It's really eye-opening. I'm watching replays on sites but to see the day-to-day of how the (arguably disrespectful) Saquon Barkley negotiations went with Joe Schoen to the surprising nature of how the Brian Burns trade might have started during the NFL Draft ("wanna give 2 #1s for Brian Burns?") ... there have been some gems for sure.I’m curious about the reaction so far to Hard Knocks from @The Frankman and other fans of the Giants
I mean they disrespected him for 3 years with the contract talk and the leaks ("he asked for $15 million"). You don't treat your best offensive player and the face of the franchise like crap in the sense that they never really sat down and offered him a contract equal to his status, I'm, sorry. Saquon was very transparent in his wishes over the years, and the Giants basically said for him to shop around twice.I don't see it as disrespectful.
GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
What was more telling to me is how pissed Saquon sounded...he does not like Schoen and I'm guessing that stems from the franchise tag stuff the prior year.
I'm loving this series...a much more in depth look at the offseason front office stuff that's ever been shown before (that I'm aware of)
I’ll add that Schoen seems like he took the previous Barkley negotiations personally.I don't see it as disrespectful.
GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
What was more telling to me is how pissed Saquon sounded...he does not like Schoen and I'm guessing that stems from the franchise tag stuff the prior year.
I'm loving this series...a much more in depth look at the offseason front office stuff that's ever been shown before (that I'm aware of)
Dabol talking to QB in the meetings was fascinating.
Saquon signed a 3-year contract with the Eagles.I mean they disrespected him for 3 years with the contract talk and the leaks ("he asked for $15 million"). You don't treat your best offensive player and the face of the franchise like crap in the sense that they never really sat down and offered him a contract equal to his status, I'm, sorry. Saquon was very transparent in his wishes over the years, and the Giants basically said for him to shop around twice.I don't see it as disrespectful.
GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
What was more telling to me is how pissed Saquon sounded...he does not like Schoen and I'm guessing that stems from the franchise tag stuff the prior year.
I'm loving this series...a much more in depth look at the offseason front office stuff that's ever been shown before (that I'm aware of)
They signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
They signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
Sure, but essentially for about $11.5, like I said earlier in range, it's not like NFL salary caps are getting hammered over what amounts to about $6M a year. If age was a reason to not extend Barkely not sure how you can make a case throwing that money at Singletary made any sense.They signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
not for 25 guaranteed
Sure, but essentially for about $11.5, like I said earlier in range, it's not like NFL salary caps are getting hammered over what amounts to about $6M a year. If age was a reason to not extend Barkely not sure how you can make a case throwing that money at Singletary made any sense.They signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
not for 25 guaranteed
I recall reading that Schoen’s philosophy is to try to avoid using void years and stay as close to so called true or straight cap hitsSure, but essentially for about $11.5, like I said earlier in range, it's not like NFL salary caps are getting hammered over what amounts to about $6M a year. If age was a reason to not extend Barkely not sure how you can make a case throwing that money at Singletary made any sense.They signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
not for 25 guaranteed
Singletary cap hit
2024: 3.75M
2025: 6.25M
2026: 6.5M
Saquon cap hit
2024: 3.8M
2025: 5.5M
2026: 9.0M
2027: Void - 19.3M
I feel like Schoen is coming off pretty solid so far, and I'm enjoying the look into FO stuff a lot more than the typical player/HC centric stuff.
The scenes with Daboll and the rookie QB prospects was really interesting, and I thought made Williams look pretty clearly ahead of the other guys when it came to memory and understanding play design concepts. Daniels especially looked lost.
I thought the Barkley stuff was very fair to Barkley. Unfair would have been tagging him and then being like, "find a better offer so we can trade you"
The ## seems big but as % of the cap, its pretty small. Howie with the classic "zig when they zag" style here is what it sounds like.I feel like Schoen is coming off pretty solid so far, and I'm enjoying the look into FO stuff a lot more than the typical player/HC centric stuff.
The scenes with Daboll and the rookie QB prospects was really interesting, and I thought made Williams look pretty clearly ahead of the other guys when it came to memory and understanding play design concepts. Daniels especially looked lost.
I thought the Barkley stuff was very fair to Barkley. Unfair would have been tagging him and then being like, "find a better offer so we can trade you"
At the very least, when Saquon said there was no offer from the Giants, the last episode confirmed it. I'm still surprised the Eagles broke with their team-building philosophy and spent big on the RB position. I would have never guess that in a million years.
Part of the price is not having to face him twice a year.I feel like Schoen is coming off pretty solid so far, and I'm enjoying the look into FO stuff a lot more than the typical player/HC centric stuff.
The scenes with Daboll and the rookie QB prospects was really interesting, and I thought made Williams look pretty clearly ahead of the other guys when it came to memory and understanding play design concepts. Daniels especially looked lost.
I thought the Barkley stuff was very fair to Barkley. Unfair would have been tagging him and then being like, "find a better offer so we can trade you"
At the very least, when Saquon said there was no offer from the Giants, the last episode confirmed it. I'm still surprised the Eagles broke with their team-building philosophy and spent big on the RB position. I would have never guess that in a million years.
At a price that helped them sign 2 offensive linemen that upgraded arguably the biggest area of needed upgradingThey signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
You get what you pay forAt a price that helped them sign 2 offensive linemen that upgraded arguably the biggest area of needed upgradingThey signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
You get what you pay forAt a price that helped them sign 2 offensive linemen that upgraded arguably the biggest area of needed upgradingThey signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
Can't it be both? - (Family Guy reference)You get what you pay forAt a price that helped them sign 2 offensive linemen that upgraded arguably the biggest area of needed upgradingThey signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
I wouldn't say the Giants upgraded the line. They signed two guys.
Isn't the price of the two RBs equivalent over the next two years?At a price that helped them sign 2 offensive linemen that upgraded arguably the biggest area of needed upgradingThey signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
It's a really interesting show for sure. GM looks completely out of his depth though. Not sure any other front office is going to sign up for this.
Isn't the price of the two RBs equivalent over the next two years?At a price that helped them sign 2 offensive linemen that upgraded arguably the biggest area of needed upgradingThey signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
Who are better than the two guys they will be replacing. That would be an upgradeYou get what you pay forAt a price that helped them sign 2 offensive linemen that upgraded arguably the biggest area of needed upgradingThey signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
I wouldn't say the Giants upgraded the line. They signed two guys.
It's easy to rip the GM watching a show like this. We'll see how things turn out in time. We all want a GM like Kevin Coster in Draft Day.
That isn't gonna happen. I'll trust the process and keep my glass half full.
Who are better than the two guys they will be replacing. That would be an upgradeYou get what you pay forAt a price that helped them sign 2 offensive linemen that upgraded arguably the biggest area of needed upgradingThey signed a 27 year old RB to replace him.GM is charged with building a winner and re-upping on a 27 year old RB doesn't make sense in their position. It's a very acceptable stance.
I wouldn't say the Giants upgraded the line. They signed two guys.
I can't stop seeing Phil Dunphy from Modern Family whenever this guy talks. He seems...nice, but also like...I feel I could do this job just as well. Am I crazy for thinking this?It's a really interesting show for sure. GM looks completely out of his depth though. Not sure any other front office is going to sign up for this.