Rewatched Interstellar because of this thread.
Better than I remembered, but also more reliant on the M Knight Shamalang moment too. Wouldn't ever put it 1st or even top 10, but a very worthy inclusion.
I think I'm broken or just allergic to Nolan movies. I thought this thing was a steaming pile of crap. Just so ridiculous that my suspension of disbelief my never recover. Like, permanently broken after this thing.
If you didn't like the Matrix there was zero chance you'd like Interstellar.
I didn't really give the Matrix a full chance. I bailed really early as I just thought it was dumb. But I should have seen it in the theater and given it a chance.
It took me three nights to get through this slog of a movie. But I did it. The ending was preposterous. The whole thing was absurd. I did like the visuals and some of the space scenes were cool, but here you have all the money in the world for special effects; why not break some of that money off for a better script with a more sensible plot? I rolled my eyes so hard they were strained for a month.
You're not entirely wrong. Interstellar doesn't deserve the plaudits it gets.
I really think it's a Christopher Nolan problem for me. I've said it before and it's pretty silly but 10% of the population can't stomach cilantro. For them, it tastes like soap. It's not their fault.
That's me and Nolan movies - well, the ones I've seen. Dunkirk was a visually amazing war film that was expertly shot. I have zero idea what it's about. I had trouble following the characters.
Oppenheimer - tremendous in so many ways but also bored me to tears and I have no desire to ever see it again.
I quit watching bat mans 30 years ago. Zero interest. Less than zero.