What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Houston RBs? (1 Viewer)

theJCdude

Footballguy
Just wondering about Slaton in Houston. Green is always hurt, and on top of that he is old. I have read in a few places that he was limping after the game on Sunday. I grab Slaton off the wire, and I think he might be the steal of the season!

What do guys think? Do you think he'll be starting soon? Any Texans fans out there?

peace...

 
Who is this Steve Slaton you speak of? I've never seen a single other thread on this board about him. :popcorn:

 
I was real impressed with how they rotated Chris Taylor in with the carries like they said they would. :IBTL:

 
link: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports...nt/5990721.html

Texans Notes: RB Green has ankle evaluated

By MEGAN MANFULL Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle

Sept. 9, 2008, 10:28AM

Despite saying he was only battling “cramping” after the season opener, running back Ahman Green spent Monday having his ankle evaluated by the Texans’ medical staff. Coach Gary Kubiak said Green sprained the ankle in the first half against Pittsburgh on Sunday.

Green played sparingly throughout the game, but was feeling pain Monday.

The Texans are deciding what to do with just Chris Taylor and Steve Slaton healthy.

“My concern right now is Ahman’s ankle,” Kubiak said. “If it’s going to be a problem then, you know, Darius (Walker) is going to be our first option.”

Walker is on the team’s practice squad.

The Texans will work out a number of backs today at Reliant Stadium. The group does not include Cedric Benson or Shaun Alexander.

 
link: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports...nt/5990721.html

Texans Notes: RB Green has ankle evaluated

By MEGAN MANFULL Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle

Sept. 9, 2008, 10:28AM

Despite saying he was only battling “cramping” after the season opener, running back Ahman Green spent Monday having his ankle evaluated by the Texans’ medical staff. Coach Gary Kubiak said Green sprained the ankle in the first half against Pittsburgh on Sunday.

Green played sparingly throughout the game, but was feeling pain Monday.

The Texans are deciding what to do with just Chris Taylor and Steve Slaton healthy.

“My concern right now is Ahman’s ankle,” Kubiak said. “If it’s going to be a problem then, you know, Darius (Walker) is going to be our first option.”

Walker is on the team’s practice squad.

The Texans will work out a number of backs today at Reliant Stadium. The group does not include Cedric Benson or Shaun Alexander.
:goodposting:
 
link: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports...nt/5990721.html

Texans Notes: RB Green has ankle evaluated

By MEGAN MANFULL Copyright 2008 Houston Chronicle

Sept. 9, 2008, 10:28AM

Despite saying he was only battling “cramping” after the season opener, running back Ahman Green spent Monday having his ankle evaluated by the Texans’ medical staff. Coach Gary Kubiak said Green sprained the ankle in the first half against Pittsburgh on Sunday.

Green played sparingly throughout the game, but was feeling pain Monday.

The Texans are deciding what to do with just Chris Taylor and Steve Slaton healthy.

“My concern right now is Ahman’s ankle,” Kubiak said. “If it’s going to be a problem then, you know, Darius (Walker) is going to be our first option.”

Walker is on the team’s practice squad.

The Texans will work out a number of backs today at Reliant Stadium. The group does not include Cedric Benson or Shaun Alexander.
:lmao:
:lmao:
 
Slaton is the future in HOU. Some tough matchups, including this week, but depending on your league, Slaton is a good pickup. Ahman Green is toast...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
this is bad postingbut on topic: even without green, it doesn't seem like slaton is the 'guy' in the eyes of the head coach or the franchise if they're considering bringing in other options
You're reading too much into that. They're trying out players--guys like Najeh Davenport--to provide depth and not necessarily to take Slaton's job. Slaton ran well against a vicious defense and, importantly, he didn't completely suck in pass blocking. Kubiak believes in him, he probably just doesn't want to throw too heavy of a workload on him this early in the season.
 
Didn't Darius Walker play pretty well last year when he got a chance.

Is it possible he gets a shot?

We've seen Notre Dame RBs come off the practice squad before to make an impact.

 
this is bad postingbut on topic: even without green, it doesn't seem like slaton is the 'guy' in the eyes of the head coach or the franchise if they're considering bringing in other options
If Slaton isn't the guy why did he get all the carries?They're bringing in guys like; Cedric Benson who the Bears didn't even want on their roster. Not to start, but to backup!

You can't have only 2 healthy RBs on your roster. You need a minimum of 4.

 
this is bad postingbut on topic: even without green, it doesn't seem like slaton is the 'guy' in the eyes of the head coach or the franchise if they're considering bringing in other options
You're reading too much into that. They're trying out players--guys like Najeh Davenport--to provide depth and not necessarily to take Slaton's job. Slaton ran well against a vicious defense and, importantly, he didn't completely suck in pass blocking. Kubiak believes in him, he probably just doesn't want to throw too heavy of a workload on him this early in the season.
I'd like to believe you. Link?
 
this is bad postingbut on topic: even without green, it doesn't seem like slaton is the 'guy' in the eyes of the head coach or the franchise if they're considering bringing in other options
If Slaton isn't the guy why did he get all the carries?They're bringing in guys like; Cedric Benson who the Bears didn't even want on their roster. Not to start, but to backup!

You can't have only 2 healthy RBs on your roster. You need a minimum of 4.
If Slaton is the guy, why would Kubiak say “If it’s going to be a problem then, you know, Darius (Walker) is going to be our first option.”?If Green isn't healthy, it's going to be a full blown rbbc in Houston.

 
this is bad postingbut on topic: even without green, it doesn't seem like slaton is the 'guy' in the eyes of the head coach or the franchise if they're considering bringing in other options
If Slaton isn't the guy why did he get all the carries?They're bringing in guys like; Cedric Benson who the Bears didn't even want on their roster. Not to start, but to backup!

You can't have only 2 healthy RBs on your roster. You need a minimum of 4.
If Slaton is the guy, why would Kubiak say “If it’s going to be a problem then, you know, Darius (Walker) is going to be our first option.”?If Green isn't healthy, it's going to be a full blown rbbc in Houston.
It wasn't before with Green in the lineup?
 
this is bad postingbut on topic: even without green, it doesn't seem like slaton is the 'guy' in the eyes of the head coach or the franchise if they're considering bringing in other options
If Slaton isn't the guy why did he get all the carries?They're bringing in guys like; Cedric Benson who the Bears didn't even want on their roster. Not to start, but to backup!

You can't have only 2 healthy RBs on your roster. You need a minimum of 4.
If Slaton is the guy, why would Kubiak say “If it’s going to be a problem then, you know, Darius (Walker) is going to be our first option.”?If Green isn't healthy, it's going to be a full blown rbbc in Houston.
I believe that what Kubiak meant by "going to be a problem", was fielding a full 53 man roster. As a poster already noted, most teams roster 4 RBs, or at least 3 with a FB. Are they thrilled about an untested rookie spearheading their attack? Probably not. But as has also been noted, his pass blocking has been very good for a rookie and he runs with vision and a burst. People being brought in to give them warm bodies, not take the job away from Slaton. Just my humble 2 cents.
 
this is bad postingbut on topic: even without green, it doesn't seem like slaton is the 'guy' in the eyes of the head coach or the franchise if they're considering bringing in other options
If Slaton isn't the guy why did he get all the carries?They're bringing in guys like; Cedric Benson who the Bears didn't even want on their roster. Not to start, but to backup!

You can't have only 2 healthy RBs on your roster. You need a minimum of 4.
If Slaton is the guy, why would Kubiak say “If it’s going to be a problem then, you know, Darius (Walker) is going to be our first option.”?If Green isn't healthy, it's going to be a full blown rbbc in Houston.
It wasn't before with Green in the lineup?
Kubiak said before week 1 that he'd ease Green in slowly. If Green is healthy (big if), he'll get the heavy load with Slaton getting some work. If Green is out, it would probably be Walker, Taylor and Slaton splitting the load. At least that's what Kubiak seems to be saying. Maybe Slaton's play will win Kubiak over. :confused:
 
this is bad postingbut on topic: even without green, it doesn't seem like slaton is the 'guy' in the eyes of the head coach or the franchise if they're considering bringing in other options
If Slaton isn't the guy why did he get all the carries?They're bringing in guys like; Cedric Benson who the Bears didn't even want on their roster. Not to start, but to backup!

You can't have only 2 healthy RBs on your roster. You need a minimum of 4.
If Slaton is the guy, why would Kubiak say “If it’s going to be a problem then, you know, Darius (Walker) is going to be our first option.”?If Green isn't healthy, it's going to be a full blown rbbc in Houston.
Probably semantics - I'm guessing he meant that Walker would be the first option to replace Green's spot in the active lineup, not necessarily that he'd assume more than a backup/spot role.
 
this is bad postingbut on topic: even without green, it doesn't seem like slaton is the 'guy' in the eyes of the head coach or the franchise if they're considering bringing in other options
If Slaton isn't the guy why did he get all the carries?They're bringing in guys like; Cedric Benson who the Bears didn't even want on their roster. Not to start, but to backup!

You can't have only 2 healthy RBs on your roster. You need a minimum of 4.
If Slaton is the guy, why would Kubiak say “If it’s going to be a problem then, you know, Darius (Walker) is going to be our first option.”?If Green isn't healthy, it's going to be a full blown rbbc in Houston.
Probably semantics - I'm guessing he meant that Walker would be the first option to replace Green's spot in the active lineup, not necessarily that he'd assume more than a backup/spot role.
Could be.
 
Didn't Darius Walker play pretty well last year when he got a chance. Is it possible he gets a shot?We've seen Notre Dame RBs come off the practice squad before to make an impact.
I believe Walker is on the practice squad, no?
 
I've got Slaton tucked away on my bench. How can anyone predict what's going to happen right now? Best hope is that he emerges by midseason as the main man. But I think he's the only Houston RB of value.

 
There are quite a few Texans threads out there if you do a search.

FWIW, the impression I got from Kubiak's comments is that Slaton is being looked at as a the guy that "could" develop into their full time starter, but he still has a ways to go. Ahman will be rotated in and out when he is healthy. Per Kube's press conference, the plan during the Pittsburgh game was for Slaton and Ahman to rotate in and out every 3 plays or so, but they fell behind too early and weren't able to get into any rhythm. Taylor and Walker could be spot starts if Slaton or Ahman are too hurt to play.

The Texans have a very tough schedule for the next few weeks, I'm not expecting any RB to put up very good numbers until week 6 when they get to play Miami.

 
JAA said:
rawdog said:
Didn't Darius Walker play pretty well last year when he got a chance.

Is it possible he gets a shot?

We've seen Notre Dame RBs come off the practice squad before to make an impact.
I believe Walker is on the practice squad, no?
:goodposting: Hence the referrence to RB's coming off the practice squad, in the post you quoted.

 
3C said:
compone said:
yonder said:
BringItOn said:
this is bad postingbut on topic: even without green, it doesn't seem like slaton is the 'guy' in the eyes of the head coach or the franchise if they're considering bringing in other options
If Slaton isn't the guy why did he get all the carries?They're bringing in guys like; Cedric Benson who the Bears didn't even want on their roster. Not to start, but to backup!

You can't have only 2 healthy RBs on your roster. You need a minimum of 4.
If Slaton is the guy, why would Kubiak say “If it’s going to be a problem then, you know, Darius (Walker) is going to be our first option.”?If Green isn't healthy, it's going to be a full blown rbbc in Houston.
Darius Walker will be their first option!FIRST OPTION MEANING FIRST PLAYER TO BRING IN TO BE THERE #3 RUNNING BACK!!!

It's funny how people twist words around to make it seem like Walker will be there first option in the running game.

Slaton and C Taylor are there options after Green.

Again any NFL team needs to carry a minimum of 4 RBs, Walker would be 1 of those 4 RBs.

 
JAA said:
rawdog said:
Didn't Darius Walker play pretty well last year when he got a chance.

Is it possible he gets a shot?

We've seen Notre Dame RBs come off the practice squad before to make an impact.
I believe Walker is on the practice squad, no?
:goodposting: Hence the referrence to RB's coming off the practice squad, in the post you quoted.
pretty funny how i missed that .... lol
 
Mighty Mice said:
The Texans will work out a number of backs today at Reliant Stadium. The group does not include Cedric Benson or Shaun Alexander.
Thses guys are idiots. Yeah, let's work out another used up fossil and an unstable never was.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So anyone think Green is worthless for the forseeable future? I have both Slaton & Green and wouldn't mind trimming the fat by cutting Green. On the other hand I don't want to be premature...

 
Slaton may end up getting the bulk of the carries. He's probably the safest bet for that.

I'm still not sold on him though as a RB that should be a starter for an NFL team. I think he does a good job bouncing the ball outside, but I think he's weak on his inside running skills. If he has a big enough hole that any RB could get a good gain through it, I think he'll do fine up the middle. But he doesn't seem to me to be a guy who finds those small gaps and creases and squeezes another 2-3 yards out when it's tight. I'd rather have Green or Taylor running up the middle than I would Slaton.

And, that said, the Texans run blocking hasn't shown any improvement yet despite the addition of Gibbs, and may have even taken a step back for the time being. Even in preseason against vanilla defenses the first team wasn't opening many holes (while the 2nd and 3rd strings actually were, which made evaluating the RBs even more difficult having to account for that). I don't know that the problem is getting beaten on scheme even, they are just getting outplayed consistently on an individual battle basis.

I guess in short, I wouldn't be looking to any Texans RB right now to be more than a bye week filler, and hopefully a RB4 for your fantasy team. I hope I'm wrong on Slaton, but I just don't see the vision, wiggle, and ability to make guys miss that I think successful NFL RBs of his size have.

 
So anyone think Green is worthless for the forseeable future? I have both Slaton & Green and wouldn't mind trimming the fat by cutting Green. On the other hand I don't want to be premature...
I imagine Green will be the primary back in an RBBC for the 1st qtr of several games this year, folllowed by sitting on the bench nursing an ankle/knee/shoulder/hammy, followed by a few weeks of GTD. Rinse & repeat.Honestly, tough to drop, because IF he gets healthy, he'll be in the mix at something like a 60/40 split.
 
So anyone think Green is worthless for the forseeable future? I have both Slaton & Green and wouldn't mind trimming the fat by cutting Green. On the other hand I don't want to be premature...
I imagine Green will be the primary back in an RBBC for the 1st qtr of several games this year, folllowed by sitting on the bench nursing an ankle/knee/shoulder/hammy, followed by a few weeks of GTD. Rinse & repeat.Honestly, tough to drop, because IF he gets healthy, he'll be in the mix at something like a 60/40 split.
Right. I think if a 12 team league holsters 6 RBs per team then Green should definitely be rostered. There may only be a handful of times he's a potential start, but he's still a better start than guys who need 2 injuries to players ahead of them to get significant touches. For a league that rosters about 5 per team, he maybe should be rostered, preferably by whoever has Slaton if the team has a reasonably stable RB situation other than that. But I could see other players getting preference over Green with that small of rosters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top