if people want to go team by team that is fine, but to save time & effort and encourage more responses, maybe we could use rough threshold of whether he could start for about...
5 teams in the league
less than 5
more than 5
i'll say more than 5
an addendum, since i seem to be higher on him than many... lets assume he ends up with another team with RB not as good as barber & does indeed become feature RB again... lets say its not a team with best or worst OL but in the middle (i don't think DAL has top 5 OL and not sure about top 10?), and he is capable of putting up numbers similar to this year... recently he was pacing for about 1,500 yards combined & 4-5 TDs, but that was WITH BARBER... so for purposes of this thought experiment, IF JJ got around 1,700 yads combined and 7-8 TDs with team X (getting bulk of carries)... how good is THAT on a relative basis? would that put him in top 25 runners, top 20... i don't mean in actual rushing leader listings... but in a personal ranking/grading sense (don't methodically & systematically consider 32 names, just give a from the hip, gut feeling take on where he would finish with best case scenario... i'm aware there are worst case scenarios that he breaks his leg tomorrow & never plays again, but not really soliciting those... thanx for playin
)... i also realize this is a pretty hypothetical & inferential argument, but it was the best i could think of at moment to get a sense of his relative value measured against other current & potential future RBs...
asking for a scouting breakdown on what he does well & doesn't do well is another way to attack the issue, but it seems like JJ invokes wildly divergent opinions, and maybe it is more scientific if we just project what his best case numbers would be (IF he was starter elsewhere, got more carries and stayed healthy... all within realm of possibility), relative to others... if he got 1,700 yards & 7-8 TDs, where would many rank him based on that, aside from some scouts thinking he is weak or doesn't break tackles well... those numbers would speak for themselves... THAT is what i am trying to get at...
* for example, in 05 his brother thomas jones had about 1,600 yards and 9 TDs, which is probably close to what i am looking at for comp in terms of STATS (LT "only" had about 1,800 combined yards, but had a BUNCH of TDs)... TJ finished NINTH in FBG scoring last season...
last question based on one immediately above... with similar genes being brothers, TJ is a comp player relative to JJ in a way that would rarely be possible to consider...
is JJ better than TJ
the same
or worse
and WHY? if some see a huge separation in ability, what is that observations grounded & rooted in?
5 teams in the league
less than 5
more than 5
i'll say more than 5
an addendum, since i seem to be higher on him than many... lets assume he ends up with another team with RB not as good as barber & does indeed become feature RB again... lets say its not a team with best or worst OL but in the middle (i don't think DAL has top 5 OL and not sure about top 10?), and he is capable of putting up numbers similar to this year... recently he was pacing for about 1,500 yards combined & 4-5 TDs, but that was WITH BARBER... so for purposes of this thought experiment, IF JJ got around 1,700 yads combined and 7-8 TDs with team X (getting bulk of carries)... how good is THAT on a relative basis? would that put him in top 25 runners, top 20... i don't mean in actual rushing leader listings... but in a personal ranking/grading sense (don't methodically & systematically consider 32 names, just give a from the hip, gut feeling take on where he would finish with best case scenario... i'm aware there are worst case scenarios that he breaks his leg tomorrow & never plays again, but not really soliciting those... thanx for playin

asking for a scouting breakdown on what he does well & doesn't do well is another way to attack the issue, but it seems like JJ invokes wildly divergent opinions, and maybe it is more scientific if we just project what his best case numbers would be (IF he was starter elsewhere, got more carries and stayed healthy... all within realm of possibility), relative to others... if he got 1,700 yards & 7-8 TDs, where would many rank him based on that, aside from some scouts thinking he is weak or doesn't break tackles well... those numbers would speak for themselves... THAT is what i am trying to get at...
* for example, in 05 his brother thomas jones had about 1,600 yards and 9 TDs, which is probably close to what i am looking at for comp in terms of STATS (LT "only" had about 1,800 combined yards, but had a BUNCH of TDs)... TJ finished NINTH in FBG scoring last season...
last question based on one immediately above... with similar genes being brothers, TJ is a comp player relative to JJ in a way that would rarely be possible to consider...
is JJ better than TJ
the same
or worse
and WHY? if some see a huge separation in ability, what is that observations grounded & rooted in?
Last edited by a moderator: