IMHO when it comes to dine in services, there is no middle ground that works. The current regulations, such as 50% occupancy max, will cause most dine in restaurants to lose more money trying to operate with the regulations than they would lose if they were closed. But if the regulations were lessened to the point where dine in restaurants could be profitable (which would be pretty close to 100% occupancy given the razor thin margins restaurants operate at), then it's probable that R0 of the area will go too high as a result. While it's pretty easy to know the restaurant needs to be close to 100% occupancy to make a profit, the problem is government doesn't know how much occupancy they can allow without causing the R0 to be too high. The only way they can learn is to experiment. The reopening with these regulations are all an experiment. If the R0 stays low, they'll reduce the regulations. If the R0 goes to high, they'll make them even stricter.