What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

HLN releases the worst programming slate in the history of TV (1 Viewer)

Homer J Simpson

I don't push
HLN (Formerly Headline News) Releases Literally The Worst Programming Slate In The History Of Television

Once upon a time, Headline News was created as an alternative to CNN for people who didn’t want a bunch of talking heads talking about the news, they just wanted hear the actual news and newspapers hurt their soft brains. And then, people lost interest in what was basically a half-hour newscast with slight modifications repeated over and over, so Headline News changed up its format to be very much like it’s sister station, CNN, only louder and even more abrasive, by hiring people like Nancy Grace, who rolls her eyes for twenty minutes and then turns into a beast and swallows the souls of her guests.

In 2011, Headline News became the Casey Anthony channel, but then the Casey Anthony verdict came down, and Headline News had a hard time finding someone else that Nancy Grace would work up enough rage about, and there’s only so many white, suburban children that go mysteriously missing every year. Now, the channel has been relaunched as HLN. Basically, they’re reaching out to younger viewers and tailoring the network toward the “social media generation,” i.e., the millennials. Apparently, the people in charge of HLN do not think much of the intelligence of millennials, because this is the slate of programming they are rolling out (and honest to God, I thought it was a joke at first):

Keywords — A game show of search and tag trivia for internet addicts. We put your browser history to the test by challenging you to guess a search term from five keyword clues. Celebrities, song lyrics, ailments, gifs, memes, photobombs — everything is fair game.
What is this, like Jeopardy for memes?

I Can Haz NewsToons — Finally, a place on TV for social media’s best satire cartoons. We’ll scour the internet to present the most original e-cards, caricatures and doodles, and for the first time bring people’s favorite political and social cartoonists from the world of print to TV.
Actually, there’s something that does that already. It’s called tumblr. And you know what? There aren’t 8 minutes of commercials every half hour. And I CANNOT BELIEVE they are actually using that as a show title.

One.Click.Away — The untold stories behind the online classifieds…the world’s biggest yard sale. Going beyond the hyperlinks, HLN digs into such stories as the unused wedding dress for sale on Craigslist and the people behind those strange and hilarious roommate ads. Online classifieds greatest stories are now just One Click Away.
So, basically Behind the Music documentaries, only instead of being about celebrities, they’re about people who post to Craigslist? Uh, OK. Thrilling TV.

Vacation Hunters — One tweet, two vacation teams, one amazing vacation. Viewers send in a 140 character description and our two vacation adventurers, and their travel agent teams, compete against each other to stretch a vacation dollar as far as humanly possible…all for the cause of giving a user the vacation of a lifetime.
Any vacation that begins with a 140 character description cannot be anyone’s definition of a “vacation of a lifetime.”


Videocracy
—- This series counts down the most talked about entertainment ripped from social media. Hosts and a team of panelists comment on the stories and the people creating the shared content we’re all talking about.
Again, this already exist. It’s called Uproxx. Why would we watch on TV for an hour what we can get on the Internet in five minutes? (Will they do True Detective theories, too?)

#What’sYourFomo
-— This app will collect your list of FOMO’s (Fear Of Missing Out) and guarantees that you never miss a thing. J-law gifs? Ugly sweaters? Lamping? Everything you are afraid to miss out on in one place.
This is just a joke dreamed up by those guys who replaced Dan Harmon last year on Community, isn’t it? This can’t possibly be real. Is FOMO an actual thing, or did some executive come up with that?
 
Any vacation that begins with a 140 character description cannot be anyone’s definition of a “vacation of a lifetime.”

Au contraire

Two weeks of Thai hookers.
Point.

It should be noted that the comments are from the link, they're not mine. I could think of a million awesome vacations that can be described in 140 characters. Most description, of course, would include the phrase "Thai hookers."

 
Politician Spock said:
All you cable and satellite TV subscribers are paying for that.

I watch CNN from my Roku.
I watch football on my 70 inch.
So do I. The OTA HD signal is not compressed like HD signals on cable and satellite are.
I don't know what any of this means, but internet streaming a game sucks balls.
At least four NFL games a week are broadcasted Over The Air (OTA) in all the major media markets. This OTA signal is the same High Definition (HD) signal cable and satelitte providers receive from the NFL... however they compress that HD signal so that they can pipe hundreds of channels to you, most of which you don't even care about... like HLN. So you are paying to have your TV receive a less quality signal than if you just hooked up a digital antenna to it and picked up the free OTA signal. There is no internet streaming involved.

If you want all the NFL games each week, then you are stuck being DirecTV's #####.

 
Awful, but I'm not sure it's actually worse than the numerous other cable channels. The trend of dumbing down cable "news and info" channels has been going on for awhile.

 
Awful, but I'm not sure it's actually worse than the numerous other cable channels. The trend of dumbing down cable "news and info" channels has been going on for awhile.
It is.
Ancient Aliens, Ice Road Truckers and Swamp People is a disgrace to history. Then there is another channel entirely dedicated to showing staged stories of people buying homes. That's a whole channel, people pretending to house hunt. I don't see this as any worse.

 
Awful, but I'm not sure it's actually worse than the numerous other cable channels. The trend of dumbing down cable "news and info" channels has been going on for awhile.
It is.
Ancient Aliens, Ice Road Truckers and Swamp People is a disgrace to history. Then there is another channel entirely dedicated to showing staged stories of people buying homes. That's a whole channel, people pretending to house hunt. I don't see this as any worse.
I would put all of HLN's shows below everything you mentioned. Maybe that's just me. :shrug:

 
Awful, but I'm not sure it's actually worse than the numerous other cable channels. The trend of dumbing down cable "news and info" channels has been going on for awhile.
It is.
Ancient Aliens, Ice Road Truckers and Swamp People is a disgrace to history. Then there is another channel entirely dedicated to showing staged stories of people buying homes. That's a whole channel, people pretending to house hunt. I don't see this as any worse.
I would put all of HLN's shows below everything you mentioned. Maybe that's just me. :shrug:
I can't argue that any of them are better than any others because that would imply any of the shows have some semblance of value.

 
Homer J Simpson said:
Vacation Hunters — One tweet, two vacation teams, one amazing vacation. Viewers send in a 140 character description and our two vacation adventurers, and their travel agent teams, compete against each other to stretch a vacation dollar as far as humanly possible…all for the cause of giving a user the vacation of a lifetime.
Any vacation that begins with a 140 character description cannot be anyone’s definition of a “vacation of a lifetime.”

Free beer, nude beaches.

(no need for the other 119 characters)

 
Politician Spock said:
All you cable and satellite TV subscribers are paying for that.

I watch CNN from my Roku.
I watch football on my 70 inch.
So do I. The OTA HD signal is not compressed like HD signals on cable and satellite are.
I don't know what any of this means, but internet streaming a game sucks balls.
The very best HD quality you can see is with an antenna. No cable. No DVR. No blu-ray disc. None of it compares to the amazing quality you get over-the-air with an antenna.

It's why I don't see the big deal with 4K TV or whatever's next. Barely anyone gets real HD quality anyway. Let's all get things upgraded to the point where we can actually see true HDTV before we move on to the next thing. I haven't yet seen a single movie or TV show on cable or on blu-ray that can show a dimly lit scene or a car exploding without the screen turning into jagged squares and pixellated blurs.

[/rant]

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Politician Spock said:
All you cable and satellite TV subscribers are paying for that.

I watch CNN from my Roku.
I watch football on my 70 inch.
So do I. The OTA HD signal is not compressed like HD signals on cable and satellite are.
I don't know what any of this means, but internet streaming a game sucks balls.
The very best HD quality you can see is with an antenna. No cable. No DVR. No blu-ray disc. None of it compares to the amazing quality you get over-the-air with an antenna.

It's why I don't see the big deal with 4K TV or whatever's next. Barely anyone gets real HD quality anyway. Let's all get things upgraded to the point where we can actually see true HDTV before we move on to the next thing. I haven't yet seen a single movie or TV show on cable or on blu-ray that can show a dimly lit scene or a car exploding without the screen turning into jagged squares and pixellated blurs.

[/rant]
Interesting.

I've noticed my really nice TV gets pixellated blacks at times. It was bizarre to see.

 
Politician Spock said:
All you cable and satellite TV subscribers are paying for that.

I watch CNN from my Roku.
I watch football on my 70 inch.
So do I. The OTA HD signal is not compressed like HD signals on cable and satellite are.
I don't know what any of this means, but internet streaming a game sucks balls.
At least four NFL games a week are broadcasted Over The Air (OTA) in all the major media markets. This OTA signal is the same High Definition (HD) signal cable and satelitte providers receive from the NFL... however they compress that HD signal so that they can pipe hundreds of channels to you, most of which you don't even care about... like HLN. So you are paying to have your TV receive a less quality signal than if you just hooked up a digital antenna to it and picked up the free OTA signal. There is no internet streaming involved.

If you want all the NFL games each week, then you are stuck being DirecTV's #####.
Maybe you are unfamiliar with the red zone channel?

It shows me all the good stuff as it happens in all the games and cost me like 8 bucks a month. And no I don't need directv for it.

Congrats to you for not having a cable bill. I work and have some money so cable is definitely a luxury I enjoy. Can't imagine watching only the football games that network tv gives me, especially with college games. #### that.

 
Politician Spock said:
All you cable and satellite TV subscribers are paying for that.

I watch CNN from my Roku.
I watch football on my 70 inch.
So do I. The OTA HD signal is not compressed like HD signals on cable and satellite are.
I don't know what any of this means, but internet streaming a game sucks balls.
At least four NFL games a week are broadcasted Over The Air (OTA) in all the major media markets. This OTA signal is the same High Definition (HD) signal cable and satelitte providers receive from the NFL... however they compress that HD signal so that they can pipe hundreds of channels to you, most of which you don't even care about... like HLN. So you are paying to have your TV receive a less quality signal than if you just hooked up a digital antenna to it and picked up the free OTA signal. There is no internet streaming involved.

If you want all the NFL games each week, then you are stuck being DirecTV's #####.
Maybe you are unfamiliar with the red zone channel?

It shows me all the good stuff as it happens in all the games and cost me like 8 bucks a month. And no I don't need directv for it.

Congrats to you for not having a cable bill. I work and have some money so cable is definitely a luxury I enjoy. Can't imagine watching only the football games that network tv gives me, especially with college games. #### that.
The only college team I have to watch is Ohio State. And 8 of their games were broadcast for free OTA. The ones that weren't were scrub teams like Florida A&M, and the bowl game because ESPN apparenly has 90% of the bowl game rights. The rare times there is an Ohio State game not on OTA that's not against a ridiculously weak opponent, I go to a sports bar to watch it. If I'm going to pay $100 for TV content, at least I should get some food and alcohol in return... and I'm not sitting on my couch vegging out. I also don't hesitate to do something else on a random Saturday in the fall and feel like I've wasted money buying sports programming that I'm not consuming because I'm out doing something else.

As for watching teams other than Ohio State, I typically get 6 to 8 college football games every weekend in the fall. CBS, ABC, FOX, NBC all broadcast at least one game every weekend, sometimes two. And the CW and BounceTV channels here sometimes broadcast games. There's also a subchannel here on 6-2 that broadcasts This TV, but in the fall at noon every Saturday they broadcast an SEC game from one of ESPN-2's offerings. That however 6-2 channel is not an HD signal (it's broadcast as SD), so having cable/satellite would provide a better pciture for that specific game... but so what? It's only one of the 6 to 8 games I'm getting.

I agree with you that being able to pick nearly any college game is a nice luxury. I've had cable/satellite ever since I was a kid, so as more and more college games hit cable and satellite, I had the option of watching them. I guess at some point I realized that I'm not benefiting from the addition of more and more games, yet I keep getting a bigger and bigger bill for them. When I saw how much I could get for free, and with a better signal, the "luxury" just seemed like a waste. The additional $100 added to my savings/investments gives me more satisfaction than the luxury of picking and choosing any game.

Redzone is great and having it in HD would be awesome as well. If you are a verison wireless subscriber, for $5 a month you can get Redzone on your phone. It is streaming, which you don't like, and it's not on your 70" TV, but 30% of all regular season games are available on your 70" for free OTA with a better signal. So Redzone is just keeping you from missing the scoring opps occuring in the other 70% of the games. If I really had to have Redzone on my 70" in HD, then yes being a cable/satellite subscriber and adding on the additional $8 is the only way to do that. To me, if I can see it on my smartphone with no cable/satellite fees and only $5 per month instead of $8, that's enough. To each their own.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top