She does suffer in the comparison with Saddon Trumpsein. It is refreshing to have a president who never makes excuses himself and always accepts responsibility for his mistakes.
It was incredibly courageous and heroic even when the Yemen mission didn't go well, and despite authorizing it, blaming it on the generals and Obama. MUCH better example of inspiring leadership there.
But Putin's a killer? We're killers, too. You think we're so innocent? Better to defend the most un-American thing ever uttered by a sitting US president.
I have no doubt if the grifter had lost, based on what he said later in the campaign leading up to the election (like criminally and seditiously calling for polling monitors, in some cases OUTSIDE THEIR DISTRICT, and in which the genius probably didn't factor in some people might have been murdered in states like FL with concealed weapons, due to being a malignant narcissistic sociopath), Don the Con would have graciously accepted defeat, idiotically whining if he lost the election was stolen from him, which could have incited violence and rioting (which he is getting sued for, very presidential), and again, one of the most monstrously self-absorbed, megalomaniacal and un-Democratic statements ever uttered in American political history. A national disgrace and travesty, international embarrassment and blight on the founding father's legacy.
Hell yes she was flawed, but not psychotic, I'd take her over 10 murderous dictator slobberers (Putin, Erdogan, Kim Yong-Un, Duterte - all "strong leaders" who get marvelous, tremendous ratings, he would be "honored" to meet!). It's reptillian and infantile to parse geopolitical ethics through the lens of Nielsen-like Apprentice ratings.
* In the interest of consistency, if HC is pathetic for making excuses AFTER she lost, how does Naranja Loco rate whining BEFORE the election was even over.
