Not only is Hakeem Nicks better than Mario Manningham, he is one of the best receivers in football, period. This a guy that DOMINATED last year, as a 22 year old! He's now still growing at 23, and in that magical 3rd year. He saw 9.9 targets a game last year. With the receiving losses, and defensive losses (leading to more passing situations for the offense due to more points giving up-theoretically) that number can even rise. Not only will Nicks have better stats than Manningham, he's on a short list of possible #1 overall wr. In manningham's 3 biggest games last year, Nicks still averaged 5 catches, 80 yards, and .67 tds a game! So even when Manningham does well, Nicks still gets his (games vs dallas philly and gb) With Smith hurt last year, and Nicks was well known as the #1 wr, in weeks 15 and 16 vs two very good defenses in big time games (Eagles and packers), and let's not forget he came back from injury early and was playing hurt, he had 10 catches 156 yards and 2 tds in those 2 games. To me, Nicks vs Fitzgerald/Roddy/Calvin is a debate, Nicks vs Manningham is not, its Nicks in a landslide.