Tough call. Louis Murphy is the #1 WR in OAK looking to be in a breakout pattern with a decent QB tossing the ball.Louis Murphy.
I'll disagree with you on that. It would be Royal's value who goes up because he's already proven he could be a top 20 WR with Marshall. Imagine without now.If these guys all go off for 100/1 in week one, Mike Williams has double the value of anyone else on that list. People want to believe in a good story.
That's nice. Not an option. Thanks for playing!I like Tampa Mike!
I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.
Do you think Hasselbeck has a better year than Orton? I don't and I'm a BMW owner. Thus the #1 WR on the Broncos will have a higher ceiling.I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
You really think Gaffney and Royal have the same ceiling?Gaffney is in his 9th year and he's cracked 700 yards just once.I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.
Both SEA and DEN are train wrecks but BMW presents the unknown so the "ceiling" is higher b/c you just don't know what he can do. He has looked awesome thus far in SEA. On the other hand, Orton, Gaffney and Royal have looked like....well...Orton, Gaffney and Royal. McDunce has ruined DEN for fantasy - stay far away.Do you think Hasselbeck has a better year than Orton? I don't and I'm a BMW owner. Thus the #1 WR on the Broncos will have a higher ceiling.I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
Do you think Hasselbeck has a better year than Orton? I don't and I'm a BMW owner. Thus the #1 WR on the Broncos will have a higher ceiling.I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
I understand your frustration! Hasselbeck may be long past his ceiling but at Orton's best he couldn't reach 3/4 of Hasselbeck's potential. BMW easily has the most potential. Again... it doesn't mean he'll actually realize it but the only answer to this question is BMW.I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
No, I think Orton will have a better season, but that's not what we are talking about here (thus theDo you think Hasselbeck has a better year than Orton? I don't and I'm a BMW owner. Thus the #1 WR on the Broncos will have a higher ceiling.I think Gaffney/Royal have the same ceiling as they are on the same team and whoever picks up more targets with the loss of Marshall will be the best option out of anyone on the list.Orton to Gaffney or Orton to Royal is the best you can do here? Really?
We are talking BMW with pro-bowler Hasselbeck. And injury concerns don't come into play when talking "highest ceiling".
I think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.
While I'd agree with this if this was the 99' Rams, but this is the 10' Bears. Their O line is not strong enough for Martz to implement his offense properly. IMO - This offense will be bottom quartile this yearI think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.1. Hester2. Gaffney3. Murphy4. Williams
And the Broncos, Raiders and Seahawks are closer to the '99 Rams than the '10 Bears?While I'd agree with this if this was the 99' Rams, but this is the 10' Bears. Their O line is not strong enough for Martz to implement his offense properly. IMO - This offense will be bottom quartile this yearI think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.1. Hester2. Gaffney3. Murphy4. Williams
Not saying that at all. His reasoning for picking Hester was he was the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense. I simply commented that this is not the Mike Martz offense of old...this IMO is going to be a failed experiment and their offense will not perform like a typical MM offense.BTW - to answer the OP's question, I think Gaffney has the highest ceiling. There are 100+ balls that went to Marshall that are now up for grabs, and it looks like Gaffney will be the prime recipient of thoseAnd the Broncos, Raiders and Seahawks are closer to the '99 Rams than the '10 Bears?While I'd agree with this if this was the 99' Rams, but this is the 10' Bears. Their O line is not strong enough for Martz to implement his offense properly. IMO - This offense will be bottom quartile this yearI think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.1. Hester2. Gaffney3. Murphy4. Williams
![]()
It's a fair point. But I think the offense will work "well enough" to produce good WR stats. It always has in the past.In Detroit, the team sucked, but the passing game was pretty good (at least by way of numbers). Kitna produced his first 4000 yards season under Martz. The year after they fired him (when the team was 7-9) was the year they went 0-16 with an absolutely horrible offense.Quick edit, I looked up team passing rankings for the years around when Martz was there (year, followed by team rank in NFL)05 26th (year b4 Martz)06 7th (1st Martz year)07 9th (2nd Martz year)08 24th (year after Martz)You can draw your own conclusions there.Not much to report in SF - he never got it going there.But the point is, regardless of whether the team or even the offense is successful overall, we know almost for certain that they will throw a lot. With Hester's speed a fair amount of those balls could turn into long TDs. Again, I'm not saying it WILL happen, just that it is conceivable, whereas I have a lot of trouble envisioning those other guys producing monster seasons.Not saying that at all. His reasoning for picking Hester was he was the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense. I simply commented that this is not the Mike Martz offense of old...this IMO is going to be a failed experiment and their offense will not perform like a typical MM offense.BTW - to answer the OP's question, I think Gaffney has the highest ceiling. There are 100+ balls that went to Marshall that are now up for grabs, and it looks like Gaffney will be the prime recipient of thoseAnd the Broncos, Raiders and Seahawks are closer to the '99 Rams than the '10 Bears?While I'd agree with this if this was the 99' Rams, but this is the 10' Bears. Their O line is not strong enough for Martz to implement his offense properly. IMO - This offense will be bottom quartile this yearI think it's funny we have forceful responses for everyone but Hester. He was my first thought for CEILING. If he turns out to be the #1 option in a Mike Martz offense (not saying he WILL, but he COULD) receiving passes from gunslinger Cutler, I think his ceiling is higher than the others. His odds might be a little lower due to the fact that we don't know where he will fall in the pecking order, but if things break right, he could be lights out.1. Hester2. Gaffney3. Murphy4. Williams
![]()
When did McIdiot get fired? Royal is stuck on that team for a while. His talents waste away.Royal has the highest ceiling and I don't think it's close
Not the way the human mind works. People are willing to believe in miracles until they've seen the man behind the curtain. 100/1 out of Royal, and you'll have people projecting a reapeat of his 90/980/5 campaign. Maybe...MAYBE...a 10% bump that would reflect natural growth as a player.There's still mystery about Williams. People haven't seen enough of a campaign out of him to believe the magic is gone yet. He's the guy who was going to reinvent the position five years ago, just a little more world weary and a little wiser. 100/1 out of BMW week one, and you're going to see people coming out of the woodwork to bandy about 1300/9 type projections.I'll disagree with you on that. It would be Royal's value who goes up because he's already proven he could be a top 20 WR with Marshall. Imagine without now.If these guys all go off for 100/1 in week one, Mike Williams has double the value of anyone else on that list. People want to believe in a good story.