can you explain this more? How do you deal with creating new divisions in the season?We have a 16-team league, so this was a big problem for a while...a lot of teams checked out by Week 10.But, since we instituted a soccer style relegation system, it's been phenomenal. Bottom 4 teams get relegated to a "Loser's Division" where teams have to sit at a special kiddie table, during the draft, they have to take a shot of cheap bourbon, and no wild card can come from that division (only a division champ). Nobody wants to be a part of this, so we've really avoided the typical tanking and roster dumping that's taken place in the past.
Seriously? Cmon now...can you explain this more? How do you deal with creating new divisions in the season?We have a 16-team league, so this was a big problem for a while...a lot of teams checked out by Week 10.But, since we instituted a soccer style relegation system, it's been phenomenal. Bottom 4 teams get relegated to a "Loser's Division" where teams have to sit at a special kiddie table, during the draft, they have to take a shot of cheap bourbon, and no wild card can come from that division (only a division champ). Nobody wants to be a part of this, so we've really avoided the typical tanking and roster dumping that's taken place in the past.
Remember the owners who quit and dont have them in the league next season.How do you keep people that have no chance at playoffs interested? In multiple leagues this year where week 13 has 6+ teams vying for 1-2 remaning playoff spots, and of course teams that are out of it aren't putting their best foot forward.
A.K.A. "Sportsmanship"....it is an unwritten rule that no team ever gives up...
Yeah, that one...I won my league last year. I am the 3rd highest scoring team this year in a 12 team league where 4 (3 divisions, 1 WC) make the playoffs.My H2H record is 4-8, I'm currently in dead last facing a 4-7-1 team this week.Starting Harvin this week -- Mr. Perpetually Questionable -- and he's missing his 2nd game in 2 seasons as a pro.Mark Ingram looms in the keeper league draft. BOOHOO HOOO for me? I don't think so!!!A.K.A. "Sportsmanship"....it is an unwritten rule that no team ever gives up...
The following season, not in-season.can you explain this more? How do you deal with creating new divisions in the season?We have a 16-team league, so this was a big problem for a while...a lot of teams checked out by Week 10.But, since we instituted a soccer style relegation system, it's been phenomenal. Bottom 4 teams get relegated to a "Loser's Division" where teams have to sit at a special kiddie table, during the draft, they have to take a shot of cheap bourbon, and no wild card can come from that division (only a division champ). Nobody wants to be a part of this, so we've really avoided the typical tanking and roster dumping that's taken place in the past.
We have a similar system. We do an auction with $200 draft dollars, and teams 7-9 get a bonus of 4-6 draft dollars to give them incentive not to tank or trade away their good players too soon.inverse seeding for the teams that dont make the playoffs.example:12 team league with 6 making the playoffs.next year's draft spot:7th gets #1 seed8th gets #2 seed...12th gets #6 seed6th gets #7 seed...1st gets #12 seed
Serious question - is this for money? How do you keep teams from quitting? If I were in the "B Division", I'd be absolutely pissed if my team went, say, 10-3 and lost out to an 11-2 team and didn't make the playoffs and there was money on the line. I think I'd just quit if I were relegated into the "B Division".We have a 16-team league, so this was a big problem for a while...a lot of teams checked out by Week 10.But, since we instituted a soccer style relegation system, it's been phenomenal. Bottom 4 teams get relegated to a "Loser's Division" where teams have to sit at a special kiddie table, during the draft, they have to take a shot of cheap bourbon, and no wild card can come from that division (only a division champ). Nobody wants to be a part of this, so we've really avoided the typical tanking and roster dumping that's taken place in the past.
This is the best system that I have ever heard for a redraft league. Anyone who is knocking this system has obviously never been a commissioner of a competitive league before. There is a big difference between being a good sport and actually doing the best you can because something is on the line. If you are in a dynasty league having the non playoff teams in a Toilet Bowl works really well. Rookie draft order is based on how well you did in the Playoffs. Toilet Bowl champ has the 1st pick and the League champ has the worst pick.We have a 16-team league, so this was a big problem for a while...a lot of teams checked out by Week 10.But, since we instituted a soccer style relegation system, it's been phenomenal. Bottom 4 teams get relegated to a "Loser's Division" where teams have to sit at a special kiddie table, during the draft, they have to take a shot of cheap bourbon, and no wild card can come from that division (only a division champ). Nobody wants to be a part of this, so we've really avoided the typical tanking and roster dumping that's taken place in the past.
Big $ league, but all a group of good friends. The relegation format likely would be a poor choice for leagues with mostly strangers. But, in a close-knit league, it's worked wonders for keeping competitive balance (i.e., no roster dumping) and interest. With as much attention is paid to the teams at the top, tons of attention--and ####---are given to the low end teams.BTW, no team that goes 10-3 would be relegated. It's the bottom-feeders in terms of total points.Serious question - is this for money? How do you keep teams from quitting? If I were in the "B Division", I'd be absolutely pissed if my team went, say, 10-3 and lost out to an 11-2 team and didn't make the playoffs and there was money on the line. I think I'd just quit if I were relegated into the "B Division".We have a 16-team league, so this was a big problem for a while...a lot of teams checked out by Week 10.But, since we instituted a soccer style relegation system, it's been phenomenal. Bottom 4 teams get relegated to a "Loser's Division" where teams have to sit at a special kiddie table, during the draft, they have to take a shot of cheap bourbon, and no wild card can come from that division (only a division champ). Nobody wants to be a part of this, so we've really avoided the typical tanking and roster dumping that's taken place in the past.
Oh, I think you may have misunderstood. To explain a bit further...say that in 2010, I'm an active owner and I have a god-awful season and go 3-10. I finish second last in the league in both record and total points, even though I didn't tank it - my team just sucked. I get relegated.In 2010, I go 10-3 in the "Loser's Division". Someone else in my division goes 11-2 and wins the division. I don't make the playoffs, right? I'd get promoted to the "Winner's Division", but I miss out on the playoffs?Big $ league, but all a group of good friends. The relegation format likely would be a poor choice for leagues with mostly strangers. But, in a close-knit league, it's worked wonders for keeping competitive balance (i.e., no roster dumping) and interest. With as much attention is paid to the teams at the top, tons of attention--and ####---are given to the low end teams.BTW, no team that goes 10-3 would be relegated. It's the bottom-feeders in terms of total points.Serious question - is this for money? How do you keep teams from quitting? If I were in the "B Division", I'd be absolutely pissed if my team went, say, 10-3 and lost out to an 11-2 team and didn't make the playoffs and there was money on the line. I think I'd just quit if I were relegated into the "B Division".We have a 16-team league, so this was a big problem for a while...a lot of teams checked out by Week 10.But, since we instituted a soccer style relegation system, it's been phenomenal. Bottom 4 teams get relegated to a "Loser's Division" where teams have to sit at a special kiddie table, during the draft, they have to take a shot of cheap bourbon, and no wild card can come from that division (only a division champ). Nobody wants to be a part of this, so we've really avoided the typical tanking and roster dumping that's taken place in the past.
Exactly. And, to take a time machine back to the year prior, that's precisely why you will be paying attention and doing everything in your power to not get relegated.Oh, I think you may have misunderstood. To explain a bit further...say that in 2010, I'm an active owner and I have a god-awful season and go 3-10. I finish second last in the league in both record and total points, even though I didn't tank it - my team just sucked. I get relegated.In 2010, I go 10-3 in the "Loser's Division". Someone else in my division goes 11-2 and wins the division. I don't make the playoffs, right? I'd get promoted to the "Winner's Division", but I miss out on the playoffs?Big $ league, but all a group of good friends. The relegation format likely would be a poor choice for leagues with mostly strangers. But, in a close-knit league, it's worked wonders for keeping competitive balance (i.e., no roster dumping) and interest. With as much attention is paid to the teams at the top, tons of attention--and ####---are given to the low end teams.BTW, no team that goes 10-3 would be relegated. It's the bottom-feeders in terms of total points.Serious question - is this for money? How do you keep teams from quitting? If I were in the "B Division", I'd be absolutely pissed if my team went, say, 10-3 and lost out to an 11-2 team and didn't make the playoffs and there was money on the line. I think I'd just quit if I were relegated into the "B Division".We have a 16-team league, so this was a big problem for a while...a lot of teams checked out by Week 10.But, since we instituted a soccer style relegation system, it's been phenomenal. Bottom 4 teams get relegated to a "Loser's Division" where teams have to sit at a special kiddie table, during the draft, they have to take a shot of cheap bourbon, and no wild card can come from that division (only a division champ). Nobody wants to be a part of this, so we've really avoided the typical tanking and roster dumping that's taken place in the past.
You can't.
I'm glad it works out for you, but I'd never be able to play in a league like that for money. Too much variance from one year to another - a few poor draft picks, and your team could conceivably be ####ed for both this year AND next year. I think if I were relegated, I'd just quit the league so I didn't have to basically waste my money next year.More power to you guys for making it work.cobalt_27 said:Exactly. And, to take a time machine back to the year prior, that's precisely why you will be paying attention and doing everything in your power to not get relegated.Steve Tasker said:Oh, I think you may have misunderstood. To explain a bit further...say that in 2010, I'm an active owner and I have a god-awful season and go 3-10. I finish second last in the league in both record and total points, even though I didn't tank it - my team just sucked. I get relegated.In 2010, I go 10-3 in the "Loser's Division". Someone else in my division goes 11-2 and wins the division. I don't make the playoffs, right? I'd get promoted to the "Winner's Division", but I miss out on the playoffs?cobalt_27 said:Big $ league, but all a group of good friends. The relegation format likely would be a poor choice for leagues with mostly strangers. But, in a close-knit league, it's worked wonders for keeping competitive balance (i.e., no roster dumping) and interest. With as much attention is paid to the teams at the top, tons of attention--and ####---are given to the low end teams.BTW, no team that goes 10-3 would be relegated. It's the bottom-feeders in terms of total points.Steve Tasker said:Serious question - is this for money? How do you keep teams from quitting? If I were in the "B Division", I'd be absolutely pissed if my team went, say, 10-3 and lost out to an 11-2 team and didn't make the playoffs and there was money on the line. I think I'd just quit if I were relegated into the "B Division".cobalt_27 said:We have a 16-team league, so this was a big problem for a while...a lot of teams checked out by Week 10.But, since we instituted a soccer style relegation system, it's been phenomenal. Bottom 4 teams get relegated to a "Loser's Division" where teams have to sit at a special kiddie table, during the draft, they have to take a shot of cheap bourbon, and no wild card can come from that division (only a division champ). Nobody wants to be a part of this, so we've really avoided the typical tanking and roster dumping that's taken place in the past.
This is what I am deciding to do to hopefully help the league that I am the gm in.Top 6 go to regular playoffs, bottom six play in their owner tourney with the winner getting the top pick the following season. Second place in the TB gets second pick etc.
I just had the final nail placed in my coffin for my season in a big money dynasty league I play in. I had the second most points scored, but had the most points scored against this year (by a wide margin in PA). Just dumb luck. In our league, thankfully, we're not as ignorant. We have a toilet bowl for the non-playoff teams. Winner gets half their buyin back. Allows you to salvage something out of your season. This league has been going strong for eight years now, and the most churn we've ever had was two seasons ago when two of the guys got married and had kids and just didn't have the time for it (12 team dynasty league).FantasyTrader said:Sudoku_in_the_Bathtub said:You can't.Chances are good they were the least interested to begin with.
This is what we do in our keeper league. I for one kept trying despite having a remote chance to make the playoffs.inverse seeding for the teams that dont make the playoffs.example:12 team league with 6 making the playoffs.next year's draft spot:7th gets #1 seed8th gets #2 seed...12th gets #6 seed6th gets #7 seed...1st gets #12 seed
I disagree completely, the right way to do this is to have a toilet bowl or other in-season incentive, not by changing the picks. I like my rookie auction concept, discussed briefly elsewhere. It doesn't completely screw over a truly bad team but doesn't benefit them enough to warrant tanking.Stop rewarding failure with better draft picks and you'll eliminate the incentive to abandon a team or keep losing games. Other people in this thread have nice spins on this concept as well. They're all good ideas, but whatever you do the team with the worst record should not be rewarded with the top pick in the following draft.
Can you elaborate on the weighted lottery system?Really simple.
Besides high games paid each week...
Take 10% of the pot...
And pay for the High Single Game at each and every position.
If you dont start your best guys, you take a chance at losing a nice cut of money.
In a 12 team 100.00 league, thats 120.00/QB,RB,WR,TE,K,DT.
Or 20.00 a pop. Win a couple of those late in the year and pay half your league fee.
Add in winning a high game and people dont slouch.
We also use a weighted lottery system for draft picks, so finishing last guarantees you nothing.
You bolded it, but did you read it?I disagree completely, the right way to do this is to have a toilet bowl or other in-season incentive, not by changing the picks. I like my rookie auction concept, discussed briefly elsewhere. It doesn't completely screw over a truly bad team but doesn't benefit them enough to warrant tanking.Stop rewarding failure with better draft picks and you'll eliminate the incentive to abandon a team or keep losing games. Other people in this thread have nice spins on this concept as well. They're all good ideas, but whatever you do the team with the worst record should not be rewarded with the top pick in the following draft.