What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How do you feel about Cutler now? (current info on pg 46) (1 Viewer)

Rotoworld:

Jay Cutler (high-ankle sprain) is "not expected" to return for Sunday's game against the Vikings.

Coach Marc Trestman also insisted Monday that Cutler isn't dealing with anything more than a high-ankle sprain despite speculation to the contrary. "I'm totally confident he'll play again this season," Trestman said. The Bears are in capable hands with Josh McCown who has a strong matchup in Minnesota but still need Cutler back to make a legitimate push for the division. McCown's lack of a deep ball has kept the Bears' offense station-to-station, even if it's been effectively station-to-station. Cutler should have a chance at suiting up for Week 14.

Related: Josh McCown

Source: Jeff Dickerson on Twitter
This sounds funny, I think he is done for the year. Detroit can keep losing and still run away with the division crown with the QB situation in that division. McCown and Flynn/Tolzien aint leading these teams anywhere.
The Bears wouldn't be any better with Cutler in there right now. There's no comparison between McCown and GB backups. Offense isn't their problem.
 
Cutler said today on his radio show his goal is to return week 14. I'd have no problem starting him as my 2nd qb in the playoffs with that Dallas matchup.

 
Cutler said today on his radio show his goal is to return week 14. I'd have no problem starting him as my 2nd qb in the playoffs with that Dallas matchup.
Rotoworld take:

Appearing on his weekly radio show Monday evening, Jay Cutler (ankle) said he'd be "pretty disappointed" if he wasn't able to play in Week 14.

"We're getting there. I feel a lot better than I felt last week," Cutler said. "I hate the position I'm in right now, so the sooner I get back out there, the better. I'd be pretty disappointed if I wasn't able to play for that [Week 14] game." Cutler has already been ruled out for Week 13 against the Vikings, but he's got his sights set on the following Monday night tilt with the Cowboys.


Source: Rich Campbell on Twitter
 
Rotoworld:

Jay Cutler said he would not be upset if the Bears use the franchise tag on him this offseason.

Cutler is in the final year of a five-year, $49 million deal he signed in 2009. The Bears would have to shell out something in the neighborhood of $16 million on a one-year franchise deal, but they'd get to evaluate him for another season without making a long-term commitment. Cutler's inability to stay healthy will certainly be a factor in negotiations. He's currently sidelined by a high-ankle sprain, missed time earlier this year with a groin issue and sat out six games in 2011 due to a broken thumb.


Source: ESPN.com
 
Rotoworld:

Jay Cutler (ankle) has said his goal is to return in Week 14.

A week ago, Cutler said he'd be "pretty disappointed" if he wasn't able to suit up against the Cowboys on Monday Night Football. We haven't heard any real update on his status since then. The Bears won't practice until Thursday this week, so owners will need to hang onto red-hot backup Josh McCown through fantasy's add/drop period. In four full games this year, McCown is averaging 298.7 passing yards per day with seven touchdowns and one interception. He's completing a very solid 64.5 percent of his passes. Whoever starts for the Bears on Monday will be a QB1.

Related: Josh McCown

Source: Chicago Tribune
 
Rotoworld:

Speaking Monday, Bears coach Marc Trestman called Jay Cutler (ankle) "week to week," and reiterated the team will "see where he is" when it returns to practice on Thursday.

The Bears are playing in Week 14's Monday night game, so they won't hold a formal practice on Wednesday. Typically, if a team knows a player is ready to go, they won't hide that fact at Monday's presser, so it's still quite possible Cutler won't be ready to return for Week 14. It's also possible that the Bears won't rush Cutler with Josh McCown continuing to show well in his absence. Cutler's status will be updated no later than Thursday, and likely earlier.

Related: Josh McCown

Source: Jeff Dickerson on Twitter
ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports Jay Cutler's (ankle) practice on Thursday will determine whether he starts in Week 14 versus Dallas.

"His practice on Thursday will determine whether Cutler will play," Mort stated. "If he's ready to play, he will go." Coach Marc Trestman has made similar statements. The Bears aren't yet sure about the health of Cutler's high ankle sprain, and won't have a good feel for his recovery until they get out onto the practice field on Thursday. The Bears play the Cowboys on Monday Night Football in Week 14, so they will not hold a Wednesday practice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

Jay Cutler indicated Monday that he hasn't gained medical clearance yet.

Cutler is truly questionable for next Monday night's game against the Cowboys. He ran on a treadmill Monday and is hoping he doesn't feel any "ill effects" from that. If cleared, he'll practice Thursday and try to prove to coaches that he's mobile enough to take back his starting job. Ideally, fantasy owners will practice a handcuff strategy, rostering both Cutler and red-hot backup Josh McCown. No matter who starts, owners would have a top-10 option on their hands.

Related: Josh McCown

Source: ESPN Chicago
 
i would be afraid to start him on MNF if this is your first round of the playoffs. to much risk IMO of reinjuring it during the game or not being mobile enough; the Bears have a reliable back up who can come in at a moments notice. the threshhold to pull the trigger may be low if cutler is limited or struggling.

 
i would be afraid to start him on MNF if this is your first round of the playoffs. to much risk IMO of reinjuring it during the game or not being mobile enough; the Bears have a reliable back up who can come in at a moments notice. the threshhold to pull the trigger may be low if cutler is limited or struggling.
Agree. I'm hoping they sit him another week. If Cutler starts, it makes for some tough decisions this week.

 
i would be afraid to start him on MNF if this is your first round of the playoffs. to much risk IMO of reinjuring it during the game or not being mobile enough; the Bears have a reliable back up who can come in at a moments notice. the threshhold to pull the trigger may be low if cutler is limited or struggling.
Agree. I'm hoping they sit him another week. If Cutler starts, it makes for some tough decisions this week.
Try owning Rodgers AND Cutler!

I had Mccown but let him go a couple weeks ago.

With the Bears playing monday night, i'm pretty much forced to start EJ Manuel week 1 of playoffs. <face into palm>

 
Try owning Cutler, Bradford, and Weeden in a $750 entry fee best ball league! Went from 100 up to 10 up with 3 weeks to go.

Come on Cutler, I'm your biggest fan!

 
Da Gildz said:
Joe T said:
red said:
i would be afraid to start him on MNF if this is your first round of the playoffs. to much risk IMO of reinjuring it during the game or not being mobile enough; the Bears have a reliable back up who can come in at a moments notice. the threshhold to pull the trigger may be low if cutler is limited or struggling.
Agree. I'm hoping they sit him another week. If Cutler starts, it makes for some tough decisions this week.
Try owning Rodgers AND Cutler!

I had Mccown but let him go a couple weeks ago.

With the Bears playing monday night, i'm pretty much forced to start EJ Manuel week 1 of playoffs. <face into palm>
Why in the world would you drop McCown?
 
Easy to say now. But he had 2 poor weeks , week 10 and 11 , also accompanied with the 'Cutler coming back' rumors. Needed to make a roster move. And then he blows up last 2 weeks, it looks pretty bad.

 
Easy to say now. But he had 2 poor weeks , week 10 and 11 , also accompanied with the 'Cutler coming back' rumors. Needed to make a roster move. And then he blows up last 2 weeks, it looks pretty bad.
Man, look at the schedule. He had St. Louis then Minnesota and Dallas coming up, these last two best possible matchups. Plus an awful defense and stud receivers.

As a cutler and mccown owner, I want one more mccown start and not a little bit gimpy cutler.

 
Easy to say now. But he had 2 poor weeks , week 10 and 11 , also accompanied with the 'Cutler coming back' rumors. Needed to make a roster move. And then he blows up last 2 weeks, it looks pretty bad.
Man, look at the schedule. He had St. Louis then Minnesota and Dallas coming up, these last two best possible matchups. Plus an awful defense and stud receivers.

As a cutler and mccown owner, I want one more mccown start and not a little bit gimpy cutler.
Totally agree here.

 
So, did he practice on Tuesday or what is the current status and outlook for this week?
They play Monday, the team said they will see if he can practice on Thursday since they do not practice until then.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jeffery is going to be the most overrated WR next season IMO. He's good, but I think he's going to be way over drafted as a wr1

Looks like cutler will be looking to practice Thursday and see how he feels. They play Monday and latest news was wait and see how things go Thursday.

As someone eying him up, I'd love for him to play so I could see him in game action for 1 game before considering starting him next week

 
Jeffery is going to be the most overrated WR next season IMO. He's good, but I think he's going to be way over drafted as a wr1

Looks like cutler will be looking to practice Thursday and see how he feels. They play Monday and latest news was wait and see how things go Thursday.

As someone eying him up, I'd love for him to play so I could see him in game action for 1 game before considering starting him next week
Agree with Alshon going to be drafted to early. Don't get me wrong, this guy is a fantastic athlete but he is benefiting from defenses double teaming Marshall or putting their #1 CB on him.
 
Jeffery is going to be the most overrated WR next season IMO. He's good, but I think he's going to be way over drafted as a wr1

Looks like cutler will be looking to practice Thursday and see how he feels. They play Monday and latest news was wait and see how things go Thursday.

As someone eying him up, I'd love for him to play so I could see him in game action for 1 game before considering starting him next week
But isn't their risk of reinjury or even death if he plays before it is completely healed?

Just asking, because here is another players who should be playing through an injury, tape em up like Mannings old gimpy ankles are where braces, dang. The NFL is not like it use to be.

 
Cutler said last week that “he’s not going to take anything personally” if the Bears tag him.

“If they want to franchise me,” he said on his radio show, “I’m gonna feel good about the situation we’re in.”

“might be like, ‘I’m gonna miss a few OTAs and go on an extra vacation,’ ” but that he’d return eventually.

“Well, you just don’t show up for a little while,” he said. “But everyone at some point comes back to work, right?’’
putting the dic in dedication

 
I really can't see how you call him a dic for that. I really don't get the Cutler hate, and I'm a Packer fan. Baffles me. He's the best quarterback the bears have had since McMahon 30 years ago. Personally I like the guy.

 
Picked him up today as a hedge against Luck. I don't see how I can start him this week, especially given that the Bears are on MNF, but if he comes back and looks good, I'll give him a long hard look for Weeks 15/16.

 
Sabertooth said:
I really can't see how you call him a dic for that. I really don't get the Cutler hate, and I'm a Packer fan. Baffles me. He's the best quarterback the bears have had since McMahon 30 years ago. Personally I like the guy.
He's a better passer than McMahon can even dream of. Cutler has a better arm and better escapability. McMahon was an excellent leader, don't get me wrong. I absolutely loved Jim McMahon - but Cutler is a much better QB.

Honestly, if you had heard the interview live (which I did) - he was pretty much saying "Sure, I'll skip an OTA or two to make a point, but there is no way I'm holding out or doing anything that is long term detrimental to the team." He basically said there is no way he would hold out - or miss significant time. Kinda the opposite of what the original quoter was trying to imply.

 
Rotoworld:

GM Phil Emery suggested that he doesn't want to use the franchise tag on Jay Cutler.

It would cost roughly $16.2 million for the Bears to slap Cutler with the tag, a number that would seriously harm their ability to improve their woeful defense. Emery would prefer to get Cutler signed to a long-term deal that would keep the franchise's cap situation in a reasonable place. The situation is complicated by not only Cutler's current ankle injury, but the multitude of injuries he's suffered of late. He's missed 11 games over the last three seasons and is highly questionable for Monday night's game against the Cowboys.


Source: Chicago Sun-Times
 
Rotoworld:

GM Phil Emery suggested that he doesn't want to use the franchise tag on Jay Cutler.

It would cost roughly $16.2 million for the Bears to slap Cutler with the tag, a number that would seriously harm their ability to improve their woeful defense. Emery would prefer to get Cutler signed to a long-term deal that would keep the franchise's cap situation in a reasonable place. The situation is complicated by not only Cutler's current ankle injury, but the multitude of injuries he's suffered of late. He's missed 11 games over the last three seasons and is highly questionable for Monday night's game against the Cowboys.


Source: Chicago Sun-Times
I don't quite get how Emery thinks signing Cutler to a long term deal will help the cap situation. If you look at what Romo, Flacco and Ryan are making in deals they just signed they are making between $18 million and $20 million a year. I know you can tweak the structure of the deal to some degree but to get the long term deal you are going to have to sign Cutler to a deal in the ball park of probably upwards of $90 million over maybe 6 years with maybe $45 million guaranteed. That is if Cutler is willing to settle for less than Romo got. Romo has been to three Pro Bowls to Cutler's one. Romo is 1-3 in the playoffs. Cutler is 1-1, but got hurt in the second game. The number I've heard for the franchise tag is $16.2 million. I don't know how they come up with that, but if that is the number it would would be cheaper to franchise him, and then you have another year to evaluate him. In addition, if you draft a QB you can spend a year developing the rookie to see if he is any good. The tag just makes more sense to me.

 
Sabertooth said:
I really can't see how you call him a dic for that. I really don't get the Cutler hate, and I'm a Packer fan. Baffles me. He's the best quarterback the bears have had since McMahon 30 years ago. Personally I like the guy.
He's a better passer than McMahon can even dream of. Cutler has a better arm and better escapability. McMahon was an excellent leader, don't get me wrong. I absolutely loved Jim McMahon - but Cutler is a much better QB.

Honestly, if you had heard the interview live (which I did) - he was pretty much saying "Sure, I'll skip an OTA or two to make a point, but there is no way I'm holding out or doing anything that is long term detrimental to the team." He basically said there is no way he would hold out - or miss significant time. Kinda the opposite of what the original quoter was trying to imply.
Agree with all of this.

It may just be because I am a Bears fan and we have had such poor QB'ing over the years but I sincerely hope he gets signed long term. I think he is quite a bit better of a QB than Jim McMahon (though JM was a better leader overall) and I would rather not lose that to play the lottery in the draft but it may just be from being gun shy from what we have done with QB draft picks in the past.

 
Rotoworld:

GM Phil Emery suggested that he doesn't want to use the franchise tag on Jay Cutler.

It would cost roughly $16.2 million for the Bears to slap Cutler with the tag, a number that would seriously harm their ability to improve their woeful defense. Emery would prefer to get Cutler signed to a long-term deal that would keep the franchise's cap situation in a reasonable place. The situation is complicated by not only Cutler's current ankle injury, but the multitude of injuries he's suffered of late. He's missed 11 games over the last three seasons and is highly questionable for Monday night's game against the Cowboys.


Source: Chicago Sun-Times
I don't quite get how Emery thinks signing Cutler to a long term deal will help the cap situation. If you look at what Romo, Flacco and Ryan are making in deals they just signed they are making between $18 million and $20 million a year. I know you can tweak the structure of the deal to some degree but to get the long term deal you are going to have to sign Cutler to a deal in the ball park of probably upwards of $90 million over maybe 6 years with maybe $45 million guaranteed. That is if Cutler is willing to settle for less than Romo got. Romo has been to three Pro Bowls to Cutler's one. Romo is 1-3 in the playoffs. Cutler is 1-1, but got hurt in the second game. The number I've heard for the franchise tag is $16.2 million. I don't know how they come up with that, but if that is the number it would would be cheaper to franchise him, and then you have another year to evaluate him. In addition, if you draft a QB you can spend a year developing the rookie to see if he is any good. The tag just makes more sense to me.
if you follow the link I believe that rotoblurb used some selective editing to take his quote out of context.

he said he'd rather not tag cutler unless it was in furtherance of signing him to a longer term deal.

according to this, flacco's 2013 cap figure is only 6.8m

 
Rotoworld:

GM Phil Emery suggested that he doesn't want to use the franchise tag on Jay Cutler.

It would cost roughly $16.2 million for the Bears to slap Cutler with the tag, a number that would seriously harm their ability to improve their woeful defense. Emery would prefer to get Cutler signed to a long-term deal that would keep the franchise's cap situation in a reasonable place. The situation is complicated by not only Cutler's current ankle injury, but the multitude of injuries he's suffered of late. He's missed 11 games over the last three seasons and is highly questionable for Monday night's game against the Cowboys.


Source: Chicago Sun-Times
I don't quite get how Emery thinks signing Cutler to a long term deal will help the cap situation. If you look at what Romo, Flacco and Ryan are making in deals they just signed they are making between $18 million and $20 million a year. I know you can tweak the structure of the deal to some degree but to get the long term deal you are going to have to sign Cutler to a deal in the ball park of probably upwards of $90 million over maybe 6 years with maybe $45 million guaranteed. That is if Cutler is willing to settle for less than Romo got. Romo has been to three Pro Bowls to Cutler's one. Romo is 1-3 in the playoffs. Cutler is 1-1, but got hurt in the second game. The number I've heard for the franchise tag is $16.2 million. I don't know how they come up with that, but if that is the number it would would be cheaper to franchise him, and then you have another year to evaluate him. In addition, if you draft a QB you can spend a year developing the rookie to see if he is any good. The tag just makes more sense to me.
if you follow the link I believe that rotoblurb used some selective editing to take his quote out of context.

he said he'd rather not tag cutler unless it was in furtherance of signing him to a longer term deal.

according to this, flacco's 2013 cap figure is only 6.8m
This is an article on Football Post trying to explain the structure of Flacco's contract. If you can figure it out kudos to you.

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/A-comprehensive-look-at-Joe-Flaccos-contract.html

He has a signing bonus of $29 million. He has option bonuses of $23 million. His salary in years 2014 thru 2018 are as follows, $6 million, $4 million, $18 million, $20.6 million, and $20 million.

I'm guessing that his salary is structured to give them salary cap relief early. But I believe the signing bonus is prorated over the life of the contract. According to the article his cap number is $28.55 in 2016, $31.55 in 2017, and drops to $24.75 in 2018. It says he would probably be in line for an extension after 2015.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

Jay Cutler (ankle) returned to Bears practice Thursday, getting in a limited session.

It gives Cutler at least a shot at returning for Monday night's game against the Cowboys, but details are scarce. Cutler declined comment after practice. It's quite possible the Bears are just getting his feet wet ahead of a possible return in Week 15. With Josh McCown playing extremely well in Cutler's absence, the Bears don't have to force the issue. For the moment, we still expect McCown to get the start on Monday Night Football.

Related: Josh McCown

Source: Brad Biggs on Twitter
 
NFL on ESPN@ESPNNFL

3m
JUST IN: Jay Cutler will not play on @ESPNMondayNight Football against the Cowboys.

Jay Cutler (ankle) has been ruled out for Week 14 against the Cowboys.
Cutler returned to practice on Thursday, but it was with an eye toward potentially returning in Week 15. Coach Marc Trestman "absolutely" expects Cutler to play again this season. As it is, Josh McCown will get the start against the Cowboys' sub-par pass defense, and is locked in as a QB1 for the first week of the fantasy playoffs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This guy is glass and a wussy.

Ankles? Really? At QB, you can't tape them up and are still being ruled out a days in advance? Wow

Chicago should just let this useless QB go after this year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This guy is glass and a wussy.

Ankles? Really? At QB, you can't tape them up and are still being ruled out a days in advance? Wow

Chicago should just let this useless QB go after this year.
For most of us with Cutler / McCown, it is VERY helpful that they decided early on. Glad this appears to be resolved.

:thumbup:

 
Jeffery is going to be the most overrated WR next season IMO. He's good, but I think he's going to be way over drafted as a wr1

Looks like cutler will be looking to practice Thursday and see how he feels. They play Monday and latest news was wait and see how things go Thursday.

As someone eying him up, I'd love for him to play so I could see him in game action for 1 game before considering starting him next week
Agree with Alshon going to be drafted to early. Don't get me wrong, this guy is a fantastic athlete but he is benefiting from defenses double teaming Marshall or putting their #1 CB on him.
This works both ways. Alshon is getting doubled as often as Marshall. I think it's a coin flip on which guy produces more in 2014.

 
Jeffery is going to be the most overrated WR next season IMO. He's good, but I think he's going to be way over drafted as a wr1

Looks like cutler will be looking to practice Thursday and see how he feels. They play Monday and latest news was wait and see how things go Thursday.

As someone eying him up, I'd love for him to play so I could see him in game action for 1 game before considering starting him next week
Agree with Alshon going to be drafted to early. Don't get me wrong, this guy is a fantastic athlete but he is benefiting from defenses double teaming Marshall or putting their #1 CB on him.
This works both ways. Alshon is getting doubled as often as Marshall. I think it's a coin flip on which guy produces more in 2014.
Do you think there's a comp between the Bears' situation and the Falcons with Roddy/Julio? It seems to me like Jeffery is a step below Julio (and that's no slam on Jeffery; Julio is just that good) and Marshall is probably a a little more dominant than White. But I agree with Dr. Brew that Jeffery will be overrated precisely because too many people will make the comparison and assume Jeffery is going to be the next Julio.

 
McCown looks fantastic. I don't think we see Cutler play another down this year.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top