Arizona Ron
Footballguy
Here's the hypothetical situation:
A shooter kills multiple people in a public downtown city area during an "active shooter situation"; the shooter is cornered as police start showing up.
The shooter wounds two officers while still cornered. More officers/SWAT/Emergency Response/etc. are showing up, to help clear the area and set up a perimeter.
The shooter is in a position which allows him a vantage over the first responding officers and keeps them pinned and unable to rush in or have a clear shot.
These are only minutes going buy - not like this shooter is there for a long time.
A citizen with a legal weapon from their residential building balcony decides to take a shot at the shooter - and kills the shooter with one shot.
For the purposes of this hypothetical:
Hero?
Vigilante?
Charged for [insert lawyer stuff] but not convicted?
Convicted of a crime?
This clearly depends on laws in your state/country but for the purposes of this question: Use your locals laws as you know them (or believe to know them; again this isn't a place for legal advice)
I ask this because I really believe this is going to happen. With the amount of gun controversy (on both sides), I really think we'll have a citizen situation that really makes us question if someone is interfering with a police situation or a hero.
Thoughts? Comments?
Obviously, this would hang in court for a long time and this is only the high-level details of the discussion (heck, we don't even know what anyone's wearing in this situation).
Just wanted to have the conversation to get you guy's thoughts on such a scenario that's not far, at all, from happening today.
A shooter kills multiple people in a public downtown city area during an "active shooter situation"; the shooter is cornered as police start showing up.
The shooter wounds two officers while still cornered. More officers/SWAT/Emergency Response/etc. are showing up, to help clear the area and set up a perimeter.
The shooter is in a position which allows him a vantage over the first responding officers and keeps them pinned and unable to rush in or have a clear shot.
These are only minutes going buy - not like this shooter is there for a long time.
A citizen with a legal weapon from their residential building balcony decides to take a shot at the shooter - and kills the shooter with one shot.
For the purposes of this hypothetical:
- This all happens in less then 15 minutes
- The Citizen who kills the shooter is a legal resident and all guns are owned legally
- The Shooter is found out later to be a legal resident but obtained the gun(s) used legally
- The Citizen made no calls or had contact with the police prior to firing a weapon
- The Citizen has no police/military training or background
- The Citizen's residents on the 5th floor of the downtown area - not a direct or presumed target; the building is locked and has no family.
- The Citizen wants to help the police and first responders.
Hero?
Vigilante?
Charged for [insert lawyer stuff] but not convicted?
Convicted of a crime?
This clearly depends on laws in your state/country but for the purposes of this question: Use your locals laws as you know them (or believe to know them; again this isn't a place for legal advice)
I ask this because I really believe this is going to happen. With the amount of gun controversy (on both sides), I really think we'll have a citizen situation that really makes us question if someone is interfering with a police situation or a hero.
Thoughts? Comments?
Obviously, this would hang in court for a long time and this is only the high-level details of the discussion (heck, we don't even know what anyone's wearing in this situation).
Just wanted to have the conversation to get you guy's thoughts on such a scenario that's not far, at all, from happening today.
Last edited by a moderator: