Look, do you have anything more than an attitude to back this up? Like maybe, how many other starting running backs in the NFL make LESS than CT this season? That might be a place for you to start showing off your massive football intellect.
Years of actually paying attention to the NFL and knowing the CBA and salary cap in and out?
I'll take that as a "no" then. . .The guy asked a good question--not for some holier-than-thou "guess you don't know NFL contracts" schtick.
This is getting a little silly.Try rereading thread, comprehending it's content, then speak to it - don't react to what you think is going on.
Crib notes in case you lack time...
T.U.B. poses a question suggesting Chester Taylor is not the #1 in Minny or is in Minny's plans to be the #1.
diesel (and others) have pined that his contract does not pay him like a backup.
Based on T.U.B.'s commentary, it is clear he is not familiar with how contracts in the NFL work.
diesel points this out and T.U.B. agrees that he is not knowledgable on contracts, but goes on to say he is sure $600,000 base is too low for a starting RB.
commentary - how can he have it both ways - he either knows contracts or does not know contracts.
diesel, after hearing T.U.B. does not know contract very well, explains that $600,000 in the first year of a contract with signing bonuses and guaranteed money is reasonable.
pine jumps in with a 'who are you' to just say it is what it is without proof.
diesel, losing patience, snaps back at pine and says, years of following football and commen sense.
pine, not to be outdone, pisses back suggesting diesel has no clue since he can not offer proof.
commentary - At least T.U.B. lack of information appears innocent, pine comes accross as an ###. What should diesel do? Write a thesis in this thread on the inner workings of nfl contracts in the salary cap era? Everyone who follows football and retains what they read knows that the first year of an NFL contract is lower than the remaining year. This is because signing bonus/roster bonuses are paid up-front (player gets money in hand) and the lower base makes the contract fit under the cap. Commen sense stuff, if you ask me. Base Salaries are only part of the equation when determing what a contract is telling you about how a player is valued by it's team.
thayman and radballs try to insert respect and decancy back into the thread.
gferrell also jumps in thinking he knows what the thread is about, but failed to absorb the first post properly.
The thread is questioning whether CT is the man in Minny which lead to a discussion about whether his contract and salary could help clear up the answer to that question. It's very well on topic. Considering T.U.B. started the post and was replying primarily to diesel, I think it goes to prove T.U.B. felt the exchange was what he was looking for.
To summarize, T.U.B. does not think CT is reliable - he is concerned.
The following think CT is a good value for 2006:
- diesel
- RaidierNation
- Bri
- datonn
- radball (does not think Minny with be drafting a replacement RB this year)
- EnglishTeacher
- Buttmonkey
- Biabreakable
- Baracuda
- BigTex
FridayFrenzy was questioned CT's value because of his assertion that salary cap increase as a result of the new CBA suddenly changes the way contracts are structured.
nygiants56 questions CT's value as he thinks Childress will duplicate Philly in Minny when it has been said time and again on this board and in press articles that Childress loves the run. The lack of run in Philly's offense was Reid, not Childress.
pinequick came in to piss at diesel.
gferrell20 thought he was fighting the good fight on getting the post back on topic, but read the post wrong. If it was off-topic for any reason, that was pine's fault.