What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I don't care if they have two wins... (1 Viewer)

Raiders: 2-5

Steelers: 2-6

Arizona: 1-7

Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9

Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13

So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...

You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Raiders: 2-5Steelers: 2-6Arizona: 1-7Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.
You haven't actually watched them play, I guess. I don't think this is even debatable.
 
Raiders: 2-5Steelers: 2-6Arizona: 1-7Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.
about 100yds of offense against the Steelers ... I can see the arguement
 
Raiders: 2-5Steelers: 2-6Arizona: 1-7Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.
about 100yds of offense against the Steelers ... I can see the arguement
So a team puts up 100 yards of total offense in a victory, and you think he's better than the team that LOST to a team that put up 100 yards of total offense?
 
Perhaps in the NFL, they are the worst. But in ProSports, there is no worse franchise right now than the NY Knicks. :bowtie:

 
Raiders: 2-5Steelers: 2-6Arizona: 1-7Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.
Umm...yeah? What's so difficult about this? Sometimes the lesser team wins. Happens a lot, actually.about 100yds of offense against the Steelers ... I can see the arguement
So a team puts up 100 yards of total offense in a victory, and you think he's better than the team that LOST to a team that put up 100 yards of total offense?
Umm...yeah? The lesser team wins sometimes over the better team. Happens every week.
 
Raiders: 2-5Steelers: 2-6Arizona: 1-7Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.
about 100yds of offense against the Steelers ... I can see the arguement
So a team puts up 100 yards of total offense in a victory, and you think he's better than the team that LOST to a team that put up 100 yards of total offense?
/subscribe
 
Raiders: 2-5Steelers: 2-6Arizona: 1-7Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.
about 100yds of offense against the Steelers ... I can see the arguement
scoreboard down?
So based on this logic the Steelers beat the Dolphins who beat the Bears so the Steelers are better than the Bears since we are judging teams on one game. Please. Not sure about whose the worst team in pro sports but the Raiders are the worst team in the NFL>
 
Raiders: 2-5Steelers: 2-6Arizona: 1-7Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.
about 100yds of offense against the Steelers ... I can see the arguement
scoreboard down?
So based on this logic the Steelers beat the Dolphins who beat the Bears so the Steelers are better than the Bears since we are judging teams on one game. Please. Not sure about whose the worst team in pro sports but the Raiders are the worst team in the NFL>
dolphins and bears do not have similar records...oakland, arizona, and pittsburgh do.let's try to have comparable analogies.tia
 
Raiders: 2-5Steelers: 2-6Arizona: 1-7Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.
about 100yds of offense against the Steelers ... I can see the arguement
scoreboard down?
So, you think the better team always wins, I guess. Would be fascinated by your analysis of this.
 
The Raiders have the worst offense in sports by far. Their defense is average to maybe even pretty good. So no, not the worst team in sports because as shown that defense will win a game every now or then.

 
In the NFL I agree. Two seasons from now the Raiders, in theory, could be in the playoffs.

I don't see ANY hope for the Tampa Bay Devil Rays...EVAH.

 
Raiders: 2-5Steelers: 2-6Arizona: 1-7Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.
about 100yds of offense against the Steelers ... I can see the arguement
scoreboard down?
So based on this logic the Steelers beat the Dolphins who beat the Bears so the Steelers are better than the Bears since we are judging teams on one game. Please. Not sure about whose the worst team in pro sports but the Raiders are the worst team in the NFL>
dolphins and bears do not have similar records...oakland, arizona, and pittsburgh do.let's try to have comparable analogies.tia
That's not a comparable anology. Different teams play different schedules and the better team does not always have the better record. If it was that simple they would just crown the champion after the regular season.
 
I don't know what Oakland would have to do to earn your respect on defense. They have a very good defense. It's only the offense that stinks. Defense is upper tier in the league. What other defense could stand so firm week in and week out with NO HELP from their offense.

 
In the NFL I agree. Two seasons from now the Raiders, in theory, could be in the playoffs.I don't see ANY hope for the Tampa Bay Devil Rays...EVAH.
If the Marlins can do it, completely blow up the team and do it again so can the Rays.They've got the O, just need some better pitching scouts.
 
:rolleyes: Horrible thread. They have the worst offense in football but one of the best defenses in the whole league. So they are not the worst team
 
:rolleyes: Horrible thread. They have the worst offense in football but one of the best defenses in the whole league. So they are not the worst team
They don't have one of the best defenses in the NFL and you can't just pay attention to stats. Teams prepare for the Raiders knowing their offense is inept and due to that they incorporate very conservative offensive game plans.I saw something like this a few years ago with the Cowboys when Dave Campo was the HC. Their offense was miserable but their D was one of, if not the top ranked in the league. They were not really that good but teams were content beating them 13-7.

 
Raiders: 2-5Steelers: 2-6Arizona: 1-7Week 7: Oakland 22, Arizona 9Week 8: Oakland 20, Pitt 13So Oakland currently has the best record out of this bunch and has beaten both of the other two...You're gonna have to explain your logic to me again.
about 100yds of offense against the Steelers ... I can see the arguement
scoreboard down?
So based on this logic the Steelers beat the Dolphins who beat the Bears so the Steelers are better than the Bears since we are judging teams on one game. Please. Not sure about whose the worst team in pro sports but the Raiders are the worst team in the NFL>
where was I judging teams on ONE game? I was judging teams by their overall records which takes into account EVERY GAME and then I was also pointing out that the team with the best record out of a particular group also beat the other two head to head.
 
:rolleyes: Horrible thread. They have the worst offense in football but one of the best defenses in the whole league. So they are not the worst team
:lmao: Their defense is not one of the best. It's serviceable. It doesn't suck. I'll give you that much. But, their offense is soooo bad, and their special teams (aside from Lechler) is well below average. They're the worst team in the NFL.

 
In the NFL I agree. Two seasons from now the Raiders, in theory, could be in the playoffs.I don't see ANY hope for the Tampa Bay Devil Rays...EVAH.
If the Marlins can do it, completely blow up the team and do it again so can the Rays.They've got the O, just need some better pitching scouts.
The Marlins don't play in the same division as the Yankees and Red Sox. In the sport where $$$ are king the Rays have a coin purse. Basically, no NFL team can be the worst in all of professional sports imo.Do we all agree that the Raiders have the worst front office/coaching in all of professional sports? :yes:
 
In the NFL I agree. Two seasons from now the Raiders, in theory, could be in the playoffs.I don't see ANY hope for the Tampa Bay Devil Rays...EVAH.
If the Marlins can do it, completely blow up the team and do it again so can the Rays.They've got the O, just need some better pitching scouts.
The Marlins don't play in the same division as the Yankees and Red Sox. In the sport where $$$ are king the Rays have a coin purse. Basically, no NFL team can be the worst in all of professional sports imo.Do we all agree that the Raiders have the worst front office/coaching in all of professional sports? :yes:
I think a previous poster noted that the Knicks could give the Raiders a run for their money. I think I agree with this.
 
This is one of the worst threads I've ever read here, and thats saying a lot.
Change the channel, then. You don't have to read any of it. Just because you're wrong and the Raiders ARE the worst team in pro sports doesn't make it a bad thread. Maybe you might want to review the talent/coaching/package of the Raiders and reconsider just how awful they really are.
 
This is one of the worst threads I've ever read here, and thats saying a lot.
Change the channel, then. You don't have to read any of it. Just because you're wrong and the Raiders ARE the worst team in pro sports doesn't make it a bad thread. Maybe you might want to review the talent/coaching/package of the Raiders and reconsider just how awful they really are.
please explain to me how the Raiders are worse than the Arizona Cardinals. -They have a better record.-They beat the Cardinals soundly-The Cardinals won in week 1 and havn't won since.-Oakland has won two consecutive games including beating last year's SB champI'll sit back and wait for your reply.And, yes, I have watched many of theirs and of the Cardinal's games this year.
 
Raiders are not the worst team in the NFL - Arizona is.

Let's compare:

Coach - Even

Offense - Arizona

Defense - Raiders

Special teams - Arizona slightly

Head-to-head winner - Raiders

I'd give the edge to the Raiders based off the win, but if you want to call it a draw, I'd buy that.

However:

Fans - Raiders by a ton.

History - Raiders by a ton.

Merchandising/Financial - Raiders by a ton

Owner - Raiders by a bit (Davis is closer to being dead)

 
This is one of the worst threads I've ever read here, and thats saying a lot.
Change the channel, then. You don't have to read any of it. Just because you're wrong and the Raiders ARE the worst team in pro sports doesn't make it a bad thread. Maybe you might want to review the talent/coaching/package of the Raiders and reconsider just how awful they really are.
please explain to me how the Raiders are worse than the Arizona Cardinals. -They have a better record.-They beat the Cardinals soundly-The Cardinals won in week 1 and havn't won since.-Oakland has won two consecutive games including beating last year's SB champI'll sit back and wait for your reply.And, yes, I have watched many of theirs and of the Cardinal's games this year.
I'll take the Cards over the Raiders. Obviously, we're scraping the bottom of the barrel with both teams. Both are terribly-coached and dysfunctional in the front office. But, I sincerely believe the Cards have more talent across the board and will finish the season with more wins than the Raiders. Where they are now, the record and and the h2h matchup seem to indicate that the Raiders are better, I guess. But, given what I've seen, there's a lot more to work with in AZ than in Oakland. The Raiders are so pathetic. Didn't gain even 100 yards of offense in their W against Pittsburgh, benefitting from a concussed, mistake-prone offense, and now they've been shut out in consecutive weeks. Looking beyond the deplorable numbers for both teams, I just see a lot more futility out of the Raiders than any other team in any other sport. At least, there's some things to hope for over the rest of the season with Arizona and into future years.
 
If you cannot score you cannot win. The Raiders simply can't score a TD on offense. At least the Cardinals have a good offense. The Raiders also have the worst coaching in the NFL. They had a 2-1 pass to run ratio tonight. They were sacked (so far) 9 times. When the run is working and the pass is both losing yards and getting your QB sacked 1/3 of the time you don't run on 1st and 2nd down.

The Steelers don't even deserve to be in this conversation. Their problems are directly related to Roethlisberger. They are well coached, they can run the ball, they have a good defense.

The Cardinals have had a few bad games but they seem to be absolutely devastated by the loss to Chicago. If they don't pull out of this tail spin they could become worse than the raiders. However I think they'll need a few more horrible games before they overtake the Raiders.

 
Raiders are not the worst team in the NFL - Arizona is.Let's compare:Coach - EvenOffense - ArizonaDefense - RaidersSpecial teams - Arizona slightlyHead-to-head winner - RaidersI'd give the edge to the Raiders based off the win, but if you want to call it a draw, I'd buy that.However:Fans - Raiders by a ton.History - Raiders by a ton.Merchandising/Financial - Raiders by a tonOwner - Raiders by a bit (Davis is closer to being dead)
:goodposting: But, the stadium in AZ... :thumbup: And, a lot more young talent to be excited about for next year and beyond. :thumbup:
 
The stadium is overrated. When the fans stop filling it, it'll be a nice half empty facility.

The Raiders don't have a shiny new stadium, but they don't need one.

I can't imagine AZ getting a real home field avantage going before 2010.

 
stevegamer said:
The stadium is overrated. When the fans stop filling it, it'll be a nice half empty facility.The Raiders don't have a shiny new stadium, but they don't need one. I can't imagine AZ getting a real home field avantage going before 2010.
The fans filling it are over-rated. But, there is no way to overstate how phenomenal the facility is.
 
I can see how Arizona won a game...and came close in a few others. I have absolutely no clue how the Raiders managed to win twice. they are absolutely the most awful and embarrassing football team i've ever seen play.

 
stevegamer said:
Raiders are not the worst team in the NFL - Arizona is.Let's compare:Coach - EvenOffense - ArizonaDefense - RaidersSpecial teams - Arizona slightlyHead-to-head winner - RaidersI'd give the edge to the Raiders based off the win, but if you want to call it a draw, I'd buy that.However:Fans - Raiders by a ton.History - Raiders by a ton.Merchandising/Financial - Raiders by a tonOwner - Raiders by a bit (Davis is closer to being dead)
Honeys- Arizona (wide margin)
 
cobalt_27 said:
Assani Fisher said:
cobalt_27 said:
Assani Fisher said:
This is one of the worst threads I've ever read here, and thats saying a lot.
Change the channel, then. You don't have to read any of it. Just because you're wrong and the Raiders ARE the worst team in pro sports doesn't make it a bad thread. Maybe you might want to review the talent/coaching/package of the Raiders and reconsider just how awful they really are.
please explain to me how the Raiders are worse than the Arizona Cardinals. -They have a better record.-They beat the Cardinals soundly-The Cardinals won in week 1 and havn't won since.-Oakland has won two consecutive games including beating last year's SB champI'll sit back and wait for your reply.And, yes, I have watched many of theirs and of the Cardinal's games this year.
I'll take the Cards over the Raiders. Obviously, we're scraping the bottom of the barrel with both teams. Both are terribly-coached and dysfunctional in the front office. But, I sincerely believe the Cards have more talent across the board and will finish the season with more wins than the Raiders. Where they are now, the record and and the h2h matchup seem to indicate that the Raiders are better, I guess. But, given what I've seen, there's a lot more to work with in AZ than in Oakland. The Raiders are so pathetic. Didn't gain even 100 yards of offense in their W against Pittsburgh, benefitting from a concussed, mistake-prone offense, and now they've been shut out in consecutive weeks. Looking beyond the deplorable numbers for both teams, I just see a lot more futility out of the Raiders than any other team in any other sport. At least, there's some things to hope for over the rest of the season with Arizona and into future years.
The Raiders have a very good young defense. I don't know why you continue to fail to see this despite quite a few people pointing it out.
 
Evilhomer3k said:
If you cannot score you cannot win. The Raiders simply can't score a TD on offense. At least the Cardinals have a good offense. The Raiders also have the worst coaching in the NFL. They had a 2-1 pass to run ratio tonight. They were sacked (so far) 9 times. When the run is working and the pass is both losing yards and getting your QB sacked 1/3 of the time you don't run on 1st and 2nd down.

The Steelers don't even deserve to be in this conversation. Their problems are directly related to Roethlisberger. They are well coached, they can run the ball, they have a good defense.

The Cardinals have had a few bad games but they seem to be absolutely devastated by the loss to Chicago. If they don't pull out of this tail spin they could become worse than the raiders. However I think they'll need a few more horrible games before they overtake the Raiders.
I'm not sure if tonight's game has been factored into these stats yet or not, but....Points allowed: Pit is 11 in the NFL, Oak is #9

pass yards allowed: Pitt is #9, Oak is #1

Rush yards allowed: Pit is #10, Oak is #15

Overall yards allowed: PIt is #9, Oak is #1

Rush TDs allowed: Pit is #14, Oak is #6

Pass TDs allowed: Pit is #26, Oak is #1

INTs: Pit is #3, Oak is #5

Fumbles forced: Pit is #32, Oak is #30

 
I can see how Arizona won a game...and came close in a few others. I have absolutely no clue how the Raiders managed to win twice. they are absolutely the most awful and embarrassing football team i've ever seen play.
They have the #1 ranked defense in the NFL...how can you say you can't see how they've won a game? Their defense alone will keep them in many games to come.
 
I can see how Arizona won a game...and came close in a few others. I have absolutely no clue how the Raiders managed to win twice. they are absolutely the most awful and embarrassing football team i've ever seen play.
They have the #1 ranked defense in the NFL...how can you say you can't see how they've won a game? Their defense alone will keep them in many games to come.
I don't feel like researching this right now, but one theory could be that teams can pretty much shut it down offensively against the Raiders and just try to control the clock, especially later on in the game.
 
After thinking about it for a while I've come to the conclusion that this is a classic case of us being influenced by Fantasy Football. The Cardinals have a ton of good fantasy options and are very star heavy in the skill positions. But they are absolutely terrible at the non-star positions and they have no clue how to win close games. The Raiders on the other hand have no star except for Moss, who is likely past his prime anyway(I guess you could count Sapp too, but the same thing applies with being past his prime).

I think that many FF players overvalue NFL teams that have good fantasy options. I think the quote "At least, there's some things to hope for over the rest of the season with Arizona and into future years" said earlier in this thread clearly shows this. Oakland does indeed have hope. They have quite a few young playmakers. They jsut arne't stars like Leinart, Boldin, Fitz, and Edge. That doesn't mean they don't have potential.

 
I think that many FF players overvalue NFL teams that have good fantasy options.
I agree 100%. This is why I just couldn't understand the people who were picking the Cardinals as their sleeper team this season.Non-skill position players are just as important as skill position players; maybe even more so.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top