Helmet Head
Footballguy
What do you think? Is it worth reading this series?
HH
HH
This is exactly what my wife tells me. As I said above, only read the first 3 books, I've seen all the movies. I need to fill in the gaps.They are definately on my "reccomend" list. Started reading them when my kids were interested, and then I got hooked. They also help when watching the movies. They help fill in the gaps. However, it's also frustrating knowing just how much they cut fromt he movies- especially this latest one.
I hate to ask, but why "not in a good way"?Kids books in my opinion and not in a good way.
Hadn't thought of that but yea, that does kind of suck for those of us who did have to wait.Yes, read them. Great series. Might not be literary masterpieces but I read books for fun and/or knowledge. This series was a lot of fun. I'm not a real fast reader but with this series I went from reading the first book in a week or two to the last book which I read in a day. Part of it was the hype about the book but once you get hooked on them you want to know, hard to put down.People reading them now are fortunate that they don't have to wait 2 years in between each book.![]()
Especially since he didn't say "The seventh was better still" As someone mentioned above I was a little disappointed in the finale. Top of head I'd rank them6, 4, 5, 7, 3, 1, 2Rowling's writing seemed to get better as she went. I've even re-read all of them save the last. Hopefully with a 2nd reading I'll enjoy it better than I did but to expound on my list I think the first 3 she was writing really good books for kids and then she just started writing really good books.MisfitBlondes said:This is all you need to know. MT is, quite possibly, the smartest guy we have around here.Definitely.The first two were page-turners, but not much more than that. (Like Dan Brown's books.)The third was quite good. The fourth was better. The fifth was better still. The sixth was better still . . .They're definitely not just children's books.
I have a hard time explaining it. When I read them it was obvious they were written for kids. I am not the smartest guy in the world but I had the feeling I was reading something that was on the level of The Hardy boys. I loved the Hardy Boys as a kid but not as an adult. I actually found the whole adult fascination with Harry potter strange. I was not a fan of the story either. It seemed like a lot of wash,rinse,repeat to me. This may have changed after the third book. I stopped reading them but the first three were all the same thing in my opinion. I know I am in the minority with this and lots of folks I respect loved these stories. I thought a lot of it was media fueled.I hate to ask, but why "not in a good way"?Kids books in my opinion and not in a good way.
I will be very surprised if the Harry Potter series stands the test of time. I do not think it will be thought of as "literature". There is nothing wrong with that. I enjoy junk food for the brain as much as the next guy but I will not try to convince people that World War Z is literature. I see a lot of Potter fans trying to do just that.It's funny that the name Harry Potter is associated with literature for kids, but I think it's definitely worth a read. I actually got started with them based on the recommendation of a literature hound that I worked with. At the time, I never would have guessed that she would have found the Harry Potter books to be engaging.The first three books are fairly simple kids fare, but starting with book 4, the plots become increasingly more complex. Books 4, 6, and 7 especially so. It's obvious that J.K. Rowling's skills as a writer were increasing. She borrows liberally from Lord of the Rings themes, but the Potter series still stands on it's own.
Unless you are a kid. As much as I did not like these books I love what they did for reading. Seems like all of a sudden kids started reading again. Kids reading is rarely a bad thing.I vote 'no'.I read the first 2 or 3 chapters of the first book and didn't see what the big deal was. Rowling's writing style wears thin really fast.
Agreed. I think she is a very pedestrian writer telling a very good story. Read Neil Gaiman's The Graveyard Book to see what a good writer can do with a similarly interesting story.I vote 'no'.
I read the first 2 or 3 chapters of the first book and didn't see what the big deal was. Rowling's writing style wears thin really fast.
I have read each book once or twice and have listened to the final two books a couple of more times. Definitely a way to go to enjoy the books again.Highly recommend. They are also definitely worth listening to on CD/tape. Jim Dale is the narrator and does fantastic voicework. He has great voices for all the characters and has won grammys for his narration work.
George Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series is IMO the best example of what a good writer can do with a great fantasy story, but I agree that Rowling isn't the greatest. Although books 4-7 were of a much higher quality than the first three.Agreed. I think she is a very pedestrian writer telling a very good story. Read Neil Gaiman's The Graveyard Book to see what a good writer can do with a similarly interesting story.I vote 'no'.
I read the first 2 or 3 chapters of the first book and didn't see what the big deal was. Rowling's writing style wears thin really fast.
Don't get me wrong. I loved how the HP series got a lot of kids interested in reading. The same thing for those 'Twilight' hunks of crap. I've got 8th grade girls who normally wouldn't read anything longer than a text message ripping through those books.I just hope it leads to reading something with more substance.Unless you are a kid. As much as I did not like these books I love what they did for reading. Seems like all of a sudden kids started reading again. Kids reading is rarely a bad thing.I vote 'no'.I read the first 2 or 3 chapters of the first book and didn't see what the big deal was. Rowling's writing style wears thin really fast.
Have had them on e-readers for months. Can get them for you for the great price of gratis. PM me if interested.
Fixed.Have had them on e-readers for monthsYEARS. Can get them for you for the great price of gratis. PM me if interested.
Interesting, one of my least favorite books was Order. I thought it needed a lot of editing.Definitely worth reading. The first couple were pretty much by-the-numbers kids fantasy books. Outcast kid with a greater destiny, etc. But Rowling can at least tell a tale, so I continued on. As they progressed, they got more adult in scope and evolved into pretty solid fantasy books for any age. Order of Phoenix is my personal favorite, with the middle three probably being the best three. As a note, Goblet of Fire won the 2001 Hugo award for best S(peculative)F(iction) book of the year. Azkaban was nominated the year before.
I loved the final book. It wrapped things up nicely and was very well paced.In order I would rank 3 or 4 as my top, 7, 1, 6, and 5/2.One nice thing about the books is she carries a lot of details throughout the books. The character development for the side characters is also fun to read.Absolutely worth reading, and in all likelyhood you'll greatly enjoy them.I was pretty disappointed with the final book but there are plenty of people who liked it.I consider the 1st 4 to be my favorites, #1 for me was probably Goblet of Fire.You may have to kind of work at not finding out any spoilers if you don't already know them.People reading them now are fortunate that they don't have to wait 2 years in between each book.![]()
Not at all. These books are waaaaaay overrated.I guess I need to be the contrarian here.
I guess that depends on whether you think your daughter is ready to handle some of the more mature themes. If you enjoyed the books, maybe you can re-read them ahead of her and be the judge of whether she's ready for the next book. Seems like most of the content wouldn't be too overwhelming for an 8 yr old.So interesting dilemma - my 8yo is now reading the first book, and is really getting into it. I have all 7 books, but I don't know that I want her to read all 7 now (or by the end of summer) Seems like the further into the series the more "mature" the books became - which was fine when they were coming out since kids were generally a year, or so, older for each book. Anyone else deal with this? Let her read them at whatever pace she is comfortable, or hold each book back a few months?
Most of it is fine, but some of the death descriptions might be a little much for an 8 year old. You are the best judge of your kid's maturity level.I guess that depends on whether you think your daughter is ready to handle some of the more mature themes. If you enjoyed the books, maybe you can re-read them ahead of her and be the judge of whether she's ready for the next book. Seems like most of the content wouldn't be too overwhelming for an 8 yr old.So interesting dilemma - my 8yo is now reading the first book, and is really getting into it. I have all 7 books, but I don't know that I want her to read all 7 now (or by the end of summer) Seems like the further into the series the more "mature" the books became - which was fine when they were coming out since kids were generally a year, or so, older for each book. Anyone else deal with this? Let her read them at whatever pace she is comfortable, or hold each book back a few months?
They're fun books. Not great literature and she wrote herself into many corners that she had to MacGuffin her way out of with horcruxes, hallows and the like but overall they are very entertaining and real page turners.You still aren't getting the irony of coming into threads exclusively to make fun of books, and the people who read them, for being childish, are you?PM Chaka. He's the resident expert on kids' books.
Why are you so sensitive about the books you read?And the OP asked for an opinion on whether or not the books were worth reading. Pretty sure that that means those of us who don't like the books have every right to slam them.They're fun books. Not great literature and she wrote herself into many corners that she had to MacGuffin her way out of with horcruxes, hallows and the like but overall they are very entertaining and real page turners.You still aren't getting the irony of coming into threads exclusively to make fun of books, and the people who read them, for being childish, are you?PM Chaka. He's the resident expert on kids' books.
My kid read them all when she was seven.* Turned out OK.So interesting dilemma - my 8yo is now reading the first book, and is really getting into it. I have all 7 books, but I don't know that I want her to read all 7 now (or by the end of summer) Seems like the further into the series the more "mature" the books became - which was fine when they were coming out since kids were generally a year, or so, older for each book. Anyone else deal with this? Let her read them at whatever pace she is comfortable, or hold each book back a few months?
I provided my opinion on these books. Still waiting on Smoovy's review. I have no problem with your opinion on the books when you actually talk about the books. What I don't understand is when you comment on books you didn't read (The Hunger Games, not sure if you actually read any of the HP books) and why you fish with commentary about Hardy Boys and pre-teen girls. That kind of commentary is every bit the pre-teen behavior that you are trying to make fun of. You did the same thing in the 2012 coming attractions thread. That is what I have a problem with, not the fact that you don't like the same books that I do.Why are you so sensitive about the books you read?And the OP asked for an opinion on whether or not the books were worth reading. Pretty sure that that means those of us who don't like the books have every right to slam them.They're fun books. Not great literature and she wrote herself into many corners that she had to MacGuffin her way out of with horcruxes, hallows and the like but overall they are very entertaining and real page turners.You still aren't getting the irony of coming into threads exclusively to make fun of books, and the people who read them, for being childish, are you?PM Chaka. He's the resident expert on kids' books.
Who said I didn't read any of HG or HP? And being able to understand how a grown man can find books written for juveniles and teenage girls appealing is juvenile? And the same applies for the movie thread. A large number of those movies are aimed towards tween/teenagers. How would you respond to a 30 year old man telling you "I really, really like Justin Bieber. I have all of his songs and can't wait to see him in concert!"?I provided my opinion on these books. Still waiting on Smoovy's review. I have no problem with your opinion on the books when you actually talk about the books. What I don't understand is when you comment on books you didn't read (The Hunger Games, not sure if you actually read any of the HP books) and why you fish with commentary about Hardy Boys and pre-teen girls. That kind of commentary is every bit the pre-teen behavior that you are trying to make fun of. You did the same thing in the 2012 coming attractions thread. That is what I have a problem with, not the fact that you don't like the same books that I do.Why are you so sensitive about the books you read?And the OP asked for an opinion on whether or not the books were worth reading. Pretty sure that that means those of us who don't like the books have every right to slam them.They're fun books. Not great literature and she wrote herself into many corners that she had to MacGuffin her way out of with horcruxes, hallows and the like but overall they are very entertaining and real page turners.You still aren't getting the irony of coming into threads exclusively to make fun of books, and the people who read them, for being childish, are you?PM Chaka. He's the resident expert on kids' books.
Just because I am of a different opinion of you, doesn't make me childish. Hope that helps.They're fun books. Not great literature and she wrote herself into many corners that she had to MacGuffin her way out of with horcruxes, hallows and the like but overall they are very entertaining and real page turners.You still aren't getting the irony of coming into threads exclusively to make fun of books, and the people who read them, for being childish, are you?PM Chaka. He's the resident expert on kids' books.
I don't have to punch myself in the face to know that it would hurt, and I wouldn't like it. Also, I am not aware of a rule that says you HAVE to read a book to be able to comment your feelings about it. If you could forward me your rules for posting about books, I would greatly appreciate it. I don't want to keep hurting your feelings.Still waiting on Smoovy's review.
If Dresden and Kingkiller are anything close to as good as ASoIaF then I'm in. Almost done with the 3rd volume in that series and am hopelessly hooked.You are selling yourself short on HP if you only read the first volume. That is a very average book, and IMO the series didn't really get good until book 3 or 4. And after that it was great.I am an avid reader of SF/Fantasy and have been since I was a kid. I read the first Harry Potter book and thought "meh". After having multiple people tell me how great the series is I thought maybe I was in a bad mood so I reread the first book - to the same result. Roald Dahl + Dr. Seuss is what I liken it to. If you are looking for good reads in that genre. I highly recommend:George RR Martin's - A Song of Ice and Fire seriesJim Butcher's - Dresden Files series.Patrick Rothfuss' - Kingkiller ChroniclesThose far surpass what I have read of HP. I can recommend another dozen series/authors over Rowling's works. Granted, I couldn't motivate myself to read past the first book but I view that as a failure of the book.
There was some development toward a more adult audience at some point. Whether that was driven by adults reading the books or it was the plan all along, I don't know. I can tell you, I became aware of the books around Order of the Phoenix and I commented to a co-worker can you believe all the hoopla about a kids book and she told me to read them. The first couple are very kid oriented, but you should be able to read them fast. The ones after that are a lot darker and more adult oriented. So I stuck with it and she was right. After I got caught up, I went back and took my time and read the first couple because I kind of rushed through them to get to the more adult ones. I enjoyed it more the second time because I knew there would be a payoff.Who said I didn't read any of HG or HP? And being able to understand how a grown man can find books written for juveniles and teenage girls appealing is juvenile? And the same applies for the movie thread. A large number of those movies are aimed towards tween/teenagers. How would you respond to a 30 year old man telling you "I really, really like Justin Bieber. I have all of his songs and can't wait to see him in concert!"?I provided my opinion on these books. Still waiting on Smoovy's review. I have no problem with your opinion on the books when you actually talk about the books. What I don't understand is when you comment on books you didn't read (The Hunger Games, not sure if you actually read any of the HP books) and why you fish with commentary about Hardy Boys and pre-teen girls. That kind of commentary is every bit the pre-teen behavior that you are trying to make fun of. You did the same thing in the 2012 coming attractions thread. That is what I have a problem with, not the fact that you don't like the same books that I do.Why are you so sensitive about the books you read?And the OP asked for an opinion on whether or not the books were worth reading. Pretty sure that that means those of us who don't like the books have every right to slam them.They're fun books. Not great literature and she wrote herself into many corners that she had to MacGuffin her way out of with horcruxes, hallows and the like but overall they are very entertaining and real page turners.You still aren't getting the irony of coming into threads exclusively to make fun of books, and the people who read them, for being childish, are you?PM Chaka. He's the resident expert on kids' books.