a great week for him to go active. Though I disagree with earlier quote that he could be like Colston or Jennings, after some thought, those were 2 rookies coming back from injury and were off- but I think some of that had to do with their limited experience with their teams and QBs, Hackett should be able to come back with better rapport with his QB due to the increased time he has had with Hass. IMO
 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
Why? Obamanu gonna beat him out? Doubt it. If he's healthy, he'll get significant playing time.
Umm cuz hes just coming back from an injury and its not like he was entrenched as a starter before his injury.
I was going to say the same thing, he wasn't very impressive before getting injured. I think Obomanu has a good chance to stay ahead of him in the rotation.
Hackett was entrenched as the starter. There was talk of rotating Nate in, but that was never settled because Hackett was hurt on his second target of week 1, in which he was the starter. You obviously didn't watch him play the last 2 years. Especially last year. Yeah he was pretty quiet in preseason but he didn't get a lot of looks because of all the Seattle WRs, Branch included, he and Engram were the only 2 that didn't need a lot more work in the Seattle O. Hackett is better than Burleson, despite Nate's good preseason showing. Obo still has work to do and Hackett is the only WR over 6'. He's the starter.
 
shadyridr said:
I seriously doubt he goes right into a starting role.
I don't see any reason to rush him back 1 week before the bye unless he was ready to go full speed. And with Branch out, there's a starter spot with his name on it. The passing game didn't seem to suffer too much without Branch and Hackett so they're not hurting for WRs. I just don't see him playing this week unless he starts, otherwise he should sit 2 more weeks and be full speed against the Browns.
:bs: You da man for Seattle info.I was thinking Engram would be keeping the flanker spot until Branch is back and he would play in 2WR sets with either Hackett or Burleson as the split end. Hass loves him and he sure didn't do anything to lose the spot. Are you saying you think Hackett gets the Branch spot and Engram is back to full-time slot guy?Thanks.
No way Hackett plays flanker. Hackett is the split end if he's healthy. Engram would move to flanker for the time being. I know they would much rather keep Engram in the slot, but he's the most logical to move to flanker. All three of the other options (Burleson, Hackett, and Obomanu) are better suited to play split end than flanker. Seattle has themselves in a bind really with Branch being out. Branch is the only natural flanker they have and Engram is just born to be the slot guy. They have a log jam at split end. Time will tell who emerges at that spot.Ugh. The injury to Branch really screws things up.From my observations the Seattle receivers (Obomanu, Pollard, and Burleson in particular) have really struggled to gain separation and get open. Its hard to tell watching on TV, but its the only logical conclusion I can come to. Hasselbeck has been seen standing in the pocket looking at covered receivers. He had tons of time play after play in Pittsburgh, but chose not to throw into coverage. I didn't see this so much against New Orleans, but still the receivers are just not running good routes. If you watch the game tape you see Engram is the only guy that was consistently getting open, hence he got a ton of balls thrown his way.
:shrug: :pokey:
 
Hackett was entrenched as the starter. There was talk of rotating Nate in, but that was never settled because Hackett was hurt on his second target of week 1, in which he was the starter. You obviously didn't watch him play the last 2 years. Especially last year. Yeah he was pretty quiet in preseason but he didn't get a lot of looks because of all the Seattle WRs, Branch included, he and Engram were the only 2 that didn't need a lot more work in the Seattle O. Hackett is better than Burleson, despite Nate's good preseason showing. Obo still has work to do and Hackett is the only WR over 6'. He's the starter.
Another good posting. Hackett is clearly ahead of Burleson, Obomanu, and Engram in the rotation if he's healthy. Have no idea where someone would get the idea that wasn't the case. Hackett was, is, and will be the starter if healthy.
 
just picked him up off waivers.. like his potential in this offense, obviously players like DJax have played well at that position..

 
He practiced yesterday but not in pads. I'm thinking he'll be questionable when the injury report comes out but be in uniform and play some this weekend.

 
Update:

When we spoke with offensive coordinator Gil Haskell about the receiving corps, he was hesitant to say anything about DJ Hackett and how he fits into the plans this week. Haskell essentially said he did not expect Hackett back this week, and he has been limited so far in practice, so he does not have a clear indication of what Hackett is going to be able to offer. I would say there is a chance that Hackett gets shelved this week because Haskell said he was sore this morning after only one day of practice, but they want to see how he does tomorrow before making a firm decision.
 
Another WR to look out for is Seneca Wallace.

Last week the OC said that Wallace could be an all-pro WR if given the chance to play there full time. With the addition of Fry, I could see Wallace starting to see more and more reps at WR.

 
Hackett is a good pickup, but not a good play this week. Next week is a bye. Look for Hackett to move into the starting lineup week 9.

 
any updates?

I know SEA is heading into a bye week, but this might be the perfect time to grab off of WW and stash for a juicy game vs CLE the following week...

 
What has Hackett ever done to get so excited about?
Most recently he played last year for injured Engram and Jackson and caught 67% of his targets. He's taller than all the other Seattle WRs and if you watch him play you see that he plays with heart and has sticky icky hands. Plus he was slated to start in a pass first offense. And many thought he might be a better WR than Branch. He's produced every time he has come in to replace injured starters and there were high expectations. So he hasn't exactly lit the world on fire but ona team with known dropsies he catches everything that comes his way/ A 67% target reception percentage is damn good.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top