What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Help me settle a debate which RB do you think is better going foward (1 Viewer)

Which guy do you want for the future?

  • Lynch

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Barber

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Carter_Can_Fly

Footballguy
I am wondering which RB you would rather have going foward not only for next year but for dynasty as well.

I think Lynch has a much higher ceiling than Barber and should be the easy choice here. What do you guys think.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Barber is the clear favorite. 4.8 yard average and 10TDs in 204 attempts? I'll take that any day. The only argument to pick Lynch over Barber would have to do with higher number of carries Lynch may get, which is a good point. Still, I'll be targeting Barber.

 
Lynch had a better PPG year last year than Barber. Lynch also was a rookie. Dallas drafted a RB in the first round to use Barber as similar as possible to prior years which was very good for them. I think Lynch has way more value going forward if anyone cares.

 
barber short term and barber long term

and it's not close

better team, better QB, better passing game to keep box from being overloaded, better skills, 2 or 3 times more red zone opps, better health, better everything

only negatives i ever hear about barber are:

1) he never has had to carry a fulltime load (fine he still will score more than lynch over the duration of their contracts with his current load and if he gets a bigger load...)

2) and he runs too hard and will get hurt (lynch missed time not running as hard as barber last year and ANYONE is one play away in the NFL of getting hurt)

 
barber short term and barber long termand it's not closebetter team, better QB, better passing game to keep box from being overloaded, better skills, 2 or 3 times more red zone opps, better health, better everythingonly negatives i ever hear about barber are:1) he never has had to carry a fulltime load (fine he still will score more than lynch over the duration of their contracts with his current load and if he gets a bigger load...) 2) and he runs too hard and will get hurt (lynch missed time not running as hard as barber last year and ANYONE is one play away in the NFL of getting hurt)
-How about Lynch being 3 years younger? -Better Skills for Barber? how so?-Better health for Barber? (Seriously?)-How about Dallas drafting a RB in the first round is that not a negative?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is really a tough call. Barber is in a better offense (system, line, overall talent, etc.) but Lynch has no real challenger for touches in Buffalo and may be slightly more talented overall. I guess for me, I am leaning toward Barber, but it is very close.

 
in FF I go with Lynch because though i believe these two have similar talent level, he has virtually no competition for carries, whereas Barber (even with Jones gone) has two swift rookie RB's fighting him for carries, and if Jerry Jones was comfortable in starting Barber by himself w/o RBBC he would not have drafted TWO rookie RB's.

if I owned a team, id take barber cause I like his bruising running style and I know that I can always supplement him with some lightening should he get tired.

BAM

 
i think barber is more impressive.

i think lynch will get more carries.

i think both will be about the same stats wise... one should go right after the other in a startup and dynasty draft.

 
I would choose Barber because I like his hard nosed runnng style. Just because they got F. Jones in the first round doesn't mean Barber will get less carries. I think Barber will get more carries than last year. Lynch may have some off the field things to worry about with his hit and run incident.

 
I think Barber is a fine, fine RB but Lynch is not getting the respect he deserves by the posts (not the poll). This guy is a very talented player who can do almost anything you ask of him and do it at a very high level. If he was in DAL and Barber were in BUF I think this is a no-brainer; maybe Lynch is a buy-low right now?

 
With Felix around, I don't see Barber ever reaching difference maker status.

I would probably rather have Lynch in a dynasty, but I think Barber is a better option in redraft leagues.

 
Lynch.

Label Felix as you may...change-of-pace RB...Reggie Bush-like role...etc...etc. The guy was the 22nd player drafted and he will undoubtedly see the field.

There have been 32 RB's drafted in the 1st-round from '97-'07. Exclusive of injuries (ie. Chris Perry, '04), how many of these 32 RB's did not receive at least 150 touches (carries & catches) in at least one of their first two seasons? Answer: Only one --- Trung Canidate, '00. (However, Trung actually received over 150 touches in Year 4 of his short career).

Felix may be great or Felix may bust. Only time will tell. However, history shows he will be given an opportunity.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lynch.

Label Felix as you may...change-of-pace RB...Reggie Bush-like role...etc...etc. The guy was the 22nd player drafted and he will undoubtedly see the field.

There have been 32 RB's drafted in the 1st-round from '97-'07. Exclusive of injuries (ie. Chris Perry, '04), how many of these 24 RB's did not receive at least 150 touches (carries & catches) in at least one of their first two seasons? Answer: Only one --- Trung Canidate, '00. (However, Trung actually received over 150 touches in Year 4 of his short career).

Felix may be great or Felix may bust. Only time will tell. However, history shows he will be given an opportunity.
Nice find.
 
Barber is a sick talent, but you have to be concerned with his number of touches. As weiner dog pointed out, Felix will most certainly vulture opportunities this season.

Lynch has already carried a full load and looked like shifty, hard-nosed runner. At 3 years younger, I gotta take Marshawn.

 
Keep the votes coming guys. I have to say this is closer then I originally thought. I thought Lynch was more of a favorite, but I guess there are many high on Barber.

 
being in texas, most of the cowboys games are aired... so i have to suffer through it.... BUT ID RATHER BE WATCHING MY ATLANTA FALCONS.

so iv seen more of barber... hes gifted, tough, and runs like a mad man. if the cowboys wise up and start giving him the carries they might eventually win a superbowl in this decade. but as i said above, i believe both are on par with each other talent wise, and lynch gets the nod due to the sheer amount of carries he will see in buffalo...

use this to decide.

MB3: talent, great OLINE/WR/TE/QB/Defense, Primary back in his respected offense, RBBC?

lynch: talented, mid teir OL, great WR, subpar QB, Age, carries, Primary back in his repected offense, trouble maker?

on the mb3 side, he has alot of talent around him to take pressure off, as well as a defense that will hold opposing teams, which means more running at the end of the game. his downside is he is in a RBBC as far as we know

on the lynch side, he will get 20+ carries, has great talent, is a few years younger, but doesnt have that great of a OL, nor does he have the talent around him that MB3 has. however, i do believe that buffalo is a up and coming team.

 
I think it needs to be noted that the Bills ranked #12 in rushing attempts/game last year at 28.0, while Dallas ranked #21 at 26.2 attempts/game. If Skip Peete's proclamation that Felix = Charlie Garner (...and his 12-carries and 5 receptions per game) holds true, then MBIII may have a difficult time eclipsing 225 carries in '08. Granted...at 4.8 yards/carry, 225 carries will net 1080 yards rushing.

However, 1080 rushing yards is less than Lynch's rookie season total of 1115 yards (...despite missing three games). I think the bulk of MBIII's future value lies in his ability to 1) score TD's and 2) catch the ball. Lynch will undoubtedly get more carries than MBIII and he should also improve slightly on his 4.0 yards/carry average.

Should be an interesting battle.

 
valhallan said:
Barber is a sick talent
Honestly, Barber isn't all that talented. He's just one of the hardest working RBs in the NFL. He's not fast, not shifty, not explosive. He's just tough to bring down.Lynch is talented.
 
valhallan said:
Barber is a sick talent
Honestly, Barber isn't all that talented. He's just one of the hardest working RBs in the NFL. He's not fast, not shifty, not explosive. He's just tough to bring down.Lynch is talented.
That's fine. Working hard is as rare as being fast, shifty, or explosive. However, I do think Barber is pretty shifty.
 
Keep the votes coming guys. I have to say this is closer then I originally thought. I thought Lynch was more of a favorite, but I guess there are many high on Barber.
Wrong place to get an unbiased view of Barber.
I actually happen to love watching Barber play. I think he is a good RB. His greatest attribute as already mentioned is being so determined that he breaks many tackles and is very hard to bring down. HoweverLynch is a better overall talent than Barber. He is a very gifted runner and one of the best young RB's in the league. There is only a handful of guys I would rather have dynasty wise than Lynch and Barber is not one of them.
 
Unless your league is set up to give major bonus pts for TV reporting...everyone should take the hit & run kid over Tiki.

 
guys,

I DON'T CARE if Felix gets touches, Barber will outscore Lynch IF HE GETS THE SAME NUMBER of touches as he did the last two years

do TDs not matter in y'alls leagues?

it'll take 2 years for Lynch to get the TDs that Barber gets in 1

Barber averages 14 (not starting!), Lynch averages 7 (full-time load)

 
i went with MBIII.

1. he's on a better team with a much more explosive offense than BUF.

2. the whole hit and run thing with Lynch has me a bit concerned, character-wise. although i admit, i dont know the details.

3. Felix Jones will be a COP back, with MBIII getting the redzone work. and we know he's got a nose for the endzone.

4. i'm not ready to jump on the "MBIII runs too hard, he'll wear out in a few yrs" bus. he's been fine so far. some guys can pound and last. time will tell. added bonus Felix can spell him, hopefully with success.

5. MBIII has better vision then he gets credit for. he is excellent at reading blocks and making quick cuts in traffic. kinda like the opposite of JJ running for the Cowboys.

6. i'm a Cowboys fan, and a BIT biased.

 
guys,I DON'T CARE if Felix gets touches, Barber will outscore Lynch IF HE GETS THE SAME NUMBER of touches as he did the last two yearsdo TDs not matter in y'alls leagues?it'll take 2 years for Lynch to get the TDs that Barber gets in 1Barber averages 14 (not starting!), Lynch averages 7 (full-time load)
You forgot the stat where he started against the Redskins and had 1 yard and no TD's. The whole point being, starter or back-up with certain roles doesn't always equate to what you think. Granted chances are better in certain situations, but we'll see what he (MBIII) really does when teams get to key on him.
 
guys,I DON'T CARE if Felix gets touches, Barber will outscore Lynch IF HE GETS THE SAME NUMBER of touches as he did the last two yearsdo TDs not matter in y'alls leagues?it'll take 2 years for Lynch to get the TDs that Barber gets in 1Barber averages 14 (not starting!), Lynch averages 7 (full-time load)
You forgot the stat where he started against the Redskins and had 1 yard and no TD's. The whole point being, starter or back-up with certain roles doesn't always equate to what you think. Granted chances are better in certain situations, but we'll see what he (MBIII) really does when teams get to key on him.
he had a bad game. it happens. what do you mean by "when they key on him". just curious, cause i remember a lot of people were sayin JJ was softening up the defense for MBIII to come in and mop up. not true, imo. MBIII was not just coming in on passing downs. when they split series MBIII always did more with his. MBIII IS more talented than JJ, bottomline. doesn't matter if he's starting or not.
 
I think Barber is a fine, fine RB but Lynch is not getting the respect he deserves by the posts (not the poll). This guy is a very talented player who can do almost anything you ask of him and do it at a very high level. If he was in DAL and Barber were in BUF I think this is a no-brainer; maybe Lynch is a buy-low right now?
IMO if Lynch were in Dallas instead of Barber, Dallas doesn't draft Jones. The answer is Lynch, especially if "going forward" is supposed to imply beyond just this season. On top of that, Lynch gets drafted later (currently 2 spots in FBG dynasty ranking, 7 spots in FBG redraft ranking), so he is better value.
 
guys,

I DON'T CARE if Felix gets touches, Barber will outscore Lynch IF HE GETS THE SAME NUMBER of touches as he did the last two years

do TDs not matter in y'alls leagues?

it'll take 2 years for Lynch to get the TDs that Barber gets in 1

Barber averages 14 (not starting!), Lynch averages 7 (full-time load)
Particularly for TDs, past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. HTH.
 
guys,

I DON'T CARE if Felix gets touches, Barber will outscore Lynch IF HE GETS THE SAME NUMBER of touches as he did the last two years

do TDs not matter in y'alls leagues?

it'll take 2 years for Lynch to get the TDs that Barber gets in 1

Barber averages 14 (not starting!), Lynch averages 7 (full-time load)
Particularly for TDs, past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. HTH.
Actually, past performance is the best reliable indictor of future performance.Since you seem to be in the mood to help, please break down your reliable indicators of future performance. This should be great.

HTH.

 
guys,I DON'T CARE if Felix gets touches, Barber will outscore Lynch IF HE GETS THE SAME NUMBER of touches as he did the last two yearsdo TDs not matter in y'alls leagues?it'll take 2 years for Lynch to get the TDs that Barber gets in 1Barber averages 14 (not starting!), Lynch averages 7 (full-time load)
You forgot the stat where he started against the Redskins and had 1 yard and no TD's. The whole point being, starter or back-up with certain roles doesn't always equate to what you think. Granted chances are better in certain situations, but we'll see what he (MBIII) really does when teams get to key on him.
he had a bad game. it happens. what do you mean by "when they key on him". just curious, cause i remember a lot of people were sayin JJ was softening up the defense for MBIII to come in and mop up. not true, imo. MBIII was not just coming in on passing downs. when they split series MBIII always did more with his. MBIII IS more talented than JJ, bottomline. doesn't matter if he's starting or not.
Let me say that even as a Redskins fan, I really like they way MBIII runs. Effort is NEVER in questions with any attempt. The "key" line is in reference to teams preparing for him. He's not coming in on 3rd down, he's going to be playing on 1st & 2nd down on a consistent where teams will play many more 8 man fronts. Again, not 3rd down when the secondary is playing back or they are in the nickle. Not saying that was always the case with him, but it helps often as he was in there on 3rd down. MBIII is very good at short yardage, so he shouldn't be hampered for getting the yard or two that is needed in those situations. My example was to show what can happen to a player when a team has the time to focus on them as the featured back. Won't happen all the time, but being the starter doesn't always mean it's better.
 
I'd have to go with Barber both short term and long term. Short term being this year, long term being roughly 3 years out. Barber is simply in a better position and has already proven capable of posting elite numbers despite sharing carries. Both should be secure in their role for the next 3 years. After that, who knows. :hey:

 
I got a very sneaky feeling that Barber = Barlow.

I remember how high I was on Barlow after he got the Niners RB job all too himself, he even lead my fantasy team to the championship game after Hearst got hurt. Everyone was hyping him up but he never did much of anything as a full time starter.

The cowboys drafted Felix for a reason and that reason is that they do not feel Barber can handle the duties by himself.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
guys,

I DON'T CARE if Felix gets touches, Barber will outscore Lynch IF HE GETS THE SAME NUMBER of touches as he did the last two years

do TDs not matter in y'alls leagues?

it'll take 2 years for Lynch to get the TDs that Barber gets in 1

Barber averages 14 (not starting!), Lynch averages 7 (full-time load)
Particularly for TDs, past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. HTH.
Actually, past performance is the best reliable indictor of future performance.Since you seem to be in the mood to help, please break down your reliable indicators of future performance. This should be great.

HTH.
I'm always in the mood to help. :lmao: On your bolded statement, do you have something that backs that up for TDs? Like some kind of analysis that shows that scoring a high number of TDs in the previous season(s) correlates to scoring a high number of TDs in future season(s)?

IMO there are three things that immediately come to mind as strong contributors to TD scoring: talent, number of opportunities, and quality of opportunities.

IMO Barber is not one of the most talented RBs in the league. I'd say his talent is above average, but that's it.

Last year, Barber was #21 in rushing attempts and tied for #18 in touches, and that is in 16 games; other players below him probably had more opportunities per game. I expect him to be in the same neighborhood on touches this year.

On the positive side, he plays in a great offense, which helps the quality of his touches to be good (e.g., not much stacking of the box).

To a degree, this Barber discussion reminds me of the MJD hype last offseason. As a rookie, MJD had 15 TDs and accumulated almost 1400 yards on 212 touches; amazing performance per touch. Many people were eager to project him to improve on that in his second season. Instead, he had only 9 TDs and less than 1200 yards on an almost identical number of touches, as his performance per touch declined... despite the fact that the passing offense improved, which arguably could have opened things up for him a bit. :goodposting:

 
I'd have to go with Barber both short term and long term. Short term being this year, long term being roughly 3 years out. Barber is simply in a better position and has already proven capable of posting elite numbers despite sharing carries. Both should be secure in their role for the next 3 years. After that, who knows. :nerd:
Elite? Really?LT, AP, Westbrook, SJax, MBIII

That tier of players? Really?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
barber short term and barber long termand it's not closebetter team, better QB, better passing game to keep box from being overloaded, better skills, 2 or 3 times more red zone opps, better health, better everythingonly negatives i ever hear about barber are:1) he never has had to carry a fulltime load (fine he still will score more than lynch over the duration of their contracts with his current load and if he gets a bigger load...) 2) and he runs too hard and will get hurt (lynch missed time not running as hard as barber last year and ANYONE is one play away in the NFL of getting hurt)
-How about Lynch being 3 years younger? -Better Skills for Barber? how so?-Better health for Barber? (Seriously?)-How about Dallas drafting a RB in the first round is that not a negative?
Why did you ask this question if you are looking for reasons to not take Barber? Take Lynch and get over it.
 
guys,

I DON'T CARE if Felix gets touches, Barber will outscore Lynch IF HE GETS THE SAME NUMBER of touches as he did the last two years

do TDs not matter in y'alls leagues?

it'll take 2 years for Lynch to get the TDs that Barber gets in 1

Barber averages 14 (not starting!), Lynch averages 7 (full-time load)
Particularly for TDs, past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. HTH.
Actually, past performance is the best reliable indictor of future performance.Since you seem to be in the mood to help, please break down your reliable indicators of future performance. This should be great.

HTH.
I'm always in the mood to help. :) On your bolded statement, do you have something that backs that up for TDs? Like some kind of analysis that shows that scoring a high number of TDs in the previous season(s) correlates to scoring a high number of TDs in future season(s)?

IMO there are three things that immediately come to mind as strong contributors to TD scoring: talent, number of opportunities, and quality of opportunities.

IMO Barber is not one of the most talented RBs in the league. I'd say his talent is above average, but that's it.

Last year, Barber was #21 in rushing attempts and tied for #18 in touches, and that is in 16 games; other players below him probably had more opportunities per game. I expect him to be in the same neighborhood on touches this year.

On the positive side, he plays in a great offense, which helps the quality of his touches to be good (e.g., not much stacking of the box).

To a degree, this Barber discussion reminds me of the MJD hype last offseason. As a rookie, MJD had 15 TDs and accumulated almost 1400 yards on 212 touches; amazing performance per touch. Many people were eager to project him to improve on that in his second season. Instead, he had only 9 TDs and less than 1200 yards on an almost identical number of touches, as his performance per touch declined... despite the fact that the passing offense improved, which arguably could have opened things up for him a bit. :thumbup:
On the MJD front, you have to take in consideration the presence of FTaylor...and his continuing to be healthy...which could be different this year with his injury history. I believe Taylor missed some time in 2006 that helped MJD be able to prove himself that season.
 
barber short term and barber long termand it's not closebetter team, better QB, better passing game to keep box from being overloaded, better skills, 2 or 3 times more red zone opps, better health, better everythingonly negatives i ever hear about barber are:1) he never has had to carry a fulltime load (fine he still will score more than lynch over the duration of their contracts with his current load and if he gets a bigger load...) 2) and he runs too hard and will get hurt (lynch missed time not running as hard as barber last year and ANYONE is one play away in the NFL of getting hurt)
-How about Lynch being 3 years younger? -Better Skills for Barber? how so?-Better health for Barber? (Seriously?)-How about Dallas drafting a RB in the first round is that not a negative?
Why did you ask this question if you are looking for reasons to not take Barber? Take Lynch and get over it.
Um I think you missed the OP whereas I was in argument with guys from my league. I own Lynch and one of them owns Barber. I was saying Lynch is better going forward in dynasty. There was 7 of us on line at the time. 5 of them said they would rather have Barber vs 2 (including me) for Lynch. Therefore I wanted to start a thread to see what people thought.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top