timschochet
Footballguy
Looks like ISIS or al-Qaeda.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/01/asia/bangladesh-dhaka-shooting/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/01/asia/bangladesh-dhaka-shooting/index.html
The FFA should have a sticky thread named -Looks like Isis or al-QaedaLooks like ISIS or al-Qaeda.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/01/asia/bangladesh-dhaka-shooting/index.html
I don't know. I know very little about Bangladesh, but it has been a very violent place for decades, hasn't it?Really, I know you're Mr. PC here Tim, but who else would it realistically be?
Who?Looks like ISIS or al-Qaeda.
More evidence of our success!Who?
Per our SOS Kerry this sounds like a job by a "violent non-state actor."
Whoever do you mean? Charlie Sheen?
Well sure, you know we're defeating [redact] because after all when [redact] started [redact] that's when we knew [redact] [redact] [redact] and [redact].More evidence of our success!
When you say "us", if you mean innocent people everywhere, of any religion, ethnicity or creed, then of course I agree.Instead of fighting Left/Right and dragging policy making into it, can we not all agree these SOBs whether you/me/we like it or not want to harm us? I'm OK with the fact we are all going to have differences in how to handle it but there seems to be at least a small group of folks who won't recognize we have a common enemy. And I'm not blaming one religion, just a particular brand(TERRORIST/TERRORISM) that covers ISIS/AQ/Hamas, those groups are not Muslim, you have to be human first and they don't qualify.
This has been a reasonable criticism since...well forever. Since Roman days I guess. But the news media only shows this stuff, and mass shootings, and police car chases, because it gets ratings. So how are you going to change human nature?I feel like we're addicted to any kind of terrorist situation these days. The news channels go into non-stop coverage. Social media sites dominated by updates and chatter. Should we acknowledge that maybe we have a problem?
Why is it that if a guy runs onto the field during a sporting event, they won't even show it. The person is completely ignored by tv as to not give him the attention he/she craves and to not incite others to do the same. Yet when a mass shooting or terror attack happens we're shown the attacker's face incessantly. We are told everything about the terrorist and their life. They become a celebrity, even a hero to those who share their ideology. People with no lives, living in the shadows think they they too can become world famous if they kill a bunch of people and maybe their piddly little life will have had meaning. Maybe if we stopped giving these people and these acts any attention at all the frequency of events like this would diminish greatly. I just imagine the higher ups at cnn hi-fiving when something like this happens. Now they'll be able to charge the drug companies even more for diabetes medication adverts.
You started the thread. Maybe the first step is looking in the mirror.This has been a reasonable criticism since...well forever. Since Roman days I guess. But the news media only shows this stuff, and mass shootings, and police car chases, because it gets ratings. So how are you going to change human nature?
This argumemt was foolish with the attack on Turkey and as foolish with this.ISIS or al-Qaeda? Oh boy, that means another lecture from the left about Guns is coming shortly.
And we're off & running .............This argumemt was foolish with the attack on Turkey and as foolish with this.
Do lefties often argue gun control over attacks in other countries?
Or just when someone with many red flags uses a legally purchased weapon to kill people in this country?
We werent when max posted it? Or the other argumemts that started? Just when someone pointed out his straw man?And we're off & running .............
This one is probably my fault too, huh?Looks like ISIS or al-Qaeda.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/01/asia/bangladesh-dhaka-shooting/index.html
I believe that people like you in the US and the west who have publicly, vocally, grouped all Muslims together with their most extreme elements are contributing to the growth of those extreme elements. Absolutely.This one is probably my fault too, huh?
I read the FFA at work with the names/avatars off the screen, so I don't know who said what as I'm reading. Honestly, when I read this quote, my first thought was, "what kind of a d-bag writes this?"I believe that people like you in the US and the west who have publicly, vocally, grouped all Muslims together with their most extreme elements are contributing to the growth of those extreme elements. Absolutely.
Please take the time to read what I wrote again and then explain what is dirtbaggish about it, please.I read the FFA at work with the names/avatars off the screen, so I don't know who said what as I'm reading. Honestly, when I read this quote, my first thought was, "what kind of a d-bag writes this?"
Congrats, Tim.
Is the belief that gays should die and that by murdering them helps them get into heaven an extreme position? I would say it is, but to the vast majority of Muslims it's not. Look I think you're a rational person and what should be normal is not normal to these people. Surly you can see this?timschochet said:I believe that people like you in the US and the west who have publicly, vocally, grouped all Muslims together with their most extreme elements are contributing to the growth of those extreme elements. Absolutely.
They are MuslimMinistry of Pain said:Instead of fighting Left/Right and dragging policy making into it, can we not all agree these SOBs whether you/me/we like it or not want to harm us? I'm OK with the fact we are all going to have differences in how to handle it but there seems to be at least a small group of folks who won't recognize we have a common enemy. And I'm not blaming one religion, just a particular brand(TERRORIST/TERRORISM) that covers ISIS/AQ/Hamas, those groups are not Muslim, you have to be human first and they don't qualify.
They are MuslimDexter said:I'm going to take a wild guess here and say the people responsible are either Amish or Atheist.
Stopping short of interpreting Trump's proposed temporary ban on Muslims that way who has done that?timschochet said:I believe that people like you in the US and the west who have publicly, vocally, grouped all Muslims together with their most extreme elements are contributing to the growth of those extreme elements. Absolutely.
Yeah, you were answering his question. You said it was his fault, "Absolutely". Your explanation of why is a pretty shoddy theory.timschochet said:Please take the time to read what I wrote again and then explain what is dirtbaggish about it, please.
You realize the majority of the people in the middle east are poor and can't get themselves a TV or in many cases even a computer, and therefore most of the news they get probably comes from a local internet cafe they spend a few hours in each week? And only have access to state run media or news they hear from members of a corrupt government or idiots in ISIS/Al-Qaeda? These entities are far more likely to invoke an inner Jihadi awakening than anything some Western schmuck on an Internet board or Western media outlet will ever say or think.timschochet said:I believe that people like you in the US and the west who have publicly, vocally, grouped all Muslims together with their most extreme elements are contributing to the growth of those extreme elements. Absolutely.
We already kiss their asses. At least the rich countries we do. We have a democratic president nominee who's campaign 25% funded by countries in the middle east.You realize the majority of the people in the middle east are poor and can't get themselves a TV or in many cases even a computer, and therefore most of the news they get probably comes from a local internet cafe they spend a few hours in each week? And only have access to state run media or news they hear from members of a corrupt government or idiots in ISIS/Al-Qaeda? These entities are far more likely to invoke an inner Jihadi awakening than anything some Western schmuck on an Internet board or Western media outlet will ever say or think.
Do you really think if the Western governments started playing nice and everyday westerners started saying nice things about the middle east that suddenly all the Middle Eastern higher ups will start saying "wow what great people!"? Which would eventually spread down to the poor most likely to join these factions? That's what your line of logic sounds like to me. Which frankly sounds a bit naive.
Islam hasn't been around for 2000 years.We already kiss their asses. At least the rich countries we do. We have a democratic president nominee who's campaign 25% funded by countries in the middle east.
I do agree with you the state funded news doesn't help, but the real problem IMHO is the religion itself. Don't get me wrong I'm not fond of any religion, but Islam is just sick and they haven't moved past the early growth states. It's like they've been stuck in the same backwards beliefs for 2000 years. At least Christianity has moved forward. Islam will burn the world to be king of the ashes.
BBC News (World) Verified account @BBCWorld 1h1 hour ago
IS says 20 people "of different nationalities" killed in Dhaka attack - via news agency Amaq http://bbc.in/29yUSgS
ISIS has claimed responsibility according to the Amaq News Agency. I didn't see that noted yet.So any actual news updates in here?
Wall Street Journal Verified account @WSJ 2h2 hours ago
The U.S. Embassy has accounted for all the Americans under the authority of the diplomatic chief of mission in Dhaka
BBC Breaking News Verified account @BBCBreaking 3h3 hours ago
Latest footage from scene of hostage crisis in Bangladeshi capital, Dhaka http://bbc.in/29bek7z
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-36687616Two police officers have been killed in a gun battle, a spokesman said, and about 30 others injured.
So-called Islamic State has said it carried out the attack.
A statement on the group's self-styled news agency Amaq said militants had attacked a restaurant "frequented by foreigners". It said that more than 20 people "of different nationalities" had been killed but this has not been confirmed.
Security forces say they are trying to negotiate the hostages' release.
Initial reports said that as many as 20 foreigners were among those taken captive.
Italian nationals are believed to be among them, a source at the Italian foreign ministry said, quoted by Reuters.
Historically or figuratively? Because it sounds like you're trying to say Christianity is a lot older than Islam and it's not. They're the same generation with the same father.In fact, at the same age that Islam is now, Christians were just coming out of the Dark Ages.
I am guessing Hasidic---at least after reading Acer's thread, it is not out of the possibility.Dexter said:I'm going to take a wild guess here and say the people responsible are either Amish or Atheist.
Um, what? Islam began in the 7th Century.Historically or figuratively? Because it sounds like you're trying to say Christianity is a lot older than Islam and it's not. They're the same generation with the same father.
In the history of religions the Abrahamic religions started close to the same time period with a common origin. (Think of Islam as Christianity's little brother) It's silly to think Islam hasn't grown up yet just because it's 600 years younger, they are both adults now.Um, what? Islam began in the 7th Century.
It's not "just because." It's primarily because it's still primarily contained in an area of the world filled with underdeveloped nations and dictatorial / feudal / slave labor regimes much like Christianity in the 14th Century. Where Islam has broken free of that mold, it has shifted drastically.In the history of religions the Abrahamic religions started close to the same time period with a common origin. (Think of Islam as Christianity's little brother) It's silly to think Islam hasn't grown up yet just because it's 600 years younger, they are both adults now.
The history is interesting, but Henry has somewhat of a point. After the conquest of Arabia by the Ottomans and their subsequent defeat, Islam is kind of in their dark ages. It matters not that their Golden Age was really the Golden Age of other cultures they conquered and converted, it was a golden age that has since disappeared, leaving them in a near-feudal situation. It is a pity that the riches that the Arabs are making off of oil isn't pulling them out, because when their oil is gone, they will fall on even harder times.In the history of religions the Abrahamic religions started close to the same time period with a common origin. (Think of Islam as Christianity's little brother) It's silly to think Islam hasn't grown up yet just because it's 600 years younger, they are both adults now.
That would be "us" for sure. I'm getting tired after these attacks of feeling like I have to pick a side. After 9/11, at least for a little while the country was trying to work together, it united everyone. The Orlando attack did not unite, it only further divided, that's not good IMO.timschochet said:When you say "us", if you mean innocent people everywhere, of any religion, ethnicity or creed, then of course I agree.
Hmm, now geography is the problem, got it. Nah, I don't buy that either.It's not "just because." It's primarily because it's still primarily contained in an area of the world filled with underdeveloped nations and dictatorial / feudal / slave labor regimes much like Christianity in the 14th Century. Where Islam has broken free of that mold, it has shifted drastically.
You said up top it's not 2,000 years old. Muhammad was alive 570-622 AD according to history, it's still 1,400 years old. You made it sound like it was as old as ScientologyUm, what? Islam began in the 7th Century.
What about the numerous instances of American born and European born terrorists who were radicalized, in part, in European and American mosques?It's not "just because." It's primarily because it's still primarily contained in an area of the world filled with underdeveloped nations and dictatorial / feudal / slave labor regimes much like Christianity in the 14th Century. Where Islam has broken free of that mold, it has shifted drastically.