But, you do realize he won't be, right? BBWoA aren't going to vote him in first ballot, this much is certain.He'll get in, eventually. And, he should. But, as a matter of practicality, I'd put my money on the over-1 on years it'll take for him to get inducted.He was probably the best player in the 1990s. He's a first ballot HOFer, no question.
i believe he was named best player of the 90s by many publications.He was probably the best player in the 1990s. He's a first ballot HOFer, no question.
We are revising history here. Excellent player, best in the NL, but he didn't make the all-century team, Griff did.i believe he was named best player of the 90s by many publications.He was probably the best player in the 1990s. He's a first ballot HOFer, no question.
http://tsn.sportingnews.com/baseball/bonds/qa.htmlthere is one.NY/NJMFDIVER said:We are revising history here. Excellent player, best in the NL, but he didn't make the all-century team, Griff did.i believe he was named best player of the 90s by many publications.He was probably the best player in the 1990s. He's a first ballot HOFer, no question.
I totally agree with you. He should be in no matter what.Bonds is one of the best players in history. With, or without roids (ok, probably with). He should be in.
No Clemens, No Arod, No Schilling No player from this era then.Hitters were not the only ones who used the roids. Bonds is a 1st time HOF. And the writers will vote him in. When ESPN had their town hall on Bonds. They had polled writers that had a vote and they said they would vote him in on the 1st timeNo McGuire, No Sosa..No Palemeiro, No BONDS!!!
Can you be a second time HOF?Bonds is a 1st time HOF.
opps ment 1st ballet HOF.. .Can you be a second time HOF?Bonds is a 1st time HOF.
You do realize that, if the baseball writers were to vote today, he wouldn't be, right?Bonds is a first ballot lock...
Why? He was skilled in one phase of the game--hitting HRs. But, when compared to his predecessors, he had to juice his way to the totals he finally got. Couldn't field, couldn't run, didn't hit for average.Big Mac should be in the hall as well...
Actually That may not be correct. When ESPN did the town hall meeting on Bonds they polled the baseball writers and most sayed they would vote him in on the 1st ballet.And the longer time goes on the more the voters will let him in. I understand the old time voters may not but I have a feeling the new voters will be more accepting of him and thats why he is a lock on the 1st balletYou do realize that, if the baseball writers were to vote today, he wouldn't be, right?Bonds is a first ballot lock...
Weren't Rizzuto and Vaughan elected by the committee, not ballot?as for McGwire's 23% showing in his first year, that is not unprecedented. Here are some other luminaries that polled around that figure (less than 33%) in their early ballots, but were ultimately elected...Johnny MizeRalph KinerPhil RizzutoArky VaughanDuke Snider (actually dropped to 21% in his 2nd ballot)Eddie MathewsOrlando Cepeda (19%)Richie AshburnBruce SutterThat said, it is apparent that this trend has diminished lately, as writers are coalescing opinions more quickly. That, or those earlier years were backlogged because the writers were so stingy there for a while, and were electing no one.
Mac hit 49 his rookie year.cobalt_27 said:Why? He was skilled in one phase of the game--hitting HRs. But, when compared to his predecessors, he had to juice his way to the totals he finally got. Couldn't field, couldn't run, didn't hit for average.' said:Big Mac should be in the hall as well...
Yeah, I know. Got his USA rookie card. Used to be a fan of his. And, he was a good HR hitter before he started roiding (and, this is assuming he wasn't when he was on the Olympic team, started out with the As, etc.). But, I think know it's pretty clear that he wouldn't have hit 70 without the juice, nor would he have accumulated the career totals that he did without it. So, my point is that the only thing he did naturally well kind of gets diminished in my eyes because he invalidated what he might have otherwise done without illegal means. And, the fact that he pedestrian qualities in other aspects of the game makes his Hall prospects pretty suspect, I think.Mac hit 49 his rookie year.cobalt_27 said:Why? He was skilled in one phase of the game--hitting HRs. But, when compared to his predecessors, he had to juice his way to the totals he finally got. Couldn't field, couldn't run, didn't hit for average.' said:Big Mac should be in the hall as well...
Koya said:Weren't Rizzuto and Vaughan elected by the committee, not ballot?
My point is that it takes a LOT longer if you don't get elected through the BWA. Would have to wait until they get off the ballot to begin with, and my feeling is that Big Mac and the other roiders will have enough support to keep them on the ballot for a while, even if they don't have enough support to get voted in.Koya said:Weren't Rizzuto and Vaughan elected by the committee, not ballot?possibly. maybe that happens for McGwire, et al, too
He has a career .394 OBP. He was skilled in getting on base, too. So he got on base a lot and he hit a bunch of HRs. That's a pretty darn valuable player.cobalt_27 said:Why? He was skilled in one phase of the game--hitting HRs. But, when compared to his predecessors, he had to juice his way to the totals he finally got. Couldn't field, couldn't run, didn't hit for average.' said:Big Mac should be in the hall as well...
Add Cepeda to that list.Weren't Rizzuto and Vaughan elected by the committee, not ballot?possibly. maybe that happens for McGwire, et al, too
Depends...... McGwire came off as a man with something to hide at the Grand Jury. ( 'm not sure if he out and out lied.....but his response was very dodgy).Why/why not?
I agree he is a first ballot guy, but I can see him sweating a little just because there will be a ton written the weeks leading up to that ballot putting some doubt in his mind that he will get in.I think McGwire goes in eventually but I think it will take a number of years before he gets enough votes.Dude is a LOCK first ballot...hate him, love him, used them, didn't use them, he is a no doubt, no brainer, (insert here), first ballot HoF'er.
Situational ethics. Gotta love em.I would go so far as to say that Sosa and Mac saved baseball the year they chased Mantle.Yeah...I know, no one or two players are bigger than the game, and no two players can really save the game but, the league was circling the drain which is a large part of why Selig turned a blind eye to the whole roid thing.Fan interest was so bad, I believe Selig was contemplating letting Rose back into baseball just to get the heartbeat of fans interest pumping again.Mac and Sosa saved Selig from having to make that move.Does he regret not turning up the heat on the guys that were juicing? Yeah probably a little, but considering the state baseball at the time, I doubt he would have done anything differently.