What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Highest Ceiling (1 Viewer)

Tough call. Louis Murphy is the #1 WR in OAK looking to be in a breakout pattern with a decent QB tossing the ball.

Louis Murphy.

 
Tough call. Louis Murphy is the #1 WR in OAK looking to be in a breakout pattern with a decent QB tossing the ball.Louis Murphy.
:goodposting: Definitely agree. With Campbell throwing the ball Murphy has some great potential for this year. I really am high on Oakland improving in all facets of the game this year and that includes a big bump for the passing game.
 
This isn't who you think will be the best... this is who has the highest ceiling and that is absolutely Mike Williams!

Kid caught 81 Receptions for 1,265 Yards and 14TDs as a Freshman and 95 for 1,314 w/ 16TDs as a sophomore in college. With his physical skills it's not even close. Now... when you bring his head into the equation then everything changes in real life but the guy with the greatest upside is Mike Williams!

 
If these guys all go off for 100/1 in week one, Mike Williams has double the value of anyone else on that list. People want to believe in a good story.

 
Gaffney could easily get 1100 receiving yards and 7 TDs this year. He's light years ahead of the rest of this group.

 
If these guys all go off for 100/1 in week one, Mike Williams has double the value of anyone else on that list. People want to believe in a good story.
I'll disagree with you on that. It would be Royal's value who goes up because he's already proven he could be a top 20 WR with Marshall. Imagine without now.
 
Some guys aren't really thinking this through.

Highest ceiling = potential for greatest season if all things go well.

One guy in this list has been an elite talent and he also has the most accomplished (though old & injury plagued) QB out of the bunch.

If you think the answer is Louis Murphy or Jabar Gaffney, you are reading the question wrong.

A case can be made for Royal, but I don't see how you can't see the upside of Mike X. Williams and know that he has the highest ceiling.

ETA: In the "who was the greatest college WR you've ever seen" thread, Mike's name came up repeatedly.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.

 
Definitelty BMW due to his chance to catch 10+ TDs.

No other WR on this list is a red zone threat.

Louis Murphy would be 2nd and the rest far behind b/c "they are who we thought they are".

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.
:goodposting:Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
 
I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.
:lmao:Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
Do you think Hasselbeck has a better year than Orton? I don't and I'm a BMW owner. Thus the #1 WR on the Broncos will have a higher ceiling.
 
I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.
You really think Gaffney and Royal have the same ceiling?Gaffney is in his 9th year and he's cracked 700 yards just once.
 
I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.
:thumbup:Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
Do you think Hasselbeck has a better year than Orton? I don't and I'm a BMW owner. Thus the #1 WR on the Broncos will have a higher ceiling.
Both SEA and DEN are train wrecks but BMW presents the unknown so the "ceiling" is higher b/c you just don't know what he can do. He has looked awesome thus far in SEA. On the other hand, Orton, Gaffney and Royal have looked like....well...Orton, Gaffney and Royal. McDunce has ruined DEN for fantasy - stay far away.
 
I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.
:thumbup:Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
Do you think Hasselbeck has a better year than Orton? I don't and I'm a BMW owner. Thus the #1 WR on the Broncos will have a higher ceiling.
:shrug: Don't discount Orton this year - he's completely healed from his ankle injury last year, his team defense sucks which means he'll be passing a lot late in the game, he's had a great preseason, and he just got a one year contract extension. Not to say he's going to light the league on fire, but he should be a solid QB2, which is more than I can say for Hasselbeck.
 
I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.
:confused:Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
I understand your frustration! Hasselbeck may be long past his ceiling but at Orton's best he couldn't reach 3/4 of Hasselbeck's potential. BMW easily has the most potential. Again... it doesn't mean he'll actually realize it but the only answer to this question is BMW.
 
I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.
:confused: Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?

We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
Do you think Hasselbeck has a better year than Orton? I don't and I'm a BMW owner. Thus the #1 WR on the Broncos will have a higher ceiling.
No, I think Orton will have a better season, but that's not what we are talking about here (thus the :wall: )We are talking about CEILING!!! That means everything goes perfect. QB stays upright all year, plays to his potential, a couple of lucky breaks, game situations dictate more passing, etc. If that is the case for all of these guys, than I think BMW will blow the others on the list out of the water. He has the potential for 85-1250-15 type numbers in an ideal situation. None of those other guys would even break 10 TD's even if they were in as ideal a spot as possible. I could see Royal catching 100 balls, but nowhere near the yards and TD's that BMW could get. Gaffney and Murphy couldn't put up those kind of numbers playing anywhere.

 
I think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.

 
By the way, we are talking about the Mike Williams who in a 3 year, 3 team career (after which he was canned by his THIRD team) put up a total of 539 yards and 2 TDs right?

I know, I know, water under the bridge, fresh start etc. It's almost like his pro career never happened.

 
I think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.
;)1. Hester2. Gaffney3. Murphy4. Williams
 
I think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.
;)1. Hester2. Gaffney3. Murphy4. Williams
While I'd agree with this if this was the 99' Rams, but this is the 10' Bears. Their O line is not strong enough for Martz to implement his offense properly. IMO - This offense will be bottom quartile this year
 
I think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.
:bs:1. Hester2. Gaffney3. Murphy4. Williams
While I'd agree with this if this was the 99' Rams, but this is the 10' Bears. Their O line is not strong enough for Martz to implement his offense properly. IMO - This offense will be bottom quartile this year
And the Broncos, Raiders and Seahawks are closer to the '99 Rams than the '10 Bears? :P
 
Wow great arguments everybody. I appreciate it. I think I'll take a shot with BMW. Which would leave me with:

Calvin Johnson

Nicks

Welker

Floyd

Williams

 
I think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.
:lmao:1. Hester2. Gaffney3. Murphy4. Williams
While I'd agree with this if this was the 99' Rams, but this is the 10' Bears. Their O line is not strong enough for Martz to implement his offense properly. IMO - This offense will be bottom quartile this year
And the Broncos, Raiders and Seahawks are closer to the '99 Rams than the '10 Bears? :lmao:
Not saying that at all. His reasoning for picking Hester was he was the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense. I simply commented that this is not the Mike Martz offense of old...this IMO is going to be a failed experiment and their offense will not perform like a typical MM offense.BTW - to answer the OP's question, I think Gaffney has the highest ceiling. There are 100+ balls that went to Marshall that are now up for grabs, and it looks like Gaffney will be the prime recipient of those
 
I think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.
:thumbup:1. Hester2. Gaffney3. Murphy4. Williams
While I'd agree with this if this was the 99' Rams, but this is the 10' Bears. Their O line is not strong enough for Martz to implement his offense properly. IMO - This offense will be bottom quartile this year
And the Broncos, Raiders and Seahawks are closer to the '99 Rams than the '10 Bears? :rolleyes:
Not saying that at all. His reasoning for picking Hester was he was the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense. I simply commented that this is not the Mike Martz offense of old...this IMO is going to be a failed experiment and their offense will not perform like a typical MM offense.BTW - to answer the OP's question, I think Gaffney has the highest ceiling. There are 100+ balls that went to Marshall that are now up for grabs, and it looks like Gaffney will be the prime recipient of those
It's a fair point. But I think the offense will work "well enough" to produce good WR stats. It always has in the past.In Detroit, the team sucked, but the passing game was pretty good (at least by way of numbers). Kitna produced his first 4000 yards season under Martz. The year after they fired him (when the team was 7-9) was the year they went 0-16 with an absolutely horrible offense.Quick edit, I looked up team passing rankings for the years around when Martz was there (year, followed by team rank in NFL)05 26th (year b4 Martz)06 7th (1st Martz year)07 9th (2nd Martz year)08 24th (year after Martz)You can draw your own conclusions there.Not much to report in SF - he never got it going there.But the point is, regardless of whether the team or even the offense is successful overall, we know almost for certain that they will throw a lot. With Hester's speed a fair amount of those balls could turn into long TDs. Again, I'm not saying it WILL happen, just that it is conceivable, whereas I have a lot of trouble envisioning those other guys producing monster seasons.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If these guys all go off for 100/1 in week one, Mike Williams has double the value of anyone else on that list. People want to believe in a good story.
I'll disagree with you on that. It would be Royal's value who goes up because he's already proven he could be a top 20 WR with Marshall. Imagine without now.
Not the way the human mind works. People are willing to believe in miracles until they've seen the man behind the curtain. 100/1 out of Royal, and you'll have people projecting a reapeat of his 90/980/5 campaign. Maybe...MAYBE...a 10% bump that would reflect natural growth as a player.There's still mystery about Williams. People haven't seen enough of a campaign out of him to believe the magic is gone yet. He's the guy who was going to reinvent the position five years ago, just a little more world weary and a little wiser. 100/1 out of BMW week one, and you're going to see people coming out of the woodwork to bandy about 1300/9 type projections.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top